1.Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor (TSH PitNET): A Single-Center Experience
Jung HEO ; Yeon-Lim SUH ; Se Hoon KIM ; Doo-Sik KONG ; Do-Hyun NAM ; Won-Jae LEE ; Sung Tae KIM ; Sang Duk HONG ; Sujin RYU ; You-Bin LEE ; Gyuri KIM ; Sang-Man JIN ; Jae Hyeon KIM ; Kyu Yeon HUR
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2024;39(2):387-396
Background:
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (TSH PitNET) is a rare subtype of PitNET. We investigated the comprehensive characteristics and outcomes of TSH PitNET cases from a single medical center. Also, we compared diagnostic methods to determine which showed superior sensitivity.
Methods:
A total of 17 patients diagnosed with TSH PitNET after surgery between 2002 and 2022 in Samsung Medical Center was retrospectively reviewed. Data on comprehensive characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected. The sensitivities of diagnostic methods were compared.
Results:
Seven were male (41%), and the median age at diagnosis was 42 years (range, 21 to 65); the median follow-up duration was 37.4 months. The most common (59%) initial presentation was hyperthyroidism-related symptoms. Hormonal co-secretion was present in four (23%) patients. Elevated serum alpha-subunit (α-SU) showed the greatest diagnostic sensitivity (91%), followed by blunted response at thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation (80%) and elevated sex hormone binding globulin (63%). Fourteen (82%) patients had macroadenoma, and a specimen of one patient with heavy calcification was negative for TSH. Among 15 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months, 10 (67%) achieved hormonal and structural remission within 6 months postoperatively. A case of growth hormone (GH)/TSH/prolactin (PRL) co-secreting mixed gangliocytoma-pituitary adenoma (MGPA) was discovered.
Conclusion
The majority of the TSH PitNET cases was macroadenoma, and 23% showed hormone co-secretion. A rare case of GH/TSH/PRL co-secreting MGPA was discovered. Serum α-SU and TRH stimulation tests showed great diagnostic sensitivity. Careful consideration is needed in diagnosing TSH PitNET. Achieving remission requires complete tumor resection. In case of nonremission, radiotherapy or medical therapy can improve the long-term remission rate.
2.Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach
Tae-Han KIM ; In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Bang Wool EOM ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chang In CHOI ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chung sik GONG ; Dong Jin KIM ; Arthur Eung-Hyuck CHO ; Eun Jeong GONG ; Geum Jong SONG ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hye Seong AHN ; Hyun LIM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Ji Yeon PARK ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Kyoung Doo SONG ; Minkyu JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Sang-Yong SON ; Shin-Hoo PARK ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Tae-Yong KIM ; Woo Kyun BAE ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Yeseob JEE ; Yoo Min KIM ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Young Suk PARK ; Hye Sook HAN ; Su Youn NAM ; Seong-Ho KONG ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2023;23(1):3-106
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.
3.Erratum: Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidencebased, Multidisciplinary Approach
Tae-Han KIM ; In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Bang Wool EOM ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chang In CHOI ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chung sik GONG ; Dong Jin KIM ; Arthur Eung-Hyuck CHO ; Eun Jeong GONG ; Geum Jong SONG ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hye Seong AHN ; Hyun LIM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Ji Yeon PARK ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Kyoung Doo SONG ; Minkyu JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Sang-Yong SON ; Shin-Hoo PARK ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Tae-Yong KIM ; Woo Kyun BAE ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Yeseob JEE ; Yoo Min KIM ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Young Suk PARK ; Hye Sook HAN ; Su Youn NAM ; Seong-Ho KONG
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2023;23(2):365-373
4.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Glioblastomas: Version 2018.01
Young Zoon KIM ; Chae Yong KIM ; Jaejoon LIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jihae LEE ; Hyuk Jin OH ; Seok Gu KANG ; Shin Hyuk KANG ; Doo Sik KONG ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Se Hyuk KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Eui Hyun KIM ; In Ah KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Tae Hoon ROH ; Jae Sung PARK ; Hyun Jin PARK ; Sang Woo SONG ; Seung Ho YANG ; Wan Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Soon Tae LEE ; Sea Won LEE ; Youn Soo LEE ; Chan Woo WEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae Young JUNG ; Hye Lim JUNG ; Jae Ho CHO ; Seung Hong CHOI ; Hyoung Soo CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Dong Sup CHUNG ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2019;7(1):1-9
BACKGROUND: There has been no practical guidelines for the management of patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors in Korea for many years. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, started to prepare guidelines for CNS tumors from February 2018. METHODS: The Working Group was composed of 35 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea. References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. RESULTS: First, the maximal safe resection if feasible is recommended. After the diagnosis of a glioblastoma with neurosurgical intervention, patients aged ≤70 years with good performance should be treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (Stupp's protocol) or standard brain radiotherapy alone. However, those with poor performance should be treated by hypofractionated brain radiotherapy (preferred)±concurrent or adjuvant temozolomide, temozolomide alone (Level III), or supportive treatment. Alternatively, patients aged >70 years with good performance should be treated by hypofractionated brain radiotherapy+concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide or Stupp's protocol or hypofractionated brain radiotherapy alone, while those with poor performance should be treated by hypofractionated brain radiotherapy alone or temozolomide chemotherapy if the patient has methylated MGMT gene promoter (Level III), or supportive treatment. CONCLUSION: The KSNO's guideline recommends that glioblastomas should be treated by maximal safe resection, if feasible, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy according to the individual comprehensive condition of the patient.
Brain
;
Central Nervous System
;
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Diagnosis
;
Drug Therapy
;
Glioblastoma
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Radiotherapy
5.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for WHO Grade II Cerebral Gliomas in Adults: Version 2019.01
Young Zoon KIM ; Chae Yong KIM ; Chan Woo WEE ; Tae Hoon ROH ; Je Beom HONG ; Hyuk Jin OH ; Seok Gu KANG ; Shin Hyuk KANG ; Doo Sik KONG ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Se Hyuk KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Eui Hyun KIM ; In Ah KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Jae Sung PARK ; Hyun Jin PARK ; Sang Woo SONG ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Seung Ho YANG ; Wan Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Jihae LEE ; Soon Tae LEE ; Sea Won LEE ; Youn Soo LEE ; Jaejoon LIM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae Young JUNG ; Hye Lim JUNG ; Jae Ho CHO ; Seung Hong CHOI ; Hyoung Soo CHOI ; Do Hoon LIM ; Dong Sup CHUNG ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2019;7(2):74-84
BACKGROUND: There was no practical guideline for the management of patients with central nervous system tumor in Korea for many years. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has developed the guideline for glioblastoma. Subsequently, the KSNO guideline for World Health Organization (WHO) grade II cerebral glioma in adults is established. METHODS: The Working Group was composed of 35 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea. References were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords regarding diffuse astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma of brain in adults. RESULTS: Whenever radiological feature suggests lower grade glioma, the maximal safe resection if feasible is recommended globally. After molecular and histological examinations, patients with diffuse astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype without molecular feature of glioblastoma should be primarily treated by standard brain radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (Level III) while those with molecular feature of glioblastoma should be treated following the protocol for glioblastomas. In terms of patients with diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant and oligodendroglioma (IDH-mutant and 1p19q codeletion), standard brain radiotherapy and adjuvant PCV (procarbazine+lomustine+vincristine) combination chemotherapy should be considered primarily for the high-risk group while observation with regular follow up should be considered for the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: The KSNO's guideline recommends that WHO grade II gliomas should be treated by maximal safe resection, if feasible, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy according to molecular and histological features of tumors and clinical characteristics of patients.
Adult
;
Astrocytoma
;
Brain
;
Central Nervous System
;
Drug Therapy
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glioblastoma
;
Glioma
;
Humans
;
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
;
Korea
;
Oligodendroglioma
;
Radiotherapy
;
World Health Organization
6.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for WHO Grade III Cerebral Gliomas in Adults: Version 2019.01
Young Zoon KIM ; Chae Yong KIM ; Jaejoon LIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jihae LEE ; Hyuk Jin OH ; Seok Gu KANG ; Shin Hyuk KANG ; Doo Sik KONG ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Se Hyuk KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Eui Hyun KIM ; In Ah KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Tae Hoon ROH ; Jae Sung PARK ; Hyun Jin PARK ; Sang Woo SONG ; Seung Ho YANG ; Wan Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Soon Tae LEE ; Sea Won LEE ; Youn Soo LEE ; Chan Woo WEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae Young JUNG ; Hye Lim JUNG ; Jae Ho CHO ; Seung Hong CHOI ; Hyoung Soo CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Dong Sup CHUNG ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2019;7(2):63-73
BACKGROUND: There was no practical guideline for the management of patients with central nervous system tumor in Korea in the past. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, developed the guideline for glioblastoma successfully and published it in Brain Tumor Research and Treatment, the official journal of KSNO, in April 2019. Recently, the KSNO guideline for World Health Organization (WHO) grade III cerebral glioma in adults has been established. METHODS: The Working Group was composed of 35 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea. References were identified by searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. Scope of the disease was confined to cerebral anaplastic astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma in adults. RESULTS: Whenever radiological feature suggests high grade glioma, maximal safe resection if feasible is globally recommended. After molecular and histological examinations, patients with anaplastic astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant should be primary treated by standard brain radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy whereas those with anaplastic astrocytoma, NOS, and anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype should be treated following the protocol for glioblastomas. In terms of anaplastic oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p19q-codeletion, and anaplastic oligodendroglioma, NOS should be primary treated by standard brain radiotherapy and neoadjuvant or adjuvant PCV (procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine) combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The KSNO's guideline recommends that WHO grade III cerebral glioma of adults should be treated by maximal safe resection if feasible, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy according to molecular and histological features of tumors.
Adult
;
Astrocytoma
;
Brain
;
Brain Neoplasms
;
Central Nervous System
;
Drug Therapy
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Glioblastoma
;
Glioma
;
Humans
;
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
;
Korea
;
Lomustine
;
Oligodendroglioma
;
Radiotherapy
;
World Health Organization
7.Comprehensive Cancer Panel Sequencing Defines Genetic Diversity and Changes in the Mutational Characteristics of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatment
Kyong Ah YOON ; Sang Myung WOO ; Yun Hee KIM ; Sun Young KONG ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Sung Sik HAN ; Tae Hyun KIM ; Woo Jin LEE ; Sang Jae PARK
Gut and Liver 2019;13(6):683-689
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. This study assessed the genetic diversity among patients with PDA and compared their mutational profiles before and after treatment. METHODS: Tumors and matched blood samples were obtained from 22 PDA patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. The somatic mutations were analyzed with comprehensive cancer gene panel (CCP). In addition, the biopsy samples obtained at diagnosis and the surgically resected samples after treatment were compared for seven patients. The CCP provided formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample-compatible multiplexed target selection for 409 genes implicated in cancer. RESULTS: Assessments of the MLH1, MLH3, MSH2, and PMS2 genes showed that the four patients with the highest relative burdens of mutations harbored somatic mutations in at least three of these genes. Genes in the histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2 (KMT2) family, such as KMT2D, KMT2A, and KMT2C, were frequently mutated in tumor samples. Survival was worse in patients with ARID1A gene mutations than those without ARID1A gene mutations. Mutation patterns were compared between tissue samples before and after neoadjuvant treatment in seven patients who underwent surgical resection. The allelic fraction of mutations in KRAS codon 12 was lower in the surgically resected samples than in the endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy samples of six patients. The number of mutant alleles of the histone lysine methyltransferase gene WHSC1 also decreased after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that tumor tissue from PDA patients is genetically diverse and suggest that ARID1A mutations may be a potential prognostic marker for PDA.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Alleles
;
Biopsy
;
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
;
Codon
;
Diagnosis
;
Genes, Neoplasm
;
Genetic Variation
;
Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase
;
Humans
;
Neoadjuvant Therapy
;
Pancreatic Ducts
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms
;
Prognosis
8.Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Followed by Simultaneous Integrated Boost–Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Gemcitabine for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results from a Feasibility Study.
Sang Myung WOO ; Min Kyeong KIM ; Jungnam JOO ; Kyong Ah YOON ; Boram PARK ; Sang Jae PARK ; Sung Sik HAN ; Ju Hee LEE ; Eun Kyung HONG ; Yun Hee KIM ; Hae MOON ; Sun Young KONG ; Tae Hyun KIM ; Woo Jin LEE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2017;49(4):1022-1032
PURPOSE: This study assessed the feasibility and compliance of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by simultaneous integrated boost–intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with concurrent gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this trial, patients received induction chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m²) and cisplatin (25 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each treatment cycle. Patients were subsequently treated with gemcitabine (300 mg/m²/wk) during SIB-IMRT. The patients received total doses of 55 and 44 Gy in 22 fractions to planning target volume 1 and 2, respectively. As an ancillary study, digital polymerase chain reaction was performed to screen for the seven most common mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS oncogene of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA). RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2015. Of these, 33 (75%) completed the treatment. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy were grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (18.2%), grade 3 nausea (6.8%) and vomiting (6.8%). The most common toxicities during SIB-IMRT were grade 3 neutropenia (24.2%) and grade 3 anemia (12.1%). Ten patients (23%) underwent a curative resection after therapy. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent curative resection (16.8 months vs. 11 months, p < 0.01). The median cfDNA concentration was significantly lower after treatment (108.5 ng/mL vs. 18.4 ng/mL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent SIB-IMRT was well tolerated and active.
Anemia
;
Cisplatin*
;
Codon
;
Compliance
;
DNA
;
Feasibility Studies*
;
Humans
;
Induction Chemotherapy*
;
Nausea
;
Neutropenia
;
Oncogenes
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms*
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Radiotherapy*
;
Vomiting
9.Aspirin induces IL-4 production: augmented IL-4 production in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.
Su Kang KONG ; Byung Soo KIM ; Tae Gi UHM ; Hun Soo CHANG ; Jong Sook PARK ; Sung Woo PARK ; Choon Sik PARK ; Il Yup CHUNG
Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2016;48(1):e202-
Aspirin hypersensitivity is a hallmark of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), a clinical syndrome characterized by the severe inflammation of the respiratory tract after ingestion of cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors. We investigated the capacity of aspirin to induce interleukin-4 (IL-4) production in inflammatory cells relevant to AERD pathogenesis and examined the associated biochemical and molecular pathways. We also compared IL-4 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with AERD vs aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) upon exposure to aspirin. Aspirin induced IL-4 expression and activated the IL-4 promoter in a report assay. The capacity of aspirin to induce IL-4 expression correlated with its activity to activate mitogen-activated protein kinases, to form DNA-protein complexes on P elements in the IL-4 promoter and to synthesize nuclear factor of activated T cells, critical transcription factors for IL-4 transcription. Of clinical importance, aspirin upregulated IL-4 production twice as much in PBMCs from patients with AERD compared with PBMCs from patients with ATA. Our results suggest that IL-4 is an inflammatory component mediating intolerance reactions to aspirin, and thus is crucial for AERD pathogenesis.
Aspirin*
;
Asthma
;
Cyclooxygenase 1
;
Eating
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Inflammation
;
Interleukin-4*
;
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases
;
Negotiating
;
Respiratory System
;
T-Lymphocytes
;
Transcription Factors
10.Clinical Features and Treatment Outcome of Chordoid Meningiomas in a Single Institute.
Tae Keun JEE ; Kyung Il JO ; Ho Jun SEOL ; Doo Sik KONG ; Jung Il LEE ; Hyung Jin SHIN
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2014;56(3):194-199
OBJECTIVE: Meningioma is the second most common primary central nervous system neoplasm. In contrast, chordoid meningioma is rare; due to the paucity of cases, little is known about its clinical features or treatment outcomes. The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients with chordoid meningioma. METHODS: In total, 16 patients, with newly diagnosed chordoid meningioma who underwent surgical excision between 1999 and 2012 were included. We retrospectively evaluated the medical records, radiological findings, and pathological findings. The median follow-up period was 56.5 (range, 3-170) months. The MIB-1 labeling index ranged from 1 to 26.60% (median, 5.04). RESULTS: Simpson grade I, II, and III resections were performed in four, nine, and three patients, respectively. The overall recurrence rate was 37.5%. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) after resection was 94.7 months (95% CI=62.9-126.6). Of the 4 patients with Simpson grade I resection, recurrence occurred in one patient. Among the Simpson grade II and III resection groups, eight patients underwent adjuvant radiation therapy and they showed significantly longer PFS (121 months, 95% CI=82.1-159.9) than the patients who underwent surgery alone (40.5 months, 95% CI=9.6-71.3) by the log-rank test (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Chordoid meningiomas are difficult to manage and have a high rate of recurrence. Complete resection of the tumor is a key determinant of better outcomes. Adjuvant radiation therapy is recommended, eparticulary when Simpson grade I resection was not achieved.
Central Nervous System
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Medical Records
;
Meningioma*
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail