1.Outcomes after liver transplantation in Korea: Incidence and risk factors from Korean transplantation registry
Jong Man KIM ; Deok Gie KIM ; Jihyun KIM ; Keunsung LEE ; Kwang-Woong LEE ; Je Ho RYU ; Bong-Wan KIM ; Dong Lak CHOI ; Young Kyoung YOU ; Dong-Sik KIM ; Yang Won NAH ; Koo Jeong KANG ; Jai Young CHO ; Geun HONG ; Hee Chul YU ; Ju Ik MOON ; Dongho CHOI ; Shin HWANG ; Myoung Soo KIM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(3):451-462
		                        		
		                        			Background/Aims:
		                        			To analyze the incidence and risk factors of outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) in the Korean population. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			This study analyzed data from the liver cohort of Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) who had LT between May 2014 and December 2017. Study measures included the incidence of post-LT outcomes in recipients of living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT). Cox multivariate proportional hazards model was used to determine the potential risk factors predicting the outcomes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 2,563 adult recipients with LT (LDLT, n=1,956; DDLT, n=607) were included, with mean±standard deviation age of 53.9±8.9 years, and 72.2% were male. The post-LT outcomes observed in each LDLT and DDLT recipients were death (4.0% and 14.7%), graft loss (5.0% and 16.1%), rejection (7.0% and 12.0%), renal failure (2.7% and 13.8%), new onset of diabetes (12.5% and 15.4%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence (both 6.7%). In both LDLT and DDLT recipients, the most common post-LT complications were renal dysfunction (33.6% and 51.4%), infection (26.7% and 48.4%), and surgical complication (22.5% and 23.9%). Incidence of these outcomes were generally higher among recipients of DDLT than LDLT. Multivariate analysis indicated recipient age and DDLT as significant risk factors associated with death and graft loss. DDLT and ABO incompatible transplant were prognostic factors for rejection, and HCC beyond Milan criteria at pre-transplant was a strong predictor of HCC recurrence. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			This study is a good indicator of the post-LT prognosis in the Korean population and suggests a significant burden of post-LT complications.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Clinical and Virologic Effectiveness of Remdesivir Treatment for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea: a Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Eun-Jeong JOO ; Jae-Hoon KO ; Seong Eun KIM ; Seung-Ji KANG ; Ji Hyeon BAEK ; Eun Young HEO ; Hye Jin SHI ; Joong Sik EOM ; Pyoeng Gyun CHOE ; Seongman BAE ; Sang Hyun RA ; Da Young KIM ; Baek-Nam KIM ; Yu Min KANG ; Ji Yeon KIM ; Jin-Won CHUNG ; Hyun-Ha CHANG ; Sohyun BAE ; Shinhyea CHEON ; Yoonseon PARK ; Heun CHOI ; Eunjung LEE ; Bo young LEE ; Jung Wan PARK ; Yujin SOHN ; Jung Yeon HEO ; Sung-Han KIM ; Kyong Ran PECK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2021;36(11):e83-
		                        		
		                        			Background:
		                        			Remdesivir is widely used for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but controversies regarding its efficacy still remain. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the effect of remdesivir on clinical and virologic outcomes of severe COVID-19 patients from June to July 2020. Primary clinical endpoints included clinical recovery, additional mechanical ventilator (MV) support, and duration of oxygen or MV support. Viral load reduction by hospital day (HD) 15 was evaluated by calculating changes in cycle threshold (Ct) values. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 86 severe COVID-19 patients were evaluated including 48 remdesivirtreated patients. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. Remdesivir was administered an average of 7.42 days from symptom onset. The proportions of clinical recovery of the remdesivir and supportive care group at HD 14 (56.3% and 39.5%) and HD 28 (87.5% and 78.9%) were not statistically different. The proportion of patients requiring MV support by HD 28 was significantly lower in the remdesivir group than in the supportive care group (22.9% vs. 44.7%, P = 0.032), and MV duration was significantly shorter in the remdesivir group (average, 1.97 vs. 5.37 days; P = 0.017). Analysis of upper respiratory tract specimens demonstrated that increases of Ct value from HD 1–5 to 11–15 were significantly greater in the remdesivir group than the supportive care group (average, 10.19 vs. 5.36; P = 0.007), and the slope of the Ct value increase was also significantly steeper in the remdesivir group (average, 5.10 vs. 2.68; P = 0.007). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The remdesivir group showed clinical and virologic benefit in terms of MV requirement and viral load reduction, supporting remdesivir treatment for severe COVID-19.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Clinical and Virologic Effectiveness of Remdesivir Treatment for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea: a Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Eun-Jeong JOO ; Jae-Hoon KO ; Seong Eun KIM ; Seung-Ji KANG ; Ji Hyeon BAEK ; Eun Young HEO ; Hye Jin SHI ; Joong Sik EOM ; Pyoeng Gyun CHOE ; Seongman BAE ; Sang Hyun RA ; Da Young KIM ; Baek-Nam KIM ; Yu Min KANG ; Ji Yeon KIM ; Jin-Won CHUNG ; Hyun-Ha CHANG ; Sohyun BAE ; Shinhyea CHEON ; Yoonseon PARK ; Heun CHOI ; Eunjung LEE ; Bo young LEE ; Jung Wan PARK ; Yujin SOHN ; Jung Yeon HEO ; Sung-Han KIM ; Kyong Ran PECK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2021;36(11):e83-
		                        		
		                        			Background:
		                        			Remdesivir is widely used for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but controversies regarding its efficacy still remain. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the effect of remdesivir on clinical and virologic outcomes of severe COVID-19 patients from June to July 2020. Primary clinical endpoints included clinical recovery, additional mechanical ventilator (MV) support, and duration of oxygen or MV support. Viral load reduction by hospital day (HD) 15 was evaluated by calculating changes in cycle threshold (Ct) values. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 86 severe COVID-19 patients were evaluated including 48 remdesivirtreated patients. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. Remdesivir was administered an average of 7.42 days from symptom onset. The proportions of clinical recovery of the remdesivir and supportive care group at HD 14 (56.3% and 39.5%) and HD 28 (87.5% and 78.9%) were not statistically different. The proportion of patients requiring MV support by HD 28 was significantly lower in the remdesivir group than in the supportive care group (22.9% vs. 44.7%, P = 0.032), and MV duration was significantly shorter in the remdesivir group (average, 1.97 vs. 5.37 days; P = 0.017). Analysis of upper respiratory tract specimens demonstrated that increases of Ct value from HD 1–5 to 11–15 were significantly greater in the remdesivir group than the supportive care group (average, 10.19 vs. 5.36; P = 0.007), and the slope of the Ct value increase was also significantly steeper in the remdesivir group (average, 5.10 vs. 2.68; P = 0.007). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The remdesivir group showed clinical and virologic benefit in terms of MV requirement and viral load reduction, supporting remdesivir treatment for severe COVID-19.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Outcomes after liver transplantation in Korea: Incidence and risk factors from Korean transplantation registry
Jong Man KIM ; Deok Gie KIM ; Jihyun KIM ; Keunsung LEE ; Kwang-Woong LEE ; Je Ho RYU ; Bong-Wan KIM ; Dong Lak CHOI ; Young Kyoung YOU ; Dong-Sik KIM ; Yang Won NAH ; Koo Jeong KANG ; Jai Young CHO ; Geun HONG ; Hee Chul YU ; Ju Ik MOON ; Dongho CHOI ; Shin HWANG ; Myoung Soo KIM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(3):451-462
		                        		
		                        			Background/Aims:
		                        			To analyze the incidence and risk factors of outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) in the Korean population. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			This study analyzed data from the liver cohort of Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) who had LT between May 2014 and December 2017. Study measures included the incidence of post-LT outcomes in recipients of living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT). Cox multivariate proportional hazards model was used to determine the potential risk factors predicting the outcomes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 2,563 adult recipients with LT (LDLT, n=1,956; DDLT, n=607) were included, with mean±standard deviation age of 53.9±8.9 years, and 72.2% were male. The post-LT outcomes observed in each LDLT and DDLT recipients were death (4.0% and 14.7%), graft loss (5.0% and 16.1%), rejection (7.0% and 12.0%), renal failure (2.7% and 13.8%), new onset of diabetes (12.5% and 15.4%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence (both 6.7%). In both LDLT and DDLT recipients, the most common post-LT complications were renal dysfunction (33.6% and 51.4%), infection (26.7% and 48.4%), and surgical complication (22.5% and 23.9%). Incidence of these outcomes were generally higher among recipients of DDLT than LDLT. Multivariate analysis indicated recipient age and DDLT as significant risk factors associated with death and graft loss. DDLT and ABO incompatible transplant were prognostic factors for rejection, and HCC beyond Milan criteria at pre-transplant was a strong predictor of HCC recurrence. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusions
		                        			This study is a good indicator of the post-LT prognosis in the Korean population and suggests a significant burden of post-LT complications.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Hepatitis B Prophylaxis after Liver Transplantation in Korea: Analysis of the KOTRY Database
Gil Chun PARK ; Shin HWANG ; Myoung Soo KIM ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Gi Won SONG ; Kwang Woong LEE ; Jong Man KIM ; Jae Geun LEE ; Je Ho RYU ; Dong Lak CHOI ; Hee Jung WANG ; Bong Wan KIM ; Dong Sik KIM ; Yang Won NAH ; Young Kyoung YOU ; Koo Jeong KANG ; Hee Chul YU ; Yo Han PARK ; Kyung Jin LEE ; Yun Kyu KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(6):36-
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence is essential after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-associated recipients. We conducted real-world analysis of HBV prophylaxis after LT in the Korean population.METHODS: Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database and additionally collected data (n = 326) were analyzed with special reference to types of HBV prophylaxis.RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 267 cases of living-donor LT and 59 cases of deceased-donor LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was diagnosed in 232 (71.2%) of these subjects. Antiviral agents were used in 255 patients (78.2%) prior to LT. HBV DNA was undetectable in 69 cases (21.2%) and detectable over wide concentrations in the other 257 patients (78.8%) prior to LT. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the store blood samples detected HBV DNA in all patients, with 159 patients (48.9%) showing concentrations > 100 IU/mL. Post-transplant HBV regimens during the first year included combination therapy in 196 (60.1%), hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy in 121 (37.1%), and antiviral monotherapy in 9 (2.8%). In the second post-transplant year, these regimens had changed to combination therapy in 187 (57.4%), HBIG monotherapy in 112 (34.4%), and antiviral monotherapy in 27 (8.3%). Trough antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers > 500 IU/mL and >1,000 IU/mL were observed in 61.7% and 25.2%, respectively. The mean simulative half-life of HBIG was 21.6 ± 4.3 days with a median 17.7 days. Up to 2-year follow-up period, HCC recurrence and HBV recurrence developed in 18 (5.5%) and 6 (1.8%), respectively. HCC recurrence developed in 3 of 6 patients with HBV recurrence.CONCLUSION: Combination therapy is the mainstay of HBV prophylaxis protocols in a majority of Korean LT centers, but HBIG was often administered excessively. Individualized optimization of HBIG treatments using SHL is necessary to adjust the HBIG infusion interval.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Antiviral Agents
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Cohort Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			DNA
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Follow-Up Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Half-Life
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hepatitis B Surface Antigens
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hepatitis B virus
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hepatitis B
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hepatitis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Immunoglobulins
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Liver Transplantation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Liver
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Organ Transplantation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Polymerase Chain Reaction
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Recurrence
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Transplants
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.Hepatitis B Prophylaxis after Liver Transplantation in Korea: Analysis of the KOTRY Database
Gil Chun PARK ; Shin HWANG ; Myoung Soo KIM ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Gi Won SONG ; Kwang Woong LEE ; Jong Man KIM ; Jae Geun LEE ; Je Ho RYU ; Dong Lak CHOI ; Hee Jung WANG ; Bong Wan KIM ; Dong Sik KIM ; Yang Won NAH ; Young Kyoung YOU ; Koo Jeong KANG ; Hee Chul YU ; Yo Han PARK ; Kyung Jin LEE ; Yun Kyu KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(6):e36-
		                        		
		                        			 BACKGROUND:
		                        			Prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence is essential after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-associated recipients. We conducted real-world analysis of HBV prophylaxis after LT in the Korean population.
		                        		
		                        			METHODS:
		                        			Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database and additionally collected data (n = 326) were analyzed with special reference to types of HBV prophylaxis.
		                        		
		                        			RESULTS:
		                        			The study cohort comprised 267 cases of living-donor LT and 59 cases of deceased-donor LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was diagnosed in 232 (71.2%) of these subjects. Antiviral agents were used in 255 patients (78.2%) prior to LT. HBV DNA was undetectable in 69 cases (21.2%) and detectable over wide concentrations in the other 257 patients (78.8%) prior to LT. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the store blood samples detected HBV DNA in all patients, with 159 patients (48.9%) showing concentrations > 100 IU/mL. Post-transplant HBV regimens during the first year included combination therapy in 196 (60.1%), hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy in 121 (37.1%), and antiviral monotherapy in 9 (2.8%). In the second post-transplant year, these regimens had changed to combination therapy in 187 (57.4%), HBIG monotherapy in 112 (34.4%), and antiviral monotherapy in 27 (8.3%). Trough antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers > 500 IU/mL and >1,000 IU/mL were observed in 61.7% and 25.2%, respectively. The mean simulative half-life of HBIG was 21.6 ± 4.3 days with a median 17.7 days. Up to 2-year follow-up period, HCC recurrence and HBV recurrence developed in 18 (5.5%) and 6 (1.8%), respectively. HCC recurrence developed in 3 of 6 patients with HBV recurrence.
		                        		
		                        			CONCLUSION
		                        			Combination therapy is the mainstay of HBV prophylaxis protocols in a majority of Korean LT centers, but HBIG was often administered excessively. Individualized optimization of HBIG treatments using SHL is necessary to adjust the HBIG infusion interval. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Glioblastomas: Version 2018.01
Young Zoon KIM ; Chae Yong KIM ; Jaejoon LIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jihae LEE ; Hyuk Jin OH ; Seok Gu KANG ; Shin Hyuk KANG ; Doo Sik KONG ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Se Hyuk KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Eui Hyun KIM ; In Ah KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Tae Hoon ROH ; Jae Sung PARK ; Hyun Jin PARK ; Sang Woo SONG ; Seung Ho YANG ; Wan Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Soon Tae LEE ; Sea Won LEE ; Youn Soo LEE ; Chan Woo WEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae Young JUNG ; Hye Lim JUNG ; Jae Ho CHO ; Seung Hong CHOI ; Hyoung Soo CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Dong Sup CHUNG ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2019;7(1):1-9
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: There has been no practical guidelines for the management of patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors in Korea for many years. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, started to prepare guidelines for CNS tumors from February 2018. METHODS: The Working Group was composed of 35 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea. References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. RESULTS: First, the maximal safe resection if feasible is recommended. After the diagnosis of a glioblastoma with neurosurgical intervention, patients aged ≤70 years with good performance should be treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (Stupp's protocol) or standard brain radiotherapy alone. However, those with poor performance should be treated by hypofractionated brain radiotherapy (preferred)±concurrent or adjuvant temozolomide, temozolomide alone (Level III), or supportive treatment. Alternatively, patients aged >70 years with good performance should be treated by hypofractionated brain radiotherapy+concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide or Stupp's protocol or hypofractionated brain radiotherapy alone, while those with poor performance should be treated by hypofractionated brain radiotherapy alone or temozolomide chemotherapy if the patient has methylated MGMT gene promoter (Level III), or supportive treatment. CONCLUSION: The KSNO's guideline recommends that glioblastomas should be treated by maximal safe resection, if feasible, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy according to the individual comprehensive condition of the patient.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Brain
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Central Nervous System
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Chemoradiotherapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Diagnosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glioblastoma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Radiotherapy
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for WHO Grade II Cerebral Gliomas in Adults: Version 2019.01
