1.Impact of Stroke Severity and Vascular Risk Factors on Early Versus Late Anticoagulation in Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation
Masatoshi KOGA ; Mattia BRANCA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kanta TANAKA ; Sohei YOSHIMURA ; Yusuke YAKUSHIJI ; Shigeru FUJIMOTO ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Gerli SIBOLT ; Kosuke MATSUZONO ; Caterina KULYK ; Silja RÄTY ; Peter SLADE ; Alexander SALERNO ; Dimitri HEMELSOET ; Thomas HORVATH ; Takenobu KUNIEDA ; Makoto NAKAJIMA ; Hisanao AKIYAMA ; Yasuyuki IGUCHI ; Manabu INOUE ; Masafumi IHARA ; Kazunori TOYODA ; David SEIFFGE ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):284-288
2.Antiplatelet Use Prior to Anticoagulant Initiation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke: An ELAN Trial Analysis
Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Masatoshi KOGA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Mattia BRANCA ; Thomas HORVATH ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Gek SHIM ; Christoph GUMBINGER ; Liqun ZHANG ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Philippe DESFONTAINES ; Peter VANACKER ; Angelika ALONSO ; Sven POLI ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Nicoletta G. CARACCIOLO ; Markus KNEIHSL ; Timo KAHLES ; Daria GIUDICI ; Silja RÄTY ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):217-227
Background:
and Purpose Antiplatelets are often used before direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) initiation after an acute ischemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the evidence is weak. Here, we explored the risks and benefits of this approach.
Methods:
A post-hoc analysis of ELAN (Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial data (NCT03148457) was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), and vascular death within 30 days (as a composite and as individual outcomes) in participants treated with and without antiplatelets before DOAC initiation after an AF-associated ischemic stroke. We used both logistic and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression in inverse probability of treatment weighted models to account for confounding. We calculated the net benefit of antiplatelet use by subtracting the weighted rate of excess bleeding events attributable to antiplatelets from the rate of excess ischemic events possibly prevented by antiplatelets.
Results:
Among 2,013 participants (median age 77 years, 45.5% female), 1,090 (54.1%) used antiplatelets, and 70 (3.5%) experienced the composite outcome. Antiplatelet use was not associated with the composite outcome (inverse probability of treatment weighted odds ratio [ORweighted] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.72; inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [HRweighted] 1.06, 95% CI 0.65–1.72), but showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (ORweighted 0.58 [0.30–1.08], HRweighted 0.57 [0.30–1.10]), and a higher risk of major bleeding (ORweighted 1.76 [0.56–6.63], HRweighted 1.88 [0.56–6.39]). Its net benefit was +0.57 (95% CI -1.25 to +2.34) to +0.30 (-1.82 to +2.27) weighted events/100 person-months for ICH weights 1.5 to 3.1.
Conclusion
Following an AF-associated ischemic stroke, we found a lower risk of recurrence and no signs of net harm with antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
3.Impact of Stroke Severity and Vascular Risk Factors on Early Versus Late Anticoagulation in Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation
Masatoshi KOGA ; Mattia BRANCA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kanta TANAKA ; Sohei YOSHIMURA ; Yusuke YAKUSHIJI ; Shigeru FUJIMOTO ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Gerli SIBOLT ; Kosuke MATSUZONO ; Caterina KULYK ; Silja RÄTY ; Peter SLADE ; Alexander SALERNO ; Dimitri HEMELSOET ; Thomas HORVATH ; Takenobu KUNIEDA ; Makoto NAKAJIMA ; Hisanao AKIYAMA ; Yasuyuki IGUCHI ; Manabu INOUE ; Masafumi IHARA ; Kazunori TOYODA ; David SEIFFGE ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):284-288
4.Antiplatelet Use Prior to Anticoagulant Initiation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke: An ELAN Trial Analysis
Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Masatoshi KOGA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Mattia BRANCA ; Thomas HORVATH ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Gek SHIM ; Christoph GUMBINGER ; Liqun ZHANG ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Philippe DESFONTAINES ; Peter VANACKER ; Angelika ALONSO ; Sven POLI ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Nicoletta G. CARACCIOLO ; Markus KNEIHSL ; Timo KAHLES ; Daria GIUDICI ; Silja RÄTY ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):217-227
Background:
and Purpose Antiplatelets are often used before direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) initiation after an acute ischemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the evidence is weak. Here, we explored the risks and benefits of this approach.
Methods:
A post-hoc analysis of ELAN (Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial data (NCT03148457) was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), and vascular death within 30 days (as a composite and as individual outcomes) in participants treated with and without antiplatelets before DOAC initiation after an AF-associated ischemic stroke. We used both logistic and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression in inverse probability of treatment weighted models to account for confounding. We calculated the net benefit of antiplatelet use by subtracting the weighted rate of excess bleeding events attributable to antiplatelets from the rate of excess ischemic events possibly prevented by antiplatelets.
Results:
Among 2,013 participants (median age 77 years, 45.5% female), 1,090 (54.1%) used antiplatelets, and 70 (3.5%) experienced the composite outcome. Antiplatelet use was not associated with the composite outcome (inverse probability of treatment weighted odds ratio [ORweighted] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.72; inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [HRweighted] 1.06, 95% CI 0.65–1.72), but showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (ORweighted 0.58 [0.30–1.08], HRweighted 0.57 [0.30–1.10]), and a higher risk of major bleeding (ORweighted 1.76 [0.56–6.63], HRweighted 1.88 [0.56–6.39]). Its net benefit was +0.57 (95% CI -1.25 to +2.34) to +0.30 (-1.82 to +2.27) weighted events/100 person-months for ICH weights 1.5 to 3.1.
Conclusion
Following an AF-associated ischemic stroke, we found a lower risk of recurrence and no signs of net harm with antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
5.Impact of Stroke Severity and Vascular Risk Factors on Early Versus Late Anticoagulation in Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation
Masatoshi KOGA ; Mattia BRANCA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kanta TANAKA ; Sohei YOSHIMURA ; Yusuke YAKUSHIJI ; Shigeru FUJIMOTO ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Gerli SIBOLT ; Kosuke MATSUZONO ; Caterina KULYK ; Silja RÄTY ; Peter SLADE ; Alexander SALERNO ; Dimitri HEMELSOET ; Thomas HORVATH ; Takenobu KUNIEDA ; Makoto NAKAJIMA ; Hisanao AKIYAMA ; Yasuyuki IGUCHI ; Manabu INOUE ; Masafumi IHARA ; Kazunori TOYODA ; David SEIFFGE ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):284-288
6.Antiplatelet Use Prior to Anticoagulant Initiation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke: An ELAN Trial Analysis
Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Masatoshi KOGA ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Adhiyaman VEDAMURTHY ; Manju KRISHNAN ; Mattia BRANCA ; Thomas HORVATH ; Martina GOELDLIN ; Gek SHIM ; Christoph GUMBINGER ; Liqun ZHANG ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Philippe DESFONTAINES ; Peter VANACKER ; Angelika ALONSO ; Sven POLI ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Nicoletta G. CARACCIOLO ; Markus KNEIHSL ; Timo KAHLES ; Daria GIUDICI ; Silja RÄTY ; Marjaana TIAINEN ; Jesse DAWSON ; Urs FISCHER ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):217-227
Background:
and Purpose Antiplatelets are often used before direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) initiation after an acute ischemic stroke related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the evidence is weak. Here, we explored the risks and benefits of this approach.
Methods:
A post-hoc analysis of ELAN (Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial data (NCT03148457) was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), and vascular death within 30 days (as a composite and as individual outcomes) in participants treated with and without antiplatelets before DOAC initiation after an AF-associated ischemic stroke. We used both logistic and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression in inverse probability of treatment weighted models to account for confounding. We calculated the net benefit of antiplatelet use by subtracting the weighted rate of excess bleeding events attributable to antiplatelets from the rate of excess ischemic events possibly prevented by antiplatelets.
Results:
Among 2,013 participants (median age 77 years, 45.5% female), 1,090 (54.1%) used antiplatelets, and 70 (3.5%) experienced the composite outcome. Antiplatelet use was not associated with the composite outcome (inverse probability of treatment weighted odds ratio [ORweighted] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.72; inverse probability of treatment weighted hazard ratio [HRweighted] 1.06, 95% CI 0.65–1.72), but showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (ORweighted 0.58 [0.30–1.08], HRweighted 0.57 [0.30–1.10]), and a higher risk of major bleeding (ORweighted 1.76 [0.56–6.63], HRweighted 1.88 [0.56–6.39]). Its net benefit was +0.57 (95% CI -1.25 to +2.34) to +0.30 (-1.82 to +2.27) weighted events/100 person-months for ICH weights 1.5 to 3.1.
Conclusion
Following an AF-associated ischemic stroke, we found a lower risk of recurrence and no signs of net harm with antiplatelet use before DOAC initiation, despite an increased risk of bleeding.
7.Ending nuclear weapons, before they end us
Kamran Abbasi ; Parveen Ali ; Virginia Barbour ; Marion Birch ; Inga Blum ; Peter Doherty ; Andy Haines ; Ira Helfand ; Richard Horton ; Kati Juva ; José ; Florencio F. Lapeñ ; a, Jr. ; Robert Mash ; Olga Mironova ; Arun Mitra ; Carlos Monteiro ; Elena N. Naumova ; David Onazi ; Tilman Ruff ; Peush Sahni ; James Tumwine ; Carlos Umañ ; a ; Paul Yonga ; Joe Thomas ; Chris Zielinski
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;40(1):6-8
8.Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: a guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
Thomas FUCHS-BUDER ; S. Carolina ROMERO ; Heidrun LEWALD ; Massimo LAMPERTI ; Arash AFSHARI ; Ana-Marjia HRISTOVSKA ; Denis SCHMARTZ ; Jochen HINKELBEIN ; Dan LONGROIS ; Maria POPP ; De Boer Hans D. ; Massimiliano SORBELLO ; Radmilo JANKOVIC ; Peter KRANKE
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology 2024;44(6):641-656
Recent data indicated a high incidence of inappropriate management of neuromuscular block, with a high rate of residual paralysis and relaxant-associated postoperative complications. These data are alarming in that the available neuromuscular monitoring, as well as myorelaxants and their antagonists basically allow well tolerated management of neuromuscular blockade. In this first European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) guideline on peri-operative management of neuromuscular block, we aim to present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians provide best medical care and ensure patient safety. We identified three main clinical questions: Are myorelaxants necessary to facilitate tracheal intubation in adults? Does the intensity of neuromuscular blockade influence a patient′s outcome in abdominal surgery? What are the strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of residual paralysis? On the basis of this, PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. A stepwise approach was used to reduce the number of trials of the initial research ( n=24 000) to the finally relevant clinical studies ( n=88). GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used for formulating the recommendations based on the findings of the included studies in conjunction with their methodological quality. A two-step Delphi process was used to determine the agreement of the panel members with the recommendations: R1 We recommend using a muscle relaxant to facilitate tracheal intubation (1A). R2 We recommend the use of muscle relaxants to reduce pharyngeal and/or laryngeal injury following endotracheal intubation (1C). R3 We recommend the use of a fast-acting muscle relaxant for rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) such as succinylcholine 1 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.9 to 1.2 mg/kg (1B). R4 We recommend deepening neuromuscular blockade if surgical conditions need to be improved (1B). R5 There is insufficient evidence to recommend deep neuromuscular blockade in general to reduce postoperative pain or decrease the incidence of peri-operative complications (2C). R6 We recommend the use of ulnar nerve stimulation and quantitative neuromuscular monitoring at the adductor pollicis muscle to exclude residual paralysis (1B). R7 We recommend using sugammadex to antagonise deep, moderate and shallow neuromuscular blockade induced by aminosteroidal agents (rocuronium, vecuronium) (1A). R8 We recommend advanced spontaneous recovery (i. e. TOF ratio>0.2) before starting neostigmine-based reversal and to continue quantitative monitoring of neuromuscular blockade until a TOF ratio of more than 0.9 has been attained (1C).
9.Do some patients receive unnecessary parenteral nutrition after pancreatoduodenectomy?Results from an international multicentre study
Thomas B. RUSSELL ; Peter L. LABIB ; Paula MURPHY ; Fabio AUSANIA ; Elizabeth PANDO ; Keith J. ROBERTS ; Ambareen KAUSAR ; Vasileios K. MAVROEIDIS ; Gabriele MARANGONI ; Sarah C. THOMASSET ; Adam E. FRAMPTON ; Pavlos LYKOUDIS ; Manuel MAGLIONE ; Nassir ALHABOOB ; Hassaan BARI ; Andrew M. SMITH ; Duncan SPALDING ; Parthi SRINIVASAN ; Brian R. DAVIDSON ; Ricky H. BHOGAL ; Daniel CROAGH ; Ismael DOMINGUEZ ; Rohan THAKKAR ; Dhanny GOMEZ ; Michael A. SILVA ; Pierfrancesco LAPOLLA ; Andrea MINGOLI ; Alberto PORCU ; Nehal S. SHAH ; Zaed Z. R. HAMADY ; Bilal AL-SARRIEH ; Alejandro SERRABLO ; ; Somaiah AROORI
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(1):70-79
Background:
s/Aims: After pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), an early oral diet is recommended; however, the postoperative nutritional management of PD patients is known to be highly variable, with some centers still routinely providing parenteral nutrition (PN). Some patients who receive PN experience clinically significant complications, underscoring its judicious use. Using a large cohort, this study aimed to determine the proportion of PD patients who received postoperative nutritional support (NS), describe the nature of this support, and investigate whether receiving PN correlated with adverse perioperative outcomes.
Methods:
Data were extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple’s study, a retrospective multicenter study of PD outcomes.
Results:
In total, 1,323 patients (89%) had data on their postoperative NS status available. Of these, 45% received postoperative NS, which was “enteral only,” “parenteral only,” and “enteral and parenteral” in 44%, 35%, and 21% of cases, respectively. Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 (p = 0.03), absence of preoperative biliary stenting (p = 0.009), and serum albumin < 36 g/L (p = 0.009) all correlated with receiving postoperative NS. Among those who did not develop a serious postoperative complication, i.e., those who had a relatively uneventful recovery, 20% received PN.
Conclusions
A considerable number of patients who had an uneventful recovery received PN. PN is not without risk, and should be reserved for those who are unable to take an oral diet. PD patients should undergo pre- and postoperative assessment by nutrition professionals to ensure they are managed appropriately, and to optimize perioperative outcomes.
10.Impact of a simple non-invasive nasal mask device on intraprocedural hypoxemia in overweight individuals undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation provided by a non-anesthesiologist provider
Jan DREWS ; Jonas HARDER ; Hannah KAISER ; Miriam SOENARJO ; Dorothee SPAHLINGER ; Peter WOHLMUTH ; Sebastian WIRTZ ; Ralf EBERHARDT ; Florian BORNITZ ; Torsten BUNDE ; Thomas VON HAHN
Clinical Endoscopy 2024;57(2):196-202
Background/Aims:
Hypoxemia is a common side effect of propofol sedation during endoscopy. Applying mild positive airway pressure (PAP) using a nasal mask may offer a simple way to reduce such events and optimize the conditions for diagnostic and therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopies.
Methods:
We compared overweight patients (body mass index >25 kg/m2) with a nasal PAP mask or standard nasal cannula undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopies by non-anesthesiologists who provided propofol sedation. Outcome parameters included the frequency and severity of hypoxemic episodes.
Results:
We analyzed 102 procedures in 51 patients with nasal PAP masks and 51 controls. Episodes of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation [SpO2] <90% at any time during sedation) occurred in 25 (49.0%) controls compared to 8 (15.7%) patients with nasal PAP masks (p<0.001). Severe hypoxemia (SpO2 <80%) occurred in three individuals (5.9%) in both groups. The mean delta between baseline SpO2 and the lowest SpO2 recorded was significantly decreased among patients with nasal PAP mask compared to controls (3.7 and 8.2 percentage points difference, respectively). There were significantly fewer airway interventions performed in the nasal PAP mask group (15.7% vs. 41.2%, p=0.008).
Conclusions
Using a nasal PAP mask may be a simple means of increasing patient safety and ease of examination.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail