1.The Effect of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0on Disparities between Patients with and without Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea
Kunhee KIM ; Deok-Gie KIM ; Jae Geun LEE ; Dong Jin JOO ; Hye Won LEE
Yonsei Medical Journal 2023;64(11):647-657
		                        		
		                        			 Purpose:
		                        			The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) 3.0 has recently been suggested for determining liver allocation. We aimed to apply MELD 3.0 to a Korean population and to discover differences between patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). 
		                        		
		                        			Materials and Methods:
		                        			This study is a retrospective study of 2203 patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis at Severance Hospital between 2016–2022. Harrell’s concordance index was used to validate the ability of MELD scores to predict 90-day survival. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			During a mean follow-up of 12.9 months, 90-day survival was 61.9% in all patients, 50.4% in the HCC patients, and 74.8% in the non-HCC patients. Within the HCC patients, the concordance index for patients on the waitlist was 0.653 using MELD, which increased to 0.753 using MELD 3.0. Among waitlisted patients, the 90-day survival of HCC patients was worse than that of non-HCC patients with MELD scores of 31–37 only (69.7% vs. 30.0%, p=0.001). Applying MELD 3.0, the 90-day survival of HCC patients was worse than that of non-HCC patients across a wider range of MELD 3.0 scores, compared to MELD, with MELD 3.0 scores of 21–30 and 31–37 (82.0% vs. 72.5% and 72.3% vs. 24.3%, p=0.02 and p<0.001, respectively). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			MELD 3.0 predicted 90-day survival of the HCC patients more accurately than original MELD score; however, the disparity between HCC and non-HCC patients increased, particularly in patients with MELD scores of 21–30. Therefore, a novel exception score is needed or the current exception score system should be modified. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Effect of the lateral tilt position on femoral vein cross-sectional area in anesthetized adults.
Tae Hun AN ; Yu Som SHIN ; Joo Won KIM ; Tae Woo PARK ; Dong Jin SHIM ; Doo Sik KIM ; Sie Jeong RYU ; Ju Deok KIM
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2019;14(1):106-111
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: A lateral tilt position can affect the size of the femoral vein (FV) due to increased venous blood volume in the dependent side of the body. METHODS: Forty-two patients, aged 20–60 years, were enrolled in this study. The crosssectional area (CSA), anteroposterior, and transverse diameters of the FV were measured 1 cm below the left inguinal line using ultrasound. The value of each parameter was recorded in the following four positions: (1) supine, (2) supine + 10° left-lateral tilt (LLT), (3) 10° reverse Trendelenburg (RT), and (4) RT + LLT. RESULTS: CSAs of the left FV in the supine, supine + LLT, RT, RT + LLT positions were 0.93 ± 0.22, 1.11 ± 0.29, 1.17 ± 0.29, and 1.31 ± 0.32 cm2, respectively. Compared to the supine position, there was a significant increase in CSA and anteroposterior diameter according to the three changed positions. The transverse diameter of the left FV was significantly increased in supine + LLT, RT, RT + LLT positions compared to that in the supine position (P = 0.010, P = 0.043, P = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the transverse diameter of the left FV between the supine + LLT and RT positions (P = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Adding LLT to the supine and RT positions increased the CSA of the unilateral FV significantly.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Blood Volume
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Catheterization
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Femoral Vein*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Posture
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Supine Position
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Ultrasonography
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
3.Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016.
Deog Young KIM ; Yun Hee KIM ; Jongmin LEE ; Won Hyuk CHANG ; Min Wook KIM ; Sung Bom PYUN ; Woo Kyoung YOO ; Suk Hoon OHN ; Ki Deok PARK ; Byung Mo OH ; Seong Hoon LIM ; Kang Jae JUNG ; Byung Ju RYU ; Sun IM ; Sung Ju JEE ; Han Gil SEO ; Ueon Woo RAH ; Joo Hyun PARK ; Min Kyun SOHN ; Min Ho CHUN ; Hee Suk SHIN ; Seong Jae LEE ; Yang Soo LEE ; Si Woon PARK ; Yoon Ghil PARK ; Nam Jong PAIK ; Sam Gyu LEE ; Ju Kang LEE ; Seong Eun KOH ; Don Kyu KIM ; Geun Young PARK ; Yong Il SHIN ; Myoung Hwan KO ; Yong Wook KIM ; Seung Don YOO ; Eun Joo KIM ; Min Kyun OH ; Jae Hyeok CHANG ; Se Hee JUNG ; Tae Woo KIM ; Won Seok KIM ; Dae Hyun KIM ; Tai Hwan PARK ; Kwan Sung LEE ; Byong Yong HWANG ; Young Jin SONG
Brain & Neurorehabilitation 2017;10(Suppl 1):e11-
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			“Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” is the 3rd edition of clinical practice guideline (CPG) for stroke rehabilitation in Korea, which updates the 2nd edition published in 2014. Forty-two specialists in stroke rehabilitation from 21 universities and 4 rehabilitation hospitals and 4 consultants participated in this update. The purpose of this CPG is to provide optimum practical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation teams to make a decision when they manage stroke patients and ultimately, to help stroke patients obtain maximal functional recovery and return to the society. The recent two CPGs from Canada (2015) and USA (2016) and articles that were published following the 2nd edition were used to develop this 3rd edition of CPG for stroke rehabilitation in Korea. The chosen articles' level of evidence and grade of recommendation were decided by the criteria of Scotland (2010) and the formal consensus was derived by the nominal group technique. The levels of evidence range from 1++ to 4 and the grades of recommendation range from A to D. Good Practice Point was recommended as best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline developmental group. The draft of the developed CPG was reviewed by the experts group in the public hearings and then revised. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” consists of ‘Chapter 1; Introduction of Stroke Rehabilitation’, ‘Chapter 2; Rehabilitation for Stroke Syndrome, ‘Chapter 3; Rehabilitation for Returning to the Society’, and ‘Chapter 4; Advanced Technique for Stroke Rehabilitation’. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” will provide direction and standardization for acute, subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation in Korea.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Canada
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Consensus
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Consultants
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Practice Guidelines as Topic
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Rehabilitation*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Scotland
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Specialization
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Stroke*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
4.Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Korean Expert Panel Report.
Jung Min AHN ; Duk Woo PARK ; Sung Jin HONG ; Young Keun AHN ; Joo Yong HAHN ; Won Jang KIM ; Soon Jun HONG ; Chang Wook NAM ; Do Yoon KANG ; Seung Yul LEE ; Woo Jung CHUN ; Jung Ho HEO ; Deok Kyu CHO ; Jin Won KIM ; Sung Ho HER ; Sang Wook KIM ; Sang Yong YOO ; Myeong Ki HONG ; Seung Jea TAHK ; Kee Sik KIM ; Moo Hyun KIM ; Yangsoo JANG ; Seung Jung PARK
Korean Circulation Journal 2017;47(6):795-810
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) is an innovative device that provides structural support and drug release to prevent early recoil or restenosis, and then degrades into nontoxic compounds to avoid late complications related with metallic drug-eluting stents (DESs). BRS has several putative advantages. However, recent randomized trials and registry studies raised clinical concerns about the safety and efficacy of first generation BRS. In addition, the general guidance for the optimal practice with BRS has not been suggested due to limited long-term clinical data in Korea. To address the safety and efficacy of BRS, we reviewed the clinical evidence of BRS implantation, and suggested the appropriate criteria for patient and lesion selection, scaffold implantation technique, and management.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Coronary Disease
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Liberation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug-Eluting Stents
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Stents
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Thrombosis
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
5.Hemodynamic Effects of Co-administration of Midazolam during Anesthesia Induction with Propofol and Remifentanil in Hypertensive Patients.
Ju Deok KIM ; Joo Won KIM ; His Chiang KUNG ; Jun Hong KANG ; Hye Young SHIN ; Doo Sik KIM ; Sie Jeong RYU ; Kyung Han KIM
Kosin Medical Journal 2017;32(1):36-46
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			OBJECTIVES: Propofol, midazolam and remifentanil are commonly used for clinical anesthesia. We compared the effects of midazolam-propofol-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil on hemodynamic responses during anesthesia induction in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Seventy-six hypertensive patients with ASA II-III were assigned to receive midazolam-propofol (group MP; n = 38) or propofol (group P; n = 38). Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.03 mg/kg (group MP) or saline 0.03 ml/kg (group P). After two minutes, propofol 1.0 mg/kg (group MP) or 1.5 mg/kg (group P) i.v. bolus was administered. Simultaneously, 4 ng/ml of remifentanil target controlled infusion (TCI) was administered in both groups. Anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane and 2 ng/ml of remifentanil TCI. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (SBP, DBP, and MBP) and heart rate (HR) were measured before induction, 2 min after midazolam or normal saline, 2 min after propofol, 1 min after rocuronium, and immediately, 1 min, 2 min, and 3 min after intubation. RESULTS: SBP, DBP, and MBP decreased after propofol administration and increased immediately after intubation in both groups (P < 0.05). After intubation, SBP, DBP, and MBP decreased more than baseline values in either group. Although the overall BP of Group P was lower than that of Group MP, there were no significant differences except for SBP at 2min after intubation (P < 0.05). HR was no significant difference in either group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that midazolam-propofol-remifentanil has similar hemodynamic effect with propofol-remifentanil during anesthesia induction in hypertensive patients.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Anesthesia*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Blood Pressure
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Synergism
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Heart Rate
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hemodynamics*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hypertension
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Intubation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Intubation, Intratracheal
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Midazolam*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Propofol*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.Late recurarization in the post-anesthetic care unit after total thyroidectomy: A case report.
Dong Wook KIM ; Bo Kyeom KIM ; Joo Won KIM ; Ju Deok KIM ; Sie Jeong RYU ; Doo Sik KIM
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2016;11(4):380-383
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Residual paralysis, recurarization is defined as a remnant effect of neuromuscular blocking after surgery that can cause postoperative complications. Clinical complications of recurarization include dyspnea, gastric content aspiration, and atelectasis. Therefore, complete recovery of muscle strength at the end of surgery is a significant factor for patient safety. We report a case of a 53-year-old woman who presented with residual paralysis after total thyroidectomy. To improve her condition, we injected sugammadex intravenously in the post-anesthetic care unit. After that, we observed her for 1 hour and her muscle strength gradually recovered. She did not have any symptoms on the next day and was discharged on the 5th post-operative day.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Dyspnea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Female
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Middle Aged
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Muscle Strength
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neuromuscular Blockade
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neuromuscular Monitoring
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Paralysis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Safety
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Postoperative Complications
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Pulmonary Atelectasis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Thyroidectomy*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
7.Changes of lip morphology following mandibular setback surgery using 3D cone-beam computed tomography images.
Seung Jae PAEK ; Ji Yong YOO ; Jang Won LEE ; Won Jong PARK ; Young Deok CHEE ; Moon Gi CHOI ; Eun Joo CHOI ; Kyung Hwan KWON
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2016;38(10):38-
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to evaluate the lip morphology and change of lip commissure after mandibular setback surgery (MSS) for class III patients and analyze association between the amount of mandibular setback and change of lip morphology. METHODS: The samples consisted of 14 class III patients treated with MSS using bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Lateral cephalogram and cone-beam CT were taken before and about 6 months after MSS. Changes in landmarks and variables were measured with 3D software program Ondemand™. Paired and independent t tests were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Landmarks in the mouth corner (cheilion, Ch) moved backward and downward (p < .005, p < .01). However, cheilion width was not statistically significantly changed. Landmark in labrale superius (Ls) was not altered significantly. Upper lip prominence angle (ChRt-Ls-ChLt °) became acute. Landmarks in stomion (Stm), labrale inferius (Li) moved backward (p < .005, p < .001). Lower lip prominence angle (ChRt-Li-ChLt °) became obtuse (p < .001). Height of the upper and lower lips was not altered significantly. Length of the upper lip vermilion was increased (p =< 0.01), and length of the lower lip vermilion was decreased (p < .05). Lip area on frontal view was not statistically significantly changed, but the upper lip area on lateral view was increased and change of the lower lip area decreased (p > .05, p < .005). On lateral view, upper lip prominent point (UP) moved downward and stomion moved backward and upward and the angle of Ls-UP-Stm (°) was decreased. Lower lip prominent point (LP) moved backward and downward, and the angle of Stm-LP-Li (°) was increased. Li moved backward. Finally, landmarks in the lower incisor tip (L1) moved backward and upward, but stomion moved downward. After surgery, lower incisor tip (L1) was positioned more superiorly than stomion (p < .05). There were significant associations between horizontal soft tissue and corresponding hard tissue. The posterior movement of L1 was related to statistically significantly about backward and downward movement of cheilion. CONCLUSIONS: The lip morphology of patients with dento-skeletal class III malocclusion shows a significant improvement after orthognathic surgery. Three-dimensional lip morphology changes in class III patients after MSS exhibited that cheilion moved backward and downward, upper lip projection angle became acute, lower lip projection angle became obtuse, change of upper lip area on lateral view was increased, change of lower lip area decreased, and morphology of lower lip was protruding. L1 was concerned with the lip tissue change in statistically significant way.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cone-Beam Computed Tomography*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Incisor
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lip*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Malocclusion
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mouth
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Orthognathic Surgery
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.Maximum standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts clinical outcome in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Hee Ryeong JANG ; Moo Kon SONG ; Joo Seop CHUNG ; Deok Hwan YANG ; Jeong Ok LEE ; Junshik HONG ; Su Hee CHO ; Seong Jang KIM ; Dong Hoon SHIN ; Young Joo PARK ; Jin Suk KANG ; Jeong Eun LEE ; Moon Won LEE ; Ho Jin SHIN
Blood Research 2015;50(2):97-102
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: Few clinical studies have clarified the prognostic factors that affect clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after immunochemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL were enrolled. All patients underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before and after salvage therapy. All enrolled patients previously received the ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide regimen. Clinical outcomes were compared according to several factors (age > or = 65 years, low age-adjusted International Prognostic Index [aa-IPI], maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] <6.0 on PET/CT, time to relapse > or =12 months, complete response after salvage therapy). A low aa-IPI, SUVmax <6.0, and time to relapse > or = 12 months were independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: In univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, SUVmax below 6.0 (P<0.001 for progression-free survival (PFS), P<0.001 for overall survival (OS)) and low aa-IPI (P<0.001 for PFS, P<0.001 for OS) were independent prognostic factors associated with favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: The aa-IPI and initial SUVmax were powerful prognostic factors in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Carboplatin
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Disease-Free Survival
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Electrons*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Etoposide
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Ifosfamide
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lymphoma, B-Cell*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Multivariate Analysis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Positron-Emission Tomography
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Recurrence
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Salvage Therapy
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
9.Survival analysis following resection of AJCC stage III gallbladder carcinoma based on different combinations of T and N stages.
Kyoung Yeon HWANG ; Young In YOON ; Shin HWANG ; Tae Yong HA ; Chul Soo AHN ; Ki Hun KIM ; Deok Bog MOON ; Gi Won SONG ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Young Joo LEE ; Kwang Min PARK ; Sung Gyu LEE
Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2015;19(1):11-16
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: According to 7th AJCC TNM staging system, gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) with lymph node (LN) metastasis is classified as N1 or N2; thus making the stage IIIB (N1) or IVB (N2). Stage IIIB consists of N1 status with wide coverage of T1-3, but T3N1 group often showed poorer outcomes than T1-2N1 groups. This study intended to assess post-resection prognosis of T3N1 versus other stage III subgroups. METHODS: We selected 103 patients from our institutional database of GBC who underwent R0 resection between July 1996 and June 2009 and whose GBC was confined to stage T3N0, T1-3N1 or T1-3N2. These patients were stratified into five groups, namely, T3N0 (n=26), T1N1 (n=13), T2N1 (n=35), T3N1 (n=20) and T1-3N2 (n=9), and were followed for > or =5 years or until death. RESULTS: Surgical procedures were minor liver resection (n=53), minor liver resection with bile duct resection (n=23), major liver resection (n=12), major liver resection with bile duct resection (n=5), and hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (n=12). Mean follow-up period was 57.2+/-68.5 months. Overall 5-year survival rate based on all-cause death and cancer-associated death, respectively, was 57.7% and 60.6% in T3N0, 15.4% and 15.4% in T1N1 (n=13), 28.6% and 28.6% in T2N1 (n=35), 5.0% and 5.7% in T3N1 (n=20), and 22.2% and 22.2% in T1-3N2. The survival outcome of T3N1 group was the poorest among the four stage III groups and was comparable to that of stage IVB (p=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of T3N1 GBC is unusually poor even after R0 resection, thus we suggest extensive LN dissection may be necessary in patients with T3 tumors for accurate prognostic evaluation and radical removal of potential nodal micrometastasis. Further validation of this result is necessary in large patient populations from multiple centers.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Bile Ducts
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Follow-Up Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gallbladder*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Liver
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lymph Nodes
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Metastasis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Micrometastasis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Staging
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prognosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Survival Analysis*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Survival Rate
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
10.Prognostic effect of preoperative sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for right hepatectomy in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.
Jeong Heon CHOI ; Shin HWANG ; Young Joo LEE ; Ki Hun KIM ; Gi Young KO ; Dong Il GWON ; Chul Soo AHN ; Deok Bog MOON ; Tae Yong HA ; Gi Won SONG ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Sung Gyu LEE
Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2015;19(2):59-65
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Both preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone and portal vein embolization (PVE) alone have a detrimental prognostic effect on the post-resection outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The main objective of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of preoperative TACE on the long-term survival outcomes in patients undergoing preoperative PVE and right liver resection for solitary HCC. METHODS: Patients who underwent macroscopic curative right liver resection of solitary HCC that lied between 3.0 and 7.0 cm (n=113) with or without preoperative TACE and PVE were selected for the study, making these subjects were divided into three groups; the TACE-PVE group (n=27), the PVE-alone group (n=13), and the control group (n=73). The subjects in the three groups were followed up for > or =36 months or until death. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall patient survival rates of all 113 patients were 96.5%, 88.2%, 81.3% and 65.0%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall patient survival rates were 96.3%, 83.4%, 83.4% and 47.6% respectively in the TACE-PVE group; 84.6%, 76.9%, 57.7% and 19.2% respectively in the PVE-alone group; and 98.6%, 91.7%, 85.1% and 81.7% respectively in the control group (p=0.047). Patients were also sub-grouped according to tumor size, and those with a tumor of up to cutoff at 5 cm showed no prognostic difference (p=0.774), but tumor size >5 cm was associated with inferior patient survival only in the TACE-PVE group (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative sequential TACE and PVE appear to be compliant to the conventional oncological concept in addition to induction of the future remnant liver regeneration. Therefore, we suggest that preoperative TACE should be come first whenever preoperative PVE for major hepatectomy is planned, especially in patients with hypervascular HCC tumors.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Carcinoma, Hepatocellular*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hepatectomy*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Liver
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Liver Regeneration
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Portal Vein*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Survival Rate
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail