Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(11):1099-1101.
Consensus Development Conferences as Topic ; Gastrectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Obesity, Morbid ; surgery ; Practice Guidelines as Topic
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
1998 to Present ISSN: 1671-0274
Sort by
Format:
Per page:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(11):1099-1101.
Neo-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):1095-1098.
Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):1092-1094.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):1027-1031.
OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians. Methods Studies comparing laparoscopic colorectal resection with open colorectal resection in octogenarians were identified from the Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases from 1990 to 2012. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed to determine studies suitable for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed or random effects model.
RESULTSFive observational studies with a total of 685 patients (330 laparoscopic colorectal resections and 355 open colorectal resections) were identified. Laparoscopic colorectal resection was associated with a prolonged operative time (WMD=27.89, P<0.01) and a lower rate of overall complications (OR=0.58, P<0.01), wound infection (OR=0.50, P<0.05), cardiovascular complication(OR=0.53, P<0.05), quicker bowel function return (WMD=-0.83, P<0.01), and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD=-3.60, P<0.05). No differences were found with regard to anastomotic leak (OR=1.13, P>0.05), prolonged ileus (OR=0.71, P>0.05), respiratory complication (OR=0.59, P>0.05),mortality (OR=0.67, P>0.05), and reoperation (OR=0.85, P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic colorectal resection is as safe as open colorectal resection, and is more favorable in terms of length of hospital stay and bowel function return in octogenarians.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):1020-1022.
Therapeutic strategy and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer patients with pulmonary metastasis.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):1017-1019.
Standardized use of sphincter preservation resection for rectal cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):1008-1009.
Second thoughts on standardized surgery of colon cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):1000-1004.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(10):997-999.
Endoscopic mucosal resection in the treatment of 2609 cases with colorectal polyps.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2012;15(12):1301-1303.
OBJECTIVETo explore the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the treatment of colorectal polyps.
METHODEMR was applied in the treatment of colorectal polyps.
RESULTSA total of 3578 polyps in 2609 patients were all completely resected except 2 cases and the integrated rate of samples was 99.6%. Intra- and post-operation complications occurred in 22 cases(0.8%), including 7 intraoperative bleeding, 5 postoperative bleeding, and 10 thermal burn, which were cured by symptomatic treatment. A total of 1530 (58.6%) cases were followed-up with 3-12 months and no relapse was found in former place of excision.
CONCLUSIONEMR can be applied in resection of colorectal polyps effectively and safely.
Country
China
Publisher
中华医学会
ElectronicLinks
https://zhwcwkzz.yiigle.comEditor-in-chief
china_gisj@vip.163.com
Abbreviation
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Vernacular Journal Title
中华胃肠外科杂志
ISSN
1671-0274
EISSN
Year Approved
2008
Current Indexing Status
Currently Indexed
Start Year
1998
Description
历史沿革【现用刊名:中华胃肠外科杂志;曾用刊名:中国胃肠外科杂志;创刊时间:1998】,该刊被以下数据库收录【CA 化学文摘(美)(2009)】,核心期刊【中文核心期刊(2008)】。