Objectives: Smoking causes 8 million deaths annually and significant socioeconomic burdens. Despite several therapies, cessation rates remain low due to nicotine’s addictive properties and withdrawal symptoms. This study evaluates the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in reducing nicotine dependence and improving psychological states. Methods: This pilot study enrolled 23 adult smokers aged 19 to 65 years with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) scores over 4 and daily cigarette consumption exceeding 10. Participants were randomized into treatment and control groups. The treatment group received personalized taVNS stimulation targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, applied for 30 minutes, three times daily, for four weeks. The control group received a low-level fixed-current stimulation. Outcomes, including the FTND, cigarettes per day (CPD), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Statistical analyses included the Mann–Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The treatment group showed significant reductions in the FTND (2.0 points at 2 weeks, p<0.05; 3.0 points at 4 weeks, p<0.05) and CPD (1.0 fewer cigarette at 2 weeks, p<0.05; 2.0 fewer cigarettes at 4 weeks, p<0.05). Additionally, the PHQ-9 scores decreased significantly in the treatment group (3.0 points at 2 weeks, p<0.05; no further improvement at 4 weeks). However, the GAD-7 and the ISI scores showed no statistically significant changes in either group. The control group exhibited slight improvements in the FTND and the CPD, possibly due to placebo effects or motivation induced by study participation. Conclusions This study highlights taVNS as a promising non-invasive treatment for smoking cessation, effective in reducing nicotine dependence and improving depressive symptoms. However, its effects on anxiety and sleep quality remain unclear. Larger studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and explore optimal parameters and underlying mechanisms.

Purpose: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Radiation therapy (RT) has served as the primary treatment option for PMBCL; however, its role has been questioned with the advent of intensified immunochemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the role of consolidative RT in the primary treatment of PMBCL. Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed the survival outcomes of 65 patients newly diagnosed with PMBCL. The patients were divided into three treatment groups: (1) EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), (2) R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), and (3) R-CHOP with consolidative RT. Results: The objective response and complete remission rates were 86.2% and 63.1%, respectively, with 3-year pro‑ gression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 72% and 81%, respectively. All patients in the R-CHOP + RT group achieved an objective response with better PFS) than those who did not receive consolidative RT (p = 0.028), although there was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.102). Consolidative RT benefited patients with an initially bulky disease or insufficient end-of-treatment response. The predictive value of  18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in assessing the treatment response in PMBCL was revali‑ dated, showing that patients who achieved negative end-of-treatment PET-CT had significantly better survival outcomes than others. Conclusions R-CHOP is a useful alternative regimen when intensified chemotherapy is not feasible. Consolidative RT should be considered in cases with an initially bulky disease and insufficient end-of-treatment response.

Purpose: While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head. Materials and Methods: We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens. Results: A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p=0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.03; p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Objectives: Smoking causes 8 million deaths annually and significant socioeconomic burdens. Despite several therapies, cessation rates remain low due to nicotine’s addictive properties and withdrawal symptoms. This study evaluates the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in reducing nicotine dependence and improving psychological states. Methods: This pilot study enrolled 23 adult smokers aged 19 to 65 years with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) scores over 4 and daily cigarette consumption exceeding 10. Participants were randomized into treatment and control groups. The treatment group received personalized taVNS stimulation targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, applied for 30 minutes, three times daily, for four weeks. The control group received a low-level fixed-current stimulation. Outcomes, including the FTND, cigarettes per day (CPD), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Statistical analyses included the Mann–Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The treatment group showed significant reductions in the FTND (2.0 points at 2 weeks, p<0.05; 3.0 points at 4 weeks, p<0.05) and CPD (1.0 fewer cigarette at 2 weeks, p<0.05; 2.0 fewer cigarettes at 4 weeks, p<0.05). Additionally, the PHQ-9 scores decreased significantly in the treatment group (3.0 points at 2 weeks, p<0.05; no further improvement at 4 weeks). However, the GAD-7 and the ISI scores showed no statistically significant changes in either group. The control group exhibited slight improvements in the FTND and the CPD, possibly due to placebo effects or motivation induced by study participation. Conclusions This study highlights taVNS as a promising non-invasive treatment for smoking cessation, effective in reducing nicotine dependence and improving depressive symptoms. However, its effects on anxiety and sleep quality remain unclear. Larger studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and explore optimal parameters and underlying mechanisms.

Purpose: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Radiation therapy (RT) has served as the primary treatment option for PMBCL; however, its role has been questioned with the advent of intensified immunochemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the role of consolidative RT in the primary treatment of PMBCL. Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed the survival outcomes of 65 patients newly diagnosed with PMBCL. The patients were divided into three treatment groups: (1) EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), (2) R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), and (3) R-CHOP with consolidative RT. Results: The objective response and complete remission rates were 86.2% and 63.1%, respectively, with 3-year pro‑ gression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 72% and 81%, respectively. All patients in the R-CHOP + RT group achieved an objective response with better PFS) than those who did not receive consolidative RT (p = 0.028), although there was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.102). Consolidative RT benefited patients with an initially bulky disease or insufficient end-of-treatment response. The predictive value of  18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in assessing the treatment response in PMBCL was revali‑ dated, showing that patients who achieved negative end-of-treatment PET-CT had significantly better survival outcomes than others. Conclusions R-CHOP is a useful alternative regimen when intensified chemotherapy is not feasible. Consolidative RT should be considered in cases with an initially bulky disease and insufficient end-of-treatment response.

Purpose: While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head. Materials and Methods: We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens. Results: A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p=0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.03; p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Objectives: Smoking causes 8 million deaths annually and significant socioeconomic burdens. Despite several therapies, cessation rates remain low due to nicotine’s addictive properties and withdrawal symptoms. This study evaluates the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in reducing nicotine dependence and improving psychological states. Methods: This pilot study enrolled 23 adult smokers aged 19 to 65 years with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) scores over 4 and daily cigarette consumption exceeding 10. Participants were randomized into treatment and control groups. The treatment group received personalized taVNS stimulation targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, applied for 30 minutes, three times daily, for four weeks. The control group received a low-level fixed-current stimulation. Outcomes, including the FTND, cigarettes per day (CPD), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Statistical analyses included the Mann–Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The treatment group showed significant reductions in the FTND (2.0 points at 2 weeks, p<0.05; 3.0 points at 4 weeks, p<0.05) and CPD (1.0 fewer cigarette at 2 weeks, p<0.05; 2.0 fewer cigarettes at 4 weeks, p<0.05). Additionally, the PHQ-9 scores decreased significantly in the treatment group (3.0 points at 2 weeks, p<0.05; no further improvement at 4 weeks). However, the GAD-7 and the ISI scores showed no statistically significant changes in either group. The control group exhibited slight improvements in the FTND and the CPD, possibly due to placebo effects or motivation induced by study participation. Conclusions This study highlights taVNS as a promising non-invasive treatment for smoking cessation, effective in reducing nicotine dependence and improving depressive symptoms. However, its effects on anxiety and sleep quality remain unclear. Larger studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and explore optimal parameters and underlying mechanisms.

Purpose: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Radiation therapy (RT) has served as the primary treatment option for PMBCL; however, its role has been questioned with the advent of intensified immunochemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the role of consolidative RT in the primary treatment of PMBCL. Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed the survival outcomes of 65 patients newly diagnosed with PMBCL. The patients were divided into three treatment groups: (1) EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), (2) R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), and (3) R-CHOP with consolidative RT. Results: The objective response and complete remission rates were 86.2% and 63.1%, respectively, with 3-year pro‑ gression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 72% and 81%, respectively. All patients in the R-CHOP + RT group achieved an objective response with better PFS) than those who did not receive consolidative RT (p = 0.028), although there was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.102). Consolidative RT benefited patients with an initially bulky disease or insufficient end-of-treatment response. The predictive value of  18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in assessing the treatment response in PMBCL was revali‑ dated, showing that patients who achieved negative end-of-treatment PET-CT had significantly better survival outcomes than others. Conclusions R-CHOP is a useful alternative regimen when intensified chemotherapy is not feasible. Consolidative RT should be considered in cases with an initially bulky disease and insufficient end-of-treatment response.