Objective To analyze the disease burden of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) at the global, regional, and national levels from 1990 to 2021, and to predict the disease burden trend from 2022 to 2026. Methods Based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database, the incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) rate of EOCRC across 204 countries and regions from 1990 to 2021 were obtained. The time trends of these indicators were assessed by calculating the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC), and the contributions of ten risk factors to the EOCRC burden were analyzed. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was used to predict the disease burden from 2022 to 2026. Results From 1990 to 2021, the number of new global EOCRC cases increased from 107 310 to 211 890, with the incidence rising from 3.96 to 5.37 per 100 000 people. In 2021, global EOCRC incidence, mortality, and DALY rate increased with age; males had higher rates than females in terms of incidence, mortality, and DALY rate in all age groups. In 2021, East Asia had the highest number of new cases, deaths, and DALY. From 1990 to 2021, the global EAPC for incidence rate was 0.96%, and death rate was –0.38%. ARIMA model indicated that from 2022 to 2026, the global incidence of EOCRC would continue to rise, while mortality and DALY rate would be expected to decline. Conclusions The disease burden of EOCRC has significantly increased globally from 1990 to 2021, with notable regional, age, and sex differences. By 2026, the mortality and DALY rate of EOCRC will decline, while the incidence is expected to further increase, highlighting the urgency of taking active measures to address the growing trend of EOCRC.

Objective To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the novel bowel-cleansing agent TCIC-001 and the traditional polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimen for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Methods Prospective inclusion of 62 patients who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from July 2021 to July 2022. They were randomly divided into TCIC-001 group (n=31) and PEG group (n=31) using a random number table method. The TCIC-001 group took TCIC-001 orally, drinking water in stages, with a total liquid intake of 1 500 mL; the PEG group took PEG orally, taking it in 4 doses, with a total liquid intake of 3 000 mL. The primary endpoint indicator is the quality of intestinal hygiene evaluated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), the secondary endpoint indicators were medication adherence, medication duration, frequency of bowel movements, duration of bowel movements, and incidence of adverse events between two groups. Results No significant differences were observed in sex, age, or defecation frequency between the two groups. For efficacy, both groups achieved equivalent bowel cleanliness, with a “good preparation” rate of 93.55% and comparable BBPS score of each intestinal segment and total scores. For tolerability, the TCIC-001 group had a shorter medication duration compared to the PEG group ([48.8±25.9] min vs [82.8±28.4] min, P<0.001), a longer defecation duration ([288.6±74.0] min vs [236.5±74.3] min, P<0.001), and a lower incidence of first defecation before medication completion (9.68% vs 41.94%, P=0.004). Regarding safety, no significant differences were observed between the TCIC-001 group and the PEG group in incidences of chloride disturbances (0% vs 9.68%) and calcium disturbances (3.23% vs 6.45%), and no other adverse events. Conclusions TCIC-001 demonstrated comparable bowel-cleansing efficacy to PEG while significantly improving tolerability (reduced medication time and lower risk of premature defecation) and maintaining favorable safety.

Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical value of endoscopic resection of duodenal papilla tumors with a maximum diameter greater than 3 cm. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of all 12 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of duodenal papilla tumors at the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital (Xuhui Hospital), Fudan University and Rongcheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 2017 to May 2023. The size of the tumors all exceeded 3 cm. Results All 12 patients successfully completed the operation, with a complete resection rate of 91.7% (11/12) and an en-bloc resection rate of 91.7% (11/12). One patient experienced delayed bleeding due to unclosed wound during operation and received endoscopic hemostasis; 11 cases underwent partial wound closure operation with pancreatic and biliary stent placement, without perforation or postoperative stenosis. Among them, 2 cases (18.2%) experienced delayed bleeding and received endoscopic hemostasis treatment. After operation, 1 case (8.3%) experienced nausea, vomiting, upper abdominal discomfort, and elevated blood amylase levels, who was later treated conservatively. During the mean follow-up period of 30.5 (1.0-69.0) months, 1 patient experienced recurrence and underwent surgical resection. Conclusions Endoscopic resection of duodenal papilla tumors can treat large diameter duodenal papilla tumors exceeding 3 cm, but postoperative complications may occur and require special attention. Postoperative placement of pancreatic and biliary stents and wound closure may reduce the incidence of complications.

Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose of prophylactic indomethacin in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in elderly patients.Methods:From July 2021 to October 2022, patients undergoing ERCP in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University and Shanghai Xuhui District Central Hospital were enrolled prospectively and assigned to either the low-dose (50 mg) indomethacin group or the conventional-dose (100 mg) group using the DAS electronic central randomization system. Data from elderly patients aged≥60 were collected and compared for the incidence of PEP and other adverse reactions.Results:A total of 418 elderly patients (Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, n=122; Shanghai Xuhui Distric Central Hospital, n=296) were ultimately included in the study, with 201 in the low-dose group and 217 in the conventional-dose group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PEP between the low-dose group and the conventional-dose group [5.97% (12/201) VS 7.37% (16/217), χ2=0.33, P=0.566]. There was also no significant difference in drug-related adverse events between the two groups [4.98% (10/201) VS 4.15% (9/217), χ2=0.16, P=0.685]. Further subgroup analysis revealed that among elderly patients aged 60-<70, there were 13 patients diagnosed as having PEP. The incidence of PEP between the low-dose group and the conventional-dose group was not statistically significant [6.19% (6/97) VS 6.60% (7/106), χ2=0.01, P=0.903], and the occurrence of drug-related adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant [6.19% (6/97) VS 2.83% (3/106), P=0.315]. Among elderly patients aged≥70, there were 15 patients diagnosed as having PEP. The incidence of PEP between the low-dose group and the conventional-dose group was not statistically significant [5.77% (6/104) VS 8.11% (9/111), χ2=0.45, P=0.501], and the occurrence of drug-related adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant [3.85% (4/104) VS 5.41% (6/111), P=0.749]. Conclusion:The prophylactic use of 50 mg indomethacin showed similar efficacy in reducing the incidence of PEP in elderly patients compared with 100 mg indomethacin. Therefore, elderly patients can use 50 mg indomethacin prophylactically to reduce the incidence of PEP.

Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of submucosal tunnel docking endoscopic resection (SDER) for the treatment of giant submucosal tumors in the cardia.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on data of patients with giant submucosal tumors in the cardia who were treated with SDER at the endoscopy center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University and Xuhui District Central Hospital from January 2021 to January 2022. The surgical records, postoperative pathology, complications, hospitalization, and follow-up were analyzed.Results:A total of 6 patients were included. The mean long diameter of the lesions was 4.0 cm, all of which were located in the cardia. All patients successfully underwent SDER treatment with a surgical time of 23-42 min. Postoperative pathology revealed that 4 cases were leiomyomas and 2 cases were gastrointestinal stromal tumors. All lesions were completely resected. The postoperative hospital stay was 3-5 d, and no serious complications occurred after surgery. All patients recovered on follow-up gastroscopy at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.Conclusion:The preliminary conclusion is that SDER for the treatment of giant submucosal tumors in the cardia is safe, effective.

To investigate the evaluation and management of gastrointestinal fistula after upper gastrointestinal tunnel endoscopic surgery, a retrospective analysis was performed on 15 patients with gastrointestinal fistula after upper gastrointestinal tunnel endoscopic surgery, who were treated at the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2012 to October 2022. All patients were treated successfully after comprehensive treatment. Three patients received metal clipping and gastric tube drainage; 10 patients received gastric tube drainage combined with jejunal nutritional tube placement, and 7 of them had gastric tube directly put into the fistula cavity; 2 patients received covered esophageal stent placement combined with jejunal nutritional tube placement. Five patients received wound tissue glue spraying; 2 patients underwent purse-string suture with nylon loops and metal clips after reduced fistula burned by hot biopsy forcep or argon plasma coagulation. The gastrointestinal fistula after tunnel endoscopic surgery is a complex postoperative complication, which needs early detection, careful evaluation and comprehensive treatment.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor among gastrointestinal tumors, with an inherent potential for malignancy. The primary approach to addressing GIST remains surgical intervention. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has emerged as an innovative treatment approach for GIST. LECS includes various techniques, such as classic LECS, inverted LECS, and laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection, all of which aim to combine the advantages of laparoscopy and endoscopy. This treatment offers benefits such as accurate localization, complete lesion removal, and a good prognosis. Generally, LECS can be used for GIST with a tumor diameter less than 50 mm, which cannot be completely removed through traditional endoscopic surgery. The clinical application of LECS deserves further exploration and expansion in the future, ultimately benefiting patients.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor among gastrointestinal tumors, with an inherent potential for malignancy. The primary approach to addressing GIST remains surgical intervention. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has emerged as an innovative treatment approach for GIST. LECS includes various techniques, such as classic LECS, inverted LECS, and laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection, all of which aim to combine the advantages of laparoscopy and endoscopy. This treatment offers benefits such as accurate localization, complete lesion removal, and a good prognosis. Generally, LECS can be used for GIST with a tumor diameter less than 50 mm, which cannot be completely removed through traditional endoscopic surgery. The clinical application of LECS deserves further exploration and expansion in the future, ultimately benefiting patients.

To study the clinical effect of non-ampullary duodenal mucosal lesions treated by endoscopic resection. A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 58 cases of duodenal non-ampullary mucosal lesions treated by endoscopic resection from January 2016 to June 2019 from 3 hospitals. Among 58 cases, 27 lesions (46.6%) were located in the duodenal bulb and 31 (53.4%) in the duodenal descending part (including the ball-drop boundary). Forty-six patients (79.3%) received endoscopic mucosal resection, 7 (12.1%) received endoscopic submucosal dissection and 5 (8.6%) received pre-cut endoscopic mucosal resection. Few postoperative complications were found except for 1 case of intraoperative bleeding, 1 case of delayed bleeding 2 days after surgery, 1 case of lesion residual and 2 cases of postoperative abdominal pain. No perforation occurred. Endoscopic treatment of non-ampullary duodenal mucosal lesions is safe and effective.

Objective:To evaluate the safety, efficacy and long-term survival of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal precancerous lesions and early cancer in the elderly over 80 years old.Methods:Clinical data of colorectal precancerous lesions and early cancer treated with ESD from January 2007 to December 2014 at Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 721 patients with 778 lesions were included in this study. These patients were stratified by age: the super-elderly group (≥80 years old, 55 patients, 7.6%) and the non-super-elderly group (<80 years old, 666 patients, 92.4%). The outcomes of ESD, complication incidences, pathological characteristics, and long-term survival were compared between the two groups.Results:Except that the incidence of chronic concomitant diseases in the super-elderly group was significantly higher than that in the non-super-elderly group [54.5% (30/55) VS 31.5% (210/666), P<0.001], other baseline characteristics were not significantly different ( P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the complete resection rate [93.1%(54/58) VS 95.3%(686/720)], the R0 resection rate [89.7% (52/58) VS 93.2% (671/720)], the curative resection rate [84.5% (49/58) VS 90.3% (650/720)], the complication incidence [5.5% (3/55) VS 2.7%(18/666)], or the median hospitalization (2.98 days VS 2.54 days) between the two groups (all P>0.05). The three-year overall survival rates of the super-elderly group and non-super-elderly group were 95.8% and 98.0%, respectively, and the five-year overall survival rates were 85.1% and 97.4%, respectively. Conclusion:Colorectal ESD is safe and effective for elderly patients (age ≥80 years old) despite a significantly higher incidence of chronic concomitant diseases than that in the non-super-elderly patients.