We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) during tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibiting therapy and to compare the incidence rate of uveitis in infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was performed in AS patients who had started TNF-inhibiting therapy from June 2003 to June 2011. The clinical characteristics of patients with documented uveitis were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 316 patients treated with TNF inhibitor, 26 patients (8%) had experienced uveitis during TNF-inhibiting therapy. Among them, 15 patients were treated with etanercept, eight with adalimumab, and three with infliximab. The overall incidence rate of uveitis flare during therapy with TNF inhibitor was 46 per 1,000 person-years (pys) (95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 64). The incidence rate did not differ between TNF inhibitors, with 54/1,000 pys (95% CI, 34 to 81) for etanercept, 46/1,000 pys (95% CI, 21 to 87) for adalimumab, and 22/1,000 pys (95% CI, 5 to 64) for infliximab. Fourteen patients experienced a first episode of uveitis. The overall incidence rate of new onset-uveitis after therapy with TNF inhibitor was 19 per 1,000 pys (95% CI, 10 to 31). The incidence rate for etanercept was 24/1,000 pys (95% CI, 12 to 45); adalimumab, 15/1,000 pys (95% CI, 3 to 45); and infliximab, 7/1,000 pys (95% CI, 0 to 40). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of uveitis flare or the cumulative uveitis-free rate among the three TNF inhibitors. CONCLUSION: The relative rate of uveitis, including the first episode, was determined using the TNF inhibitor. However, there was no difference in the incidence rate of uveitis among the three TNF inhibitors.
Humans ; Incidence* ; Korea* ; Retrospective Studies ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing* ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha* ; Uveitis* ; Adalimumab ; Infliximab ; Etanercept

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the impact on mortality of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 100 RA-ILD patients who visited our tertiary care medical center between 2004 and 2011, identified those treated with an anti-TNF agent, divided patients into non-survivor and survivor groups and evaluated their clinical characteristics and causes of death. RESULTS: A total of 24 RA-ILD patients received anti-TNF therapy, of whom six died (25%). Mean age at initiation of anti-TNF therapy was significantly higher in the nonsurvivor versus survivor group (76 years [range, 66 to 85] vs. 64 years [range, 50 to 81], respectively; p = 0.043). The mean duration of anti-TNF treatment in the non-survivor group was shorter (7 months [range, 2 to 14] vs. 23 months [range, 2 to 58], respectively; p = 0.030). The duration of anti-TNF therapy in all nonsurviving patients was < 12 months. Pulmonary function test results at ILD diagnosis, and cumulative doses of disease-modifying drugs and steroids, did not differ between groups. Five of the six deaths (83%) were related to lung disease, including two diffuse alveolar hemorrhages, two cases of acute exacerbation of ILD, and one of pneumonia. The sixth patient died of septic shock following septic arthritis of the knee. CONCLUSIONS: Lung complications can occur within months of initial anti-TNF treatment in older RA-ILD patients; therefore, anti-TNF therapy should be used with caution in these patients.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications/diagnosis/*drug therapy/immunology/mortality ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis/etiology/*mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/*antagonists & inhibitors

Our aim was to examine whether serum testosterone concentrations are in fact low in hospitalized men with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes compared with healthy men. In this study, 79 men aged 40 years or older (41 healthy men and 38 men with type 2 diabetes) were included. Total testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels were measured. The average duration of diagnosed diabetes was 10.8 years and the mean glycated hemoglobin value was 10.8%. Total testosterone concentrations were lower in men with type 2 diabetes than in healthy men, after adjusting for age and body mass index (3.83+/-0.32 ng/mL vs. 5.63+/-0.31 ng/mL, P<0.001). In conclusion, this study shows that serum testosterone concentrations are lower in hospitalized men with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes than in healthy men. Therefore, men with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes should undergo further assessment for hypogonadism.
Body Mass Index ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated ; Humans ; Hypogonadism ; Male ; Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin ; Testosterone*

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) sustaining high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) despite clinical remission. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 91 patients, who visited a tertiary medical center. Patients underwent laboratory tests and a physical examination by a rheumatologist. The disease activity score (DAS) was calculated and patients who were in remission (defined as DAS28-CRP <2.6) were selected. Patients were divided into two groups: those with high and low ESRs (> or =40 and <40 mm/hr, respectively). RESULTS: DAS 28-CRP scores revealed that 61 of the 91 patients were in remission. Of these 61 patients, 15 and 46 were allocated to the high and low ESR groups, respectively. Compared to the low ESR group, the high ESR group had a longer disease duration (99.2+/-60.2 vs. 59.1+/-48.9 months), significantly higher white blood cell counts, and CRP levels, total modified Sharp radiographic joint scores, and erosion scores, as well as significantly lower hemoglobin, albumin and alanine aminotransferase levels. CONCLUSION: Patients who have high ESRs despite their remission status may show progressive radiographic change. In such patients, additional treatments that decreases the inflammation and prevents radiological progression should be considered.
Alanine Transaminase ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid* ; Blood Sedimentation* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Erythrocytes* ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Joints ; Leukocyte Count ; Physical Examination