Young Zoon KIM ; Chae Yong KIM ; Chan Woo WEE ; Tae Hoon ROH ; Je Beom HONG ; Hyuk Jin OH ; Seok Gu KANG ; Shin Hyuk KANG ; Doo Sik KONG ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Se Hyuk KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Eui Hyun KIM ; In Ah KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Jae Sung PARK ; Hyun Jin PARK ; Sang Woo SONG ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Seung Ho YANG ; Wan Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Jihae LEE ; Soon Tae LEE ; Sea Won LEE ; Youn Soo LEE ; Jaejoon LIM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae Young JUNG ; Hye Lim JUNG ; Jae Ho CHO ; Seung Hong CHOI ; Hyoung Soo CHOI ; Do Hoon LIM ; Dong Sup CHUNG ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2019;7(2):74-84
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: There was no practical guideline for the management of patients with central nervous system tumor in Korea for many years. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has developed the guideline for glioblastoma. Subsequently, the KSNO guideline for World Health Organization (WHO) grade II cerebral glioma in adults is established. METHODS: The Working Group was composed of 35 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea. References were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords regarding diffuse astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma of brain in adults. RESULTS: Whenever radiological feature suggests lower grade glioma, the maximal safe resection if feasible is recommended globally. After molecular and histological examinations, patients with diffuse astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype without molecular feature of glioblastoma should be primarily treated by standard brain radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (Level III) while those with molecular feature of glioblastoma should be treated following the protocol for glioblastomas. In terms of patients with diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant and oligodendroglioma (IDH-mutant and 1p19q codeletion), standard brain radiotherapy and adjuvant PCV (procarbazine+lomustine+vincristine) combination chemotherapy should be considered primarily for the high-risk group while observation with regular follow up should be considered for the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: The KSNO's guideline recommends that WHO grade II gliomas should be treated by maximal safe resection, if feasible, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy according to molecular and histological features of tumors and clinical characteristics of patients.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Astrocytoma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Brain
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Central Nervous System
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Therapy, Combination
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Follow-Up Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glioblastoma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glioma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Oligodendroglioma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Radiotherapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			World Health Organization
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
9.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for WHO Grade III Cerebral Gliomas in Adults: Version 2019.01
Young Zoon KIM ; Chae Yong KIM ; Jaejoon LIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jihae LEE ; Hyuk Jin OH ; Seok Gu KANG ; Shin Hyuk KANG ; Doo Sik KONG ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Se Hyuk KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Eui Hyun KIM ; In Ah KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Tae Hoon ROH ; Jae Sung PARK ; Hyun Jin PARK ; Sang Woo SONG ; Seung Ho YANG ; Wan Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Soon Tae LEE ; Sea Won LEE ; Youn Soo LEE ; Chan Woo WEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae Young JUNG ; Hye Lim JUNG ; Jae Ho CHO ; Seung Hong CHOI ; Hyoung Soo CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Dong Sup CHUNG ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2019;7(2):63-73
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND: There was no practical guideline for the management of patients with central nervous system tumor in Korea in the past. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, developed the guideline for glioblastoma successfully and published it in Brain Tumor Research and Treatment, the official journal of KSNO, in April 2019. Recently, the KSNO guideline for World Health Organization (WHO) grade III cerebral glioma in adults has been established. METHODS: The Working Group was composed of 35 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea. References were identified by searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. Scope of the disease was confined to cerebral anaplastic astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma in adults. RESULTS: Whenever radiological feature suggests high grade glioma, maximal safe resection if feasible is globally recommended. After molecular and histological examinations, patients with anaplastic astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant should be primary treated by standard brain radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy whereas those with anaplastic astrocytoma, NOS, and anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype should be treated following the protocol for glioblastomas. In terms of anaplastic oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p19q-codeletion, and anaplastic oligodendroglioma, NOS should be primary treated by standard brain radiotherapy and neoadjuvant or adjuvant PCV (procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine) combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The KSNO's guideline recommends that WHO grade III cerebral glioma of adults should be treated by maximal safe resection if feasible, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy according to molecular and histological features of tumors.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Astrocytoma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Brain
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Brain Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Central Nervous System
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Therapy, Combination
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glioblastoma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Glioma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lomustine
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Oligodendroglioma
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Radiotherapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			World Health Organization
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
10.Nutritional Therapy Related Complications in Hospitalized Adult Patients: A Korean Multicenter Trial
Eun Mi SEOL ; Kye Sook KWON ; Jeong Goo KIM ; Jung Tae KIM ; Jihoon KIM ; Sun Mi MOON ; Do Joong PARK ; Jung Hyun PARK ; Je Hoon PARK ; Ji Young PARK ; Jung Min BAE ; Seung Wan RYU ; Ji Young SUL ; Dong Woo SHIN ; Cheung Soo SHIN ; Byung Kyu AHN ; Soo Min AHN ; Hee Chul YU ; Gil Jae LEE ; Sanghoon LEE ; A Ran LEE ; Jae Young JANG ; Hyun Jeong JEON ; Sung Min JUNG ; Sung Sik HAN ; Suk Kyung HONG ; Sun Hwi HWANG ; Yunhee CHOI ; Hyuk Joon LEE
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2019;11(1):12-22
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			PURPOSE: Nutritional therapy (NT), such as enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN), is essential for the malnourished patients. Although the complications related to NT has been well described, multicenter data on symptoms in the patients with receiving NT during hospitalization are still lacking. METHODS: Nutrition support team (NST) consultations, on which NT-related complications were described, were collected retrospectively for one year. The inclusion criteria were patients who were (1) older than 18 years, (2) hospitalized, and (3) receiving EN or PN at the time of NST consultation. The patients' demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), type of NT and type of complication were collected. To compare the severity of each complication, the intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital stay, and type of discharge were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 14,600 NT-related complications were collected from 13,418 cases from 27 hospitals in Korea. The mean age and BMI were 65.4 years and 21.8 kg/m2. The complications according to the type of NT, calorie deficiency (32.4%, n=1,229) and diarrhea (21.6%, n=820) were most common in EN. Similarly, calorie deficiency (56.8%, n=4,030) and GI problem except for diarrhea (8.6%, n=611) were most common in PN. Regarding the clinical outcomes, 18.7% (n=2,158) finally expired, 58.1% (n=7,027) were admitted to ICU, and the mean hospital days after NT-related complication were 31.3 days. Volume overload (odds ratio [OR]=3.48) and renal abnormality (OR=2.50) were closely associated with hospital death; hyperammonemia (OR=3.09) and renal abnormality (OR=2.77) were associated with ICU admission; “micronutrient and vitamin deficiency” (geometric mean [GM]=2.23) and volume overload (GM=1.61) were associated with a longer hospital stay. CONCLUSION: NT may induce or be associated with several complications, and some of them may seriously affect the patient's outcome. NST personnel in each hospital should be aware of each problem during nutritional support.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adult
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Body Mass Index
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Demography
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Diarrhea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Enteral Nutrition
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hospitalization
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Hyperammonemia
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Intensive Care Units
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Length of Stay
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Multicenter Studies as Topic
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Nutrition Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Nutritional Support
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Parenteral Nutrition
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Referral and Consultation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Retrospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Vitamins
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail