1.Is a secondary procedure necessary in every case of failed endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux?.
Hyun Jin JUNG ; Young Jae IM ; Yong Seung LEE ; Myung Joo KIM ; Sang Won HAN
Korean Journal of Urology 2015;56(5):398-404
PURPOSE: Endoscopic treatment (ET) has become a widely accepted procedure for treating vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). However, patients followed up after ET over long periods have reported persistent or recurrent VUR. We evaluated the natural course of failed ET in patients who required further treatments to help physicians in making decisions on the treatment of VUR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with VUR and underwent ET from January 2006 to December 2009. A total of 165 patients with 260 ureters underwent ET. We compared the parameters of the patients according to ET success or failure and evaluated the natural course of the patients after ET failure. RESULTS: Mean VUR grade and positive photon defect were higher in the failed ET group than in the successful ET group. Six months after the operation, persistent or recurrent VUR was observed in 76 ureters (29.2%), and by 16.3 months after the operation, VUR resolution was observed in 18 ureters (23.7%). Twenty-five ureters (32.9%) without complications were observed conservatively. Involuntary detrusor contraction was found in 1 of 9 (11.1%) among the secondary ET success group, whereas in the secondary ET failure group, 4 of 6 (66.7%) had accompanying involuntary detrusor contraction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom ET fails can be observed for spontaneous resolution of VUR unless they have febrile urinary tract infection or decreased renal function. Urodynamic study may be helpful in deciding whether a secondary procedure after ET failure is necessary.
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
*Cystoscopy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Male
;
Muscle, Smooth/*physiopathology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Failure
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urinary Bladder/*physiopathology
;
*Urodynamics
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/*therapy
2.Postoperative ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux.
Jae Min CHUNG ; Chang Soo PARK ; Sang Don LEE
Korean Journal of Urology 2015;56(7):533-539
PURPOSE: We undertook this study to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome of postoperative ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for VUR were retrospectively reviewed and classified into two groups according to ureteral obstruction: the nonobstruction group (83 cases, 122 ureters; mean age, 7.0+/-2.8 years) and the obstruction group (7 cases, 10 ureters; mean age, 6.2+/-8.1 years). We analyzed the following factors: age, sex, injection material, laterality, voiding dysfunction, constipation, renal scarring, preoperative and postoperative ultrasound findings, endoscopic findings, injection number, and injection volume. Additionally, we reviewed the clinical manifestations, natural course, management, and outcome of ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment was 7.6% (10/132 ureters). The type of bulking agent used and injection volume tended to be associated with ureteral obstruction. However, no significant risk factors for obstruction were identified between the two groups. Three patients showed no symptoms or signs after the onset of ureteral obstruction. Most of the patients with ureteral obstruction experienced spontaneous resolution within 1 month with conservative therapy. Two patients required temporary ureteral stents to release the ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the incidence of ureteral obstruction was slightly higher than in previous reports. Our study identified no predictive risk factors for developing ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment. Although most of the ureteral obstructions resolved spontaneously within 1 month, some cases required drainage to relieve symptoms or to prevent renal function deterioration.
Adolescent
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Cystoscopy/*adverse effects
;
Drainage
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hydronephrosis/etiology
;
Male
;
Postoperative Period
;
Prognosis
;
Remission, Spontaneous
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Stents
;
Ureteral Obstruction/*etiology/pathology/therapy
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/*surgery
3.Does the Modified STING Method Increase the Success Rate in the Management of Moderate or High-Grade Reflux?.
Osman Raif KARABACAK ; Fatih YALCINKAYA ; Ugur ALTUG ; Nurettin SERTCELIK ; Fuat DEMIREL
Korean Journal of Urology 2014;55(9):615-619
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of subureteral injection types in patients with middle- to high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and September 2010, subureteral dextranomer was applied at our clinic to 149 patients (214 refluxing ureters) with grades II, III, and IV VUR. Group 1 consisted of 54 patients (80 ureters), and group 2 consisted of 95 patients (134 ureters). The standard subureteric transurethral injection (STING) procedure was applied to group 1, and the modified STING procedure was applied to group 2. A second and if needed a third injection was applied to unsuccessfully treated patients. The mean follow-up period was 2 years. Patients were evaluated by cystography and ultrasonography in the third month of follow-up. RESULTS: VUR was resolved completely after a single injection in 54/80 ureters (67.5%) in group 1 and in 94/134 ureters (70.1%) in group 2. Overall successes after a second or a third injection were 61/80 (76.2%) and 111/134 (82.8%), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups only for grade IV reflux following multiple injections (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of VUR is a recommended treatment because it is minimally invasive, efficient, and repeatable. Our study confirmed that a modified STING procedure can be an alternative treatment to the standard technique.
Administration, Intravesical
;
Adolescent
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Dextrans/*administration & dosage
;
Endoscopy
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Hyaluronic Acid/*administration & dosage
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Ureter/*surgery
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures/*methods
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/*drug therapy/ultrasonography
4.Does the Modified STING Method Increase the Success Rate in the Management of Moderate or High-Grade Reflux?.
Osman Raif KARABACAK ; Fatih YALCINKAYA ; Ugur ALTUG ; Nurettin SERTCELIK ; Fuat DEMIREL
Korean Journal of Urology 2014;55(9):615-619
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of subureteral injection types in patients with middle- to high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and September 2010, subureteral dextranomer was applied at our clinic to 149 patients (214 refluxing ureters) with grades II, III, and IV VUR. Group 1 consisted of 54 patients (80 ureters), and group 2 consisted of 95 patients (134 ureters). The standard subureteric transurethral injection (STING) procedure was applied to group 1, and the modified STING procedure was applied to group 2. A second and if needed a third injection was applied to unsuccessfully treated patients. The mean follow-up period was 2 years. Patients were evaluated by cystography and ultrasonography in the third month of follow-up. RESULTS: VUR was resolved completely after a single injection in 54/80 ureters (67.5%) in group 1 and in 94/134 ureters (70.1%) in group 2. Overall successes after a second or a third injection were 61/80 (76.2%) and 111/134 (82.8%), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups only for grade IV reflux following multiple injections (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of VUR is a recommended treatment because it is minimally invasive, efficient, and repeatable. Our study confirmed that a modified STING procedure can be an alternative treatment to the standard technique.
Administration, Intravesical
;
Adolescent
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Dextrans/*administration & dosage
;
Endoscopy
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Hyaluronic Acid/*administration & dosage
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Ureter/*surgery
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures/*methods
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/*drug therapy/ultrasonography
5.Resolution of UTIs Post Deflux Injections for VUR May Be due to the Cure of BBD.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(9):1410-1410
No abstract available.
Dextrans/*therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hyaluronic Acid/*therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Urinary Tract Infections/*epidemiology
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/*drug therapy
6.Clinical Value of Persistent but Downgraded Vesicoureteral Reflux after Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Children.
Minki BAEK ; Min Young KANG ; Hahn Ey LEE ; Kwanjin PARK ; Hwang CHOI
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2013;28(7):1060-1064
We aimed to investigate the clinical value of persistent but downgraded vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) injection in children. The medical records of 128 children (195 ureters) who underwent Dx/HA injections for VUR were reviewed. The incidences of pre- and post-operative febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) were analyzed in children with or without persistent VUR on voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) 3 months postoperatively. The surgical results of VUR persistent children who underwent a single additional injection were assessed. The VUR resolved completely in 100 ureters (51.3%), was persistent in 95 ureters, and newly developed in 2 ureters. The incidence of pre/post-operative febrile UTIs were 0.35 +/- 0.39 per year and 0.07 +/- 0.32 per year in VUR resolved children (P < 0.001), and 0.76 +/- 1.18 per year and 0.20 +/- 0.61 per year in VUR persistent children (P < 0.001). A single additional Dx/HA injection (44 ureters) resolved VUR in 29 ureters (65.9%), and also reduced the VUR to grade I in 7 ureters (15.9%), II in 4 (9.1%), and III in 4 (9.1%). Even in children with persistent VUR after Dx/HA injection, the incidence of febrile UTIs decreased markedly. The VUR grade significantly decreases after single additional Dx/HA injection.
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Dextrans/*therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Fever/complications/epidemiology
;
Humans
;
Hyaluronic Acid/*therapeutic use
;
Incidence
;
Male
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urinary Tract Infections/complications/drug therapy/*epidemiology
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/*drug therapy/surgery
7.Predicting Factors of Breakthrough Infection in Children with Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux.
Hyeon Chan JANG ; Yoo Jun PARK ; Jae Shin PARK
Yonsei Medical Journal 2012;53(4):748-752
PURPOSE: Many pediatric urologists still favor using prophylactic antibiotics to treat children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). However, breakthrough infection sometimes occurs, leading to significant increases in morbidity as a result of renal scarring. Therefore, we tested whether abnormal renal scan and other factors are predictive of breakthrough infection using univariate analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 163 consecutive children who were diagnosed with vesicoureteral reflux between November 1997 and June 2010. Clinical parameters for the statistical analysis included form of presentation, gender, age, VUR grade, laterality, presence of intrarenal reflux, class of antibiotic drug, and presence of abnormal renal scan by Dimercapto-succinic acid. Clinical parameters used for prognostic factors were established by univariate analyses. Fisher's exact test and unpaired t-test were done using SPSS software [SPSS ver. 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)]. RESULTS: Breakthrough infection developed in 61 children (48.0%). A total of 58 children (45.7%) had abnormal renal scans. Time to development of breakthrough infection was significantly longer in girls (9.0+/-8.2 months) than in boys (5.8+/-4.8 months, p<0.05). On univariate analysis, though statistically not significant, the most predictive factor of breakthrough infection was abnormal renal scan (p=0.062). In patients with abnormal renal scans, breakthrough infection was not associated with mode of presentation, gender, grade or prophylactic antibiotics. However, there was a significant difference between patients younger than 1 year and those 1 year old or older. Mean+/-SD age at diagnosis of VUR in patients with breakthrough infection (1.14+/-3.14) was significantly younger than in those without breakthrough infection (5.05+/-3.31, p=0.009). There was also a significant difference between patients with bilateral or unilateral reflux (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: Our data showed that abnormal renal scan was the most predictive factor of breakthrough infection and demonstrated statistical significance in patients under the age of 1 year. Parents and physicians should remain aware that these patients are at high risk of breakthrough urinary tract infection, which may potentially lead to renal damage.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Urinary Tract Infections/*drug therapy/etiology
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/complications/*drug therapy/*microbiology
8.Analysis of the prognosis and clinical factors in primary vesicoureteral reflux patients.
Jing XU ; Hong XU ; Li-jun ZHOU ; Qian SHEN ; Li SUN ; Yun-li BI ; Xiang WANG
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics 2012;50(8):587-592
OBJECTIVETo analyze the relationship between the prognosis and clinical factors of primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) patients under the condition of non-surgical treatment.
METHODThe medical records of the patients who were diagnosed as VUR by micturating cystourethrography (MCU) from January 2000 to December 2009 in Children's Hospital of Fudan University underwent non-surgical treatment, and followed up for more than one year then had repeated MCU, were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTA total of 73 children (30 boys, 43 girls) were included in this study. The percentage of mild reflux (grade I-II) was 19.2% (14/73), that of moderate reflux (grade III) was 53.4% (39/73), and that of severe reflux (grade IV-V) was 27.4% (20/73). Among 73 patients, 27 (37.0%) patients were found to have renal damage. The average interval of repeated MCU was (1.29 ± 0.40) years (1 - 2 years). After follow-up, it was found that the reflux grade was relieved in 41 (56.2%) patients, of whom 27 (37.0%) patients achieved complete resolution, 32 (43.8%) patients did not have remission in reflux grade, of whom 13 (17.8%) patients had worsened reflux grade. Logistic regression analysis showed that VUR patients with renal damage at initial diagnosis was an important clinical factor to affect reflux remission (P = 0.000), complete resolving (P = 0.008) and result in worsening (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONA certain proportion of primary VUR patients could get reflux grade self-resolution, it was also quite common in severe VUR patients. VUR patients with renal damage at initial diagnosis was an important clinical factor affecting the reflux grade prognosis. Mild and moderate VUR patients with renal damage were at risk of worsening. VUR patients with high reflux grade had normal renal status could still get remission or even disappearance of VUR. But severe VUR patients with renal damage were still recommended to receive surgical therapy.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cicatrix ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Kidney Diseases ; epidemiology ; etiology ; pathology ; Male ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate ; Urinary Tract Infections ; epidemiology ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Urography ; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux ; complications ; drug therapy ; pathology
9.Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux): The National Kidney and Transplant Institute experience.
Dator Jose Dante P. ; Tandoc Neil Alvin ; Torres Carlos Ramon N.
Philippine Journal of Urology 2011;21(2):35-38
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux has evolved as a viable alternative to open surgery. This study was conducted to review the experience of a single institution with the endoscopic Deflux procedure and assess its effectiveness in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic Deflux treatment for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) between January 2005 and December 2010 was performed. Data collected included: age, gender, unilateral or bilateral treatment, pre-operative grade of VUR on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), and the number of Deflux injections per patient.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients [7 (43.75%) males and 9 (56.25%) females] were included in this study. The ages ranged from 6 months to 8 years old with a mean age of 3.15 years. Four (25%) patients had bilateral VUR while 12 (75%) had unilateral VUR, with a total of 21 refluxing ureters. Three had Grade II reflux (14.3%), 13 had Grade III reflux (62%), 5 had Grade IV reflux (24%), and 1 had Grade V reflux (4.7%). Nineteen ureters required one injection while one ureter required two injections. There were no intraoperative nor postoperative complications noted.
CONCLUSION: At the National Kidney and Transplant Institute, endoscopic treatment of VUR with Deflux for primary VUR demonstrated a cure rate of 90%, with no associated perioperative morbidity.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Child ; Child Preschool ; Infant ; deflux ; Endoscopy ; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux-treatment, therapy, management, drug therapy ; Urinary Bladder Diseases ; dextranomer ; dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer
10.Clinical Characteristics of Renal Transplant Recipients that Underwent Urologic Surgery for de novo Disease Before and After Transplantation.
Kwan Sik BAE ; Jung Sik HUH ; Young Joo KIM ; Sung Goo CHANG
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2005;20(1):75-78
The pre-transplantation goal of the urologist is the optimization of urinary tract condition. Therefore, urologic surgery may be needed before or after renal transplantation. We analyzed the results of urologic surgery performed because of de novo urologic diseases. Between January 1986 and January 2001, 281 patients underwent renal transplantation, and 23 urologic surgical procedures were performed on 21 transplant recipients before or after renal transplantation because of de novo urologic diseases. By review the major reasons for urologic surgery in recipients were polycystic kidney diseases, vesicoureteral reflux, and dysfunctional voiding disorders. Nineteen surgical corrective procedures were done average 2.9 months before transplantation. The mortality rate was 10.5%. Four patients underwent urologic surgery at an average 57.5 months after transplantation. We highlight the fact that patients with uremia are vulnerable to surgical complications, and conclude that more intensive longterm urologic follow-ups should be conducted on recipients.
Adult
;
Child
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Kidney/abnormalities
;
Kidney Diseases/surgery/*therapy
;
Kidney Transplantation/*methods
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Nephrectomy
;
Polycystic Kidney Diseases/pathology/therapy
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Preoperative Care
;
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
;
Time Factors
;
Urologic Diseases/surgery
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures/*methods
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/therapy

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail