BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies.

We used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty.

Ivermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Both ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Scabies, caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis, is a highly contagious condition with significant public health implications. Standard treatments for scabies can be expensive, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of 1% permethrin shampoo compared to the standard 5% permethrin lotion in treating scabies, assessing Total Lesion Count (TLC), Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS), clinical response, adverse events, and treatment acceptability.

This is an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in Barangay Malagutay, Zamboanga City, Philippines, involving 28 participants (14 per group). After dermatologic confirmation of diagnosis and a skin irritation test, participants were randomly assigned to receive either 5% permethrin lotion or 1% permethrin shampoo. Outcome measurements included Total Lesion Count (TLC) and SIRS, which evaluated erythema, crusting, purulence, itching, and pain. These were assessed on Days 0, 3, and 7. Clinical response, treatment acceptability, and adverse events were also monitored throughout the 7-day study period.

Results showed both treatments were effective with comparable outcomes on Day 3. Improvement in lesions, SIRS-erythema, crusting, purulence, pain, and itching was observed for both groups from Day 0 to Day 7. No significant difference was noted between the groups (p > 0.05) on Day 3. Both 1% and 5% permethrin treatments showed complete symptom resolution by Day 7, achieving 100% treatment success with 1% permethrin shampoo and 93% with the 5% permethrin lotion.

1% permethrin shampoo offers effective treatment for scabies, with comparable efficacy to 5% permethrin lotion.

Elemene, derived from Curcuma wenyujin, one of the "8 famous genuine medicinal materials of Zhejiang province," exhibits remarkable antitumor activity. It has gained wide recognition in clinical practice for effectiveness on tumors. Dr. XIE Tian, introduced the innovative concept of "molecular compatibility theory" by combining Chinese medicine principles, specifically the "monarch, minister, assistant, and envoy" theory, with modern biomedical technology. This groundbreaking approach, along with a systematic analysis of Chinese medicine and modern biomedical knowledge, led to the development of elemene nanoliposome formulations. These novel formulations offer numerous advantages, including low toxicity, well-defined composition, synergistic effects on multiple targets, and excellent biocompatibility. Following the principles of the "molecular compatibility theory", further exploration of cancer treatment strategies and methods based on elemene was undertaken. This comprehensive review consolidates the current understanding of elemene's potential antitumor mechanisms, recent clinical investigations, advancements in drug delivery systems, and structural modifications. The ultimate goal of this review is to establish a solid theoretical foundation for researchers, empowering them to develop more effective antitumor drugs based on the principles of "molecular compatibility theory".
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use* ; Sesquiterpenes/therapeutic use*

Background and Objective: Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies. Methods: We used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty. Results: Ivermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Conclusion Both ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.
Scabies ; Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Cost-Benefit Analysis

Objectives: The stratum corneum (SC) remains an obstacle to the passage of drugs applied topically. Several investigations have focused on enhancing the penetration of drugs through the SC by integrating permeation enhancers (PE) into the drug formulation. Terpenes are among the PE utilized in formulations and are categorized by the regulatory bodies as generally recognized as safe (GRAS). This study aimed to comparatively analyze the skin permeation enhancing effect of terpenes on lipophilic drugs. Methods: The present study reviewed the effects of terpenes on the permeation of lipophilic small-molecule drugs through the skin using original research published between 2000 - 2022 retrieved from PubMed®. The search phrase used was (lipophilic drug) AND (terpene) AND (permeation enhancer). Results: Terpenes increase the percutaneous permeation of lipophilic small molecule drugs by 1.06 – 256.80-fold. Linear correlation analysis of terpenes’ cLog P with enhancement ratio (ER) revealed moderate and strong positive correlations in pig skin (r = 0.21) and mouse skin (r = 0.27), and rat skin (r = 0.41) and human skin (r = 0.67), respectively. Drug cLog P is a poor (r = -0.06) predictor of permeation enhancement. Terpenes with cLog P higher than 2.40 had ER greater than 10. Higher ERs (>30) were recorded for nerolidol, carvacrol, borneol, terpineol, limonene, menthone, pulegone, and menthol among the terpene-chemical penetration enhancers. Conclusion cLog P of terpene-based chemical permeation enhancers (CPE) is strongly correlated with ER of lipophilic drugs across human skin. Non-polar groups in terpenes and hydrogen bond interactions by terpenes with SC lipid enhance cutaneous drug penetration of lipophilic drugs.
Terpenes ; Skin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug, alone or in combination with permethrin, may be a cheaper and more convenient alternative drug to topical permethrin alone in the treatment of classic scabies. There are no previous studies on the treatment acceptability of the three interventions among individual patients with scabies in the Philippines. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences and perceptions on treatment acceptability for oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or combination treatment among patients with scabies using the multiple-case study approach.

We conducted a qualitative multiple case study among adult Filipino patients with classic scabies who were prescribed oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or its combination at a government tertiary hospital dermatology outpatient clinic from December 2022 to September 2023. Semi-structured interviews were used as the primary source of data and analyzed together with chart reviews, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and clinical images. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and triangulated with other secondary data. A three-person research team employed a reflexive and iterative process of familiarization, coding, and thematic analysis using a modified Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to generate case descriptions, within-case analyses, and cross-case syntheses.

The acceptability of scabies treatments (permethrin, ivermectin, and combination therapy) was generally positive. Permethrin, used in three patient cases, was generally perceived as effective but itch relief varied. The burden of whole-body application of permethrin was context-dependent, influenced by living arrangements and family support. Perceived affordability of permethrin was linked to socioeconomic status. Ivermectin, used by one patient case, was perceived as highly effective with no side effects. Its single dose use did not interfere with patient routine. Combination therapy was also considered effective but potential antagonistic effects and the cost of adding permethrin made it less preferred. Reluctance in taking oral pills was noted. All patients valued medical advice and deferred to their physicians for treatment decisions.

All three treatment options were considered effective and safe. Patients generally preferred permethrin over oral ivermectin due to its topical nature and perceived lower side effects. However, affordability and logistical challenges, especially for large households and low-income families, were noted with permethrin. Oral ivermectin elicited hesitation due to its controversial role in COVID-19 and veterinary use. Concerns about added costs and potential antagonism in combination therapy were raised. Despite these considerations, patients ultimately relied on physicians for treatment decisions. This study underscores the importance of understanding patient perspectives, experiences, and the patient-physician relationship in choosing scabies interventions. Addressing patient concerns, providing education, and ensuring ease of use and affordability can enhance treatment acceptability and adherence for better outcomes.

We report a case of a Filipino child who presented with yellowish hyperkeratotic plaques on the palms and soles with palmar transgredient extension to the wrists, a yellowish hyperkeratotic plaque over the coccygeal area, and brownish-black hyperkeratotic perianal plaques. Patient had delayed physical development and short stature, but no intellectual disability. Histopathologic examination showed palmoplantar keratoderma. These clinical findings of symmetrical palmoplantar keratoderma with periorificial keratotic plaques were consistent with Olmsted Syndrome. Oral retinoids with topical keratolytics afforded significant improvement with increased hand mobility. Although there is no curative management for these patients, current experimental therapies like epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid-3 (TRPV3) antagonists are promising. Olmsted Syndrome is a rare genodermatosis with 73 cases officially reported as of this writing. This is the first case to be reported from the Philippines.

INTRODUCTION

Oral isothretinoin is the treatment of choice in moderate to severe acne vulgaris. The most common adverse effect is mild mucocutaneous symptoms and the most seious risk is related to teratogenecity. Hyperuricemia and gouty arthritis are rarely associated with isotretinoin therapy.

We report a case of a 26-year-old female patient with no known comorbidities who was started on isotretinoin therapy for acne vulgaris. The patient presented with baseline hyperuricemia with no joint pains or swelling. Two and a half weeks later after initiation of isotretinoin therapy, the patient developed pain and swelling on the left wrist, hence was started on urate-lowering medications and maintained on isotretinoin tharapy. The patient had no recurrence of joint pains and remains symptom-free for six months later.

Crusted scabies, characterized by hyperkeratosis and significant mite proliferation, is particularly prevalent in immunocompromised patients, such as those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This report presents a case of J.A., a 35-year-old female with SLE on prednisone and hydroxychloroquine, who developed pruritic erythematous papules on her palms and fingers. Over several months, these progressed to crusted hyperkeratotic plaques with fissures on her face, scalp, neck, and extremities.

Clinical evaluation revealed positive ink burrow tests and mineral oil preparation showing scabies mites and eggs. Histopathology confirmed the presence of intracorneal mites and scybala. Treatment involved permethrin 5% lotion applied daily for 14 hours over 7 days, followed by keratolytic soap and petroleum jelly twice weekly. Due to ivermectin unavailability, albendazole 400 mg was administered daily for three doses. Significant improvement was noted within two weeks.

Crusted scabies carries a high mite burden up to 4000 mites/gram of skin compared to 20 in typical scabies. The immunocompromised state in SLE patients, often marked by lower CD4+ counts and increased CD8+ T cells, lead to epidermal hyperproliferation. Early recognition and prompt combination treatment with permethrin and albendazole are essential for effective management. This case underscores the need for vigilance in diagnosing crusted scabies in patients with altered immune responses.

BACKGROUND

Scabies, caused by Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis, is a prevalent and burdensome skin disease in the Philippines, ranking second in disability. Recognized as a neglected tropical disease (NTD) by the WHO, scabies management is targeted for inclusion in universal healthcare programs worldwide by 2030. Current treatment involves topical neurotoxic drugs like permethrin, but issues such as expense and inconvenience hinder compliance. Oral ivermectin, recommended by the WHO only recently, is more cost-effective and easier to administer but is considered a second-line option in clinical practice guidelines. This research aimed to determine the comparative efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with topical permethrin, versus topical permethrin alone, in the treatment of classic scabies among Filipino patients.

This 4-part study was conducted from July 2021 to September 2023 and aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of oral ivermectin alone or in combination with topical permethrin versus topical permethrin alone for treating classic scabies among Filipino patients. Quantitative methods included a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a pharmacoeconomic evaluation using decision tree modeling. Qualitative methods involved a multiple case study of patient experiences and perceptions and in-depth interviews with physicians.

There seems to be comparable efficacy between oral ivermectin and permethrin, with limited evidence favoring the combination ivermectin/permethrin regimen. Adverse events were minor, and cost-effectiveness analyses favored ivermectin-based regimens over permethrin. Patient and physician perspectives supported the effectiveness of all treatments, with oral ivermectin recognized as safe but underutilized.

Evidence synthesis suggests that oral ivermectin, especially in combination with permethrin, could be a viable and cost-effective alternative for scabies treatment in the Philippines. The optimal dosing regimen, safety in specific populations, and factors influencing treatment choice need further exploration. Recommendations include advocating for oral ivermectin inclusion in regulatory guidelines and national formulary, considering it as a first- or second- line treatment, and conducting further research, including mixed-methods designs, to confirm efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness in different settings. Shared decision-making, considering ethical, logistical, socioeconomic, and psychological aspects, is crucial in implementing effective scabies control programs.