1.Effect of regional COVID-19 outbreak to emergency department response on acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter retrospective study
Young Wook KIM ; Sungbae MOON ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Jae Yun AHN ; Jung Bae PARK ; Dong Eun LEE ; Sang Hun LEE ; Sangchan JIN ; You Ho MUN ; Jung Ho KIM ; Tae Chang JANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2025;36(2):72-82
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			The Daegu region experienced the first wave of the pandemic at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Korea. Other non-COVID-19-related treatments during a community outbreak, such as cardiovascular diseases, were expected to impact emergency departments. In acute myocardial infarctions, time is an important factor affecting the patient outcome. This study examined how community COVID-19 outbreak affected STsegment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) care in emergency departments. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective analysis was performed on patients visiting five emergency departments in the Daegu area who were diagnosed with STEMI from February 18 to April 17 each year from 2018 to 2020. The demographic characteristics, prehospital variables, in-hospital time variables, and treatment results were collected. The cases were divided into the pre-COVID period and the COVID period for comparison. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 254 patients (194 pre-COVID, 60 during COVID). The symptom-to-door time did not differ. Although the door-to-first doctor time was shortened (4 min vs. 2 min, P=0.01), the rate of coronary angiogram along with the door-to-angiogram time and the door-to-balloon time did not change. The length of stay in the emergency department was delayed during COVID-19 (median, 136 min vs. 404 min; P<0.01). The in-hospital length of stay and mortality were similar in both groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The time to treat STEMI was not delayed significantly during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Daegu area compared with the pre-pandemic period. Mortality did not change. The length of stay was elongated significantly in the emergency department but not in the hospital. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Effect of regional COVID-19 outbreak to emergency department response on acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter retrospective study
Young Wook KIM ; Sungbae MOON ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Jae Yun AHN ; Jung Bae PARK ; Dong Eun LEE ; Sang Hun LEE ; Sangchan JIN ; You Ho MUN ; Jung Ho KIM ; Tae Chang JANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2025;36(2):72-82
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			The Daegu region experienced the first wave of the pandemic at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Korea. Other non-COVID-19-related treatments during a community outbreak, such as cardiovascular diseases, were expected to impact emergency departments. In acute myocardial infarctions, time is an important factor affecting the patient outcome. This study examined how community COVID-19 outbreak affected STsegment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) care in emergency departments. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective analysis was performed on patients visiting five emergency departments in the Daegu area who were diagnosed with STEMI from February 18 to April 17 each year from 2018 to 2020. The demographic characteristics, prehospital variables, in-hospital time variables, and treatment results were collected. The cases were divided into the pre-COVID period and the COVID period for comparison. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 254 patients (194 pre-COVID, 60 during COVID). The symptom-to-door time did not differ. Although the door-to-first doctor time was shortened (4 min vs. 2 min, P=0.01), the rate of coronary angiogram along with the door-to-angiogram time and the door-to-balloon time did not change. The length of stay in the emergency department was delayed during COVID-19 (median, 136 min vs. 404 min; P<0.01). The in-hospital length of stay and mortality were similar in both groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The time to treat STEMI was not delayed significantly during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Daegu area compared with the pre-pandemic period. Mortality did not change. The length of stay was elongated significantly in the emergency department but not in the hospital. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Effect of regional COVID-19 outbreak to emergency department response on acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter retrospective study
Young Wook KIM ; Sungbae MOON ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Jae Yun AHN ; Jung Bae PARK ; Dong Eun LEE ; Sang Hun LEE ; Sangchan JIN ; You Ho MUN ; Jung Ho KIM ; Tae Chang JANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2025;36(2):72-82
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			The Daegu region experienced the first wave of the pandemic at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Korea. Other non-COVID-19-related treatments during a community outbreak, such as cardiovascular diseases, were expected to impact emergency departments. In acute myocardial infarctions, time is an important factor affecting the patient outcome. This study examined how community COVID-19 outbreak affected STsegment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) care in emergency departments. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective analysis was performed on patients visiting five emergency departments in the Daegu area who were diagnosed with STEMI from February 18 to April 17 each year from 2018 to 2020. The demographic characteristics, prehospital variables, in-hospital time variables, and treatment results were collected. The cases were divided into the pre-COVID period and the COVID period for comparison. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The study included 254 patients (194 pre-COVID, 60 during COVID). The symptom-to-door time did not differ. Although the door-to-first doctor time was shortened (4 min vs. 2 min, P=0.01), the rate of coronary angiogram along with the door-to-angiogram time and the door-to-balloon time did not change. The length of stay in the emergency department was delayed during COVID-19 (median, 136 min vs. 404 min; P<0.01). The in-hospital length of stay and mortality were similar in both groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The time to treat STEMI was not delayed significantly during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Daegu area compared with the pre-pandemic period. Mortality did not change. The length of stay was elongated significantly in the emergency department but not in the hospital. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Mortality prognostic factors of COVID-19 in the emergency department during outbreak in Daegu, Korea: a multicenter retrospective study
Jong-yeon KIM ; Jung Ho KIM ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Jae Yun AHN ; Sungbae MOON ; Dong Eun LEE ; Sang Hun LEE ; You Ho MUN ; Tae Chang JANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2022;33(1):94-105
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			We aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognostic factors of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in the emergency departments (EDs) in Daegu, Korea, the region with the second regional outbreak worldwide. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We conducted a retrospective observational multicenter study using a population-based COVID-19 registry of EDs. We included the demographic, clinical and laboratory data. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors of mortality. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 241 patients were included in this study. In the Cox hazard regression model (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]), age (65-79 years: 3.531 [1.529-8.156], ≥80 years: 5.335 [2.229-12.770]), respiratory rate (RR) (>20 breaths/min: 2.025 [1.205-3.403], ≤11 breaths/min: 111.292 [30.845-401.555]), lymphocyte counts <1.0×109/L (2.611 [1.494-4.739]), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels>23 mg/dL (2.047 [1.233-3.399]), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels>40 IU/L (1.785 [1.009-3.158]) and neutrophil counts>6.3×109/L (1.638 [1.014-2.644]) were associated with mortality. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			Age, RR, lymphocyte counts, BUN levels, AST levels and neutrophil counts were prognostic factors in COVID-19 patients in the ED. These factors can help effectively treat and reduce mortality through optimized management of COVID-19 patients, in places with limited emergency medical resources such as massive regional outbreaks. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes according to the time of day: a citywide multicenter retrospective observational study
Jong Hwa RYU ; Jung Ho KIM ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Jong-yeon KIM ; Jae Yun AHN ; Sungbae MOON ; Dong Eun LEE ; Tae Chang JANG ; Sang Chan JIN ; You Ho MUN
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2022;33(1):28-36
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			The characteristics and prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients can vary due to a variety of factors, including the time of the day. We tried to identify the characteristics and prognosis of OHCA in a Korean metro city based on the time of the day. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			This citywide retrospective observational study was conducted from January 1, 2015, to November 31, 2020, in Daegu, Korea on patients over 18 years of age who were suspected of having a medical etiology of OHCA. We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of OHCA, according to the time of day, divided into dawn (00:00-05:59), morning (06:00-11:59), afternoon (12:00-17:59), and night (18:00-23:59). The outcome variables were survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcomes. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The median age of the total of 4,783 OHCA patients in the study was 72.0 years of which 3,096 (64.7%) were males. The number of patients who survived was 317 (7.8%) and 301 (6.3%) were discharged with favorable neurological outcomes. There were 672 (14.0%) patients admitted at dawn, 1,607 (33.6%) in the morning, 1,379 (28.8%) in the afternoon, and 1,125 (23.5%) at night. After adjusting for the possible confounding variables, compared with the morning group, the survival to hospital discharge was low in the afternoon and the night (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.98 and aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.74). In addition, favorable neurological outcomes were also low in the afternoon and the night compared with the morning (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85 and aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			Diurnal differences in OHCA outcomes were observed. Identification of the diurnal OHCA characteristics will be necessary to devise an appropriate regional emergency medical services strategy. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Public awareness and willingness to use automated external defibrillators in a metropolitan city
Jae Hyuk LEE ; Dong Eun LEE ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Sungbae MOON ; Jae Wan CHO ; Yun Jeong KIM ; Jong Kun KIM ; Jung Ho KIM ; Kyung Woo LEE ; Sang-chan JIN ; Jun Seok SEO
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2021;8(1):1-8
		                        		
		                        			Objective:
		                        			Early defibrillation is crucial for the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study aimed to examine the trends and associated factors regarding public awareness and willingness to use automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through citywide surveys. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Three-round surveys were conducted in February 2012 (n=1,000), December 2016 (n=1,141), and December 2018 (n=1,001) among citizens in Daegu, South Korea, who were aged ≥19 years. The subjects were selected through a three-stage quota sampling. Awareness and willingness to use an AED were assessed in the three groups. The primary outcome was willingness to use AEDs. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Of 3,142 respondents, 3,069 were eligible for analysis. The proportion of respondents who knew how to use AEDs increased from 4.7% in 2012 to 20.8% in 2018. Of the respondents in 2012, 2016, and 2018, 39.7%, 50.0%, and 43.2%, respectively, were willing to use an AED. Factors associated with willingness to use AEDs were male sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.75), cardiopulmonary resuscitation training experience in the previous 2 years (AOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.43–2.28), recognition of the Good Samaritan law (AOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13–1.86), and awareness of how to use an AED (AOR, 4.40; 95% CI, 3.26–5.93). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			To increase willingness to use AEDs, education in AED use and the Good Samaritan law, along with re-education to maintain knowledge of AED use, should be considered.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Public awareness and willingness to use automated external defibrillators in a metropolitan city
Jae Hyuk LEE ; Dong Eun LEE ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Sungbae MOON ; Jae Wan CHO ; Yun Jeong KIM ; Jong Kun KIM ; Jung Ho KIM ; Kyung Woo LEE ; Sang-chan JIN ; Jun Seok SEO
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2021;8(1):1-8
		                        		
		                        			Objective:
		                        			Early defibrillation is crucial for the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study aimed to examine the trends and associated factors regarding public awareness and willingness to use automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through citywide surveys. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Three-round surveys were conducted in February 2012 (n=1,000), December 2016 (n=1,141), and December 2018 (n=1,001) among citizens in Daegu, South Korea, who were aged ≥19 years. The subjects were selected through a three-stage quota sampling. Awareness and willingness to use an AED were assessed in the three groups. The primary outcome was willingness to use AEDs. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Of 3,142 respondents, 3,069 were eligible for analysis. The proportion of respondents who knew how to use AEDs increased from 4.7% in 2012 to 20.8% in 2018. Of the respondents in 2012, 2016, and 2018, 39.7%, 50.0%, and 43.2%, respectively, were willing to use an AED. Factors associated with willingness to use AEDs were male sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.75), cardiopulmonary resuscitation training experience in the previous 2 years (AOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.43–2.28), recognition of the Good Samaritan law (AOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13–1.86), and awareness of how to use an AED (AOR, 4.40; 95% CI, 3.26–5.93). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			To increase willingness to use AEDs, education in AED use and the Good Samaritan law, along with re-education to maintain knowledge of AED use, should be considered.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Effect of trauma center establishment to clinical outcome of severe pediatric trauma patients: retrospective single center study
Haewon JUNG ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Dong Eun LEE ; Sungbae MOON ; Jae Yun AHN ; Jong Kun KIM ; Jung Bae PARK ; Kang Suk SEO
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2020;31(3):284-290
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			Trauma death is one of the most preventable deaths by various efforts in the healthcare sector. The establishment of a regional trauma center will aid in efforts to reduce mortality. On the other hand, the effects of trauma centers on pediatric trauma in Korea are not fully understood. This study compared the clinical outcomes of severe pediatric trauma patients before and after the regional trauma center was set into action. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records in a single regional emergency and trauma center from November 2014 to October 2016 and from January 2017 to December 2018. The general demographic information, injury details, and clinical outcome data were collected. The cases were divided into two groups, the before and after groups, and comparisons were made. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Seventy-three patients were included in the study. Thirty-seven patients were in the before group, and 36 were in the after group. The mortality (21.6% to 5.6%, P=0.04) and interhospital transfer rate (27.0% to 8.3%, P=0.03) were lower in after group than in the before group. On the other hand, the time to receive a transfusion, operation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission did not differ significantly. The lengths of the emergency department, ICU, and hospital stay were also similar in the two groups. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			For severe pediatric trauma patients, the mortality and transfer rates decreased after implementing the trauma center. On the other hand, the implementation itself was not identified as a major factor, and the time required to receive a definite treatment or length of stay did not change significantly. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.A single emergency center study for obstructive urinary tract infection with sepsis
Jae Hyung PARK ; Seong Hun KIM ; Michael Sung Pil CHOE ; Dong Wook JE ; Woo Young NHO ; Hong In PARK ; Su Jeong SHIN ; Yong Seok PARK ; Chang Won PARK ; Mi Jin LEE ; Jae Yun AHN ; Dong Eun LEE ; Sungbae MOON ; Chang Ho KIM ; Suk Hee LEE
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2020;31(3):267-274
		                        		
		                        			 Objective:
		                        			Unlike common acute urinary tract infections, obstructive urinary tract infections caused by urinary calculus can be fatal because they can progress to sepsis and cause shock or disseminated intravascular coagulation. The evidence of patients with obstructive urinary tract infections caused by urinary tract stones visiting the emergency center is still lacking. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			Seventy-seven patients who visited the emergency room with obstructive urinary tract infections caused by urinary calculus from January 2016 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups: sepsis group and non-sepsis group. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			The lymphocyte count, platelet count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, serum creatinine, and C-reactive protein were significantly different in the sepsis-positive and negative groups. Percutaneous nephrostomy was also significantly higher in the sepsis-positive group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to evaluate the ability of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio to predict a septic urinary tract infection. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio were 0.659 and 0.550, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that diabetic patients, percutaneous nephrostomy, and serum creatinine were associated with septic obstructive urinary tract infection. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			In patients with an obstructive urinary tract infection who were referred to the emergency center, diabetic patients and those with high blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels are at high risk of sepsis. In such cases, rapid diagnosis and treatment, such as percutaneous nephrostomy, are necessary. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Comparison of the new and conventional injury severity scoring systems for predicting mortality in severe geriatric trauma
Ho Wan RYU ; Jae Yun AHN ; Kang Suk SEO ; Jung Bae PARK ; Jong Kun KIM ; Mi Jin LEE ; Hyun Wook RYOO ; Yun Jeong KIM ; Changho KIM ; Jae Young CHOE ; Dong Eun LEE ; In Hwan YEO ; Sungbae MOON ; Yeonjoo CHO ; Han Sol CHUNG ; Jae Wan CHO ; Haewon JUNG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2020;31(6):543-552
		                        		
		                        			Objective:
		                        			This study compared the prognostic performance of the following five injury severity scores: the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS), the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the New Injury Severity Score (NISS), the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for in-hospital mortality in severe geriatric trauma patients. 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted using a database of severe geriatric trauma patients (age ≥65 years and ISS ≥16) who presented to a single regional trauma center between November 2016 and October 2018. We compared the baseline characteristics between the survivor and mortality groups and the predictive ability of the five scoring systems. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			A total of 402 patients were included in the analysis; the in-hospital mortality rate was 25.6% (n=103). The TRISS had the highest area under the curve of 0.953 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.927-0.971); followed by RTS, 0.777 (95% CI, 0.733-0.817); NISS, 0.733 (95% CI, 0.687-0.776); ISS, 0.660 (95% CI, 0.612-0.707); and GTOS, 0.660 (95% CI, 0.611-0.706) in severe geriatric trauma. The TRISS also had the highest area under the curve of 0.961 (0.919-0.985) among the injury severity scoring systems in polytrauma. The predictive ability of TRISS was significantly higher than the other four scores with respect to overall trauma and polytrauma (P<0.001). 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			The TRISS showed the highest prognostic performance for predicting in-hospital mortality among all the injury severity scoring systems in severe geriatric trauma.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail