Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a condition in which an intramural hematoma within the coronary artery leads to acute coronary syndrome without atherosclerosis, trauma, or iatrogenic causes. It predominantly affects middle-aged women and is associated with several predisposing conditions, including fibromuscular dysplasia, systemic inflammatory disorders, connective tissue diseases, and coronary artery spasms. We report the case of a 64-year-old male with a history of hypertension who died of SCAD. His death occurred suddenly and without preceding trauma while the decedent was working overtime at a construction site. On gross examination, a thrombus-like material was identified in a branch of the left anterior descending artery and was initially presumed to be a postmortem clot. However, microscopic examination revealed an intramural hemorrhage, medial dissection, and formation of a false lumen within the coronary artery. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough histopathological examination of the coronary arteries during autopsy, even in the absence of atherosclerosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a condition in which an intramural hematoma within the coronary artery leads to acute coronary syndrome without atherosclerosis, trauma, or iatrogenic causes. It predominantly affects middle-aged women and is associated with several predisposing conditions, including fibromuscular dysplasia, systemic inflammatory disorders, connective tissue diseases, and coronary artery spasms. We report the case of a 64-year-old male with a history of hypertension who died of SCAD. His death occurred suddenly and without preceding trauma while the decedent was working overtime at a construction site. On gross examination, a thrombus-like material was identified in a branch of the left anterior descending artery and was initially presumed to be a postmortem clot. However, microscopic examination revealed an intramural hemorrhage, medial dissection, and formation of a false lumen within the coronary artery. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough histopathological examination of the coronary arteries during autopsy, even in the absence of atherosclerosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a condition in which an intramural hematoma within the coronary artery leads to acute coronary syndrome without atherosclerosis, trauma, or iatrogenic causes. It predominantly affects middle-aged women and is associated with several predisposing conditions, including fibromuscular dysplasia, systemic inflammatory disorders, connective tissue diseases, and coronary artery spasms. We report the case of a 64-year-old male with a history of hypertension who died of SCAD. His death occurred suddenly and without preceding trauma while the decedent was working overtime at a construction site. On gross examination, a thrombus-like material was identified in a branch of the left anterior descending artery and was initially presumed to be a postmortem clot. However, microscopic examination revealed an intramural hemorrhage, medial dissection, and formation of a false lumen within the coronary artery. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough histopathological examination of the coronary arteries during autopsy, even in the absence of atherosclerosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a condition in which an intramural hematoma within the coronary artery leads to acute coronary syndrome without atherosclerosis, trauma, or iatrogenic causes. It predominantly affects middle-aged women and is associated with several predisposing conditions, including fibromuscular dysplasia, systemic inflammatory disorders, connective tissue diseases, and coronary artery spasms. We report the case of a 64-year-old male with a history of hypertension who died of SCAD. His death occurred suddenly and without preceding trauma while the decedent was working overtime at a construction site. On gross examination, a thrombus-like material was identified in a branch of the left anterior descending artery and was initially presumed to be a postmortem clot. However, microscopic examination revealed an intramural hemorrhage, medial dissection, and formation of a false lumen within the coronary artery. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough histopathological examination of the coronary arteries during autopsy, even in the absence of atherosclerosis.

Background/Aims: Bile duct invasion (BDI) is rarely observed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), leading to hyperbilirubinemia. However, the efficacy of pretreatment biliary drainage for HCC patients with BDI and obstructive jaundice is currently unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of biliary drainage on the prognosis of these patients. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 200 HCC patients with BDI from multicenter cohorts. Patients without obstructive jaundice (n=99) and those who did not undergo HCC treatment (n=37) were excluded from further analysis. Finally, 64 patients with obstructive jaundice (43 subjected to drainage and 21 not subjected to drainage) were included. Propensity score matching was then conducted. Results: The biliary drainage group showed longer overall survival (median 10.13 months vs 4.43 months, p=0.004) and progression-free survival durations (median 7.00 months vs 1.97 months, p<0.001) than the non-drainage group. Multivariate analysis showed that biliary drainage was a significantly favorable prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.42; p=0.006) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.30; p<0.001). Furthermore, in the evaluation of first response after HCC treatment, biliary drainage was beneficial (p=0.005). Remarkably, the durations of overall survival (p=0.032) and progression-free survival (p=0.004) were similar after propensity score matching. Conclusions Biliary drainage is an independent favorable prognostic factor for HCC patients with BDI and obstructive jaundice. Therefore, biliary drainage should be contemplated in the treatment of advanced HCC with BDI to improve survival outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Preventing occupational injuries remains a significant challenge in Korea. A positive safety climate can contribute to reducing workplace injuries. However, the impact of safety climate on preventing occupational injuries among the Korean workforce has not been adequately explored. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the perceived safety climate and occupational injuries within the Korean working population. METHODS: This study used baseline data from the Korean Work, Sleep, and Health Study (KWSH). The safety climate was measured using the brief version of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire. Occupational injury was determined by whether injuries or accidents had occurred at workplaces in the past year. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the safety climate and occupational injury. RESULTS: Participants who reported an unfavorable workplace safety climate were more likely to experience occupational injuries. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for occupational injuries in an unfavorable safety climate was 2.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38 to 3.51) compared to a favorable safety climate. Specifically, factors such as “not encouraging employees to follow safety rules when on a tight schedule” (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.24) and “not helping each other work safely” (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.25) were significantly associated with occupational injuries. CONCLUSIONS An unfavorable safety climate was associated with increased occupational injuries among Korean workers. Improving the safety climate in the workplace may reduce occupational injuries in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: Preventing occupational injuries remains a significant challenge in Korea. A positive safety climate can contribute to reducing workplace injuries. However, the impact of safety climate on preventing occupational injuries among the Korean workforce has not been adequately explored. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the perceived safety climate and occupational injuries within the Korean working population. METHODS: This study used baseline data from the Korean Work, Sleep, and Health Study (KWSH). The safety climate was measured using the brief version of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire. Occupational injury was determined by whether injuries or accidents had occurred at workplaces in the past year. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the safety climate and occupational injury. RESULTS: Participants who reported an unfavorable workplace safety climate were more likely to experience occupational injuries. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for occupational injuries in an unfavorable safety climate was 2.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38 to 3.51) compared to a favorable safety climate. Specifically, factors such as “not encouraging employees to follow safety rules when on a tight schedule” (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.24) and “not helping each other work safely” (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.25) were significantly associated with occupational injuries. CONCLUSIONS An unfavorable safety climate was associated with increased occupational injuries among Korean workers. Improving the safety climate in the workplace may reduce occupational injuries in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: Preventing occupational injuries remains a significant challenge in Korea. A positive safety climate can contribute to reducing workplace injuries. However, the impact of safety climate on preventing occupational injuries among the Korean workforce has not been adequately explored. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the perceived safety climate and occupational injuries within the Korean working population. METHODS: This study used baseline data from the Korean Work, Sleep, and Health Study (KWSH). The safety climate was measured using the brief version of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire. Occupational injury was determined by whether injuries or accidents had occurred at workplaces in the past year. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the safety climate and occupational injury. RESULTS: Participants who reported an unfavorable workplace safety climate were more likely to experience occupational injuries. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for occupational injuries in an unfavorable safety climate was 2.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38 to 3.51) compared to a favorable safety climate. Specifically, factors such as “not encouraging employees to follow safety rules when on a tight schedule” (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.24) and “not helping each other work safely” (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.25) were significantly associated with occupational injuries. CONCLUSIONS An unfavorable safety climate was associated with increased occupational injuries among Korean workers. Improving the safety climate in the workplace may reduce occupational injuries in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: Preventing occupational injuries remains a significant challenge in Korea. A positive safety climate can contribute to reducing workplace injuries. However, the impact of safety climate on preventing occupational injuries among the Korean workforce has not been adequately explored. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the perceived safety climate and occupational injuries within the Korean working population. METHODS: This study used baseline data from the Korean Work, Sleep, and Health Study (KWSH). The safety climate was measured using the brief version of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire. Occupational injury was determined by whether injuries or accidents had occurred at workplaces in the past year. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the safety climate and occupational injury. RESULTS: Participants who reported an unfavorable workplace safety climate were more likely to experience occupational injuries. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for occupational injuries in an unfavorable safety climate was 2.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38 to 3.51) compared to a favorable safety climate. Specifically, factors such as “not encouraging employees to follow safety rules when on a tight schedule” (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.24) and “not helping each other work safely” (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.25) were significantly associated with occupational injuries. CONCLUSIONS An unfavorable safety climate was associated with increased occupational injuries among Korean workers. Improving the safety climate in the workplace may reduce occupational injuries in Korea.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.