Objective:To analyze the early diagnostic value of plasma soluble cluster of differentiation 14 subtype (sCD14-ST, Presepsin) in sepsis in a population with suspected sepsis in fever clinic.Methods:A prospective observational study was conducted. The patients admitted to the fever clinic of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from April to December 2022 were enrolled as the study objects. According to sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, the patients were divided into low SOFA score group (SOFA score ≤3) and high SOFA score group (SOFA score > 3). Venous blood was collected at the time of admission. The level of plasma Presepsin was detected by chemiluminescence enzyme-linked immunoassay. The level of plasma procalcitonin (PCT) was detected by enzyme-linked immunofluorescence method. The level of C-reactive protein (CRP) was detected by scattering turbidimetry. White blood cell count (WBC) and neutrophil count (NEUT) were measured by automatic blood cell analyzer. For patients with fear of cold or chills, venous blood of upper limbs was taken for blood culture at the time of admission. The differences in inflammatory biomarkers were compared between the two groups. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the early risk factors of sepsis in fever outpatients with suspected sepsis. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to investigate the early diagnostic value of Presepsin and other inflammatory markers in sepsis, and to analyze the optimal cut-off value.Results:A total of 149 fever outpatients with suspected sepsis were enrolled, including 92 patients with low SOFA score and 57 patients with high SOFA score. Plasma PCT and Presepsin levels in the high SOFA score group were significantly higher than those in the low SOFA score group [PCT (μg/L): 0.77 (0.18, 2.02) vs. 0.22 (0.09, 0.71), Presepsin (ng/L): 1?129.00 (785.50, 1?766.50) vs. 563.00 (460.50, 772.25), both P < 0.01]. There was no significant difference in WBC, NEUT, CRP or positive rate of blood culture between the high and low SOFA score groups [WBC (×10 9/L): 11.32±5.47 vs. 11.14±5.29, NEUT (×10 9/L): 9.88±4.89 vs. 9.60±5.10, CRP (mg/L): 54.05 (15.95, 128.90) vs. 46.11 (19.60, 104.60), blood culture positivity rate: 42.3% (11/26) vs. 29.4% (10/34), all P > 0.05]. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that Presepsin was an early risk factor for sepsis in suspected sepsis patients in fever clinics [odds ratio ( OR) = 16.96, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 6.35-45.29, P = 0.000]. ROC curve analysis showed that the early diagnostic value of Presepsin in sepsis was significantly better than WBC, NEUT, CRP, PCT, and blood culture [the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% CI: 0.832 (0.771-0.899) vs. 0.522 (0.424-0.619), 0.532 (0.435-0.629), 0.533 (0.435-0.632), 0.664 (0.574-0.753), 0.554 (0.458-0.650)]. When the optimal cut-off value of Presepsin was 646.50 ng/L, its sensitivity and positive predictive value were higher than those of WBC, NEUT, CRP, and PCT (sensitivity: 89.5% vs. 38.6%, 68.4%, 38.6%, 57.9%; positive predictive value: 64.6% vs. 44.9%, 44.3%, 47.8%, 55.9%). Conclusion:Plasma PCT and Presepsin have early diagnostic value for sepsis in suspected sepsis patients in fever clinics, and Presepsin is more sensitive than PCT and can be used as a early marker of sepsis.

Objective: To compare the treatment outcomes for locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma between surgery plus radio(chemo) therapy(SRT) and non-surgery chemoradiotherapy(CRT). Methods: A total of 119 patients diagnosed with advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma without distant metastases between 2010 and 2014 were identified in the Chinese People′s Liberation Army General Hospital, and they were divided into 2 groups: 42 cases in SRT group and 77 cases in CRT group. Patients′ clinical information was collected. Survival rates and prognostic factors were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with SPSS 23.0 software. The survival rates, laryngeal preservation rates and complication rates were compared between the two groups using the chi-square test.Among the 119 patients, 112 were males and 7 were females. Age ranged from 27 to 78 years, with an average age of 57 years. Results: There were no significant difference between the SRT and CRT group for five-year disease-free survival (DFS, 53.9% vs. 45.1%, χ²=1.251, P=0.263) and overall survival (OS, 54.9% vs. 45.6%, χ²=1.749, P=0.186). Compared to SRT group, CRT group did not showed the significant increase of treatment complications (χ²=0.858, P=0.354), with a higher laryngeal preservation rate (50.0% vs. 71.4%, χ²=6.493, P=0.011). Conclusions Advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma is of high malignancy and poor prognosis. Combined modality treatment is a main approach for advanced hypopharyngeal cancer. SRT offers disease-free survival and overall survival rates equivalent to CRT, but with a higher laryngeal preservation rate.