1.Foreign Body Removal in Children Using Foley Catheter or Magnet Tube from Gastrointestinal Tract
Jae Young CHOE ; Byung Ho CHOE
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2019;22(2):132-141
Foreign body (FB) ingestion of children is a common pediatric emergency requiring medical attention. Pediatric emergency physicians and gastroenterologists often encounter nervous and distressed situations, because of children presenting with this condition in the common clinical practice. When determining the appropriate timing and indications for intervention, physicians should consider multiple patient- and FB-related factors. The utilization of a flexible endoscopy is considered safe and effective to use in these cases, with a high success rate, for the effective extraction of FBs from the gastrointestinal tract of a child. Additionally, a Foley catheter and a magnet-attached Levin tube have been used for decades in the case of FB removal. Although their use has decreased significantly in recent times, these instruments continue to be used for several indications. Using a Foley catheter for this purpose does not require special training and does not necessarily require sedation of the patient or fluoroscopy, which serve as advantages of utilizing this method for foreign object retrieval. An ingested magnet or iron-containing FB can be retrieved using a magnet-attached tube, and can be effective to retrieve an object from any section of the upper gastrointestinal tract that can be reached. Simple and inexpensive devices such as Foley catheters and magnet-attached tubes can be used in emergencies such as with the esophageal impaction of disk batteries if endoscopy cannot be performed immediately (e.g., in rural areas and/or in patients presenting at midnight in a facility, especially in those without access to endoscopes or emergency services, or in any situation that warrants urgent removal of a foreign object).
Catheters
;
Child
;
Eating
;
Emergencies
;
Endoscopes
;
Endoscopy
;
Esophagus
;
Fluoroscopy
;
Foreign Bodies
;
Gastrointestinal Tract
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
;
Urinary Catheterization
2.The Effects of Intradetrusor BoNT-A Injections on Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children With Myelodysplasia
Tuncay TOPRAK ; Yavuz Onur DANACIOGLU ; Ayhan VERIT
International Neurourology Journal 2019;23(4):321-326
PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) on vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), continence status, and urodynamic parameters in children with myelodysplasia who were not responsive to standard conservative therapy.METHODS: The study included 31 children (13 boys, 18 girls) with a mean age of 9.2±2.3 years (range, 5–14 years) with myelodysplasia, retrospectively. All children were fully compatible with clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and did not respond to the maximum tolerable anticholinergic dose. All children received an intradetrusor injection of 10 U/kg (maximum, 300 U) of BoNT-A into an infection-free bladder. All patients had VUR (22 unilateral, 9 bilateral) preoperatively. The grade of reflux was mild (grades 1, 2), intermediate (grade 3), and severe (grades 4, 5) in 25, 7, and 8 ureters, respectively.RESULTS: The mean maximum bladder capacity increased from 152.9±76.9 mL to 243.7±103 mL (P<0.001), and the maximum detrusor pressure decreased from 57±29.4 cm H₂O to 29.6±13.9 cm H₂O (P<0.001). After BoNT-A treatment, 16 refluxing ureters (40%) completely resolved, 17 (42.5%) improved, 5 (12.5%) remained unchanged, and 2 (5%) became worse. Of the 31 children with urinary leakage between CICs, 22 (71%) became completely dry, 6 (19%) improved, and 3 (10%) experienced partial improvement.CONCLUSIONS: In children with myelodysplasia, we were able to increase bladder capacity, enhance continence, and prevent VUR by using intradetrusor BoNT-A injections. Although our results are promising, a larger group of long-term prospective studies are warranted to investigate this method of treatment.
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
;
Child
;
Humans
;
Intermittent Urethral Catheterization
;
Methods
;
Prospective Studies
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Ureter
;
Urinary Bladder
;
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
;
Urodynamics
;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
3.Reconsideration of urine culture for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children: a new challenging method for diagnosing acute pyelonephritis
Korean Journal of Pediatrics 2019;62(12):433-437
Acute pyelonephritis (APN) should be detected and treated as soon as possible to reduce the risk of the development of acquired renal scarring. However, in the medical field, urine culture results are not available or considered when the prompt discrimination of APN is necessary and empirical treatment is started. Furthermore, urine culture cannot discriminate APN among children with febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) (pyelitis, lower UTI with other fever focus). Therefore, the usefulness of urine culture for diagnostic purposes is small and the sampling procedure is invasive. Congenital hypoplastic kidney is the most common cause of chronic kidney injury in children. Thus, it is desirable that a main target be detected as early as possible when imaging studies are performed in children with APN. However, if APN does not recur, no medical or surgical treatment or imaging studies would be needed because the acquired renal scar would not progress further. Therefore, the long-term prognosis of APN in young children, particularly infants, depends on the number of recurrent APN, not other febrile UTI. New methods that enable prompt, practical, and comfortable APN diagnosis in children are needed as alternatives to urinary catheterization for urine culture sampling.
Child
;
Cicatrix
;
Diagnosis
;
Discrimination (Psychology)
;
Fever
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Kidney
;
Methods
;
Prognosis
;
Pyelitis
;
Pyelonephritis
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Catheters
;
Urinary Tract Infections
4.Strategies of preserving urinary continence in transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia.
Jun-Yi CHEN ; Dong CHEN ; Jia-Liang WANG ; Xin MU ; Yi-Hong GUO ; Jian-Yu ZHANG ; Yi-Ning LI
National Journal of Andrology 2018;24(2):138-141
Objective:
To explore the strategies of preserving urinary continence in transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS:
We treated 65 BPH patients by PKEP with preservation of urinary continence (UC-PKEP), which involved protection of the external urethral sphincter in the beginning of surgery, proper preservation of the anterior lobe of the prostate to protect the internal urethral sphincter in the middle, and preservation of the integrity of the bladder neck towards the end. We compared the postoperative status of urinary continence of the patients with that of the 54 BPH cases treated by complete plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (Com-PKEP).
RESULTS:
All the operations were performed successfully with the urinary catheters removed at 5 days after surgery. In comparison with Com-PKEP, UC-PKEP achieved evidently lower incidence rates of urinary incontinence at 24 hours (31.49% vs 13.85%, P <0.05), 1 week (18.52% vs 4.62%, P <0.05), 2 weeks (14.81% vs 3.08%, P <0.05), 1 month (3.70% vs 1.54%, P >0.05), and 3 months (3.70% vs 0%, P >0.05) after catheter removal. Compared with the baseline, the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was significantly improved postoperatively in both the Com-PKEP ([7.43 ± 3.26] vs [20.58 ± 3.22] ml, P <0.05) and the UC-PKEP group ([8.04 ± 2.28] vs [20.66 ± 3.08] ml, P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Transurethral PKEP is a safe and effective method for the management of BPH, during which the strategies of avoiding blunt or sharp damage to the external urethral sphincter in the beginning, properly preserving the anterior lobe of the prostate in the middle and preserving the integrity of the bladder neck towards the end may help to achieve rapid recovery of urinary continence.
Humans
;
Male
;
Organ Sparing Treatments
;
methods
;
Postoperative Period
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethra
;
Urinary Bladder
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Incontinence
;
prevention & control
5.Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery.
Kwang Suk LEE ; Kyo Chul KOO ; Byung Ha CHUNG
International Neurourology Journal 2017;21(4):320-328
PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after spinal surgery. However, no clear definition of POUR currently exists, and no studies have evaluated the management of POUR. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for eventual POUR-free status in spinal surgery patients. METHODS: The records of patients who received a urologic consultation for POUR from January 2015 to December 2016 were reviewed. POUR-free status was defined as a voiding volume (VV) >100 mL and a VV ratio >50%. Patients with an indwelling Foley catheter and those with any postoperative complications were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the primary management method (Foley catheterization [FC] or intermittent catheterization [IC]). RESULTS: In total, 205 patients (median age, 70.6 years) were evaluated. Significant prognostic factors for eventual POUR-free status were intraoperative FC, previous spinal surgery, operative level (L3–5), lumbar fusion, and total volume (TV) at the time of POUR. Bladder training and medication did not reduce the time to POUR-free status. In patients who underwent FC, the duration of indwelling FC was a significant prognostic factor for POUR-free status. In a subanalysis, the TV (≥500 mL) and VV ratio at the time of POUR were significant prognostic factors for POUR-free status after primary management. Among the patients who achieved a POUR-free status, 8 (6.4%) experienced recurrent POUR. The VV ratio (<62.0%) was the only predictor of recurrent POUR. CONCLUSIONS: The criterion of POUR-free status is useful after spinal surgery. IC and FC were similar in their efficacy for the management of these patients.
Catheterization
;
Catheters
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Postoperative Period
;
Urinary Bladder
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Retention*
6.Risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.
Yong ZHAO ; Xiaoling HOU ; Yujuan ZHAO ; Yingying FENG ; Bin ZHANG ; Ke ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(3):295-299
OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.
METHODSClinical data of 133 patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014 in the General Hospital of the PLA Rocket Force were retrospectively analyzed. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter, incidence of postoperative urinary retention, and time to re-insert indwelling catheter were recorded. Risk factors of urinary retention were analyzed.
RESULTSOf 133 patients, 70 were males and 63 were females, with a median age of 62 (20-79) years old. Distance from tumor lower margin to anal verge were ≤5 cm in 58 patients, >5 cm to 10 cm in 41 patients, and >10 cm to 15 cm in 34 patients. The postoperative TNM stage was recorded in 35 patients with stage I(, 34 with stage II(, 59 with stage III( and 5 with stage IIII(. Surgical procedures included anterior resection (AR) for 92 patients, abdominoperineal resection (APR) for 25 patients and intersphincteric resection (ISR) for 16 patients. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 89 patients compared with open operation in 44 patients. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter was 2-7 days after operation (median, 5 days) and 36 (27.1%) patients developed urinary retention. All the 36 patients achieved spontaneous voiding by re-inserting urinary catheter for 2-28 days (median, 6 days). Univariate analysis showed that elderly (>65 years) and laparoscopic approach had significantly higher incidence of urinary retention [37.5%(21/56) vs. 19.5%(15/77), χ=5.333, P=0.021; 34.8%(31/89) vs. 11.4%(5/44), χ=8.214, P=0.004; respectively]. Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that old age(OR=3.949, 95%CI:1.622 to 9.612, P=0.002), laparoscopic approach (OR=5.665, 95%CI:1.908 to 16.822, P=0.002), and abdominoperineal resection (OR=3.443, 95%CI:1.199 to 9.887, P=0.022) were independent risk factors of urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.
CONCLUSIONSPatients undergoing rectal cancer surgery have a high risk of postoperative urinary retention. More attention should be paid to the old patients, especially those undergoing laparoscopic procedure or abdominoperineal resection, to prevent postoperative urinary retention and urinary dysfunction.
Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Colon, Sigmoid ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms ; classification ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Catheterization ; statistics & numerical data ; Urinary Retention ; epidemiology ; Urination ; physiology
7.Transurethral diode laser enucleation versus transurethral electrovaporization resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia with different prostate volumes.
Duo LIU ; Li FAN ; Cheng LIU ; Xue-Jun LIU ; Dong-Sheng ZHU ; Jia-Gui MU ; Dong-Wei YAO ; Qun SONG
National Journal of Andrology 2017;23(3):217-222
Objective:
To compare the clinical effect of diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DIOD) with that of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with different prostate volumes.
METHODS:
This retrospective study included 256 BPH patients treated by DIOD (n = 141) or TURP (n = 115) from March 2012 to August 2015. According to the prostate volume, we divided the patients into three groups: <60 ml (42 for DIOD and 31 for TURP), 60-80 ml (51 for DIOD and 45 for TURP), and >80 ml (48 for DIOD and 39 for TURP). We obtained the relevant data from the patients before, during and at 6 months after surgery, and compared the two surgical strategies in operation time, perioperative levels of hemoglobin and sodium ion, post-operative urethral catheterization time and bladder irrigation time, pre- and post-operative serum PSA levels, International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), post-void residual urine (PVR) volume and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and incidence of post-operative complications among different groups.
