OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic efficacy of micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of mandibular molars with severe periodontitis compared with natural healing, and to preliminarily propose the surgical indication. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from patients with mandibular molars with severe periodontitis either receiving micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation (MCF-ARP group) or undergoing natural healing in department of periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from September 2013 to June 2021. Cone-beam computed tomography scannings performed before/immediately after extraction (as baseline) and repeated before implantation (after the extraction socket healing) were used to measure the ridge width, height and volumetric changes of the sockets, and the proportion of guided bone regeneration (GBR) during implant therapy were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Between baseline and healing, significant differences in changes of MCF-ARP group [(8.34±2.81) mm] and natural healing group [(3.82±3.58) mm] in the distances from mandibular canal to center of the tooth socket were recorded (P < 0.001). The ridge width at 1 mm below the most coronal aspect of the crest increased by (3.50±4.88) mm in the MCF-ARP group but decreased by (0.16±5.70) mm in the natural healing group, respectively (P=0.019). After healing, the MCF-ARP group showed the distances from mandibular canal to center of the tooth socket >8 mm in all the cases, with 97.1% exceeding 10 mm. Natural healing group displayed 23.1% of the cases with center bone height < 8 mm and 61.5% exceeding 10 mm. Volume changes at the buccal and lingual aspect as well as the total socket were significantly greater in the MCF-ARP group compared with natural healing group (P < 0.001).At the time of implantation, GBR was performed in 5 out of 68 subjects (8.3%) in the MCF-ARP group, whereas 8 out of 26 subjects (30.8%) in the natural healing group required GBR, reflecting significant difference (P=0.003). CONCLUSION In the sites of mandibular molars with severe periodontitis, when the distances from mandibular canal to center of the tooth socket was not enough (less than 7 mm), clinicians could consider performing the micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation to achieve augmentation for alveolar ridge and reduce the proportion of guided bone regeneration during implant therapy to reduce the difficulty and risk of injuries during implant therapy.
Humans ; Tooth Extraction ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Flaps ; Molar/surgery* ; Mandible/surgery* ; Female ; Periodontitis/surgery* ; Male ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods* ; Alveolar Process/surgery* ; Tooth Socket/diagnostic imaging* ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effects of concentrated growth factor (CGF) membrane and Bio-Gide ^® collagen membrane, combined with Bio-Oss ^® sticky bone respectively in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) of maxillary anterior teeth. METHODS: Thirty patients who needed alveolar ridge preservation after maxillary anterior tooth extraction were selected and randomly assigned to the Bio-Gide group and the CGF group. In both groups, the extraction sockets were tightly filled with the Bio-Oss^® sticky bone. In the Bio-Gide group used Bio-Gide^® collagen membrane to cover the upper edge of the Bio-Oss^® sticky bone and closed the wound. The CGF group, the CGF membrane was covered on the upper edge of the Bio-Oss^® sticky bone and the wound was closed. The soft tissue wound healing status at 10 days after ARP, the changes in alveolar ridge height and width immediately after ARP and at 6 months after ARP, and the doctor-patient satisfaction at 6 months after ARP were compared and evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: At 6 months after ARP, there was no statistically significant difference in the changes of alveolar bone width and height between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the CGF group showed better performance in soft tissue healing after ARP and doctor-patient satisfaction, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the Bio-Gide^® collagen membrane, the combined application of CGF membrane and Bio-Oss^® sticky bone can lead to better soft tissue healing after ARP of maxillary anterior teeth and higher doctor-patient satisfaction, showing obvious advantages in ARP of maxillary anterior teeth.
Humans ; Maxilla/surgery* ; Tooth Extraction ; Alveolar Process/surgery* ; Membranes, Artificial ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods* ; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/therapeutic use* ; Minerals/therapeutic use* ; Collagen ; Wound Healing ; Tooth Socket/surgery* ; Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Alveolar Bone Loss/prevention & control* ; Adult

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of two barrier membranes [multilaminated small intestinal submucosa (mSIS) and bioresorable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide)] combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral Bio-Oss on guided bone regeneration through a canine extraction sockets model. METHODS: The distal roots of 18 premolars of the Beagle' s bilateral maxillary and mandibular were removed, and 18 extraction sockets were obtained. They were randomly divided into 3 groups, and the following procedures were performed on the sockets: (1) filled with Bio-Oss and covered by mSIS (mSIS group), (2) filled with Bio-Oss and covered by Bio-Gide (BG group), (3) natural healing (blank control group). Micro-computed tomograph (Micro-CT) was performed 4 and 12 weeks after surgery to eva-luate the new bone regeneration in the sockets of each group. RESULTS: The postoperative healing was uneventful in all the animals, and no complications were observed through the whole study period. Micro-CT analysis showed that the new bone fraction in the mSIS group and the BG group was significantly higher than that in the blank control group at the end of 4 weeks and 12 weeks (P < 0.05), and more new bone fraction was observed in the mSIS group than in the BG group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The new bone fraction of coronal third part of the socket in the mSIS group and BG group at the end of 4 weeks were significantly higher than that of the middle and apical third part of each group (P < 0.05). The values of bone mineral density were similar at 4 weeks in all the groups (P>0.05), but were significantly higher than that in the control group at the end of 12 weeks (P < 0.05). The bone morphometric analysis showed that the trabecular number and trabecular spacing were significantly better in the mSIS group and the BG group than in the control group at the end of 4 weeks and 12 weeks (P < 0.05), while the value in the mSIS group was slightly higher than in the BG group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The difference in trabecular thickness between all the groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION mSIS membrane as a barrier membrane combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral can enhance new bone formation in canine extraction sockets, similar to Bio-Gide collagen membrane.
Animals ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone Substitutes ; Cattle ; Dogs ; Membranes, Artificial ; Minerals ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket/surgery* ; X-Ray Microtomography

OBJECTIVE: To examine the morphology and biocompatibility of a native acellular porcine pericardium (APP) in vitro and to evaluate its barrier function and effects on osteogenesis when used in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in vivo. METHODS: First, the morphology of APP (BonanGen^Ⓡ) was detected using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Next, for biocompatibility test, proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) were determined using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) after being seeded 1, 3 and 7 days. Meanwhile, the cells stained with phalloidine and 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to view the morphology of cell adhesion and pattern of cell proliferation on day 5. A 3-Beagle dog model with 18 teeth extraction sockets was used for the further research in vivo. These sites were randomly treated by 3 patterns below: filled with Bio-Oss^Ⓡand coverd by APP membrane (APP group), filled with Bio-Oss^Ⓡand covered by Bio-Gide^Ⓡmembrane (BG group) and natural healing (blank group). Micro-CT and hematoxylin-eosin (HE) were performed after 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: A bilayer and three-dimensional porous ultrastructure was identified for APP through SEM. In vitro, APP facilitated proliferation and adhesion of hBMSCs, especially after 7 days (P < 0.05). In vivo, for the analysis of the whole socket healing, no distinct difference of new bone ratio was found between all the three groups after 4 weeks (P>0.05), however significantly more new bone regeneration was detected in APP group and BG group in comparison to blank group after 12 weeks (P < 0.05). The radio of bone formation below the membrane was significantly higher in APP group and BG group than blank group after 4 and 12 weeks (P < 0.05), however, the difference between APP group and BG group was merely significant in 12 weeks (P < 0.05). Besides, less resorption of buccal crest after 4 weeks and 12 weeks was observed in APP group of a significant difference compared in blank group (P < 0.05). The resorption in BG group was slightly lower than blank group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION APP showed considerable biocompatibility and three-dimentional structure. Performing well as a barrier membrane in the dog alveolar ridge preservation model, APP significantly promoted bone regeneration below it and reduced buccal crest resorption. On the basis of this study, APP is a potential osteoconductive and osteoinductive biomaterial.
Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; Bone Regeneration ; Dogs ; Humans ; Osteogenesis ; Pericardium ; Swine ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket

BACKGROUND: After tooth extraction, pain due to dry socket and pain in the adjacent tooth are common. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze pain in the adjacent tooth after surgical extraction of the mandibular third molar. METHODS: Postoperative pain due to dry socket, pain in the adjacent tooth, and pain from other causes were present. Group A included patents with dry socket alone; group B included patients with pain in the adjacent tooth alone; and group C included patients with both. The duration of symptoms was recorded. In addition, the prognosis of pain was divided into the complete improvement, improvement, maintenance, deterioration, and complete deterioration groups. RESULTS: A total of 312 mandibular third molars were extracted from 13, 60, and 10 patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean duration of symptoms was 5 days in group A and B and 15.2 days in group C. There were statistically significant differences in the duration of symptoms between groups A and C and groups B and C. CONCLUSION: Pain in the adjacent tooth after third molar extraction can be caused by inflammatory reactions and pressure on this tooth. The pain caused by pressure on the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone results from the cytokines released by osteoclasts, which are responsible for bone destruction. However, pain from periodontal ligament damage caused by excessive pressure may be misunderstood as pulpal pain. Unconscious parafunctional habits, such as clenching and bruxism, could also be associated with post-extraction pain.
Bruxism ; Cytokines ; Dry Socket ; Humans ; Molar, Third ; Osteoclasts ; Pain, Postoperative ; Periodontal Ligament ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth ; Weight-Bearing

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of immediate implantation after tooth extraction in the maxillary molar socket with poor bone quality beneath the sinus. METHODS: We collected the data from the patients undergoing extraction of maxillary molars with poor bone quality between the sockets and sinuses. Sinus lifting and immediate implant following the extraction were performed simultaneously in these cases, and the primary stability of the implants, wound healing, and changes of the sinus were observed. At 6 months after the operations, the crowns were installed on the implants. The masticatory function was observed, and the growth of the alveolar bones and their changes after the operations were examined using microcomputed tomography (MCT). RESULTS: We analyzed 32 extraction cases with immediate implantation in the maxillary molar sockets with poor bone quality beneath the sinus. The average age of the patients was 59.8 years, and the length and diameter of the implant ranged from 8.5 to 10 mm and from 4.5 to 5.5 mm, respectively. The torque force of the implants varied from the minimum (in which cases the implants remained fixed after insertion with fingers) to the maximum of 30 N·cm. The postoperative recovery was uneventful in all the cases and no failed or movable implants were found. At 6 months after the operation, none of the patients showed abnormalities in the sinus, and in all the cases the crowns were successfully installed on the implants with good recovery of the masticatory functions. Follow-up of the patients for 12 to 96 months after the operation showed successful immediate implantation in all the cases. After the operation, the changes of the mean alveolar ridge heights on the buccal, palatal, mesial, and distal sides of the patients were 0.8069±0.6253 mm (=1.2904, >0.1), 0.5272± 0.3331 mm (=1.5836, >0.05), 0.5416±0.4048 mm (=1.3379, >0.05), and 0.5172±0.3874 mm (=1.3351, >0.05), respectively; the change of the alveolar ridge width was 0.5522±0.4381 mm (=1.2604, >0.1) mm. The dimension of the alveolar bone underwent no significant changes after the operation in these patients. CONCLUSIONS Immediate implantation in the maxillary extraction socket with a poor bone quality can avoid damages to the sinus and achieve good outcomes with such advantages of less trauma, full use of the innate gingiva and alveolar ridge, and well preserved morphology of the alveolar ridge as compared with delayed implantation.
Dental Implantation ; methods ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading ; methods ; Maxilla ; Middle Aged ; Molar ; surgery ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket ; Treatment Outcome ; X-Ray Microtomography

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects of a modified socket shield technique (SST) and the conventional immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with one hopeless upper incisor were consecutively enrolled in this study. All patients were scheduled for immediate implant placement. Twelve patients underwent a modified SST (experimental group) whereas the others underwent conventional procedures (control group). Radiographic and clinical data were obtained preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. The success rate of the implants, the pink esthetic score (PES) and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 21.0 software. RESULTS: One year after operation, the success rate of the implants was 100% in both groups. The PES and patient satisfaction of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The buccal bone plate resorbed less in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The modified SST is advantageous over the conventional immediate implant placement in terms of buccal bone and soft tissue maintenance.
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide foundation for interproximal bone preservation to improve esthetic effects of inter-implant papillar by alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction of maxillary single anterior teeth. METHODS: A total of 30 patients requiring maxillary single anterior teeth extraction were randomly divided into test and control groups (15 cases in each group). The test group underwent alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction (Bio-Oss bone powder was implanted in alveolar fossa and fixed with surface free gingival graft suture). No other treatment was performed on the control group after tooth extraction. All patients were scanned using cone beam computed tomography with personalized digital radiographic template at 7 days and 6 months after tooth extraction. Then, measurement of height changes at the interproximal and middle buccal was performed. RESULTS: At the mesial and distal interproximal site, ridge height reduction in the test group measured (0.358±0.151) mm, (0.322±0.180) mm, whereas that of control group reached (0.653±0.260) mm, (0.667±0.274) mm, indicating statistical significance (P<0.05). At the middle buccal site, the ridge height reduction of test group amounted to (0.826±0.307) mm, whereas that of control group totaled (1.510±0.625) mm, also presenting statistical significance (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Alveolar ridge preservation can reduce absorption of alveolar crest height after tooth extraction, which could improve esthetic effects of inter-implant papillae gingiva.
Alveolar Bone Loss ; Alveolar Process ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket

Resorption of alveolar bone that occurs following tooth extraction is irreversible, it may compromise the restoration of implants or conventional prostheses. Ridge preservation can minimize ridge resorption after tooth extraction. In this article, healing features of socket after tooth extraction, factors influencing ridge remodeling, and the use of bioma-terials were reviewed.
Alveolar Bone Loss ; Alveolar Process ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ; Humans ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket ; Wound Healing

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of the socket-shield technique in the maxillary anterior region at one year after implant placement. METHODS: Ten patients with maxillary anterior teeth that cannot be reserved were enrolled. Implants were installed following the socket-shield technique and restored six months after the surgery. The thickness of the labial maxillary bone of the implant was compared before and one year after the surgery. At one year follow-up, the reten-tion rate of the implants, Jemt classification, and pink and white aesthetic scores were evaluated. Postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were also analyzed. RESULTS: One year after installation, the retention rate of the implant was 100%. The thickness of the maxillary bone at the neck, central, and root section of the implant reduced to (0.27±0.21), (0.19±0.20), and (0.28±0.29) mm, respectively, compared with the values immediately after the operation. The thickness of the labial maxillary bone at the three measurement points immediately after and one year after the operation was statistically significant (P<0.05). No significant difference (P>0.05) of the difference thickness between immediate and one year after operation at the three measurement points. The pink esthetic scores of the implant prosthesis was 9.10±0.54, and the white esthetic scores was 9.00±0.63. No complications were observed, and the patients had a high degree of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS The socket-shield technique could provide acceptable treatment results but cannot completely avoid the reconstruction of the labial maxillary bone of the implants. The technique exhibits favo-rable short-term aesthetic result, but its long-term clinical effect and aesthetic problems need to be further studied.
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading ; Maxilla ; Tooth Socket ; Treatment Outcome