Noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease that carries high socioeconomic and medical burdens and is caused by diverse respiratory illnesses. To improve clinical outcomes, early recognition, active treatment of exacerbations, and prevention of further exacerbations are essential. However, evidence for the treatment and prevention of acute exacerbation of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, especially in children, is lacking. Therefore, the evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for medical and nonmedical treatment strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents were developed by the Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease using the methods recommended by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group with evidence published through July 2, 2020. This guideline encompasses evidence-based treatment recommendations as well as expert opinions, addressing crucial aspects of the treatment and management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children. This includes considerations for antibiotics and airway clearance strategies, particularly in areas where evidence may be limited. Large, well-designed, and controlled studies are required to accumulate further evidence of management strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents.

Noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease that carries high socioeconomic and medical burdens and is caused by diverse respiratory illnesses. To improve clinical outcomes, early recognition, active treatment of exacerbations, and prevention of further exacerbations are essential. However, evidence for the treatment and prevention of acute exacerbation of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, especially in children, is lacking. Therefore, the evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for medical and nonmedical treatment strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents were developed by the Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease using the methods recommended by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group with evidence published through July 2, 2020. This guideline encompasses evidence-based treatment recommendations as well as expert opinions, addressing crucial aspects of the treatment and management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children. This includes considerations for antibiotics and airway clearance strategies, particularly in areas where evidence may be limited. Large, well-designed, and controlled studies are required to accumulate further evidence of management strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents.

Noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease that carries high socioeconomic and medical burdens and is caused by diverse respiratory illnesses. To improve clinical outcomes, early recognition, active treatment of exacerbations, and prevention of further exacerbations are essential. However, evidence for the treatment and prevention of acute exacerbation of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, especially in children, is lacking. Therefore, the evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for medical and nonmedical treatment strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents were developed by the Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease using the methods recommended by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group with evidence published through July 2, 2020. This guideline encompasses evidence-based treatment recommendations as well as expert opinions, addressing crucial aspects of the treatment and management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children. This includes considerations for antibiotics and airway clearance strategies, particularly in areas where evidence may be limited. Large, well-designed, and controlled studies are required to accumulate further evidence of management strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents.

Noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease that carries high socioeconomic and medical burdens and is caused by diverse respiratory illnesses. To improve clinical outcomes, early recognition, active treatment of exacerbations, and prevention of further exacerbations are essential. However, evidence for the treatment and prevention of acute exacerbation of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, especially in children, is lacking. Therefore, the evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for medical and nonmedical treatment strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents were developed by the Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease using the methods recommended by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group with evidence published through July 2, 2020. This guideline encompasses evidence-based treatment recommendations as well as expert opinions, addressing crucial aspects of the treatment and management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children. This includes considerations for antibiotics and airway clearance strategies, particularly in areas where evidence may be limited. Large, well-designed, and controlled studies are required to accumulate further evidence of management strategies for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adolescents.

Background: The increasing prevalence of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) necessitates a reliable assessment of bone quality. Central bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the lumbar spine and hip, is conventionally used to estimate bone quality. However, its effectiveness in predicting the actual bone strength at the knee, which is crucial for cementless TKA, is under scrutiny. This study investigated the relationship between central BMD and actual bone strength at the knee. Methods: This prospective study included 191 knees undergoing standard posterior-stabilized TKA between November 2021 and March 2023. Central BMD was assessed 3 months before TKA, and the failure load of bone fragments collected during box preparation was directly measured using an indentation test. Relationships between central BMD and failure load as a measure of the actual bone strength at the knee were analyzed. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between central BMD and the actual bone strength at the knee (R 2= 0.146 in all patients; < 0.001 in osteoporosis group; 0.126 in non-osteoporosis group). The correlation suggested by the regression models was particularly insignificant in the osteoporosis subgroup, showing that central BMD is not a reliable predictor of bone strength for cementless TKA. Conclusions Central BMD measurements have limited utility in accurately predicting the real bone strength at the knee for cementless TKA. This study highlights the need for more specific and direct methods of assessing bone quality at the knee to ensure the success of cementless TKA.

Background: The increasing prevalence of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) necessitates a reliable assessment of bone quality. Central bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the lumbar spine and hip, is conventionally used to estimate bone quality. However, its effectiveness in predicting the actual bone strength at the knee, which is crucial for cementless TKA, is under scrutiny. This study investigated the relationship between central BMD and actual bone strength at the knee. Methods: This prospective study included 191 knees undergoing standard posterior-stabilized TKA between November 2021 and March 2023. Central BMD was assessed 3 months before TKA, and the failure load of bone fragments collected during box preparation was directly measured using an indentation test. Relationships between central BMD and failure load as a measure of the actual bone strength at the knee were analyzed. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between central BMD and the actual bone strength at the knee (R 2= 0.146 in all patients; < 0.001 in osteoporosis group; 0.126 in non-osteoporosis group). The correlation suggested by the regression models was particularly insignificant in the osteoporosis subgroup, showing that central BMD is not a reliable predictor of bone strength for cementless TKA. Conclusions Central BMD measurements have limited utility in accurately predicting the real bone strength at the knee for cementless TKA. This study highlights the need for more specific and direct methods of assessing bone quality at the knee to ensure the success of cementless TKA.

Background: The increasing prevalence of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) necessitates a reliable assessment of bone quality. Central bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the lumbar spine and hip, is conventionally used to estimate bone quality. However, its effectiveness in predicting the actual bone strength at the knee, which is crucial for cementless TKA, is under scrutiny. This study investigated the relationship between central BMD and actual bone strength at the knee. Methods: This prospective study included 191 knees undergoing standard posterior-stabilized TKA between November 2021 and March 2023. Central BMD was assessed 3 months before TKA, and the failure load of bone fragments collected during box preparation was directly measured using an indentation test. Relationships between central BMD and failure load as a measure of the actual bone strength at the knee were analyzed. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between central BMD and the actual bone strength at the knee (R 2= 0.146 in all patients; < 0.001 in osteoporosis group; 0.126 in non-osteoporosis group). The correlation suggested by the regression models was particularly insignificant in the osteoporosis subgroup, showing that central BMD is not a reliable predictor of bone strength for cementless TKA. Conclusions Central BMD measurements have limited utility in accurately predicting the real bone strength at the knee for cementless TKA. This study highlights the need for more specific and direct methods of assessing bone quality at the knee to ensure the success of cementless TKA.

Background: The increasing prevalence of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) necessitates a reliable assessment of bone quality. Central bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the lumbar spine and hip, is conventionally used to estimate bone quality. However, its effectiveness in predicting the actual bone strength at the knee, which is crucial for cementless TKA, is under scrutiny. This study investigated the relationship between central BMD and actual bone strength at the knee. Methods: This prospective study included 191 knees undergoing standard posterior-stabilized TKA between November 2021 and March 2023. Central BMD was assessed 3 months before TKA, and the failure load of bone fragments collected during box preparation was directly measured using an indentation test. Relationships between central BMD and failure load as a measure of the actual bone strength at the knee were analyzed. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between central BMD and the actual bone strength at the knee (R 2= 0.146 in all patients; < 0.001 in osteoporosis group; 0.126 in non-osteoporosis group). The correlation suggested by the regression models was particularly insignificant in the osteoporosis subgroup, showing that central BMD is not a reliable predictor of bone strength for cementless TKA. Conclusions Central BMD measurements have limited utility in accurately predicting the real bone strength at the knee for cementless TKA. This study highlights the need for more specific and direct methods of assessing bone quality at the knee to ensure the success of cementless TKA.

Background/Aims: Papillary adenocarcinoma is classified to differentiated-type gastric cancer and is indicated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. However, due to its rare nature, there are limited studies on it. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with papillary-type early gastric cancer and to find the risk factors of lymph node metastasis. Methods: Patients diagnosed with papillary-type early gastric cancer at eight medical centers, who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgical treatment, were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical results and long-term outcomes of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection were evaluated, and the risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the surgery group were analyzed. Results: One-hundred and seventy-six patients with papillary-type early gastric cancer were enrolled: 44.9% (n=79) in the surgery group and 55.1% (n=97) in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group. As a result of endoscopic submucosal dissection, the en bloc resection and curative resection rates were 91.8% and 86.6%, respectively. The procedure-related complication rate was 4.1%, and local recurrence occurred in 3.1% of patients. Submucosal invasion (odds ratio, 3.735; 95% confidence interval, 1.026 to 12.177; p=0.047) and lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio, 7.636; 95% confidence interval, 1.730 to 22.857; p=0.004) were the risk factors of lymph node metastasis in papillary-type early gastric cancer patients. Conclusions The clinical results of endoscopic submucosal dissection in papillary-type early gastric cancer were relatively favorable, and endoscopic submucosal dissection is considered safe if appropriate indications are confirmed by considering the risk of lymph node metastasis.

Background and Objectives: Identifying patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) is important when making decisions for antiplatelet therapy strategy. This study evaluated the impact of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) according to HBR in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with drug eluting stents (DESs). Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the TICO trial, HBR was defined by 2 approaches: meeting Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria or Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent DAPT (PRECISEDAPT) score ≥25. The primary outcome was a 3–12 months net adverse clinical event (composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events). Results: Of the 2,980 patients without adverse events during the first 3 months after DES implantation, 453 (15.2%) were HBR by ARC-HBR criteria and 504 (16.9%) were HBR by PRECISE-DAPT score. The primary outcome rate was higher in HBR versus non-HBR patients (by ARC-HBR criteria: hazard ratio [HR], 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76– 4.69; p<0.001; by PRECISE-DAPT score: HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.92–4.98; p<0.001). Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT was associated with lower primary outcome rate than ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT regardless of HBR by ARC-HBR criteria, with similar magnitudes of therapy effect for HBR and non-HBR patients (p-interaction=0.400). Results were consistent by PRECISE-DAPT score (p-interaction=0.178). Conclusions In ACS patients treated with DESs, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT was associated with lower rate of adverse clinical outcomes regardless of HBR, with similar magnitudes of therapy effect between HBR and non-HBR.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02494895