PURPOSE: Although common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFAE) is regarded as the standard treatment modality for common femoral artery (CFA) disease, availability of advanced endovascular techniques has resulted in an increased number of CFA disease being treated. We evaluated clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of patients who were treated for CFA disease using endarterectomy alone or combined with endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients from November 2001 through December 2007. The treated lesions were divided into 4 groups based on operative procedure: group I (n=11), CFAE alone; group II (n=15), CFAE and iliac artery (IA) endovascular treatment; group III (n=6), CFAE and superficial femoral artery (SFA) endovascular treatment; group IV (n=14), CFAE and IA and SFA endovascular treatment or bypass surgery. RESULTS: The degree of CFA steno-occlusion was not different among the groups. The 3-year primary patency rates of each group were 88.9±10.5%, 60.0±14.5%, 62.5±21.3%, and 83.9±10.4%, respectively. The 3-year primary assisted patency rates were 100%, 70.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 89.3±10.4%, while 3-year secondary patency rates were 100%, 80.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 92.3±7.4%, respectively. There was no procedure-related mortality. Significant improvement of ankle-brachial index was achieved in all groups. CONCLUSION: CFAE alone is the treatment of choice for excellent patency and clinical improvement in steno-occlusive lesions confined to the CFA. In multiple steno-occlusive diseases, this procedure could be combined with endovascular procedures to reduce the operative risk in conditions with high morbidity.
Ankle Brachial Index ; Endarterectomy ; Endovascular Procedures ; Femoral Artery ; Humans ; Iliac Artery ; Mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Procedures, Operative

Endoscopic management is presently the recommended first-line of treatment for biliary strictures. However, surgery still has an important role especially for biliary obstruction (BO) with duodenal obstruction. Even though endoscopic treatment for concurrent BO and gastric-outlet obstruction has been proposed, it is still not widespread. Duodenal obstruction is often associated with malignant BO which makes endoscopic treatment more challenging. Biliary and gastrointestinal double bypass with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy is the most common surgical intervention for malignant biliary and gastric-outlet obstruction. A variety of procedures of biliary bypass and gastrointestinal bypass have been reported. According to several studies, mortality rates range from 0% to 7%, while morbidity rates range from 3% to 50%. Higher morbidity was observed in symptomatic patients caused by the disease. Most common morbidity after double bypass was delayed gastric emptying. Recurrence of BO and gastric-outlet obstruction was less frequently seen after surgical bypass compared to after endoscopic treatment. Minimally invasive approach has been applied to double bypass. Studies showed that laparoscopic double bypass has a shorter hospital stay and reduced postoperative pain; however, due to its technical demand, it is still presently an uncommon procedure. Robotic bypass surgery may resolve this issue in the future. Further analyses of outcomes of both surgical and endoscopic treatments are necessary to establish better and suitable palliation options for concurrent biliary and duodenal obstruction caused by unresectable malignant tumors.
Cholestasis ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Duodenal Obstruction ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastric Emptying ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Pain, Postoperative ; Recurrence ; Surgical Procedures, Operative

PURPOSE: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal surgery is widely performed for many disease entities. However, there are few reports about the role of repeat single-incision laparoscopic surgery (R-SILS). The aim of this study is to analyze R-SILS data to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the occurrence and review its outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the prospectively collected SILS database in Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between April 2009 and December 2015. A retrospective review of 38 patients who underwent R-SILS from 2,207 patients who underwent primary SILS for colorectal surgery was performed. RESULTS: The indications of R-SILS were 23 primary SILS-related complications, 10 cancer-related, and 5 other surgical indications. Of the 38 repeat surgeries, 24 were emergent operations, and 14 were elective operations. Fecal diversion for anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery was the most common reason for reoperation. There were 2 cases of conversions: one case was converted to conventional multi-port, and the other case was converted to open surgery. Mean operative time was 137.9±64.1 min, estimated blood loss (EBL) was 105±98 ml, and length of hospital stay was 10.1±8.1 days. Post-operative complication was noted in 5 (13.2%) of 38 R-SILS cases, and there was no 30-day postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: Repeat single-incision laparoscopy surgery is feasible and safe in select patients when performed by an experienced surgeon.
Anastomotic Leak ; Colorectal Surgery ; Humans ; Korea ; Laparoscopy* ; Length of Stay ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Mortality ; Operative Time ; Prospective Studies ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Seoul

