Kimura’s disease is a rare, chronic inflammatory disorder that typically presents as painless head and neck masses in young Asian males, often accompanied by peripheral eosinophilia and elevated IgE levels. We report a case of recurrent Kimura’s disease involving the right parotid gland in a 35-year-old man, previously treated surgically. Due to tumor size (6 cm) and high risk of surgical complications, the patient underwent radiotherapy (30 Gy/15 fractions). Post-treatment imaging showed significant tumor reduction with no adverse effects or recurrence during 12 months of follow-up. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, recent studies suggest that radiotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy may be effective, especially in cases at high risk of recurrence. A recent meta-analysis identified tumor size ≥3 cm, prolonged disease duration (5 years), high eosinophil percentage (20%), and elevated IgE (10,000 IU/ml) as significant recurrence predictors. This case supports that radiotherapy may sere as a valuable treatment option when surgery in contraindicated or in high-risk recurrent cases.

Kimura’s disease is a rare, chronic inflammatory disorder that typically presents as painless head and neck masses in young Asian males, often accompanied by peripheral eosinophilia and elevated IgE levels. We report a case of recurrent Kimura’s disease involving the right parotid gland in a 35-year-old man, previously treated surgically. Due to tumor size (6 cm) and high risk of surgical complications, the patient underwent radiotherapy (30 Gy/15 fractions). Post-treatment imaging showed significant tumor reduction with no adverse effects or recurrence during 12 months of follow-up. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, recent studies suggest that radiotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy may be effective, especially in cases at high risk of recurrence. A recent meta-analysis identified tumor size ≥3 cm, prolonged disease duration (5 years), high eosinophil percentage (20%), and elevated IgE (10,000 IU/ml) as significant recurrence predictors. This case supports that radiotherapy may sere as a valuable treatment option when surgery in contraindicated or in high-risk recurrent cases.

Kimura’s disease is a rare, chronic inflammatory disorder that typically presents as painless head and neck masses in young Asian males, often accompanied by peripheral eosinophilia and elevated IgE levels. We report a case of recurrent Kimura’s disease involving the right parotid gland in a 35-year-old man, previously treated surgically. Due to tumor size (6 cm) and high risk of surgical complications, the patient underwent radiotherapy (30 Gy/15 fractions). Post-treatment imaging showed significant tumor reduction with no adverse effects or recurrence during 12 months of follow-up. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, recent studies suggest that radiotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy may be effective, especially in cases at high risk of recurrence. A recent meta-analysis identified tumor size ≥3 cm, prolonged disease duration (5 years), high eosinophil percentage (20%), and elevated IgE (10,000 IU/ml) as significant recurrence predictors. This case supports that radiotherapy may sere as a valuable treatment option when surgery in contraindicated or in high-risk recurrent cases.

Kimura’s disease is a rare, chronic inflammatory disorder that typically presents as painless head and neck masses in young Asian males, often accompanied by peripheral eosinophilia and elevated IgE levels. We report a case of recurrent Kimura’s disease involving the right parotid gland in a 35-year-old man, previously treated surgically. Due to tumor size (6 cm) and high risk of surgical complications, the patient underwent radiotherapy (30 Gy/15 fractions). Post-treatment imaging showed significant tumor reduction with no adverse effects or recurrence during 12 months of follow-up. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, recent studies suggest that radiotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy may be effective, especially in cases at high risk of recurrence. A recent meta-analysis identified tumor size ≥3 cm, prolonged disease duration (5 years), high eosinophil percentage (20%), and elevated IgE (10,000 IU/ml) as significant recurrence predictors. This case supports that radiotherapy may sere as a valuable treatment option when surgery in contraindicated or in high-risk recurrent cases.

Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care because it is the first step by which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit and return to their own life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider not only the individual experiences of healthcare professionals, but also scientific and systematic approaches. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools for identifying when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians about liberation from the ventilator. Methods: Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. Those evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved recommendations. Results: Recommendations for nine PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions about ventilator liberation are presented in this document. This guideline includes seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation. Conclusions: We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care because it is the first step by which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit and return to their own life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider not only the individual experiences of healthcare professionals, but also scientific and systematic approaches. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools for identifying when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians about liberation from the ventilator. Methods: Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. Those evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved recommendations. Results: Recommendations for nine PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions about ventilator liberation are presented in this document. This guideline includes seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation. Conclusions: We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care because it is the first step by which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit and return to their own life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider not only the individual experiences of healthcare professionals, but also scientific and systematic approaches. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools for identifying when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians about liberation from the ventilator. Methods: Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. Those evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved recommendations. Results: Recommendations for nine PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions about ventilator liberation are presented in this document. This guideline includes seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation. Conclusions: We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care because it is the first step by which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit and return to their own life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider not only the individual experiences of healthcare professionals, but also scientific and systematic approaches. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools for identifying when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians about liberation from the ventilator. Methods: Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. Those evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved recommendations. Results: Recommendations for nine PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions about ventilator liberation are presented in this document. This guideline includes seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation. Conclusions: We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a particularly challenging subtype of breast cancer, with a poorer prognosis compared to other subtypes. Unfortunately, unlike luminal-type cancers, there is no validated biomarker to predict the prognosis of patients with early-stage TNBC. Accurate biomarkers are needed to establish effective therapeutic strategies. Materials and Methods: In this study, we analyzed gene expression profiles of tumor samples from 184 TNBC patients (training cohort, n=76; validation cohort, n=108) using RNA sequencing. Results: By combining weighted gene expression, we identified a 10-gene signature (DGKH, GADD45B, KLF7, LYST, NR6A1, PYCARD, ROBO1, SLC22A20P, SLC24A3, and SLC45A4) that stratified patients by risk score with high sensitivity (92.31%), specificity (92.06%), and accuracy (92.11%) for invasive disease-free survival. The 10-gene signature was validated in a separate institution cohort and supported by meta-analysis for biological relevance to well-known driving pathways in TNBC. Furthermore, the 10-gene signature was the only independent factor for invasive disease-free survival in multivariate analysis when compared to other potential biomarkers of TNBC molecular subtypes and T-cell receptor β diversity. 10-gene signature also further categorized patients classified as molecular subtypes according to risk scores. Conclusion Our novel findings may help address the prognostic challenges in TNBC and the 10-gene signature could serve as a novel biomarker for risk-based patient care.

Background: Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care, because it is the first step through which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit, and return to normal life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider scientific and systematic approaches, as well as the individual experiences of healthcare professionals. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools to identify when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians for liberation from the ventilator. Methods: Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. These evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved the recommendations. Results: Recommendations for nine questions on ventilator liberation about Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) are presented in this document. This guideline presents seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation. Conclusion We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.