Objective:To explore the therapeutic effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for primary achalasia (AC) in patients aged over 60 years.Methods:Data of 146 patients aged ≥60 years (the elderly group) and 146 patients aged 18-59 years (the adult group) who received POEM from November 2010 to September 2019 at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of PLA General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline data, surgery data, surgery-related complications and surgery-related efficacy were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in gender, Ling classification, HRM classification or previous treatment between the two groups ( P>0.05). All 292 patients successfully underwent POEM surgery. The clinical success (Eckardt score ≤3) rates in the elderly group and the adult group were 96.33% (105/109) and 96.77% (90/93), respectively with no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=0.030， P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the length of myotomy between the two groups (7.09±2.49 cm VS 7.12±2.24 cm， t=0.472， P>0.05). Complications occurred in 26 cases (17.81%) in the elderly group and 21 cases (14.38%) in the adult group with no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=0.634， P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay (12.61±9.69 days VS 11.00±4.43 days, t=1.825, P>0.05) or the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux [43.33% (13/30) VS 51.52% (17/33), χ2=0.422, P>0.05] between the elderly group and the adult group. Conclusion:The efficacy of POEM for AC patients over 60 years old is equivalent to that of adult patients, and the incidence of complications is similar. POEM is safe and effective for AC patients over 60 years old.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), EMR with pre-cutting (EMR-P), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and ESD with snare (ESD-S) for the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs).Methods:Between January 2016 and March 2018, a total of 146 patients with 146 colorectal LSTs undergone endoscopic resection at the first medical center of PLA General Hospital. Data of demographics, treatment information, pathology and follow-up results were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Among the 146 patients, EMR, EMR-P, ESD, and ESD-S were performed in 23, 29, 50 and 44 tumors, respectively. Median tumor diameter was 2.5 cm (ranged 1.2-10.0 cm). The en bloc resection rate of EMR, EMR-P, ESD and ESD-S were 73.9% (17/23), 72.4% (21/29), 96.0% (48/50), and 65.9% (29/44), respectively, with statistical difference ( P<0.001). And the R0 resection rate were 65.2% (15/23), 69.0% (20/29), 94.0% (47/50), and 63.6% (28/44), respectively, with statistical difference ( P=0.002). The en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate of the ESD group were significantly higher than those of the other three groups (all P<0.05). The difference was not statistically significant in terms of perforation rate [0, 0, 6.0% (3/50), and 9.1% (4/44), respectively, P=0.269] and delayed hemorrhage rate [4.3% (1/23), 0, 2.0% (1/50), and 2.3% (1/44), respectively, P=0.768] among the four groups. Follow-up endoscopy was performed in 117 cases (80.1%) with a median period of 10.0 months (ranged 3.0-26.0 months), and local recurrence was identified in 7 (6.0%) cases. Conclusion:ESD could be the optimal method for the resection of colorectal LSTs, while LSTs smaller than 20 mm can be resected by EMR. EMR-P and ESD-S as modified methods have their respective advantages for the treatment of LSTs.

Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for tumor size and invasion of non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NA-DETs) and to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection ( ESD ) and modified ESD for the treatment of NA-DETs. Methods Data of 22 patients with 22 NAD-NETs confirmed by histopathological examinations from January 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. ESD was performed on 13 tumors, and modified ESD was performed on 9 tumors. R0 resection rate, procedure time and incidence of procedure-related complications in the ESD group and the modified ESD group were compared. The postoperative pathological results were used as the gold standard to assess the accuracy of preoperative EUS in diagnosing tumor size and invasion of NA-DETs. Results The mean size of NA-DETs was 6. 9 ± 1. 5 mm. The accuracy in assessing the invasion depth by EUS was 95. 5％ ( 21/22 ) compared with histological results. R0 resection was achieved in 13/13 ( 100. 0％) of the ESD group and in 7/9 ( 77. 8％) of the modified ESD group (P=1. 000). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the modified ESD group than that in the ESD group ( 16. 0 ± 2. 2 min VS 29. 8 ± 4. 9 min, P<0. 001 ) . Intraoperative perforation occurred in one patient and delayed perforation occurred in one patient in the ESD group. Delayed bleeding occurred in one patient in the modified ESD group. Follow-up data were available in all cases with a mean period of 30. 0±24. 8 months. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis were detected in the follow-up period. Conclusion EUS can accurately assess the size and depth of NAD-NETs. Modified ESD can provide comparable clinical outcomes to ESD for NAD-NETs ≤10 mm in diameter that are confined to the submucosa.

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and application value of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection(STER)for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors(SMTs). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the endoscopic and clinical data of 44 cases with SMTs who received STER from January 2015 to June 2016 in Chinese PLA General Hospital. Results The rate of complete resection was 88.6%(39/44). The operating time was 60.1±30.6 min. The hospitalization time was 10.1± 3.3 days. The rate of complications was 6.8%(3/44). The diagnosis of SMTs by pathology and endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS),the size of SMTs measured by EUS and ruler after STER,and the growing direction judged by EUS and CT were consistent. Conclusion STER for SMTs has a higher complete resection rate, shorter operating time and hospitalization time, and fewer complications. EUS combined with CT is an effective method for preoperative evaluation.

Objective To study the effect of different grades of gastric mucosa epithelial neoplasia tissues of Helicobacter pylori (Hp ) infection and the relationship between chemokine CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 expression and significance. Methods Based on a total of 138 cases of endoscopic specimens, there were normal gastric mucosa (NGM) in 32 cases, low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIEN) in 35 cases, high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIEN) in 36 cases, and gastric adenocarcinoma (GCA) in 35 cases. Hp infection was determined by 13C breath test and serum Hp antibodies,the double positive for Hp infection. CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 were detected by immunohistochemical method. Results The positive rates of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in LGIEN,HGIEN and GCA were higher than those in NGM:71.43%(25/35), 86.11%(31/36), 91.43%(32/35) vs. 25.00%(8/32);71.43%(25/35), 86.11%(31/36), 91.43%(32/35)vs. 28.12%(9/32), P<0.05;the positive rates of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in HGIEN and GCA were higher than those in LGIEN (P<0.05);the positive rates of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in HGIEN and GCA had no significant difference (P>0.05). The positive expression of CXCL12 and CXCR4 had no correlation with Hp infection (P>0.05). Conclusions The positive rates of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in LGIEN,HGIEN and GCA are higher than those in NGM.The positive rates of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in HGIEN and GCA are higher than those in LGIEN. The positive rates of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in HGIEN and GCA are similar. The positive expression of CXCL12 and CXCR4 have no correlation with Hp infection, it suggests that Hp infection may not play oncogenic role by CXCL12 and CXCR4 receptor expression.

OBJECTIVETo compare the safety and efficiency of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large esophageal superficial neoplasms.

METHODSA total of 235 consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic resection for esophageal neoplasms between October, 2010 and June, 2013 in our endoscopy center were analyzed retrospectively. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 patients receiving ESTD or ESD for large esophageal superficial neoplasms were enrolled for data analysis.

RESULTSOf the 29 patients, 11 underwent ESTD and 18 received ESD. The dissection speed of ESTD was significantly higher than that of ESD (22.4∓5.2 mm(2)/min vs 12.2∓4.0 mm(2)/min, P<0.05). Despite a similar en bloc rate between the two groups (100% [11/11] vs 88.9% [16/18], P>0.05), the radical curative rate of ESTD was significantly greater than that of ESD (81.8% [9/11] vs 66.7% [12/18], P<0.05). No serious bleeding or perforation occurred in the patients except for 1 in ESD group with intraoperative bleeding, which was managed with hemostatic forceps. Eight patients had postoperative esophageal strictures in relation with circumferential extension and the longitudinal length (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONESTD is a safe and effective alternative for large esophageal superficial neoplasms with a shortened operative time, a higher dissection speed and a higher radical curative rate in comparison with ESD, but postoperative esophageal strictures should be closely monitored especially for lesions more than 3/4 of the circumferential extension or exceeding 50 mm.

Aged ; Endoscopy ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Esophagus ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mucous Membrane ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies

Objective This paper explored the effect of the early clinical exposure in im-proving medical students' cognitive aspects of the doctor-patient relationship. Methods (1)From 280 undergraduate students of Grade 2010 who participated in early clinical exposure of Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine and 280 undergraduate students of Grade 2011 who did not participate in the early clinical exposure, we selected 140 students respectively to conduct a simple random sam-pling survey. The results were analyzed by SPSS after using Microsoft Excellsoftware for entry. Statis-tical methods selected χ2-test/Fisher exact test(P<0.05). (2)We had an interview to students,teachers leading the project, instructor,experts engaging in the study of the doctor-patient relationship by using focus group discussion and in-depth interview, and then using thematic analysis to analyze the data. (3)The main aspects of questionnaires and interviews were: details, activity participation/interest, general cognitive on the doctor-patient relationship, passion for profession, choice of career, the effect in improving medical students' cognitive aspects of the doctor-patient relationship and the suggestions and comments. Results The effective questionnaires collected from Grade 2010 were 134, and124 from Grade 2011.The participation rate of the undergraduates of Grade 2010(participating group) was 94.0%(126/134), while the interest rate of undergraduates of Grade 2011 (control group) was only 76.6%(95/124). Participating group had a better cognitive understanding of doctor-patient relationship than control group(P=0.0192). The activities had significant effects on choice of career(P=0.0002), and no effect on passion for profession(P=0.7372). There was statistically significant difference on their views of employment(P=0.0002). The key words for the interview were: not enough preparation before activity, not reasonable timing, teachers leading the project, stimulation of professional pride. Conclusions Early clinical exposure activities can be effective in improving medical students' awareness of the current doctor-patient relationship. Still we have some shortages in the activity, some more exploration and amelioration should be made in late stage.

Objective To compare the safety and efficiency of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large esophageal superficial neoplasms. Methods A total of 235 consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic resection for esophageal neoplasms between October, 2010 and June, 2013 in our endoscopy center were analyzed retrospectively. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 patients receiving ESTD or ESD for large esophageal superficial neoplasms were enrolled for data analysis. Results Of the 29 patients, 11 underwent ESTD and 18 received ESD. The dissection speed of ESTD was significantly higher than that of ESD (22.4±5.2 mm2/min vs 12.2±4.0 mm2/min, P<0.05). Despite a similar en bloc rate between the two groups (100%[11/11]vs 88.9%[16/18], P>0.05), the radical curative rate of ESTD was significantly greater than that of ESD (81.8%[9/11]vs 66.7%[12/18], P<0.05). No serious bleeding or perforation occurred in the patients except for 1 in ESD group with intraoperative bleeding, which was managed with hemostatic forceps. Eight patients had postoperative esophageal strictures in relation with circumferential extension and the longitudinal length (P<0.05). Conclusions ESTD is a safe and effective alternative for large esophageal superficial neoplasms with a shortened operative time, a higher dissection speed and a higher radical curative rate in comparison with ESD, but postoperative esophageal strictures should be closely monitored especially for lesions more than 3/4 of the circumferential extension or exceeding 50 mm.

Objective To compare the safety and efficiency of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large esophageal superficial neoplasms. Methods A total of 235 consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic resection for esophageal neoplasms between October, 2010 and June, 2013 in our endoscopy center were analyzed retrospectively. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 patients receiving ESTD or ESD for large esophageal superficial neoplasms were enrolled for data analysis. Results Of the 29 patients, 11 underwent ESTD and 18 received ESD. The dissection speed of ESTD was significantly higher than that of ESD (22.4±5.2 mm2/min vs 12.2±4.0 mm2/min, P<0.05). Despite a similar en bloc rate between the two groups (100%[11/11]vs 88.9%[16/18], P>0.05), the radical curative rate of ESTD was significantly greater than that of ESD (81.8%[9/11]vs 66.7%[12/18], P<0.05). No serious bleeding or perforation occurred in the patients except for 1 in ESD group with intraoperative bleeding, which was managed with hemostatic forceps. Eight patients had postoperative esophageal strictures in relation with circumferential extension and the longitudinal length (P<0.05). Conclusions ESTD is a safe and effective alternative for large esophageal superficial neoplasms with a shortened operative time, a higher dissection speed and a higher radical curative rate in comparison with ESD, but postoperative esophageal strictures should be closely monitored especially for lesions more than 3/4 of the circumferential extension or exceeding 50 mm.

OBJECTIVETo compare the safety and efficiency of transverse-incision peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) with longitudinal-incision POEM.

METHODSPOEM, with a transverse or longitudinal entry incision, was performed in 53 consecutive patients with confirmed achalasia (AC) between December 2010 and September 2012. Data of those patients was collected including the time spent for different procedures and complications.

RESULTSAll the 53 patients underwent POEM successfully, among whom 41 patients had a transverse entry incision and 12 had a longitudinal incision. Treatment success (Eckardt score≤3) with a follow-up for 3-24 months (median 5 month) was achieved in 96.2% of the cases (mean score pre-treatment vs. post-treatment: 7.5 vs 0.6, P<0.001). The whole operation time of transverse-incision group was slightly shorter than that of longitudinal-incision group (65.0∓18.0 min vs 74.1∓18.2 min, P=0.142), but it took much less time in tunnel built-up and muscle dissection in the transverse-incision group (36.3∓9.0 min vs 45.4∓10.5 min; 10.2∓4.6 min vs 15.5∓5.5 min, P<0.05). In addition, patients in transverse incision group were much less likely to develop pneumatosis- related complications [9.8% (4/41) vs 41.7% (5/12), P<0.05). No serious complications occurred in these two groups such as pleural effusion, mediastinitis or digestive tract fistula.

CONCLUSIONSPOEM with a transverse entry incision can significantly decrease the operation time and reduce the incidence of pneumatosis-related complications while obviously relieving the symptoms.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Endoscopy ; Esophageal Achalasia ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tendons ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult