Background: The stimulatory effects of caffeine contribute to poor sleep quality. However, the relationship between caffeinated beverages and sleep quality, considering frequency or types of caffeinated beverages, were not extensively studied. Methods: Data were collected from 160 urban workers (75 men [46.9%] aged 20–69 years; with an average age of 41.8±12.3 years) using a structured, self-administered online questionnaire. Sleep quality, time, satisfaction; types and frequency of caffeinated beverages (number of cups per week; Q1: 0 cup, Q4: 14 or more cups per week), demographics, and health behaviors were asked. Sleep quality were evaluated using the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K). Multiple regression analysis was conducted on the association between the frequency of caffeinated beverages consumption and sleep quality. Results: The most frequently consumed beverages were unsweetened coffee (22.8%) and the most common time for caffeine was between 12 pm to 5 pm (58.2%). The average sleep quality score based on the PSQI-K was 6.0±2.0 overall, 5.3±1.6 in Q1, and 6.6±2.2 in Q4 (frequent caffeinated beverage drinkers), indicating poorer sleep quality in Q4 (P=0.022). In Q1, 13.3% rated their sleep quality as ‘very good,’ while in Q4, only 2.5% gave the same rating. Poor sleep quality was significantly associated with the frequency of caffeinated beverages per week (β=0.232, P=0.004) and self-reported stress level (β=0.256, P=0.002). Conclusions Frequent consumption of caffeinated beverages appears to be associated with poor sleep quality among urban workers. While reducing caffeine intake may contribute to improvements in sleep quality as a health promoting behavior, this hypothesis requires validation through future studies employing personalized intervention approaches.

Background: The stimulatory effects of caffeine contribute to poor sleep quality. However, the relationship between caffeinated beverages and sleep quality, considering frequency or types of caffeinated beverages, were not extensively studied. Methods: Data were collected from 160 urban workers (75 men [46.9%] aged 20–69 years; with an average age of 41.8±12.3 years) using a structured, self-administered online questionnaire. Sleep quality, time, satisfaction; types and frequency of caffeinated beverages (number of cups per week; Q1: 0 cup, Q4: 14 or more cups per week), demographics, and health behaviors were asked. Sleep quality were evaluated using the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K). Multiple regression analysis was conducted on the association between the frequency of caffeinated beverages consumption and sleep quality. Results: The most frequently consumed beverages were unsweetened coffee (22.8%) and the most common time for caffeine was between 12 pm to 5 pm (58.2%). The average sleep quality score based on the PSQI-K was 6.0±2.0 overall, 5.3±1.6 in Q1, and 6.6±2.2 in Q4 (frequent caffeinated beverage drinkers), indicating poorer sleep quality in Q4 (P=0.022). In Q1, 13.3% rated their sleep quality as ‘very good,’ while in Q4, only 2.5% gave the same rating. Poor sleep quality was significantly associated with the frequency of caffeinated beverages per week (β=0.232, P=0.004) and self-reported stress level (β=0.256, P=0.002). Conclusions Frequent consumption of caffeinated beverages appears to be associated with poor sleep quality among urban workers. While reducing caffeine intake may contribute to improvements in sleep quality as a health promoting behavior, this hypothesis requires validation through future studies employing personalized intervention approaches.

Background: The stimulatory effects of caffeine contribute to poor sleep quality. However, the relationship between caffeinated beverages and sleep quality, considering frequency or types of caffeinated beverages, were not extensively studied. Methods: Data were collected from 160 urban workers (75 men [46.9%] aged 20–69 years; with an average age of 41.8±12.3 years) using a structured, self-administered online questionnaire. Sleep quality, time, satisfaction; types and frequency of caffeinated beverages (number of cups per week; Q1: 0 cup, Q4: 14 or more cups per week), demographics, and health behaviors were asked. Sleep quality were evaluated using the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K). Multiple regression analysis was conducted on the association between the frequency of caffeinated beverages consumption and sleep quality. Results: The most frequently consumed beverages were unsweetened coffee (22.8%) and the most common time for caffeine was between 12 pm to 5 pm (58.2%). The average sleep quality score based on the PSQI-K was 6.0±2.0 overall, 5.3±1.6 in Q1, and 6.6±2.2 in Q4 (frequent caffeinated beverage drinkers), indicating poorer sleep quality in Q4 (P=0.022). In Q1, 13.3% rated their sleep quality as ‘very good,’ while in Q4, only 2.5% gave the same rating. Poor sleep quality was significantly associated with the frequency of caffeinated beverages per week (β=0.232, P=0.004) and self-reported stress level (β=0.256, P=0.002). Conclusions Frequent consumption of caffeinated beverages appears to be associated with poor sleep quality among urban workers. While reducing caffeine intake may contribute to improvements in sleep quality as a health promoting behavior, this hypothesis requires validation through future studies employing personalized intervention approaches.

Background: The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. Methods: We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. Results: A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). Conclusion This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care.

Background: The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. Methods: We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. Results: A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). Conclusion This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care.

Background: The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. Methods: We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. Results: A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). Conclusion This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care.

Background: The accuracy of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) mappings is reportedly low, and the LOINC codes used for research purposes in Korea have not been validated for accuracy or usability. Our study aimed to evaluate the discrepancies and similarities in interoperability using existing LOINC mappings in actual patient care settings. Methods: We collected data on local test codes and their corresponding LOINC mappings from seven university hospitals. Our analysis focused on laboratory tests that are frequently requested, excluding clinical microbiology and molecular tests. Codes from nationwide proficiency tests served as intermediary benchmarks for comparison. A research team, comprising clinical pathologists and terminology experts, utilized the LOINC manual to reach a consensus on determining the most suitable LOINC codes. Results: A total of 235 LOINC codes were designated as optimal codes for 162 frequent tests.Among these, 51 test items, including 34 urine tests, required multiple optimal LOINC codes, primarily due to unnoted properties such as whether the test was quantitative or qualitative, or differences in measurement units. We analyzed 962 LOINC codes linked to 162 tests across seven institutions, discovering that 792 (82.3%) of these codes were consistent. Inconsistencies were most common in the analyte component (38 inconsistencies, 33.3%), followed by the method (33 inconsistencies, 28.9%), and properties (13 inconsistencies, 11.4%). Conclusion This study reveals a significant inconsistency rate of over 15% in LOINC mappings utilized for research purposes in university hospitals, underlining the necessity for expert verification to enhance interoperability in real patient care.

Background: The stimulatory effects of caffeine contribute to poor sleep quality. However, the relationship between caffeinated beverages and sleep quality, considering frequency or types of caffeinated beverages, were not extensively studied. Methods: Data were collected from 160 urban workers (75 men [46.9%] aged 20–69 years; with an average age of 41.8±12.3 years) using a structured, self-administered online questionnaire. Sleep quality, time, satisfaction; types and frequency of caffeinated beverages (number of cups per week; Q1: 0 cup, Q4: 14 or more cups per week), demographics, and health behaviors were asked. Sleep quality were evaluated using the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K). Multiple regression analysis was conducted on the association between the frequency of caffeinated beverages consumption and sleep quality. Results: The most frequently consumed beverages were unsweetened coffee (22.8%) and the most common time for caffeine was between 12 pm to 5 pm (58.2%). The average sleep quality score based on the PSQI-K was 6.0±2.0 overall, 5.3±1.6 in Q1, and 6.6±2.2 in Q4 (frequent caffeinated beverage drinkers), indicating poorer sleep quality in Q4 (P=0.022). In Q1, 13.3% rated their sleep quality as ‘very good,’ while in Q4, only 2.5% gave the same rating. Poor sleep quality was significantly associated with the frequency of caffeinated beverages per week (β=0.232, P=0.004) and self-reported stress level (β=0.256, P=0.002). Conclusions Frequent consumption of caffeinated beverages appears to be associated with poor sleep quality among urban workers. While reducing caffeine intake may contribute to improvements in sleep quality as a health promoting behavior, this hypothesis requires validation through future studies employing personalized intervention approaches.

The Korean Dementia Association (KDA) has been organizing biennial international academic conferences since 2019, with the International Conference of the KDA (IC-KDA) 2023 held in Busan under the theme ‘Beyond Boundaries: Advancing Global Dementia Solutions.’ The conference comprised 6 scientific sessions, 3 plenary lectures, and 4luncheon symposiums, drawing 804 participants from 35 countries. Notably, a Korea– Taiwan Joint Symposium addressed insights into Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Plenary lectures by renowned scholars explored topics such as microbiome-related AD pathogenesis, social cognition in neurodegenerative diseases, and genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD). On the first day, specific presentations covered subjects like the gut–brain axis and neuroinflammation in dementia, blood-based biomarkers in AD, and updates in AD therapeutics. The second day’s presentations addressed recent issues in clinical neuropsychology, FTD cohort studies, and the pathogenesis of non-AD dementia. The Academic Committee of the KDA compiles lecture summaries to provide comprehensive understanding of the advanced dementia knowledge presented at IC-KDA 2023.

Background: The increasing rate of excess body weight (EBW) in the global population has led to growing health concerns, including cancer-related EBW. We aimed to estimate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of cancer incidence and deaths linked to EBW in Korean individuals from 2015 to 2030 and to compare its value with various body mass index cutoffs. Methods: Levin’s formula was used to calculate the PAF; the prevalence rates were computed using the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, while the relative risks of specific cancers related to EBW were estimated based on the results of Korean cohort studies. To account for the 15-year latency period when estimating the PAF in 2020, the prevalence rates from 2015 and attributable cases or deaths from 2020 were used. Results: The PAF attributed to EBW was similar for both cancer incidence and deaths using either the World Health Organization (WHO) Asian-Pacific region standard or a modified Asian standard, with the WHO standard yielding the lowest values. In the Korean population, the PAFs of EBW for cancer incidence were 2.96% in men and 3.61% in women, while those for cancer deaths were 0.67% in men and 3.06% in women in 2020. Additionally, PAFs showed a gradual increase in both sexes until 2030. Conclusion The EBW continues to have a significant impact on cancer incidence and deaths in Korea. Effective prevention strategies targeting the reduction of this modifiable risk factor can substantially decrease the cancer burden.