Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) was conducted on two male patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome who were resistant to conventional medical therapies. Both patients underwent 20 sessions of 100% oxygen inhalation (2.0 atmosphere absolute for 90 min/day, five days/week for four weeks) in a hyperbaric chamber. The follow-up period was three months. Although the patients reported a slight improvement in the pain domain of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) after HBOT, no changes were noted in the other domains of NIH-CPSI and International Prostate Symptom Score. No adverse events were encountered during or after HBOT.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) was conducted on two male patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome who were resistant to conventional medical therapies. Both patients underwent 20 sessions of 100% oxygen inhalation (2.0 atmosphere absolute for 90 min/day, five days/week for four weeks) in a hyperbaric chamber. The follow-up period was three months. Although the patients reported a slight improvement in the pain domain of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) after HBOT, no changes were noted in the other domains of NIH-CPSI and International Prostate Symptom Score. No adverse events were encountered during or after HBOT.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) was conducted on two male patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome who were resistant to conventional medical therapies. Both patients underwent 20 sessions of 100% oxygen inhalation (2.0 atmosphere absolute for 90 min/day, five days/week for four weeks) in a hyperbaric chamber. The follow-up period was three months. Although the patients reported a slight improvement in the pain domain of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) after HBOT, no changes were noted in the other domains of NIH-CPSI and International Prostate Symptom Score. No adverse events were encountered during or after HBOT.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) was conducted on two male patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome who were resistant to conventional medical therapies. Both patients underwent 20 sessions of 100% oxygen inhalation (2.0 atmosphere absolute for 90 min/day, five days/week for four weeks) in a hyperbaric chamber. The follow-up period was three months. Although the patients reported a slight improvement in the pain domain of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) after HBOT, no changes were noted in the other domains of NIH-CPSI and International Prostate Symptom Score. No adverse events were encountered during or after HBOT.

Purpose: This study investigated the dose perturbation according to the size of the sensitive volume in the dosimeter in small-field dosimetry. Methods: The dose profiles with different field sizes were measured using three different dosimeters: the CC13, Razor ion chamber, and Edge solid-state detector. Both the open and wedged beams with different field sizes were employed in the measurement. The profiles were measured in a water phantom at maximum dose depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. The penumbra and width of the open-beam profiles were compared according to the types of the dosimeters and beam. The dose fall-off between the peak and 20% dose was evaluated for the wedged beam profiles. Results: In the open-beam measurement, the fall-off of the profile was steeper with the Edge detector, which has the smallest sensitive volume. Meanwhile, the dose in the out-of-field region was the smallest with the Edge detector. The widths of the penumbra were 6.10, 4.47, and 4.03 mm for the profile of the 3×3 cm 2 field measured by the CC13 chamber, Razor chamber, and Edge detector, respectively. The width of the profile was not changed even if different dosimeters were used in the measurement. The wedged beam profiles showed more clear peaks at the field edge when a smaller dosimeter was used. Conclusions The results demonstrate the necessity of dosimeters with a small sensitive volume for measuring a small-field beam or a steep dose gradient.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) was conducted on two male patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome who were resistant to conventional medical therapies. Both patients underwent 20 sessions of 100% oxygen inhalation (2.0 atmosphere absolute for 90 min/day, five days/week for four weeks) in a hyperbaric chamber. The follow-up period was three months. Although the patients reported a slight improvement in the pain domain of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) after HBOT, no changes were noted in the other domains of NIH-CPSI and International Prostate Symptom Score. No adverse events were encountered during or after HBOT.