Overactive bladder (OAB) is a symptom-driven condition characterized by urinary urgency with or without urinary incontinence and a common problem that can significantly affect quality of life. Drugs that prevent acetylcholine-mediated involuntary detrusor contractions are the mainstay of OAB treatment, but several alternative therapeutic options have become established treatments for OAB. Mirabegron (a β3-adrenoceptor agonist) has a different mechanism of action from antimuscarinic agents. Recently published randomized controlled trials have shown that mirabegron is an effective and safe drug for the symptomatic treatment of OAB patients. Mirabegron represents a valid option both for patients with OAB who are antimuscarinics treatment-naïve, as well as for those who are unresponsive or intolerant to antimuscarinics. Intravesical injection of botulinum toxin A is an effective treatment for OAB that is refractory to antimuscarinics. Treatment with botulinum toxin A showed clinically relevant improvement in all OAB symptoms and health-related quality of life. It was generally well tolerated by most patients, and most treatment-related complications were acceptable. However, increased risk of a larger volume of post-void residual urine was noted in several patients and the possibility of chronic catheterization requires careful evaluation before treatment. In sum, recent options for management of OAB, mirabegron and intravesical injection of botulinum toxin A, expand the treatment options for the optimal treatment of each patient.
Administration, Intravesical ; Botulinum Toxins* ; Catheterization ; Catheters ; Drug Therapy* ; Humans ; Muscarinic Antagonists ; Quality of Life ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive* ; Urinary Incontinence

BACKGROUNDOnabotulinumtoxinA is widely used in treating neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the drug for treating NDO.

METHODSWe searched the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. All published randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of NDO were identified in the analysis. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were also investigated.

RESULTSFour publications involving a total of 807 patients were identified in the analysis, which compared onabotulinumtoxinA with placebo. The changes of the mean number of urinary incontinence per week (the standardized mean difference [SMD] = -10.91, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = -14.18--7.63, P < 0.0001); maximum cystometric capacity (SMD = 146.09, 95% CI = 126.19-165.99, P < 0.0001) and maximum detrusor pressure (SMD = -32.65, 95% CI = -37.83--27.48, P < 0.0001) indicated that onabotulinumtoxinA was more effective than the placebo, despite the doses of onabotulinumtoxinA. Safety assessments primarily localized to the urinary tract indicated onabotulinumtoxinA were often associated with more complications. Urinary tract infections (relative risk [RR] =1.48, 95% CI = 1.20-1.81, P = 0.0002); hematuria (RR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.00-3.24, P = 0.05) and urinary retention (RR = 5.87, 95% CI = 3.61-9.56, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONSThis meta-analysis indicates that onabotulinumtoxinA to be an effective treatment for NDO with side effects primarily localized to urinary tract.

Botulinum Toxins, Type A ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive ; drug therapy

After the approval and introduction of mirabegron, tadalafil, and botulinum toxin A for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms/overactive bladder, focus of interest has been on their place in therapy versus the previous gold standard, antimuscarinics. However, since these agents also have limitations there has been increasing interest in what is coming next - what is in the pipeline? Despite progress in our knowledge of different factors involved in both peripheral and central modulation of lower urinary tract dysfunction, there are few innovations in the pipe-line. Most developments concern modifications of existing principles (antimuscarinics, beta3-receptor agonists, botulinum toxin A). However, there are several new and old targets/drugs of potential interest for further development, such as the purinergic and cannabinoid systems and the different members of the transient receptor potential channel family. However, even if there seems to be good rationale for further development of these principles, further exploration of their involvement in lower urinary tract function/dysfunction is necessary.
Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use ; Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods/trends ; Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use ; Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive/*drug therapy

PURPOSE: To determine whether levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) can be used to objectively assess overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) treatment outcome and to evaluate the effects of fixed-dose fesoterodine on OAB symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 124 participants (62 patients with OAB and 62 controls) in Severance Hospital between 2010 and 2012. In patients with OAB, 4 mg fesoterodine was administered once daily. Repeated evaluations of putative biomarker levels, urine creatinine (Cr) levels, and questionnaire responses, including the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB q), were performed from baseline to 16 weeks. RESULTS: Urinary levels of NGF/Cr (OAB: 1.13+/-0.9 pg/mg; control: 0.5+/-0.29 pg/mg) and HB-EGF/Cr (OAB: 8.73+/-6.55 pg/mg; control: 4.45+/-2.93 pg/mg) were significantly higher in subjects with OAB than in controls (p<0.001). After 16 weeks of fixed-dose fesoterodine treatment, urinary NGF/Cr levels (baseline: 1.13+/-0.08 pg/mg; 16 weeks: 0.60+/-0.4 pg/mg; p=0.02) and HB-EGF/Cr levels significantly decreased (baseline: 8.73+/-6.55 pg/mg; 16 weeks: 4.72+/-2.69 pg/mg; p=0.03, respectively). Both the OABSS and OAB q scores improved (p<0.001). However, there were no a statistically significant correlations between these urinary markers and symptomatic scores. CONCLUSION: Urinary levels of NGF and HB-EGF may be potential biomarkers for evaluating outcome of OAB treatment. Fixed-dose fesoterodine improved OAB symptoms. Future studies are needed to further examine the significance of urinary NGF and HB-EGF levels as therapeutic markers for OAB.
Adult ; Benzhydryl Compounds/pharmacology/*therapeutic use ; Biological Markers/urine ; Case-Control Studies ; Creatinine/urine ; Female ; Heparin-binding EGF-like Growth Factor/*urine ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Growth Factor/*urine ; Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive/*drug therapy/physiopathology/*urine ; Urodynamics

We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of various anticholinergics in Korean children with non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB). A total of 326 children (males:females= 157:169) aged under 18 yr (mean age 7.3+/-2.6 yr) who were diagnosed with OAB from 2008 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean duration of OAB symptoms before anticholinergic treatment was 16.9+/-19.0 months. The mean duration of medication was 5.6+/-7.3 months. Urgency urinary incontinence episodes per week decreased from 1.9+/-3.1 to 0.4+/-1.5 times (P<0.001). The median voiding frequency during daytime was decreased from 9.2+/-5.4 to 6.3+/-4.2 times (P<0.001). According to 3-day voiding diaries, the maximum and average bladder capacity were increased from 145.5+/-66.9 to 196.8+/-80.3 mL and from 80.8+/-39.6 to 121.8+/-56.5 mL, respectively (P<0.001). On uroflowmetry, maximum flow rate was increased from 17.6+/-8.4 to 20.5+/-8.2 mL/sec (P<0.001). Adverse effects were reported in 14 (4.3%) children and six children (1.8%) discontinued medication due to adverse effects. Our results indicate that anticholinergics are effective to improve OAB symptoms and tolerability was acceptable without severe complications in children.
Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Constipation/etiology ; Dizziness/etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive/*drug therapy

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin for mild and moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODSWe randomly divided 166 patients with BPH and concomitant OAB into a mild obstruction symptom group (n = 88) and a moderate obstruction symptom group (n =78), 48 of the former group treated with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin + 5 mg solifenacin and the other 40 with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin; 36 of the latter group treated with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin + 5 mg solifenacin and the other 42 with 0. 2 mg tamsulosin, all administered once daily for 12 weeks. We obtained the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urine storage period symptom score (USPSS), voiding symptom score (VSS), Qmax, residual urine volume, OAB symptom score (OABSS) and adverse reactions, and compared them among different

RESULTSAmong the patients with mild obstruction symptoms, the combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin achieved remark-groups. able improvement in IPSS, USPSS, Qmax and OABSS as compared with the baseline (P < 0.05), but made no significant difference in the residual urine volume (P > 0. 05) , while tamsulosin improved IPSS only (P < 0.05). The combination therapy exhibited an obvious superiority over tamsulosin alone in improving IPSS (9.7 micro 3.0 vs 15.8 micro 3.3), USPSS (8. 1 micro 1.7 vs 12.3 micro 3.1), Qmax ([18.6 micro 2.3] ml/s vs [14.2 micro 2.3] ml/s ), and OABSS (5.3micro 1.3 vs 9.7 micro 2.7) (P < 0.05), but there were no obvious differences in residual urine, urine routine test results and adverse events between the two therapies ( P > 0. 05). In those with moderate obstruction symptoms, the combination therapy significantly improved IPSS, VSS, Qmax and OABSS (P < 0.05) but not the residual urine (P > 0. 05) in comparison with the baseline. The tamsulosin therapy achieved obvious improvement in IPSS, VSS, Qmax, OABSS and residual urine. The combination therapy showed a better effect than tamsulosin only in OABSS (4. 8 +/-1.5 vs 6.5 +/-2.5, P < 0.05), but no significant differences from the latter in IPSS, Qmax, VSS, routine urine test results, and adverse

CONCLUSIONCombination therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin is obviously safe and efficacious in the treatment (P > 0.05). events of both mild and moderate BPH with concomitant OAB, and it is superior to tamsulosin alone.

Aged ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; complications ; drug therapy ; Quinuclidines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Solifenacin Succinate ; Sulfonamides ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Tetrahydroisoquinolines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive ; complications ; drug therapy

OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of alpha-blocker alone and combined tamsulosin with an anticholinergic drug for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODSLiterature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Wanfang, and CNKI from inception to October 2013 for comparative studies assessing alpha-blocker alone and combined alpha-blocker with an anticholinergic drug for BOO+OAB. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.2.

RESULTSA total of 7 studies involving 3 458 patients were included for the analysis. The values of total IPSS and storage IPSS reduced significantly after treatment in combination group (RR = -0.23, 95%CI: -0.44--0.02, P = 0.03; RR = -0.69, 95%CI: -0.88--0.51, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in voiding IPSS and Qmax (P = 0.86 and 0.89). The incidences of dry mouth (OR = 2.53), constipation (OR = 3.74), dizziness (OR = 0.73), and urinary retention (OR = 0.26) were higher in combination group than in alpha-blocker alone group (P < 0.05). But most adverse events were mild in degree.

CONCLUSIONAlpha-blocker combined with an anticholinergic drug in the treatment of BOO+OAB was better than that of alpha-blocker alone, and was safe and well tolerated.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Cholinergic Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Sulfonamides ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction ; drug therapy ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive ; drug therapy

BACKGROUNDOveractive bladder (OAB) is a series of symptoms with high prevalence in elderly people. This study was conducted using the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) to evaluate the efficacy of solifenacin succinate for the treatment of OAB.

METHODSThis was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, 12-week study that enrolled 241 OAB patients. The patients received 5-10 mg/day solifenacin. Changes in OABSS, symptoms from voiding diary, perception of bladder condition (PPBC) score, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated at weeks 0, 4, and 12. The relationship between OABSS and PPBC score or parameters of voiding diary was also evaluated.

RESULTSAt baseline, the mean OABSS for all patients was 9.41 ± 2.40, and was reduced significantly at week 12 (-3.76 points; 61.21%, P < 0.0001). The OABSS subscore, PPBC score, IPSS, and QOL were also significantly reduced during the study (P < 0.0001). The overall incidence of adverse events was 19.91% (44 cases). The gastrointestinal system was the most commonly affected (11.31%). Around 5.88% of the cases had adverse events related to the genitourinary system. There was a strong correlation between OABSS and urinary symptoms that was recorded in the 3-day voiding dairy.

CONCLUSIONSWe showed that solifenacin was clinically effective for relieving OAB symptoms, considering the balance between efficacy, patients' well-being, and tolerability. OABSS integrates four OAB symptoms into a single score and can be a useful tool for research and clinical practice.

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscarinic Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Quinuclidines ; therapeutic use ; Solifenacin Succinate ; Tetrahydroisoquinolines ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive ; drug therapy

PURPOSE: To review the clinical outcomes of patients with voiding dysfunction who have detrusor overactivity with impaired contractility (DOIC) diagnosed with urodynamic studies. METHODS: Urodynamic reports from 2005 to 2009 were reviewed, and 54 male patients had findings consistent with DOIC. Patients with acontractile or neuropathic bladders were excluded. Clinical outcomes were obtained from patient records. RESULTS: Of 54 men, 8 presented with voiding symptoms, 17 had storage symptoms, and 29 had mixed symptoms. Twenty-two had a previous transurethral resection of the prostate. The median follow-up was 12 months. Four patients received no intervention. Two patients were taught intermittent self-catheterization. Five patients underwent surgery to reduce outlet resistance and all reported improvement. Forty-three patients were started on pharmacotherapy; symptomatic improvement was reported by 9 of 16 patients commenced on anticholinergics alone, 6 of 16 on alpha-blockers alone, and 4 of 5 treated with a combination of alpha-blockers and anticholinergics. Eleven patients experienced no difference on pharmacotherapy and 2 reported deterioration. One patient developed acute urinary retention (18 months after commencing treatment with alpha-blockers). No patient had urosepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergics and alpha-blockers appear to be safe in patients with DOIC. The risk of urinary retention and sepsis is low. The majority of patients report symptomatic benefit from either drugs or surgical treatment.
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; Cholinergic Antagonists ; Drug Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ; Male ; Prostate ; Sepsis ; Urinary Bladder ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive ; Urinary Retention ; Urodynamics

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effectiveness of the monotherapy of Cardura and the combination therapy of Cardura and Tolterodine L-Tartrate Tablets for II° ? benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODSThis study included 87 cases of BPH with OAB, with a disease course > or = 3 months, daily urination > or = 8 times, nocturnal urination > or = 2 times, urine volume < 200 ml per time, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > or = 8, OAB symptom score (OABS) > or = 3, quality of life score (QOL) > or = 3, post-void residual (PVR) < or = 100 ml, maximum urinary flow (Qmax) > or = 5 ml/s, prostate weight 25-50 g, and PSA < 4 microg/L. We randomized the patients to a monotherapy group (n = 44) and combination group (n = 43), the former treated with Cardura 4 mg qd, and the latter with Cardura 4 mg + Tolterodine L-Tartrate Tablets 4 mg qd, both for 8 weeks. Then we recorded the IPSS, OABS, Qmax, PVR, PSA, and adverse events.

RESULTSThe baseline parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). In comparison with the baseline, both the monotherapy group and the combination therapy group showed significant decreased in the IPSS (16.50 +/- 4.27 vs 13.68 +/- 3.69 and 15.51 +/- 3.80 vs 11.49 +/- 2.75), urine storage symptom score (10.48 +/- 2.75 vs 7.98 +/- 2.34 and 9.47 +/- 2.31 vs 5.74 +/- 1.66), OABS (8.55 +/- 2.69 vs 6.32 +/- 1.97 and 8.21 +/- 2.55 vs 4.44 +/- 1.62), urgent micturition score (4.25 +/- 1.06 vs 3.23 +/- 0.99 and 4.07 +/- 0.83 vs 2.26 +/- 1.05), QOL (5.36 +/- 0.72 vs 3.43 +/- 0.66 and 5.07 +/- 0.86 vs 2.37 +/- 0.76) and PVR ([44.55 +/- 22.39] vs [38.30 +/- 20.20] ml and [36.19 +/- 21.21] vs [24.98 +/- 17.60] ml) (P < 0.01). All the six parameters were significantly more improved in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (P < 0.01), but there were no remarkable differences between the groups in Qmax and voiding symptom score (P > 0.05). Neither group exhibited significant changes in the PSA level and prostate weight after treatment as compared with the baseline (P > 0.05). No acute urinary retention and other severe adverse reactions were observed during the medication.

CONCLUSIONBoth Cardura monotherapy and the combination therapy of Cardura + Tolterodine L-Tartrate Tablets can improve II ? BPH with OAB, and the latter has an even better efficacy than the former.

Aged ; Benzhydryl Compounds ; therapeutic use ; Cresols ; therapeutic use ; Doxazosin ; therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phenylpropanolamine ; therapeutic use ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; complications ; drug therapy ; Tolterodine Tartrate ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive ; complications ; drug therapy