OBJECTIVE: The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) initiated a nation-wide training system for the education and certification for gynecologic oncologists in 2005. To assess the impact of the quality of the JSGO-accredited institutions, JSGO undertook an analysis of the Uterine Cervical Cancer Registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) to determine the effectiveness of the JSGO-accredited institutions on the treatment and survival of women with cervical cancer. METHODS: The effectiveness of 119 JSGO-accredited institutions and 125 non-JSGO-accredited institutions on the treatment and survival of women with cervical cancer were compared by analyzing the tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of women with stage T1B–T4 cervical cancer utilizing the data in the JSOG nation-wide registry for cervical cancer (2006–2009). RESULTS: A total of 14,185 eligible women were identified: 10,920 (77.0%) cases for 119 JSGO-accredited institutions and 3,265 (23.0%) cases for 125 non-accredited institutions. A multivariate analysis showed that age, stage, histology type, and treatment pattern were independently associated with mortality. Moreover, women who received treatment at the JSGO-accredited institutions had a significantly decreased mortality risk compared to non-accredited institutions (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.843; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.784–0.905). Similar findings on multivariate analysis were seen among subset of women who received surgery alone (aHR=0.552; 95% CI=0.393–0.775) and among women who received radiotherapy (aHR=0.845; 95% CI=0.766–0.931). CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of gynecologic oncology accrediting institution was associated with improved survival outcome of women with cervical cancer in Japan.
Accreditation* ; Certification ; Education ; Female ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Japan* ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Obstetrics ; Radiotherapy ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HTx) can be a life-saving procedure for patients in whom single ventricle palliation or one-and-a-half (1½) ventricle repair has failed. However, the presence of a previous bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BCS) necessitates extensive pulmonary artery angioplasty, which may lead to worse outcomes. We sought to assess the post-HTx outcomes in patients with a previous BCS, and to assess the technical feasibility of leaving the BCS in place during HTx. METHODS: From 1992 to 2017, 11 HTx were performed in patients failing from Fontan (n=7), BCS (n=3), or 1½ ventricle (n=1) physiology at Asan Medical Center. The median age at HTx was 12.0 years (range, 3–24 years). Three patients (27.3%) underwent HTx without taking down the previous BCS. RESULTS: No early mortality was observed. One patient died of acute rejection 3.5 years after HTx. The overall survival rate was 91% at 2 years. In the 3 patients without BCS take-down, the median anastomosis time was 65 minutes (range, 54–68 minutes), which was shorter than in the patients with BCS take-down (93 minutes; range, 62–128 minutes), while the postoperative central venous pressure (CVP) was comparable to the preoperative CVP. CONCLUSION: Transplantation can be successfully performed in patients with end-stage congenital heart disease after single ventricle palliation or 1½ ventricle repair. Leaving the BCS in place during HTx may simplify the operative procedure without causing significant adverse outcomes.
Angioplasty ; Central Venous Pressure ; Chungcheongnam-do ; Fontan Procedure ; Heart Defects, Congenital ; Heart Transplantation* ; Heart* ; Humans ; Mortality ; Physiology ; Pulmonary Artery* ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Survival Rate ; Vena Cava, Superior*

OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a useful surgical method to achieve adequate decompression in hypertensive intracranial patients. This study suggested a new skin incision for DC, and analyzed its efficacy and safety. METHODS: In the retrograde reviews, 15 patients underwent a newly suggested surgical approach using n-shape skin incision technique (Group A) and 23 patients were treated with conventional question mark skin incision technique (Group B). Two groups were compared in the terms of the decompressed area of the craniectomy, protruded brain volume out of the skull layer, the operation time from skin incision to bone flap removal, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) which was evaluated for 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: The decompressed area of craniectomy (389.1 cm² vs. 318.7 cm², p=0.041) and the protruded brain volume (151.8 cm³ vs. 116.2 cm³, p=0.045) were significantly larger in Group A compared to the area and the volume in Group B. The time interval between skin incision and bone flap removal was much shorter in Group A (23.3 minutes vs. 29.5 minutes, p=0.013). But, the clinical results were similar between 2 groups. Group A showed more favorable outcome proportion (mRS 0-3, 6/15 patients vs. 5/23 patients, p=0.225) and lesser mortality cases proportion 1/15 patients vs. 4/23 patients, but these differences were not significantly observed (p=0.225 and 0.339). CONCLUSION: DC using n-shaped skin incision was a feasible and safe surgical technique. It may be an easier and faster method for the purpose of training neurosurgeons.
Brain ; Decompression ; Decompressive Craniectomy* ; Dermatologic Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Methods ; Mortality ; Neurosurgeons ; Skin* ; Skull ; Surgical Flaps ; Surgical Procedures, Operative

PURPOSE: To propose a new, multivariable risk-scoring model for predicting 30-day mortality in individuals underwent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: Four hundred eighty-five consecutive patients who underwent AAA repair from January 2000 to December 2010 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors, and a risk-scoring model was developed. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified three independent preoperative risk factors associated with mortality, and a risk-scoring model was created by assigning an equal value to each factor. The independent predictors were location of the AAA, rupture of AAA, and preoperative pulmonary dysfunction. The multivariable regression model demonstrated moderate discrimination (c statistic, 0.811) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.793). The observed mortality rate did not differ significantly from that predicted by our risk-scoring model. CONCLUSION: Our risk-scoring model has excellent ability to predict 30-day mortality after AAA repair, and awaits validation in further studies.
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal* ; Calibration ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Endovascular Procedures* ; Humans ; Mortality* ; Multivariate Analysis ; Risk Factors ; Rupture ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and its Portsmouth modification (P-POSSUM) are comprehensive assessment methods for evaluating patient and surgical factors widely used to predict 30-day mortality rates. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the usefulness of POSSUM and P-POSSUM in predicting 30-day mortality after intraoperative cardiac arrests in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 190486 patients who underwent anesthesia, 51 experienced intraoperative cardiac arrest as defined in our study protocol. Predicted mortality rates were calculated using POSSUM and P-POSSUM equations and were compared with actual outcomes using exponential and linear analyses. In addition, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was undertaken, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) values with confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for POSSUM and P-POSSUM. RESULTS: Among the 51 patients with intraoperative cardiac arrest, 32 (62.7%) died within 30 days postoperatively. The overall predicted 30-day mortality rates using POSSUM and P-POSSUM were 65.5% and 57.5%, respectively. The observed-to-predicted (O:E) ratio for the POSSUM 30-day mortality was 1.07, with no significant difference between the observed and predicted values (chi2=4.794; p=0.779). P-POSSUM predicted mortality equally well, with an O:E ratio of 1.10 (chi2=8.905; p=0.350). AUC values (95% CI) were 0.771 (0.634-0.908) and 0.785 (0.651-0.918) for POSSUM and P-POSSUM, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both POSSUM and P-POSSUM performed well to predict overall 30-day mortality following intraoperative cardiac arrest in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery at a university teaching hospital in Korea.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Heart Arrest/*complications/mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intraoperative Complications/*mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Postoperative Period ; ROC Curve ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment/*methods ; *Severity of Illness Index ; Surgical Procedures, Operative/*mortality

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical value of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) and modified Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (mE-PASS) scoring systems in predicting the mortality and surgical risk of gastric cancer patients, and to analyze the relationship between the parameters of E-PASS and early postoperative complications.

METHODSClinical data of 778 gastric cancer patients who underwent elective surgical resection in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jan. 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. E-PASS and mE-PASS scoring systems were used to predict the mortality of gastric cancer patients, respectively. Univariate and unconditioned logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationships between nine parameters of E-PASS system and early postoperative complications.

RESULTSE-PASS and mE-PASS systems were used to predict the mortality in the death group and non-death group. The Z value was -5.067 and -4.492, respectively, showing a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). AUCs of mortality predicted by E-PASS and mE-PASS were 0.926 and 0.878 (P>0.05), and the prediction calibration of postoperative mortality showed statistically non-significant difference (P>0.05) between the E-PASS and mE-PASS prediction and actual mortality. Univariate analysis showed that age, operation time, severe heart disease, severe lung disease, diabetes mellitus, physical state index and ASA classification score are related to postoperative complications (P<0.05 for all). Unconditioned logistic regression analysis showed that severe lung disease, diabetes mellitus, ASA classification score and operation time are risk factors for early postoperative complications (P<0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONSBoth mE-PASS and E-PASS scoring system have good consistency in the predicting postoperative mortality and actual mortality, and both are suitable for clinical application. Moreover, the mE-PASS scoring system is clinically more simple and convenient than E-PASS scoring system. Preoperative severe lung disease, diabetes mellitus, ASA classification score and operation time are independent factors affecting the early postoperative complications.

Age Factors ; Area Under Curve ; Diabetes Complications ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Homeostasis ; Humans ; Lung Diseases ; complications ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; mortality ; Postoperative Period ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; methods ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; mortality ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Stress, Physiological

BACKGROUND: We report our initial experiences of robot-assisted cardiac surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System. METHODS: Between February 2010 and March 2014, 50 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive robot-assisted cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Robot-assisted cardiac surgery was employed in two cases of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, 17 cases of mitral valve repair, 10 cases of cardiac myxoma removal, 20 cases of atrial septal defect repair, and one isolated CryoMaze procedure. Average cardiopulmonary bypass time and average aorta cross-clamping time were 194.8+/-48.6 minutes and 126.1+/-22.6 minutes in mitral valve repair operations and 132.0+/-32.0 minutes and 76.1+/-23.1 minutes in myxoma removal operations, respectively. During atrial septal defect closure operations, the average cardiopulmonary bypass time was 128.3+/-43.1 minutes. The median length of stay was between five and seven days. The only complication was that one patient needed reoperation to address bleeding. There were no hospital mortalities. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted cardiac surgery is safe and effective for mitral valve repair, atrial septal defect closure, and cardiac myxoma removal surgery. Reducing operative time depends heavily on the experience of the entire robotic surgical team.
Aorta ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Heart Septal Defects, Atrial ; Hemorrhage ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Mitral Valve ; Myxoma ; Operative Time ; Reoperation ; Robotics ; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive ; Thoracic Surgery*