Objective To study the effect of different types of renal puncture needles on the risk of bleeding after renal puncture.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 428 patients who under-went renal biopsy in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and Jiulongpo District People's Hospital of Chongqing from January 2020 to December 2022.Different types of puncture needles were used to compare the occurrence of postoperative bleeding complications(hematoma,hematuria).Results The incidence of bleeding complications after renal puncture in 428 patients was 21.0％(90/428),of which the incidence of hematoma was 18.9％(81/428),the incidence of hematuria was 2.1％(9/428),the median decrease in hemoglobin(Hb)was 5 g/L,and the incidence of serious complications such as blood transfusion and interventional therapy was 0.7％(4/428).The patients with different types of renal puncture needles were grouped(16G group,18G group).There was no significant difference in baseline data and distri-bution of renal pathological types between the two groups(P＞0.05).The incidence of postoperative bleeding in 16G group and 18G group was 22.4％(52/232)and 19.4％(38/196),respectively.The incidence of hema-toma was 20.6％(48/232)and 16.8％(33/196),respectively.The incidence of hematuria was 1.7％(4/232)and 2.6％(5/196),respectively.The decrease of Hb was 6(0,16)g/L and 4(0,17)g/L,respectively.There was no significant difference(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious compli-cations such as blood transfusion,interventional therapy and Hb decrease＞10 g/L between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided renal biopsy is safe and has a low incidence of serious complica-tions.There was no significant relationship between different puncture needle types and postoperative bleeding risk.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective:To explore whether there is a solution to the trilemma of health policy,and to reveal whether the health policy and policy portfolio can simultaneously improve the"health","wealth"and"equity"of residents.Methods:The study constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and indicator estimation procedure that includes human health capital,and used Bayesian model comparison method to determine reasonable model settings.Using numerical simulation methods,by adjusting the corresponding parameters,it also simulates the policy effect of implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy and medical quality management policy separately,as well as the policy effects of combining these two policies.Results:Simply implementing comprehensive medical supervision policy may lead to the deviation of health outcomes from health affordability and financing equity,and simply implementing medical quality management policy may lead to the deviation of health affordability from health outcomes and financing fairness,and the combination of these two policies can effectively solve the trilemma of health policy.Conclusion:The problem of health policy trilemma is not unsolvable,and the mutual deviation of"health","wealth"and"equity"can be reconciled through reasonable policy combination design.

Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect and mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor-dapansutrile(OLT1177)-against acute radiation lung injury.Methods Mice were divided into the control group,OLT1177 injection group,irradiation group,and irradiation+OLT1177 injection group.A single dose of 22 Gy whole-lung 60Co radiation was used to establish a model of acute radiation lung injury.After 6 h of radiation,OLT1177(100mg/kg,once daily)was administered intraperitoneally.After 14 consecutive days of administration,lung tissues were collected and weighed while the lung coefficient was calculated.Hematoxylin-eosin(HE)staining and F4/80 immuno-histochemical staining were used to observe the pathological changes and inflammatory cell infiltration in lung tissues.Real-time quantitative PCR(qPCR)was used to detect the transcription levels of NLRP3,IL-1β,and other mRNAs in lung tissues.Serum cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 were measured by cytometric bead array(CBA).The activation of Caspase-1 and IL-18 was detected by Western blotting.Results Radiation caused acute inflammation in the lung tissues of mice,manifested as edema in the lung tissues and destruction of the alveolar structure,increased macrophage infiltration,and elevated expressions of inflammatory genes NLRP3,IL-1β,TNF-α,and IL-6 in the lung tissues and higher serum levels of TNF-α,IL-6.Treatment with OLT1177 significantly improved the above symptoms induced by radiation.OLT1177 inhibited the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome downstream Caspase-1 and IL-18 induced by radiation.Conclusion OLT1177 can significantly alleviate acute radiation lung injury in mice,which may be due to its inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation induced by radiation.