1.Perioperative application of prucalopride in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion
Fayun WEI ; Ning JIANG ; Huaying LIU ; Baofu FENG ; Shun ZHANG ; Jiarong DING ; Weidong GAN ; Shiwei ZHANG ; Hongqian GUO ; Rong YANG
Journal of Modern Urology 2024;29(5):394-398
Objective To explore the effects of prucalopride(PRUC)on the intestinal function during the perioperative period of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy(RARC)and urinary diversion.Methods A total of 75 patients undertaking RARC with urinary diversion(orthotopic neobladder or ileal bladder)in Nanjing Drum Hospital during Jan.and Dec.2021 were divided into PRUC group(n=28)and control group(n=47)according to whether they took PRUC or not.Postoperative intestinal ventilation time and defecation time,drainage tube retention time,tolerance time for first intake of semi-flow food,postoperative hospital stay,and incidence of complications were observed and recorded in the two groups.Postoperative C-reactive protein(CRP)and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)were compared.Results The PRUC group had shorter intestinal ventilation time and defecation time[(47.14±16.31)h vs.(74.04±35.33)h,P<0.01;(86.14±30.47)h vs.(123.57±79.12)h,P=0.02],smaller change of ΔCRP and ΔNLR[(79.99±29.71)mg/L vs.(127.75±56.98)mg/L;(9.24±6.43)vs.(16.11±9.90),P<0.01].All complications were minor,the incidence of intestinal obstruction in PRUC group tended to decrease within 90 days after operation(P=0.38),and there was no significant difference in other complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The perioperative use of PRUC in RARC with urinary diversion is safe and effective,which can promote the recovery of intestinal function after operation.
2.Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients (version 2024)
Yao LU ; Yang LI ; Leiying ZHANG ; Hao TANG ; Huidan JING ; Yaoli WANG ; Xiangzhi JIA ; Li BA ; Maohong BIAN ; Dan CAI ; Hui CAI ; Xiaohong CAI ; Zhanshan ZHA ; Bingyu CHEN ; Daqing CHEN ; Feng CHEN ; Guoan CHEN ; Haiming CHEN ; Jing CHEN ; Min CHEN ; Qing CHEN ; Shu CHEN ; Xi CHEN ; Jinfeng CHENG ; Xiaoling CHU ; Hongwang CUI ; Xin CUI ; Zhen DA ; Ying DAI ; Surong DENG ; Weiqun DONG ; Weimin FAN ; Ke FENG ; Danhui FU ; Yongshui FU ; Qi FU ; Xuemei FU ; Jia GAN ; Xinyu GAN ; Wei GAO ; Huaizheng GONG ; Rong GUI ; Geng GUO ; Ning HAN ; Yiwen HAO ; Wubing HE ; Qiang HONG ; Ruiqin HOU ; Wei HOU ; Jie HU ; Peiyang HU ; Xi HU ; Xiaoyu HU ; Guangbin HUANG ; Jie HUANG ; Xiangyan HUANG ; Yuanshuai HUANG ; Shouyong HUN ; Xuebing JIANG ; Ping JIN ; Dong LAI ; Aiping LE ; Hongmei LI ; Bijuan LI ; Cuiying LI ; Daihong LI ; Haihong LI ; He LI ; Hui LI ; Jianping LI ; Ning LI ; Xiying LI ; Xiangmin LI ; Xiaofei LI ; Xiaojuan LI ; Zhiqiang LI ; Zhongjun LI ; Zunyan LI ; Huaqin LIANG ; Xiaohua LIANG ; Dongfa LIAO ; Qun LIAO ; Yan LIAO ; Jiajin LIN ; Chunxia LIU ; Fenghua LIU ; Peixian LIU ; Tiemei LIU ; Xiaoxin LIU ; Zhiwei LIU ; Zhongdi LIU ; Hua LU ; Jianfeng LUAN ; Jianjun LUO ; Qun LUO ; Dingfeng LYU ; Qi LYU ; Xianping LYU ; Aijun MA ; Liqiang MA ; Shuxuan MA ; Xainjun MA ; Xiaogang MA ; Xiaoli MA ; Guoqing MAO ; Shijie MU ; Shaolin NIE ; Shujuan OUYANG ; Xilin OUYANG ; Chunqiu PAN ; Jian PAN ; Xiaohua PAN ; Lei PENG ; Tao PENG ; Baohua QIAN ; Shu QIAO ; Li QIN ; Ying REN ; Zhaoqi REN ; Ruiming RONG ; Changshan SU ; Mingwei SUN ; Wenwu SUN ; Zhenwei SUN ; Haiping TANG ; Xiaofeng TANG ; Changjiu TANG ; Cuihua TAO ; Zhibin TIAN ; Juan WANG ; Baoyan WANG ; Chunyan WANG ; Gefei WANG ; Haiyan WANG ; Hongjie WANG ; Peng WANG ; Pengli WANG ; Qiushi WANG ; Xiaoning WANG ; Xinhua WANG ; Xuefeng WANG ; Yong WANG ; Yongjun WANG ; Yuanjie WANG ; Zhihua WANG ; Shaojun WEI ; Yaming WEI ; Jianbo WEN ; Jun WEN ; Jiang WU ; Jufeng WU ; Aijun XIA ; Fei XIA ; Rong XIA ; Jue XIE ; Yanchao XING ; Yan XIONG ; Feng XU ; Yongzhu XU ; Yongan XU ; Yonghe YAN ; Beizhan YAN ; Jiang YANG ; Jiangcun YANG ; Jun YANG ; Xinwen YANG ; Yongyi YANG ; Chunyan YAO ; Mingliang YE ; Changlin YIN ; Ming YIN ; Wen YIN ; Lianling YU ; Shuhong YU ; Zebo YU ; Yigang YU ; Anyong YU ; Hong YUAN ; Yi YUAN ; Chan ZHANG ; Jinjun ZHANG ; Jun ZHANG ; Kai ZHANG ; Leibing ZHANG ; Quan ZHANG ; Rongjiang ZHANG ; Sanming ZHANG ; Shengji ZHANG ; Shuo ZHANG ; Wei ZHANG ; Weidong ZHANG ; Xi ZHANG ; Xingwen ZHANG ; Guixi ZHANG ; Xiaojun ZHANG ; Guoqing ZHAO ; Jianpeng ZHAO ; Shuming ZHAO ; Beibei ZHENG ; Shangen ZHENG ; Huayou ZHOU ; Jicheng ZHOU ; Lihong ZHOU ; Mou ZHOU ; Xiaoyu ZHOU ; Xuelian ZHOU ; Yuan ZHOU ; Zheng ZHOU ; Zuhuang ZHOU ; Haiyan ZHU ; Peiyuan ZHU ; Changju ZHU ; Lili ZHU ; Zhengguo WANG ; Jianxin JIANG ; Deqing WANG ; Jiongcai LAN ; Quanli WANG ; Yang YU ; Lianyang ZHANG ; Aiqing WEN
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2024;40(10):865-881
Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.
3.Evaluation of the diagnostic value of targeted biopsy of secondary lesion in the systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer
Yongbing CHENG ; Haifeng HUANG ; Shan PENG ; Danyan LI ; Xuefeng QIU ; Hongqian GUO ; Weidong GAN
Chinese Journal of Urology 2024;45(6):420-423
Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of targeted biopsy of secondary lesion (SL) in systematic biopsy (SB) combined targeted biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of patients who underwent systematic biopsy combined target biopsy at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2021 to February 2023, and they had at least two Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥3 lesions on prostate magnetic resonance imaging. The study included patients with a median age of 70 (65, 76) years old, median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 9.1 (5.96, 13.62) ng/ml, median prostate volume was 39.1 (29.27, 53.25) ml, and median PSAD was 0.2 (0.15, 0.38) ng/ml 2.The index lesion (IL) was defined as the one with the highest PI-RADS score and SL was defined as the one with the second-highest PI-RADS score. If the two lesions had the same PI-RADS score, the one with larger maximum diameter was IL and the other one was SL. The median maximum diameter of IL and SL were 1.3 (1.06, 1.66) cm and 0.9 (0.69, 1.20) cm, respectively. The median maximum diameter ratio of IL and SL was 1.48 (1.10, 1.91), and the median maximum diameter difference of IL and SL was 0.9 (0.20, 1.89) cm. The IL in peripheral zone was found in 238 patients (62.63%) and SL in peripheral zone was found in 255 patients (67.10%). There were 204 patients (53.68%) having both IL and SL on the same side of prostate. According to the combination of PI-RADS scores of IL and SL, patients were categorized into various groups: 96 patients (25.26%) with IL3 and SL3, 79 (20.78%) with IL4 and SL3, 98 (25.78%) with IL4 and SL4, 21 (5.52%) with IL5 and SL3, 76 (20.0%) with IL5 and SL4, and 10 (2.63%) with IL5 and SL5. Targeted biopsy was performed on at least two of the most significant lesions. Comparison was performed in the detection rate of CsPCa between SB+ IL+ SL and SB+ IL (SL was omitted). To explore the factors influencing the detection rate of CsPCa, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Results:The detection rate of CsPCa in this study was 78.95% (300/380) based on SB+ IL+ SL. After omitting SL target biopsy, the detection rate of CsPCa was 78.16% (297/380, P>0.05) under the condition of SB+ IL. No significant differences were noted between the two groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PSA ( OR=1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.20, P<0.01), prostate volume ( OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, P<0.01), SL maximum diameter ( OR=0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, P<0.01), ratio of IL and SL maximum diameter ( OR=0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.68, P<0.01), difference of IL and SL maximum diameter ( OR=1.50, 95% CI 1.10-2.29, P<0.05), and PI-RADS score group of IL and SL (IL3 vs. SL3 as the reference, IL4 vs. SL3 OR=4.79, 95% CI 2.21-10.91, P<0.01, IL4 vs. SL4 OR=23.11 95% CI 8.09-85.28, P<0.01, IL5 vs. SL3/4/5 OR=15.28 95% CI 5.21-48.55, P<0.01) were the influencing factors for detection rate of CsPCa. Conclusions:For patients with at least two PI-RADS score≥3 lesions on prostate magnetic resonance imaging, omitting SL can almost maintain the same detection efficacy.
4.Protective effects of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re on LPS-induced damage of porcine jejunal epithelial cells IPEC-J2
Lin DU ; Li ZHANG ; Weidong HU ; Qi MA ; Hongxu DU ; Jun LI ; Ling GAN ; Shich-Eng BI
Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science 2024;44(6):1256-1267
Based on network pharmacology and in vitro assays,we conducted a collaborative investi-gation into the protective effects of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re on LPS-induced damage of porcine je-junal epithelial cells IPEC-J2.Network pharmacology was used to obtain and screen the intersec-ting targets of Rg1 and Re to alleviate intestinal barrier damage,and molecular docking technique was used to verify the predicted results of network pharmacology.The experiment included the Control group,LPS group,Rg1 group,and Re group.The effects of different concentrations of Rg1 and Re on cell survival rate,apoptosis rate,TEER value,FD4 permeability,and inflammatory fac-tors of IPEC-J2 were observed,and the effects of different concentrations of Rg1 and Re on the mRNA expression levels of apoptosis-related genes were also detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR.The results of network pharmacology showed that the prevention of intestinal barrier damage by Rg1,Re mainly involved the processes of PI3K-Akt and MAPK signaling pathways.The molec-ular docking results showed that the binding energy of Rg1 to all intersecting targets was less than 0,while that of ginsenoside Re to SRC targets only was less than 0.In vitro experiments showed that pretreatment with different concentrations of Rg1 and Re increased the survival rate and TEER value of LPS-treated IPEC-J2 to varying degrees,and reduced the apoptosis,the decrease of FD4 permeability,and the secretion of inflammatory factor TNF-α,suggesting that Re and Rg1 prevented the intestinal barrier from damage.It was shown that Re and Rg1 could effectively re-duce the effects of LPS treatment on IPEC-J2 cells.Rg1 significantly upregulated the mRNA ex-pression levels of MAPK8,MAPK10,HRAS,and significantly down-regulated the mRNA expres-sion levels of MAP2K1,PIK3CG,IL-2 and SRC;and Re significantly upregulated the mRNA ex-pression levels of MAPK8,MAPK10,HRAS,and PIK3R1,BCL2 gene mRNA expression levels.These results suggest that ginsenosides Rg1,Re and ginsenoside products containing Rg1 and Re deserve further investigation in preventing intestinal barrier damage in piglets.
5.Analysis of family mutation type and two-hit hypothesis of a familial VHL Syndrome patient
Jun PAN ; Yuxin CHEN ; Yanwen LU ; Xiang DONG ; Haiyang YANG ; Gutian ZHANG ; Weidong GAN ; Hongqian GUO
Journal of Modern Urology 2023;28(9):799-804
【Objective】 To explore the mutation type, clinical characteristics, molecular genetics and the two-hit type of a patient with familial Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) syndrome. 【Methods】 The data of the patient were collected. DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood and renal cell carcinoma sample. The VHL gene germline mutation site was detected with high throughput sequencing next generation sequencing (NGS). The two-hit site was identified with UCSCXena database, methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and microsatellite stability detection. 【Results】 The mutation site of the embryo line was located in c.500G>A R167Q mutation. The patient had single nucleotide polymorphism, but no clear loss of heterozygosity, methylation or system mutation. 【Conclusion】 The germline mutation in exon 3 is the basis for the clinical features of this familial renal cell carcinoma proband. The identification of the two-hit site is key to the occurrence of the disease, which is significant for the diagnosis and treatment. The use of the databases can guide the screening of mutations and methylation sites in familial renal cell carcinoma.
6.Mechanism of disordered subcellular localization of TFE3 fusion protein in TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma
Jun PAN ; Yi CHEN ; Lei YANG ; Ning LIU ; Yanwen LU ; Wenliang MA ; Weidong GAN ; Dongmei LI
Journal of Modern Urology 2023;28(8):713-719
【Objective】 To investigate the effects of the loss of exon 1 of TFE3 on nuclear localization of chimeric TFE3 protein in TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma (TFE3 tRCC). 【Methods】 The localization of TFE3 protein in TFE3 tRCC and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) were detected with immunochemistry. The exon retention of TFE3 gene in TFE3 tRCC was analyzed in databases and literatures. The plasmids containing TFE3 full-length and different-length of TFE3 exons which were constructed to pCDH-MCS-EGFP-Puro were transfected into HEK293T using Lipo FiterTM. The localization of EGFP protein in HEK293T cells were detected with confocal microscopy. The localization of TFE3 protein and truncated TFE3 protein were detected with Western blotting. The mRNA expression of the downstream genes of TFE3 protein were detected with q-PCR. 【Results】 Strong nuclear signal of TFE3 protein was observed in TFE3 tRCC, whereas TFE3 protein in ccRCC was mainly localized in cytoplasm. The results of fluorescence imaging and Western blotting showed that TFE3 full-length protein was expressed both in nucleus and cytoplasm, and the expression of truncated TFE3 protein was mainly localized in nucleus. The q-PCR analysis demonstrated that the deletion of exon 1 in TFE3 gene led to a higher transcriptional level of targeted genes of TFE3 protein. 【Conclusion】 The loss of exon 1 in TFE3 played a critical role in preventing TFE3 protein from entering the nucleus. In TFE3 tRCC, the loss of exon 1 in TFE3 gene leads to the nuclear localization of TFE3 fusion protein and activation of its downstream target genes. This mechanism promises to uncover the occurrence and development of TFE3 tRCC.
7.Clinical features of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma
Shuoming ZHOU ; Wenliang MA ; Xiang DONG ; Guangxiang LIU ; Changwei JI ; Gutian ZHANG ; Weidong GAN ; Hongqian GUO
Chinese Journal of Urology 2023;44(6):427-433
Objective:A single-center analysis was performed to assess the significant clinical features and prognostic factors of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3 rRCC).Methods:The clinical data of 85 confirmed cases of TFE3 rRCC patients at the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University from January 2007 to February 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Among these patients, there were 39 males and 46 females, with a median age of 32 (26, 45) years. All patients underwent preoperative CT scans, 21/85 cases (24.7%) of TFE3 rRCC exhibited the characteristic feature of "circular calcification" with plain CT imaging, and enhanced CT scan showed that the tumor enhancement during the arterial phase was lower than the adjacent renal cortex. Among the 85 patients in this cohort, the median tumor diameter was 4.8(3.2, 6.5). Thirty-two patients underwent partial nephrectomy (NSS), while 51 patients underwent radical nephrectomy (RN). Two patients with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis received only sunitinib therapy. Forty-three patients received adjuvant treatment, including 14 patients who received targeted therapy. There were 29 patients in AJCC stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ, with 10 patients presenting with venous tumor thrombus and 14 patients with lymph node metastasis. Histopathology, TFE3 immunohistochemistry, and break-apart TFE3 FISH probe detection were performed on all 85 cases, while 52 patients underwent RT-PCR and/or DNA sequencing. By combining the clinical and pathological data, we summarized the diagnostic Methods for TFE3 rRCC, evaluated the impact of surgical approaches (RN and NSS) on the survival outcomes of cT 1a/b patients, and assessed the influence of genetic subtypes (ASPL, NONO, PRCC, SFPQ, and others) on the survival outcomes of all patients. Furthermore, we analyzed the risk factors for disease progression. Results:TFE3 rRCC exhibited variable histopathological features, and the presence of acinar-like structures with psammoma bodies may be a relatively typical characteristic. All 85 patients showed positive TFE3 immunohistochemical staining. In 6 cases of TFE3 rRCC, break-apart TFE3 FISH probe yielded negative results. However, final confirmation was achieved through genetic sequence, with 5 cases diagnosed as NONO-TFE3 subtype and 1 case as RBM10-TFE3 subtype. Among the 85 patients, 52 underwent RT-PCR and/or DNA sequencing, revealing a total of 8 TFE3 fusion subtypes, including 11 cases of ASPL-TFE3, 8 cases of PRCC-TFE3, 10 cases of NONO-TFE3, 15 cases of SFPQ-TFE3, 1 case of CLTC-TFE3, 2 cases of LUC7L3-TFE3, 4 cases of MED15-TFE3, and 1 case of RBM10-TFE3. The survival analysis results revealed that among the 12 patients with cT 1b stage tumors who underwent radical nephrectomy (RN), the progression-free survival (PFS) was 35 (14, 109) months, which was significantly better than the NSS group ( P=0.041). However, for the 14 patients with cT 1a stage tumors who underwent RN, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) and PFS compared to the NSS group, with OS being 55(27, 134) months and PFS being 71(41, 134) months. Stratifying according to TFE3 fusion subtypes, it was found that patients with ASPL-TFE3 fusion had a significantly lower PFS compared to those with non-ASPL-TFE3 fusion subtypes ( P=0.029). Survival analysis revealed that tumor diameter, surgical approach, adjuvant therapy, AJCC staging, venous tumor thrombus, and lymph node metastasis were associated with OS and PFS( P<0.05). The results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that AJCC stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ( HR=2.393, 95% CI 1.418-4.039, P=0.001) and venous tumor thrombus ( HR=3.543, 95% CI 1.159-10.827, P=0.026) were independent risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Conclusions:During the non-enhanced phase of CT scan, TFE3 rRCC tumors can exhibit a circular calcification. TFE3 immunohistochemistry is an important screening method for TFE3 rRCC.Break-apart TFE3 FISH probe detection is considered the diagnostic gold standard, and gene sequencing, if feasible, can provide the subtype diagnosis of TFE3 rRCC. For cT 1a stage TFE3 rRCC, partial nephrectomy (NSS) is a viable option, while caution should be taken in selecting NSS for cT1b stage patients. Patients with ASPL-TFE3 fusion subtype have a worse prognosis. AJCC stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ and venous tumor thrombus indicate poor prognosis in TFE3 rRCC.
8.Prognostic risk factors in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy
Shangxun XIE ; Zihan ZHAO ; Shiwei ZHANG ; Gutian ZHANG ; Yifan SUN ; Wei CHEN ; Xiaogong LI ; Weidong GAN ; Rong YANG ; Hongqian GUO
Chinese Journal of Urology 2021;42(2):97-103
Objective:To analyze the prognostic factors of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).Methods:The clinical data of 224 patients underwent RARC from December 2014 to December 2018 in Nanjing Drum Hospital were reviewed. There were 193 males and 31 females, aged 36-92 years, with mean of 68 years. There were 7 patients(3.1%)undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the ASA scores of 125 patients (55.8%) were more than 2, and the mean body mass index was 23.4(15.4-35.5)kg/m 2. All patients were treated with RARC, with 72(32.1%) patients undergoing intraoperative blood transfusion. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze recurrence-free survival rate (RFS), cancer-specific survival rate (CSS) and overall survival rate (OS). Cox multivariate risk ratio model was used to evaluate the correlation between survival outcome and perioperative and pathological factors in patients treated with RARC. Results:For pathological status, there were 82 of ≤T 1, 64 of T 2, 57 of T 3 and 21 of T 4. Of all the patients, 49(21.9%) had lymph node metastasis, 12(5.4%) had positive surgical margin, 82(36.6%) had lymphovascular invasion(LVI), and 41(18.3%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Follow-up time was between 11-60 months, and the median follow-up time was 24 months. The 5-year cumulative OS, RFS and CSS were 57.15%, 48.84% and 59.60%, respectively. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that T stage( HR=5.764, 95% CI 1.926-17.249, P=0.002; HR=4.086, 95% CI 1.611-10.364, P=0.003; HR=9.391, 95% CI 2.118-41.637, P=0.003), N stage( HR=6.446, 95% CI 3.438-12.087, P<0.001; HR=5.661, 95% CI 3.086-10.385, P<0.001; HR=5.980, 95% CI 2.982-11.992, P<0.001), LVI( HR=3.319, 95% CI 2.008-5.486, P<0.001; HR=2.894, 95% CI 1.782-4.701, P<0.001; HR=3.471, 95% CI 2.017-5.974, P<0.001), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA)score( HR=2.888, 95% CI 1.619-5.150, P<0.001; HR=1.765, 95% CI 1.060-2.940, P=0.029; HR=2.612, 95% CI 1.424-4.792, P=0.002), body mass index( HR=0.886, 95% CI 0.819-0.957, P=0.002; HR=0.885, 95% CI 0.819-0.955, P=0.002; HR=0.862, 95% CI 0.792-0.938, P=0.001), age( HR=1.580, 95% CI 1.250-1.997, P<0.001; HR=1.362, 95% CI 1.088-1.705, P=0.007; HR=1.530, 95% CI 1.190-1.968, P=0.001) and intraoperative blood transfusion( HR=1.899, 95% CI 1.160-3.108, P=0.011; HR=2.218, 95% CI 1.371-3.587, P=0.001; HR=2.227, 95% CI 1.312-3.782, P=0.003) were significantly related to survival outcome. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that T stage( HR=4.506, 95% CI 1.433-14.175, P=0.01; HR=3.159, 95% CI 1.180-8.454, P=0.022; HR=7.810, 95% CI 1.674-36.444, P=0.009), N stage( HR=6.096, 95% CI 2.981-12.467, P<0.001; HR=5.368, 95% CI 2.683-10.740, P<0.001; HR=5.539, 95% CI 2.497-12.288, P<0.001) and ASA score( HR=6.180, 95% CI 2.371-16.110, P<0.001; HR=2.702, 95% CI 1.175-6.215, P=0.019; HR=6.471, 95% CI 2.290-18.286, P<0.001) were independent predictors of RFS, CSS and OS, and adjuvant chemotherapy( R=0.434, 95% CI 0.202-0.930, P=0.032) could only predict OS. Conclusion:T stage, N stage and ASA were main independent predictors of postoperative survival outcomes, and adjuvant chemotherapy was independent predictor of OS.
9.Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal ileal conduit: comparative analysis with extracorporeal ileal conduit
Jiale TIAN ; Tianwei YUN ; Wei ZHANG ; Yongming DENG ; Tingsheng LIN ; Yifan SUN ; Rong YANG ; Shiwei ZHANG ; Weidong GAN ; Xiaogong LI ; Gutian ZHANG ; Hongqian GUO
Chinese Journal of Urology 2021;42(7):524-529
Objective:To compare the perioperative complications and prognosis of intracorporeal and extracorporea lileal conduit urinary diversion(ICUD or ECUD)following robot-assisted radical cystectomy(RARC).Methods:The data of 95 patients who underwent RARC treatment in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from March 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 37 underwent ICUD and 58 underwent ECUD. In the ICUD group, there were 32 males and 5 females, aged(68.0±7.8) years, body mass index (BMI) of (24.1±3.4) kg/m 2, American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)score of 1-2 in 4 cases(10.8%), ASA score of 3-5 in 33 cases(89.2%), preoperative hemoglobin of(126.5±14.2)g/L, albumin of(39.0±2.2)g/L, and C-reactive protein of 4.0(2.0-8.5) mg/L. In the ECUD group, there were 53 males and 5 females, aged(67.5±9.0)years, BMI of(24.2±3.6)kg/m 2, ASA score of 1-2 in 16 cases(27.6%), ASA score of 3-5 in 42 cases (72.4%) , preoperative hemoglobin of(129.0±12.4)g/L, albumin (38.2±3.1) g/L, and C-reactive protein of 4.9 (3.1-14.4) mg/L. There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups ( P>0.05). The two groups underwent RARC and pelvic lymph node dissection similarly. The ICUD group underwent a total intracorporeal ileal conduit and the ECUD group underwent extracorporeal ileal conduit with direct vision through a median incision in the lower abdomen.There were 32 cases (86.5%) and 46 cases (79.3%) undergoing expanded pelvic lymph node dissection in the ICUD group and the ECUD group respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.374). The complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system. The perioperative complications and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results:The operation time of the ICUD group and the ECUD group were (430±63) min vs. (410±69) min, respectively ( P=0.163). The estimated blood loss were (435±233) ml vs. (388±277) ml, respectively ( P=0.182). Intraoperative blood transfusion were 10 cases (27.0%) and 12 cases (20.7%)( P=0.475). None of the above differences were statistically significant. Postoperative albumin of the ICUD group and the ECUD group were (31.5±2.4) g/L vs. (31.0±2.8) g/L ( P=0.387), postoperative C-reactive protein were 30.9 (10.4-52.1) mg/L vs.29.5 (14.4-58.5) mg/L ( P=0.655) and postoperative hemoglobin were (110.0±13.8) g/L vs. (113.7±13.4) g/L ( P=0.187). The postoperative feeding recovery were 4(3-5) d vs. 4(3-5) d ( P=0.752) and the postoperative hospital stay were 13(10-19) d vs. 13(11-18) d ( P=1.000). There was no statistically significant difference in perioperative data. The postoperative pathological examination results of ICUD group and ECUD group showed that there were 17 cases (45.9%) vs.19 cases (32.8%) in T a/T 1/Tis stage, 12 cases (32.4%) vs. 18 cases (31.0%) in T 2 stage, 5 cases (13.5%) vs. 19 cases (32.8%) in T 3 stage, 3 cases (8.1%) vs. 2 cases (3.4%) in T 4 stage, respectively and the difference was not statistically significant( P=0.166). The number of lymph nodes removed were (18.2±6.7) vs.(16.5±7.9)( P=0.178) and the number of patients with positive lymph nodes were 6(16.2%) vs.11(19.0%), respectively( P=0.733). None of the patients had positive margins. There was no statistically significant difference in pathological examination overall. There were 14 cases (37.8%) in the ICUD group and 21 cases (36.2%) in the ECUD group experiencing complications within 30 days after operation and the difference was not statistically significant( P=0.872). The complications within 90 days after operation were 14 cases (37.8%) vs. 24 cases (41.4%) respectively and the difference was not statistically significant( P=0.731). Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ-Ⅴ complications in the two groups were 1 case (2.7%) vs.1 case (1.7%) respectively, with no significant difference ( P=0.849). One patient in the ICUD group developed an intestinal anastomotic leakage and underwent reoperation for repairing and 1 patient in the ECUD group developed mechanical intestinal obstruction and underwent reoperation. The rate of readmission within 90 days after operation of the ICUD group was lower than that of the ECUD group, but the difference was not statistically significant [3 cases (8.1%) vs. 11 cases (19.0%), P=0.090]. Postoperative follow-up was 13-53 months and the median follow-up of ICUD group and ECUD group were 19 months and 31 months respectively. There was no significant difference in the survival curve between the two groups( P=0.746). The 1-year survival rate was 91.9% in the ICUD group and 91.4% in the ECUD group. Routine re-examination of urinary system CT or B-ultrasound was performed 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. The incidence of ureteral dilatation/hydronephrosis in the ICUD group was lower than that of the ECUD group, with 4.1%(3 sides) vs. 14.7%(17 sides)( P=0.020). Conclusion:Compared with RARC+ ECUD, RARC+ ICUD does not increase the incidence of complications within 90 days after surgery and may reduce the risk of upper urinary tract dilatation.
10. Extraperitoneal approach robotic-assisted urethra-sparing simple prostatectomy for large-gland benign prostatic hyperplasia: initial experience
Feng QU ; Gutian ZHANG ; Yongming DENG ; Jing LIANG ; Ning LIU ; Rong YANG ; Linfeng XU ; Xiaogong LI ; Weidong GAN ; Hongqian GUO
Chinese Journal of Urology 2019;40(10):757-762
Objective:
To report our initial experience with extraperitoneal approach Robotic-Assisted Urethra-sparing simple prostatectomy(US-RASP)on large-gland (>100 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).
Methods:
From August 2015 to April 2018, 32 patients with large volume prostate underwent US-RASP performed by single surgical team were retrospectively reviewed. The patient's median age was 73 (range 59-80) years, and median BMI was 24.9 (19.3-34.8 ) kg/m2, The estimated prostate volume(V), postvoid residual volume(PV) by transrectal ultrasonography and PSA were 152.0(119.0-223.1)ml, 145(0-280)ml and 13.7(5.2-27.3)ng/ml, respectively. Four of 32 patients underwent preoperative urinary catheterization. The perioperative functional parameters including international prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire, maximum flow rate (Qmax), maximum voided volume(Vmax), quality of life questionnaires (QOL) and International Index of erectile function-erectile function (IIEF-EF) were 27(23-33), 5.9 (2.5-7.8) ml/s, 110 (80-210)ml, 5(3-6), and 27(26-29), respectively. Functional parameters including IPSS, QOL, Qmax, Vmax, PV and IIEF-EF were compared and analyzed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively during the following-up.
Results:
The US-RASP was completed in all 32 patients and no open conversion. Median operation time was 180 (115-240) min, the estimated blood loss was 300(range 100 to 400)ml, Hemoglobin loss was 17(5-38)g/L. The median Foley catheterization time was 7 (5-12) days and drainage was removed after a median of 5 (4-7) days with median hospital stay of 8(6-14)days. Median specimen weight on pathological examination was 107.7 (79.8-147.4)g with median of 64.2% (49.4%-86.2%) resection ratio. At 3-mo follow-up, median IPSS score, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL were 6(4-18), 17.3 (13.8-21.1)ml/s, 167(140-310)ml, 50(0-61)ml, 1(0-3) , respectively. At 12-mo follow-up, median IPSS score, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL were 4(1-9), 20.1 (17.9-24.1)ml/s, 205(176-305)ml, 24(0-35)ml and 1(0-2) , respectively. All patients showed great improvement of IPSS, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL after median 17 (12-44) months follow-up compared with preoperative parameters (

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail