Manual blood pressure (BP) recorded in routine clinical practice is relatively inaccurate and associated with higher readings compared to BP measured in research studies in accordance with standardized measurement guidelines. The increase in routine office BP is the result of several factors, especially the presence of office staff, which tends to make patients nervous and also allows for conversation to occur. With the disappearance of the mercury sphygmomanometer because of environmental concerns, there is greater use of oscillometric BP recorders, both in the office setting and elsewhere. Although oscillometric devices may reduce some aspects of observer BP measurement error in the clinical setting, they are still associated with higher BP readings, known as white coat hypertension (for diagnosis) or white coat effect (with treated hypertension). Now that fully automated sphygmomanometers are available which are capable of recording several readings with the patient resting quietly, there is no longer any need to have office staff present when BP is being recorded. Such readings are called automated office blood pressure (AOBP) and they are both more accurate than conventional manual office BP and not associated with the white coat phenomena. AOBP readings are also similar to the awake ambulatory BP and home BP, both of which are relatively good predictors of cardiovascular risk. The available evidence suggests that AOBP should now replace manual or electronic office BP readings when screening patients for hypertension and also after antihypertensive drug therapy is initiated.
Blood Pressure ; Drug Therapy ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Mass Screening ; Reading ; Sphygmomanometers ; White Coat Hypertension

The clinical prognostic importance of white coat hypertension (WCH), that is, the clinical condition characterized by an increase of office but a normal ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) is since a long time matter of considerable debate. WCH accounts for a consistent portion of hypertensive patients (up to 30–40%), particularly when hypertension is mild or age is more advanced. Although scanty and inconsistent information is available on the response of office and out-office BP to antihypertensive treatment and the cardiovascular (CV) protection provided by treatment, an increasing body of evidence focusing on the association of WCH with CV risk factors, subclinical cardiac and extra-cardiac organ damage and, more importantly, with CV events indicates that the risk entailed by this condition is intermediate between true normotension and sustained hypertension. This review will address a number of issues concerning WCH with particular attention to prevalence and clinical correlates, relation with subclinical target organ damage and CV morbidity/mortality, therapeutic perspectives. Several topics covered in this review are based on data acquired over the past 20 years by the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study, a longitudinal survey performed by our group on the general population living in the surroundings of Milan area in the north part of Italy.
Blood Pressure ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Italy ; Longitudinal Studies ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; White Coat Hypertension

OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variation (BPV) and metabolic syndrome is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. Ambulatory blood Pressure (ABP) has been shown to be more closely related to cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients than conventional office BP (OBP). Using both OBP and ABP, 4 groups of patients were identified: (1) normotensive patients (NT); (2) white coat hypertensives (WCHT); (3) masked hypertensives (MHT); and (4) sustainedhypertensives (SHT). We investigated the significance of BPV and metabolic risks of these 4 groups. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients between January 2008 and May 2013. Echocardiography and 24 hour ABP monitoring were performed. RESULTS: BMI was significantly higher in the MHT compared with the NT. There were progressive increases in fasting glucose level from NT to WCHT, MHT, and SHT.MHT and SHT had higher 24h and nighttime BPV than NT.MHT was significantly related with BMI (r = 0.139, P = 0.010), creatinine (r = 0.144, P = 0.018), fasting glucose (r = 0.128, P = 0.046), daytime systolic BPV (r = 0.130, P = 0.017), and daytime diastolic BPV (r = 0.130, P = 0.017). Dyslipidemia (r = 0.110, P = 0.043), nighttime systolic BPV (r = 0.241, P < 0.001) and nighttime diastolic BPV (r = 0.143, P = 0.009) shown correlation with SHT. In multivariate logistic regression, MHT was independently associated with Body mass index (OR 1.086, 95% CI 1.005–1.174, P = 0.038) and creatinine (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.010, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: BPV and metabolic risk factors were found to be greater in MHT and SHT compared with NT and WCHT. This suggests that BPV and metabolic risks may contribute to the elevated cardiovascular risk observed in patients with MHT and SHT.
Blood Pressure* ; Body Mass Index ; Creatinine ; Dyslipidemias ; Echocardiography ; Fasting ; Glucose ; Humans ; Hypertension* ; Logistic Models ; Masked Hypertension ; Masks ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors* ; White Coat Hypertension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variability (BPV) was recently shown to be a risk factor of stroke. White coat hypertension (WCH) used to be regarded as innocuous, but one long-term follow-up study reported that WCH increased stroke rate compared to normotension (NT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between WCH and BPV. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1398 subjects from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry, who were divided into NT (n=364), masked hypertension (n=122), white coat hypertension (n=254), and sustained hypertension (n=658) groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. The average real variability (ARV), a highly sensitive BPV parameter, was highest in the WCH group, followed by the sustained hypertension, masked hypertension, and NT groups. The results persisted after being adjusted for covariates. The WCH vs. sustained hypertension results (adjusted mean±standard error) were as follows: 24-h systolic ARV, 22.9±0.8 vs. 19.4±0.6; 24-h diastolic ARV, 16.8±0.6 vs. 14.3±0.5; daytime systolic ARV, 21.8±0.8 vs. 16.8±0.6; and daytime diastolic ARV, 16.2±0.6 vs. 13.4±0.5 (p<0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: From the registry data, we found that subjects with WCH or masked hypertension had higher BPV than NT. However, long-term follow-up data assessing the clinical influences of WCH on stroke are needed.
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory* ; Blood Pressure* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hypertension ; Masked Hypertension ; Risk Factors ; Stroke ; White Coat Hypertension*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The detection of white coat hypertension (WCH), treated normalized hypertension, and masked hypertension (MH) is important to improve the effectiveness of hypertension management. However, whether global cardiovascular risk (GCR) profile has any effect on the discordance between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and clinic blood pressure (CBP) is unknown. METHODS: Data from 1,916 subjects, taken from the Korean Multicenter Registry for ABP monitoring, were grouped according to diagnostic and therapeutic thresholds for CBP and ABP (140/90 and 135/85 mmHg, respectively). GCR was assessed using European Society of Hypertension 2007 guidelines. RESULTS: The mean subject age was 54.1 ± 14.9 years, and 48.9% of patients were female. The discordancy rate between ABP and CBP in the untreated and treated patients was 32.5% and 26.5%, respectively (p = 0.02). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension and MH was 14.4% and 16.0%, respectively. Discordance between ABP and CBP was lower in the very high added-risk group compared to the moderate added-risk group (odds ratio [OR], 0.649; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.487 to 0.863; p = 0.003). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension was also lower in the very high added-risk group (OR, 0.451; 95% CI, 0.311 to 0.655). CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between ABP and CBP was observed more frequently in untreated subjects than in treated subjects, and less frequently in the very high added-risk group, which was due mainly to the lower prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension.
Adult ; Aged ; *Blood Pressure ; *Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Masked Hypertension/*diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Observer Variation ; Odds Ratio ; *Office Visits ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prevalence ; Registries ; Reproducibility of Results ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; White Coat Hypertension/*diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology

BACKGROUND: Many studies have aimed to determine whether body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), or waist to hip ratio (WHR) best predicts hypertension in diabetic patients, with conflicting results. However, no study has examined the specific relationship between these anthropometric parameters with sustained normotension (SNT), white coat hypertension (WCHT), masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) based on office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements in these patients. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes underwent the following procedures: history taking, measurements of anthropometric parameters, office and ambulatory BP measurements, physical examination, laboratory analysis, and random and 24-hour urine analysis. RESULTS: In total, there were 65 dippers and 37 nondipper patients. None of the anthropometric parameters were different between the dippers and the nondippers. There were 25 patients with SNT, 32 with WCHT, seven with MHT, and 38 with SHT. A comparison of anthropometric parameters between these four groups of patients showed that WC (P=0.016) and WHR (P=0.015) were different among all groups. According to regression analysis, only BMI was independently related with MHT (odds ratio [OR], 1.373, P=0.022), whereas only WC has been associated with SHT (OR, 1.321, P=0.041). CONCLUSION: Among anthropometric parameters, only WC and WHR were different in SNT, WCHT, MHT, and SHT in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes.
Blood Pressure ; Body Mass Index ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Masked Hypertension ; Masks ; Physical Examination ; Waist Circumference ; Waist-Hip Ratio ; White Coat Hypertension

BACKGROUND: The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in childhood hypertension has been in great advance. ABPM has been able to detect significantly high blood pressure (BP) and also helpful for identifying white coat hypertension. METHODS: Between March 2007 and December 2009, we evaluated individuals aged from 7 to 19 years who were referred as high BP with ABPM, echocardiogram, and abdominal computerized tomography, calculation of body mass index (BMI) at Ajou University Hospital. ABPM was performed using the Tonoport V monitors and SpaceLab 90217 monitors. Seventy were evaluated with 55 boys and 5 girls. The mean age of them was 13.1 +/- 2.8 years (mean +/- standard deviation). RESULTS: Forty of seventy (57.1%) were diagnosed as hypertension in ABPM and 8 of 40 were diagnosed as secondary hypertension with underline diseases such as hyperthyroidism, chronic renal disease, Takayasu's arteritis, coarctation of aorta. The mean BMI in 40 was 24.8 +/- 4.72 kg/m2. Twenty-three of seventy (32.8%) were obese with higher prevalence than in general population. White coat hypertension was diagnosed in 30 of 70 (42.9%). CONCLUSIONS: ABPM could provide more detailed data including mean values of BP, load, and night dip in assessment of children's BP. According to increasing children's obesity, use of ABPM was thought to be necessary for evaluation of their risk of hypertension and useful for diagnosis of masked hypertension and white coat hypertension. Further more study of ABPM in children and adolescents would be needed for absolute standards of ABPM.
Adolescent ; Aged ; Aortic Coarctation ; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory ; Body Mass Index ; Child ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hyperthyroidism ; Masked Hypertension ; Obesity ; Prevalence ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ; Takayasu Arteritis ; White Coat Hypertension

This review represents the clinical significance of home blood pressure (BP) and its possible practical application. Home BP is highly reproducible and its reproducibility is better than ambulatory BP. According to this feature home BP has a greater prognostic value at least than clinic BP and is extremely effective for the evaluation of drug effects and their duration. The introduction of home BP to the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension facilitates long-term BP control. Home BP is particularly important for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, children and renal diseases. Home BP measurements improve the adherence to medications and medical consultations, and are indispensable for diagnosis of white coat hypertension and masked hypertension. Such efficiency of home BP improves medical economy. Home BP can detect minimal charge in BP mediated by medication, and intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli and detect long-term change in BP. Thus, home BP is now indispensable for improvement in the management of hypertension in medical practice as well as for the recognition of hypertension in the general population. Standardization of the measurement procedure may elevate the position of home BP in the practice of diagnosing and treating hypertension.
Blood Pressure ; Child ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Fees and Charges ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Masked Hypertension ; Pharmacology, Clinical ; Pregnancy ; Referral and Consultation ; White Coat Hypertension

Resistant hypertension is defined as when the blood pressure cannot be reduced to below 140/90 mmHg in patients who are adhering to an adequate and appropriate triple drug regimen that includes a diuretic, in near full doses. Before changing or increasing the antihypertensive medication, several factors should be checked. A careful evaluation of the patient's adherence to therapy and adequate measurement of blood pressure are needed to exclude pseudoresistance secondary to poor medical adherence or white coat hypertension. Patients should be asked regularly about medications or substances that could interfere with blood pressure control. Successful treatment requires the identification of causes and a reversal of life style factors contributing to treatment resistance. Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, high salt intake, obesity, and alcohol abuse are frequent causes of uncontrolled hypertension in Korea. The diagnosis and appropriate treatment of secondary hypertension is also needed. When multiple medications are used, vasodilators are the most commonly used antihypertensive drugs that cause subsequent fluid retention or sympathetic tone elevation. Adequate, effective, and sufficient diuresis and catecholamine suppression are needed for patients who do not respond to several vasodilators.
Alcoholism ; Antihypertensive Agents ; Blood Pressure ; Diuresis ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Korea ; Life Style ; Obesity ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ; Retention (Psychology) ; Vasodilator Agents ; White Coat Hypertension

BACKGROUND: This study compared the results of 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with the clinical blood pressure measurements, and we investigated the relationship of the blood pressure measurement and left ventricular hypertrophy, as determined by routine 12 lead electrocardiography. METHODS: We studied 204 healthy adults with no prior history of heart disease or antihypertensive medication. The clinic blood pressure was measured 3 times and the average was taken. We compared the clinic blood pressure with the daytime blood pressure of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and we compared the blood pressure with the sum of the voltage of the S wave on V1 and the R wave on V5. RESULTS: The average of the daytime ambulatory blood pressure of all the patients was 135.33+/-13.73 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 86.55+/-10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The average of the clinic blood pressure measurement was 140.10+/-17.41 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 88.84+/-10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The clinic blood pressure averaged higher than the daytime ambulatory blood pressure by 5 mmHg on the systolic pressure and 2 mmHg on the diastolic pressure (p<0.001). The normal ambulatory blood pressure limits were estimated as those that best correlated with 140/90 mmHg at the clinic. The estimated value was 135/87 mmHg for the daytime ambulatory blood pressure (p+/-0.001). The incidence of white coat hypertension was 10.8%. The sum of the voltage on electrocardiography showed a positive linear relationship with all the blood pressure measurements. The daytime systolic blood pressure showed the strongest correlation with the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r=0.283, p+/-0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a linear relation and we analyzed the differences between the clinical and 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure. A daytime ambulatory blood pressure value of 135/87 mmHg was a suitable upper normal limit for the corresponding cutoff value of the clinic blood pressure. Left ventricular hypertrophy showed the strongest relationship with the daytime systolic blood pressure among the results of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Adult ; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory ; Blood Pressure* ; Electrocardiography* ; Heart Diseases ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular* ; Incidence ; White Coat Hypertension