Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), characterized by the expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells harboring somatic mutations, has emerged as a significant age-related phenomenon with profound implications for human health. While initially recognized in the 1960s, recent technological advances have revealed its complex nature and widespread prevalence, affecting up to 84% of individuals aged ≥ 70 years. The clinical significance of CH extends beyond its well-established role as a precursor to hematological malignancies, encompassing its association with cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, and other non-malignant disorders. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current understanding of CH, focusing on recent advances in genetic and molecular mechanisms, particularly the roles of commonly mutated genes such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1. We address the emerging distinction between myeloid and lymphoid CH, their differential impacts on disease progression, and the complex interplay between CH and inflammation. Special attention is given to newly identified genetic determinants of clonal expansion rates and their implications for disease progression. The review also examines the revolutionary concept of passenger-approximated clonal expansion rate and its utility in understanding CH dynamics. Furthermore, we dis‑ cuss therapeutic strategies targeting inflammatory pathways and their potential in mitigating CH-associated compli‑ cations. By integrating recent findings from genetic, molecular, and clinical studies, this review provides a framework for understanding CH as a systemic condition and highlights promising directions for therapeutic interventions.

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), characterized by the expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells harboring somatic mutations, has emerged as a significant age-related phenomenon with profound implications for human health. While initially recognized in the 1960s, recent technological advances have revealed its complex nature and widespread prevalence, affecting up to 84% of individuals aged ≥ 70 years. The clinical significance of CH extends beyond its well-established role as a precursor to hematological malignancies, encompassing its association with cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, and other non-malignant disorders. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current understanding of CH, focusing on recent advances in genetic and molecular mechanisms, particularly the roles of commonly mutated genes such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1. We address the emerging distinction between myeloid and lymphoid CH, their differential impacts on disease progression, and the complex interplay between CH and inflammation. Special attention is given to newly identified genetic determinants of clonal expansion rates and their implications for disease progression. The review also examines the revolutionary concept of passenger-approximated clonal expansion rate and its utility in understanding CH dynamics. Furthermore, we dis‑ cuss therapeutic strategies targeting inflammatory pathways and their potential in mitigating CH-associated compli‑ cations. By integrating recent findings from genetic, molecular, and clinical studies, this review provides a framework for understanding CH as a systemic condition and highlights promising directions for therapeutic interventions.

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), characterized by the expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells harboring somatic mutations, has emerged as a significant age-related phenomenon with profound implications for human health. While initially recognized in the 1960s, recent technological advances have revealed its complex nature and widespread prevalence, affecting up to 84% of individuals aged ≥ 70 years. The clinical significance of CH extends beyond its well-established role as a precursor to hematological malignancies, encompassing its association with cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, and other non-malignant disorders. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current understanding of CH, focusing on recent advances in genetic and molecular mechanisms, particularly the roles of commonly mutated genes such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1. We address the emerging distinction between myeloid and lymphoid CH, their differential impacts on disease progression, and the complex interplay between CH and inflammation. Special attention is given to newly identified genetic determinants of clonal expansion rates and their implications for disease progression. The review also examines the revolutionary concept of passenger-approximated clonal expansion rate and its utility in understanding CH dynamics. Furthermore, we dis‑ cuss therapeutic strategies targeting inflammatory pathways and their potential in mitigating CH-associated compli‑ cations. By integrating recent findings from genetic, molecular, and clinical studies, this review provides a framework for understanding CH as a systemic condition and highlights promising directions for therapeutic interventions.

Background: Although most studies on the cardiovascular toxicity of proteasome inhibitors have focused on carfil‑ zomib, the risk of cardiotoxicity associated with bortezomib remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) associated with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma in a real-world setting. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients who were treated with bortezomib at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. CVAEs, defined as hypertension, arrhythmia, heart failure, myocardial infarction, pulmonary arterial hypertension, angina, and venous thromboembolism, were detected using cardiac markers, ECG, echocardiography, medications, or documentation by clinicians. The patients were observed for at least 6 months and up to 2 years after starting bortezomib administration. Results: Among the 395 patients, 20.8% experienced CVAEs of any grade, and 14.7% experienced severe adverse events. The median onset time for any CVAE was 101.5 days (IQR, 42–182 days), and new-onset/worsened hyperten‑ sion was the most prevalent CVAE. The risk of CVAEs increased in patients with a body mass index lower than 18.5 (adjusted HR (aHR) 3.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-11.72), light chain (1.80, 1.04-3.13), and IgD (4.63, 1.06-20.20) as the multiple myeloma subtype, baseline stroke (4.52, 1.59-12.80), and hypertension (1.99, 1.23-3.23). However, CVAEs did not significantly affect the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival. Conclusion Approximately 15% of the Korean patients treated with bortezomib experienced severe CVAEs. Thus, patients, especially those with identified risk factors, should be closely monitored for CVAE symptoms during bort‑ ezomib treatment.