RESULTS:
In the <60 ml group, there were no remarkable differences in the peri- and post-operative parameters between the two surgical strategies. In the 60-80 ml group, DIOD exhibited a significant superiority over TURP in the perioperative levels of hemoglobin ([3.25 ± 1.53] g/L vs [4.77 ± 1.67] g/L, P <0.05) and Na+ ([3.58 ± 1.27]mmol/L vs [9.67 ± 2.67] mmol/L, P <0.01), bladder irrigation time ([30.06 ± 6.22]h vs [58.32 ± 10.25] h, P <0.01), and urethral catheterization time ([47.61 ± 13.55] h vs [68.01 ± 9.69] h, P <0.01), but a more significant decline than the latter in the postoperative PSA level ([2.34 ± 1.29] ng/ml vs [1.09 ± 0.72] ng/ml, P <0.05), and similar decline was also seen in the >80 ml group ([3.35 ± 1.39] ng/ml vs [1.76 ± 0.91] ng/ml, P <0.05). No blood transfusion was necessitated and nor postoperative transurethral resection syndrome or urethral stricture observed in DIOD. However, the incidence rate of postoperative pseudo-urinary incontinence was significantly higher in the DIOD (22.7%, 32/141) than in the TURP group (7.83%, 9/115) (P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
DIOD, with its obvious advantages of less blood loss, higher safety, faster recovery, and more definite short-term effectiveness, is better than TURP in the treatment of BPH with medium or large prostate volume and similar to the latter with small prostate volume.
Humans
;
Lasers, Semiconductor
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Operative Time
;
Organ Size
;
Postoperative Complications
;
etiology
;
Prostate
;
pathology
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
pathology
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Therapeutic Irrigation
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
statistics & numerical data
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethral Stricture
;
etiology
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Incontinence
;
etiology
8.Thulium laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate and risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture.
Wen SONG ; Tao WANG ; Qing LING ; Xia-Ming LIU ; Zhong CHEN ; Xiao-Dong SONG ; Xiao-Lin GUO ; Qian-Yuan ZHUANG ; Shao-Gang WANG ; Ji-Hong LIU
National Journal of Andrology 2017;23(12):1085-1088
Objective:
To compare thulium laser vaporization of the prostate (TLVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) analyze the risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture.
METHODS:
From June 2015 to June 2016, 210 BPH patients in our hospital underwent TURP (n = 126) or TLVP (n = 84). We followed up the patients for 6 months, compared the effects of the two surgical strategies and analyzed the risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS:
Compared with TURP, TLVP achieved significantly shorter time of operation ([78.6 ± 27.5] vs [53.2 ± 21.6] min, P <0.01), postoperative bladder irrigation ([31.5 ± 2.9] vs [26.1 ± 3.7] h, P <0.01), urethral catheterization ([5.3 ± 1.7] vs [3.7 ± 1.5] d, P <0.01) and postoperative hospitalization ([7.9 ± 2.1] vs [5.5 ± 1.4] d, P <0.01) as well as lower urinary leukocyte count at 6 months after surgery ([32.1 ± 12.6] vs [24.9 ± 11.7] /μl, P <0.01) and incidence rate of postoperative complications (11.9% [15/126] vs 3.6% [3/84], P <0.05), particularly that of urethral stricture (7.9% [10/126] vs 1.2% [1/84], P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative urinary leukocyte count, postoperative urethral catheterization time, and surgical method were independent risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture.
CONCLUSIONS
TLVP, in comparison with TURP, has the advantages of definite effect, fast recovery, high safety and low incidence of postoperative urethral stricture. The main risk factors for postoperative urethral stricture include preoperative urinary tract infection, postoperative urethral catheterization time and surgical method.
Humans
;
Laser Therapy
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Male
;
Operative Time
;
Postoperative Complications
;
etiology
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia
;
surgery
;
Quality of Life
;
Regression Analysis
;
Risk Factors
;
Thulium
;
therapeutic use
;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
;
adverse effects
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethral Stricture
;
etiology
;
Urinary Catheterization
;
Urinary Tract Infections
;
complications
9.Transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia with bladder detrusor overactivity.
Jun-Wen SHEN ; Chuan-Jun DU ; Fu-Ding BAI ; Rong-Jiang WANG
National Journal of Andrology 2016;22(8):720-724
ObjectiveTo compare and analyze the effects of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with bladder detrusor overactivity.
METHODShis study included 51 cases of BPH with bladder detrusor overactivity treated by TURP and another 58 treated by HoLEP. We evaluated the urination of the two groups of patients during the recovery period and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTSThere were no statistically significant differences in such baseline data as the blood PSA level, prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QOL) between the two groups of patients, except in effective bladder capacity, which was higher in the TURP than in the HoLEP group ([315±59] vs [287±76] ml, P<0.05). Urine storage symptoms were obviously improved in both of the groups postoperatively, with the storage symptoms score significantly decreased from 12.6±4.9 preoperatively to 7.5±3.9 at 3 months and 6.1±4.2 at 6 months after surgery in the TURP group (P<0.01) and from 13.7±5.7 to 7.9±4.2 and 7.0±5.1 in the HoLEP group (P<0.01). HoLEP manifested significant advantages over TURP in the postoperative urethral catheterization time ([2.7±0.8] vs [5.1±1.2] d, P<0.05), postoperative bladder contracture time ([4.1±1.9] vs [5.8±2.4] d, P<0.05), postoperative hospital stay ([4.4±1.8] vs [5.9±2.5] d, P<0.05), and improvement of the maximum urinary flow rate, which was increased from (7.9±3.7) ml/s preoperatively to (16.8±4.3) ml/s at 3 months after surgery in the HoLEP group and from (8.6±3.2) ml/s to (14.6±4.3) ml/s in the TURP group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONSBoth TURP and HoLEP can improve bladder function and detrusor overactivity in BPH patients, with similar effects in improving urination at 3 to 6 months after surgery. However, HoLEP has more advantages over TURP during the period of postoperative recovery.
Humans ; Lasers, Solid-State ; therapeutic use ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Prostate ; surgery ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Quality of Life ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction ; surgery ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive ; surgery ; Urinary Catheterization ; statistics & numerical data ; Urination ; physiology
10.Surgical Outcome of Children and Adolescents with Tethered Cord Syndrome.
Toshitaka SEKI ; Kazutoshi HIDA ; Shunsuke YANO ; Toru SASAMORI ; Shuji HAMAUCH ; Izumi KOYANAGI ; Kiyohiro HOUKIN
Asian Spine Journal 2016;10(5):940-944
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To compare long-term results of surgery with the outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic tethered cord syndrome (TCS) in children and adolescents and to assess the surgery duration for those with TCS. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Pediatric patients with TCS continue to pose significant diagnostic and management challenges. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 31 patients (16 males, 15 females) with TCS, including 21 with lumbosacral lipoma. All were surgically treated between 1989 and 2015. They were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic TCS groups. The results of the treatment were summarized and analyzed using a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had symptomatic TCS and 12 had asymptomatic TCS. Patients had a median age of 34 months (range, 0–201 months). The median follow-up period was 116 months (range, 7–223 months). Of the 19 symptomatic TCS patients, preoperative deficits improved after surgery in two (10.5%) and remained stable in 17 (89.5%) patients. One of the 12 asymptomatic TCS (8.3%) patients showed an exacerbated illness after surgery, and one in 11 patients remained stable (11.7%). There were significant differences in monthly age at surgery, preoperative bowel and bladder dysfunction, neurological function, presence/absence of clean intermittent catheterization introduction, and presence/absence of motor disorder at final follow-up (all p<0.05). In the univariate analysis, the presence/absence of preoperative bowel and bladder dysfunction, and symptoms were strongly associated with the risk of children and adolescents with TCS (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early accurate diagnosis and adequate surgical release might lead to successful outcomes in children and adolescents with TCS. Surgical untethering is a safe and effective method for treatment of children with TCS.
Adolescent*
;
Child*
;
Cohort Studies
;
Diagnosis
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Intermittent Urethral Catheterization
;
Lipoma
;
Male
;
Methods
;
Neural Tube Defects*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spinal Dysraphism
;
Urinary Bladder

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail