OBJECTIVES: We designed the study to compare the oncologic and renal function outcomes of off-clamp, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (OCLPN) and conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HCLPN) for renal tumors. METHODS: Between March 2008 and July 2015, 114 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) of a renal neoplasm were studied. We performed LPN without hilar clamp on 40 patients (OCLPN, Group 1), and conventional LPN with hilar control and renorrhaphy on another 40 patients (HCLPN, Group 2). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of each patient's age, sex, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS), operation time, complications, hospitalization period, tumor size, positive resection margin, histologic classification of tumor, pathologic stage, Fuhrman grade, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemic time (WIT), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and one year after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, preoperative eGFR, EBL, surgical (anesthesia) time, and tumor size between the two groups. The mean eGFR was not significantly different between the OCLPN and HCLPN groups 1 month (95 and 86.2 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively; P = 0.106), 6 months (92.9 and 83.6 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively; P = 0.151) and 12 months (93.8 and 84.7 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively; P = 0.077) postoperatively. The change in eGFR after one year was 3.9% in the OCLPN group and −7.9% in the HCLPN group. CONCLUSIONS: OCLPN was superior to HCLPN in preserving renal function one year after surgery, and there was no statistically significant difference in tumor treatment results.
Classification ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms ; Medical Records ; Nephrectomy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Warm Ischemia

PURPOSE: To compare the 5-year oncologic and functional outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) as treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 181 patients with localized RCC who underwent RALPN (n=97) or LPN (n=84) between 2007 and 2011. Demographic and preoperative data with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), intraoperative data including warm ischemic time (WIT) and complications, oncologic outcomes (recurrence, metastasis), and rate of eGFR preservation at most recent follow-up were examined. RESULTS: WIT was shorter in the RALPN group (27±9.1 minutes) than the LPN group (31±10 minutes, p=0.019). Intraoperative complication rates were also lower in RALPN patients than LPN patients (4.1% vs. 14.3%). The eGFR preservation rate was higher in the RALPN group (84.6%) than in the LPN group (81.5%, p=0.049). Particularly, a relatively high difference in the eGFR preservation rate was observed in the RALPN group compared with the LPN group according to R.E.N.A.L. score 7–10 values (RALPN, 86.5±12.9 vs. LPN, 76.7±16.0; p=0.003). During the follow-up period, there was no local recurrence in either group and distant metastases only occurred in one patient in the RALPN group and in 2 patients in the LPN group. CONCLUSIONS: RALPN and LPN showed similar 5-year oncologic outcomes, but RALPN was superior to LPN in terms of WIT, intraoperative complications, and long-term eGFR preservation rate, especially in complex cases.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Nephrectomy* ; Recurrence ; Warm Ischemia

PURPOSE: Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification is useful to predict perioperative complications and warm ischemia time. However, it remains uncertain whether PADUA classification can predict intraoperative conversion from partial nephrectomy (PN) to radical nephrectomy (RN). We evaluate whether PADUA classification parameters can predict conversion to RN during PN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed data of 593 patients who underwent open PN and robotic PN for renal tumors by a single surgeon at a single tertiary center between December 2003 and September 2017. Intraoperative conversion to RN was performed in 17 of 593 patients who initially underwent PN. We evaluated the factors influencing the surgical modalities including PN and radical conversion cases. Then, the factors significantly associated with conversion to RN were further analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, longitudinal location, exophytic rate, and rim or face locations of renal masses. Renal sinus involvement, urinary collecting system involvement, and renal mass size were variables that predicted radical conversion, using univariate analysis. Renal sinus involvement (odds ratio [OR], 9.075; p=0.049) and urinary collecting system involvement (OR, 3.944; p=0.029) were independent predictors of intraoperative radical conversion, using multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The PADUA classification is a useful tool to predict intraoperative conversion from PN to RN. Renal sinus involvement and urinary collecting system involvement are the best predictors of intraoperative conversion from PN to RN.
Classification ; Factor Analysis, Statistical* ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nephrectomy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Warm Ischemia

The quality of a donor liver after cardiac death is closely associated with energy metabolism during preservation. Ex vivo mechanical perfusion has broad application prospects because this technique can help energy metabolism and repair ischemia injury of donors' livers. Some core issues are presented in this review in order to provide references for propelling secure application of liver transplantation based on donation after cardiac death.
Death ; Humans ; Liver ; Liver Transplantation ; Organ Preservation ; methods ; Perfusion ; methods ; Warm Ischemia ; adverse effects

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship of atheroembolic risk factors with postoperative recovery of renal function after on-clamp partial nephrectomy (PN) with warm ischemia in patients with staged T1-2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 234 patients from 2004 to 2012 were included, and their clinicopathologic and operative parameters, including atheroembolic risk factors were reviewed retrospectively. Renal function, as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and measurement of serum creatinine level (Cr) at each scheduled follow-up for a median four years, was compared between the high-risk (HR) group (n=49, > or = five risk factors) and the low-risk (LR) group (n=185, < five risk factors). RESULTS: Except for baseline renal function and number of risk factors for atheroembolism, differences in characteristics between groups were comparatively insignificant. At 3 months after the operation, Cr and eGFR differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.05), but no differences were observed afterward. Significant deterioration from baseline in Cr and eGFR was observed in both groups at 1 month after the operation, with a greater change in the HR group (p < 0.05). From measurement to measurement, significantly faster deterioration in Cr and eGFR was observed in the HR group than in the LR group until 6 months after the operation (Cr: LR, 0.02 mg/dL and HR, 0.13 mg/dL; eGFR: LR, 1.50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and HR, 6.38 mL/min/1.73 m2; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The presence of atheroembolic risk factors may negatively influence postoperative recovery of renal function after PN in patients with localized RCC.
Atherosclerosis ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell* ; Creatinine ; Embolism ; Embolism, Cholesterol ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Nephrectomy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors* ; Warm Ischemia

PURPOSE: The efficiency of ischemic postconditioning (IPC) was evaluated in a rat model of ischemic liver. Concentration of survivin of liver tissue correlated with the degree of antiapoptosis, so survivin was estimated to evaluate the efficiency of IPC on ischemic reperfusion (IR) injury. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy rats were divided to three groups (SHAM, IR, and IPC). Rats in the SHAM group displayed no change during 3 hours. Rats in the IR group were ischemic within 1 hour of clamping the left hepatic artery and left portal vein. Reperfusion for 2 hours was then done. IPC group, intermittent 2, 3, 5, and 7 minutes of reperfusion followed by 1 hour of warm ischemia. Two-minute reocclusion was done after each reperfusion. Rat sera were analyzed for AST and ALT, and Western blot analysis of rat liver tissue of rats evaluated malondialdehyde (MDA) and survivin. RESULTS: MDA in the liver tissue of rats in the IR and IPC group were significantly high than in the liver tissue of the SHAM group (P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively). Survivin was higher in the IPC group than in the SHAM and IR groups (P = 0.021 and P = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSION: IPC could not prevent lipid oxidation in liver cell mitochondria, but did aid in the regeneration of ischemic injured liver cells. The results indicate that IPC can suppress the apoptosis of liver cells and reduce reperfusion injury of liver tissue.
Animals ; Apoptosis ; Blotting, Western ; Constriction ; Hepatic Artery ; Ischemic Postconditioning* ; Liver* ; Malondialdehyde ; Mitochondria ; Models, Animal ; Portal Vein ; Rats* ; Regeneration ; Reperfusion ; Reperfusion Injury* ; Warm Ischemia

OBJECTIVETo discuss the risk factors of splenic arterial steal syndrome (SASS) after orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODSTwenty-four cases who confirmed SASS after liver transplantation in Tianjin First Central Hospital between June 2005 and June 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Another 96 cases were selected randomly from those patients of the same time with no complication of SASS patients postoperatively as control group. Clinical data of two groups including diameter of splenic artery and hepatic artery preoperatively, weight of graft, weight of recipients, cold/warm ischemia time, an hepatic period and operation time and so on were collected. Others including hepatic artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), blood flow resistance index and portal vein average velocity (PVF) on the first day after liver transplantation, the day before diagnosis, the day when diagnosed, the 1, 3, 7 days after treatment in SASS group and on 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 14 days after liver transplantation in control group. Statistical analysis were made between two groups.

RESULTSThe splenic artery/hepatic artery ratio preoperatively and weight of donor liver,and the GRWR in SASS group and control group were 1.26 and 1.00, 1 032 g and 1 075 g, (1.40±0.30)% and (1.82±0.21)% respectively, with significantly statistical differences (Z=-6.40, Z=-2.22, t=-6.50; all P<0.05). The warm ischemia time, the cold ischemia time, the anhepatic period and operation time in SASS group and control group were 3.5 minutes and 4.0 minutes, 10.25 hours and 10.10 hours, 43 minutes and 45 minutes, 8.7 hours and 8.7 hours, with no significantly statistical differences (all P>0.05). RI of hepatic went up gradually in the early time after transplantation while dropped obviously when spleen artery spring coils embolization was received (P<0.01) and trended to stable two weeks later.

CONCLUSIONSSplenic artery/hepatic artery ratio and GRWR are the positive and negative risk factors respectively for SASS. The gradual rising of hepatic RI in the early time after transplantation may be the warning signal SASS and spleen artery spring coils embolization is the effective strategy for SASS after liver transplantation.

Cold Ischemia ; Embolization, Therapeutic ; Hepatic Artery ; pathology ; Humans ; Liver ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Spleen ; blood supply ; Splenic Artery ; pathology ; Vascular Diseases ; epidemiology ; Warm Ischemia

BACKGROUND: While the number of deceased donor donations has increased in Korea, the organ shortage remains a major limitation for kidney transplantation. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be an option to expand the donor pool. In this study we evaluated the short and long term survival of grafts and patients and assessed the risk factors for graft failure. METHODS: In a single center, from August 1997 to December 2013, 28 cases of recipients who received kidney transplantation from DCD were enrolled. Information about donor and recipient factors, graft conditions, and transplant outcomes was collected through review of medical records. We calculated overall graft and patient survival rates and the risk factors for graft failure according to donor criteria and whether or not delayed graft function (DGF) occurred. RESULTS: There was no primary non-function, but DGF developed in 67.9% (19/28). Graft losses occurred in five patients during a median follow-up period of 68.2 months (4~204). There was no significant difference in graft survival rates depending on the donor criteria and the occurrence of DGF. In addition, there were no noteworthy risk factors for graft failure among donor age, donor creatinine, extended criteria donor, recipient age, warm ischemic time, cold ischemic time, and DGF. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, despite the high incidence of DGF, the long-term graft and patient survival in kidney transplantation from DCD were acceptable. Therefore, DCD can be an alternative to expand the donor pool and to shorten the waiting time.
Brain Death* ; Brain* ; Cold Ischemia ; Creatinine ; Delayed Graft Function ; Follow-Up Studies ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kidney Transplantation* ; Kidney* ; Korea* ; Medical Records ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate ; Tissue Donors* ; Transplants ; Warm Ischemia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of high body mass index (BMI) on outcomes following robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 83 Korean patients who had undergone robotic partial nephrectomy from 2006 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were stratified into two groups according to WHO definitions for the Asian population, consisting of 56 normal range (BMI=18.5-24.99 kg/m2) and 27 obese (> or =25 kg/m2) patients. Outcome measurements included Trifecta achievement and the perioperative and postoperative comparison between high and normal BMI series. The measurements were estimated and analyzed with SPSS version 17. RESULTS: Tumor's complexity characteristics (R.E.N.A.L. score, tumor size) of both groups were similar. No significant differences existed between the two groups with regard to operative time (p=0.27), warm ischemia time (p=0.35) estimated blood loss (p=0.42), transfusion rate (p=0.48) renal function following up for 1 year, positive margins (p=0.24) and postoperative complication rate (p=0.34). Trifecta was achieved in 5 (18.5%) obese and 19 (33.9%) normal weight patients, respectively (p=0.14). In multivariable analysis, only tumor size was significantly correlated with the possibility of Trifecta accomplishment. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that R-LESS RPN can be effectively and safely performed in patients with increased BMI, since Trifecta rate, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes are not significantly different in comparison to normal weight subjects.
Adult ; Blood Transfusion ; Body Mass Index ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms/*surgery ; *Laparoscopy/adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy/*methods ; Obesity/*complications ; Operative Time ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Postoperative Complications ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; *Robotics ; Treatment Outcome ; Warm Ischemia

PURPOSE: Current clinical data support a safe warm ischemia time (WIT) limit of 30 minutes during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN). We evaluated independent factors predicting prolonged WIT (more than 30 minutes) after LPN or RPN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective data review was performed for 317 consecutive patients who underwent LPN or RPN performed by the same surgeon from October 2007 to May 2013. Patients were divided into two groups: group A was defined as prolonged WIT (> or =30 minutes) and group B as short WIT (<30 minutes). We compared clinical factors between the two groups to evaluate predictors of prolonged WIT. RESULTS: Among 317 consecutive patients, 80 were in the prolonged WIT group. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. In the univariable analysis, PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical) score (p=0.001), approach method (transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach; p<0.001), and surgeon experience (p<0.001) were significantly associated with prolonged WIT. In the multivariable analysis, PADUA score (p=0.032), tumor size (> or =25 mm; odds ratio, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-5.96; p=0.002), and surgeon experience (p<0.001) were independent predictors of prolonged WIT. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon experience, tumor size, and PADUA score predicted prolonged WIT after RPN or LPN. Among these factors, increasing surgical experience with LPN or RPN is the most important factor for preventing prolonged WIT.
Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology/*surgery ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Period ; Kidney Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy/*methods ; Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial/*methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods ; Warm Ischemia/*methods