Purpose: Despite the recent success of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors for the treatment of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM), their indefinite treatment duration ultimately tantamount to substantial financial and emotional burden. On the other hand, fixed duration of proteasome inhibitors (PI) have shown rapid and reasonable response in WM treatment. Despite the well-known synergism between PI and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), there is no trials evaluating such combination in WM. Materials and Methods: Based on above, we designed this phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 6 cycles of 28-day bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) regimen for treatment-naïve WM. Results: A total of 15 patients were enrolled: major response rate was 64.3%, and overall response rate was 78.6%. During the median follow-up of 41 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months and overall survival 40 months. For responders, median duration of response was 13 months and median PFS 19 months. The most common adverse event (AE) of any grade was constipation (57.1%). The most common grade ≥ 3 AE was anemia (21.4%). Conclusion All in all, we hereby provide proof-of-concept that PI + IMiD may be an attractive backbone for fixed duration treatment. It should be noted that granting the same level of access to newer drugs globally is virtually impossible. Thus efforts to develop regimens using readily available drugs to yield similar or adequate treatment outcomes should not be disregarded. In this sense, we believe our study holds its place for its novelty and eloquently addresses achieving the daunting societal quest of health equity.

Background: There is limited data regarding the clinical outcomes of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of CHIP as a COPD biomarker. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients with COPD who were enrolled prospectively in the Seoul National University Hospital Airway Registry from January 2013 to December 2019 and underwent pulmonary function and blood tests. We evaluated the CHIP score according to smoking status and severity of airflow obstruction. Results: We analyzed next-generation sequencing data to detect CHIP in 125 patients with COPD. Current smokers had a higher prevalence of CHIP in combination of DNMT3A, TET2, and PPM1D (DTP), DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A), and protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1D (PPM1D) genes than in never- or ex-smokers. CHIP of DTP and DNMT3A genes was significantly associated with current smokers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 7.79) (aOR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.09 to 14.0). Patients with moderate-to-severe airflow obstruction had a higher prevalence of CHIP in most of the explored genes than those with mild obstruction, although the difference was not statistically significant. CHIP in ASXL transcriptional regulator 1 (ASXL1) genes was significantly associated with history of mild, severe, and total acute exacerbation. Conclusion Given that CHIP in specific genes was significantly associated with current smoking status and acute exacerbation, CHIP can be considered as a candidate biomarker for COPD patients.

Purpose: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common hematologic malignancy worldwide. Although substantial improvement has been achieved by the frontline rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy, up to 40%-50% of patients will eventually have relapsed or refractory disease, whose prognosis is extremely dismal. Materials and Methods: We have carried out two prospective cohort studies that include over 1,500 DLBCL patients treated with rituximab plus CHOP (#NCT01202448 and #NCT02474550). In the current report, we describe the outcomes of refractory DLBCL patients. Patients were defined to have refractory DLBCL if they met one of the followings, not achieving at least partial response after 4 or more cycles of R-CHOP; not achieving at least partial response after 2 or more cycles of salvage therapy; progressive disease within 12 months after autologous stem cell transplantation. Results: Among 1,581 patients, a total of 260 patients met the criteria for the refractory disease after a median time to progression of 9.1 months. The objective response rate of salvage treatment was 26.4%, and the complete response rate was 9.6%. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.4 to 8.6), and the 2-year survival rate was 22.1%±2.8%. The median OS for each refractory category was not significantly different (p=0.529). Conclusion In line with the previous studies, the outcomes of refractory DLBCL patients were extremely poor, which necessitates novel approaches for this population.

Background: The goal of induction therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) is to achieve adequate disease control. Current guidelines favor triplet (bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone;VRd) or quadruplet regimens (daratumumab, bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone;D-VTd). In the absence of a direct comparison between two treatment regimens, we conducted this study to compare the outcomes and safety of VRd and D-VTd. Methods: Newly diagnosed MM patients aged ＞18 years who underwent induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between November 2020 and December 2021 were identified. Finally, patients with VRd (N=37) and those with D-VTd (N=43) were enrolled. Results: After induction, 10.8% of the VRd group showed stringent complete remission (sCR), 21.6% showed complete response (CR), 35.1% showed very good partial response (VGPR), and 32.4% showed partial response (PR). Of the D-VTd group, 9.3% showed sCR, 34.9% CR, 48.8% VGPR, and 4.2% PR (VGPR or better: 67.6% in VRd vs. 93% in D-VTd, P =0.004). After ASCT, 68.6% of the VRd group showed CR or sCR, while 90.5% of the D-VTd group showed CR or sCR (P=0.016). VRd was associated with an increased incidence of skin rash (P=0.044). Other than rashes, there were no significant differences in terms of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion Our study supports the use of a front-line quadruplet induction regimen containing a CD38 monoclonal antibody for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM.