Background: and Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage to dementia, Alzheimer’s disease being a major cause. Although amyloid beta-positive (Aβ+) MCI has been well-characterized, Aβ-negative (Aβ−) MCI has not. This study compared the comprehensive clinical and behavioral characteristics of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI in a large multicenter cohort to better understand the heterogeneity of MCI, and to identify contributing factors to cognitive impairment. Methods: A total of 686 MCI participants were included. Aβ positivity was determined using Aβ positron emission tomography imaging with a direct conversion Centiloid cutoff value of 25.5. Standardized assessment and questionnaires were used to collect a wide range of clinical information, including vascular risk factors, cognition, daily living function, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and lifestyle behavior. Groups were compared using independent t-tests and χ2 tests. Results: Aβ+ participants (n=406) were older, predominantly female, and more likely to be ApoE4 carriers. In contrast, Aβ− participants (n=280) showed higher vascular risk factors, including diabetes, elevated body mass index, and higher C-reactive protein levels.Aβ+ participants exhibited worse global cognition and functional decline, with a higher prevalence of delusions and appetite disturbances. Meanwhile, Aβ− participants reported greater social engagement, but poorer sleep quality. Conclusions This study highlights the distinct clinical and lifestyle profiles of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI, illuminating the heterogeneity of MCI and its underlying factors in the Korean population.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage to dementia, Alzheimer’s disease being a major cause. Although amyloid beta-positive (Aβ+) MCI has been well-characterized, Aβ-negative (Aβ−) MCI has not. This study compared the comprehensive clinical and behavioral characteristics of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI in a large multicenter cohort to better understand the heterogeneity of MCI, and to identify contributing factors to cognitive impairment. Methods: A total of 686 MCI participants were included. Aβ positivity was determined using Aβ positron emission tomography imaging with a direct conversion Centiloid cutoff value of 25.5. Standardized assessment and questionnaires were used to collect a wide range of clinical information, including vascular risk factors, cognition, daily living function, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and lifestyle behavior. Groups were compared using independent t-tests and χ2 tests. Results: Aβ+ participants (n=406) were older, predominantly female, and more likely to be ApoE4 carriers. In contrast, Aβ− participants (n=280) showed higher vascular risk factors, including diabetes, elevated body mass index, and higher C-reactive protein levels.Aβ+ participants exhibited worse global cognition and functional decline, with a higher prevalence of delusions and appetite disturbances. Meanwhile, Aβ− participants reported greater social engagement, but poorer sleep quality. Conclusions This study highlights the distinct clinical and lifestyle profiles of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI, illuminating the heterogeneity of MCI and its underlying factors in the Korean population.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage to dementia, Alzheimer’s disease being a major cause. Although amyloid beta-positive (Aβ+) MCI has been well-characterized, Aβ-negative (Aβ−) MCI has not. This study compared the comprehensive clinical and behavioral characteristics of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI in a large multicenter cohort to better understand the heterogeneity of MCI, and to identify contributing factors to cognitive impairment. Methods: A total of 686 MCI participants were included. Aβ positivity was determined using Aβ positron emission tomography imaging with a direct conversion Centiloid cutoff value of 25.5. Standardized assessment and questionnaires were used to collect a wide range of clinical information, including vascular risk factors, cognition, daily living function, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and lifestyle behavior. Groups were compared using independent t-tests and χ2 tests. Results: Aβ+ participants (n=406) were older, predominantly female, and more likely to be ApoE4 carriers. In contrast, Aβ− participants (n=280) showed higher vascular risk factors, including diabetes, elevated body mass index, and higher C-reactive protein levels.Aβ+ participants exhibited worse global cognition and functional decline, with a higher prevalence of delusions and appetite disturbances. Meanwhile, Aβ− participants reported greater social engagement, but poorer sleep quality. Conclusions This study highlights the distinct clinical and lifestyle profiles of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI, illuminating the heterogeneity of MCI and its underlying factors in the Korean population.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage to dementia, Alzheimer’s disease being a major cause. Although amyloid beta-positive (Aβ+) MCI has been well-characterized, Aβ-negative (Aβ−) MCI has not. This study compared the comprehensive clinical and behavioral characteristics of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI in a large multicenter cohort to better understand the heterogeneity of MCI, and to identify contributing factors to cognitive impairment. Methods: A total of 686 MCI participants were included. Aβ positivity was determined using Aβ positron emission tomography imaging with a direct conversion Centiloid cutoff value of 25.5. Standardized assessment and questionnaires were used to collect a wide range of clinical information, including vascular risk factors, cognition, daily living function, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and lifestyle behavior. Groups were compared using independent t-tests and χ2 tests. Results: Aβ+ participants (n=406) were older, predominantly female, and more likely to be ApoE4 carriers. In contrast, Aβ− participants (n=280) showed higher vascular risk factors, including diabetes, elevated body mass index, and higher C-reactive protein levels.Aβ+ participants exhibited worse global cognition and functional decline, with a higher prevalence of delusions and appetite disturbances. Meanwhile, Aβ− participants reported greater social engagement, but poorer sleep quality. Conclusions This study highlights the distinct clinical and lifestyle profiles of Aβ+ and Aβ− MCI, illuminating the heterogeneity of MCI and its underlying factors in the Korean population.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: Dementia, particularly Alzheimer’s disease, is a significant global health concern, with early diagnosis and treatment development being critical goals. While numerous cohorts have advanced dementia research, there is a lack of comprehensive data on ethnic differences, particularly for the Korean population. The Korea-Registries to Overcome Dementia and Accelerate Dementia Research (K-ROAD) aims to establish a large-scale, hospital-based dementia cohort to address this gap, with a focus on understanding disease progression, developing early diagnostics, and supporting treatment advancements specific to the Korean population. Methods: K-ROAD comprises multiple prospective cohorts. Participants underwent clinical evaluations, neuroimaging, and biomarker analysis, with data collected on a range of clinical and genomic markers. Results: As of December 2023, K-ROAD has recruited over 5,800 participants, including individuals across the Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome, subcortical vascular cognitive impairment, and frontotemporal dementia spectra. Preliminary findings highlight significant ethnic differences in amyloid positivity, cognitive decline, and biomarker profiles, compared to Western cohorts. Conclusions The K-ROAD cohort offers a unique and critical resource for dementia research, providing insights into ethnic-specific disease characteristics and biomarker profiles. These findings will contribute to the development of personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to dementia, enhancing global understanding of the disease.

Background: and Purpose: We aimed to develop the diagnostic matrix of the Seoul Cognitive Status Test (SCST) and compare its performance with traditional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests, including the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-II (SNSB-II) and the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD-K). Methods: We recruited 197 participants from the head-to-head SCST-SNSB cohort, and 204 participants from the head-to-head SCST-CERAD cohort. They underwent either SNSB-II or CERAD-K, in addition to SCST. The diagnostic matrix was developed by combining cognitive function, determined by neuropsychological tests, and activities of daily living (ADL), determined by Instrumental-ADL scales. Results: The diagnostic agreement between the SCST and the SNSB-II was 83.9% (weighted kappa=0.87). The agreement between the SCST and the CERAD-K was 84.3% (weighted kappa=0.88). In the SCST-SNSB cohort, all differences in SCST scores between the cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia diagnosed with the SNSB-II were significant in all cognitive domains (all p<0.01), except for the executive domain between CU and MCI (p=0.145). In the SCST-CERAD cohort, all differences in SCST scores between the 3 groups diagnosed with the CERAD-K were significant in all cognitive domains (all p<0.01), except for the language and visuospatial domains between MCI and dementia (p=0.169 and p=0.778, respectively). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the tablet-based SCST may be another option to traditional paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests, especially in situations where time and space are relatively limited, and neuropsychological testing specialists are not available.