Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Graft failure (GF) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Secondary transplantation has been recognized as a potential curative intervention. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of salvage transplantation by analyzing the patients who underwent a second HCT for GF following the initial allo-HCT between 1998 and 2020. Results: Overall, 23 recipients were identified, including 14 and 9 individuals with primary and secondary GF, respectively. Nine recipients underwent a second transplant from the same donor. Familial mismatched donors predominated in the second HCT (86.9%), with reduced-intensity conditioning as the prevailing approach (60.9%). Neutrophil engraftment occurred in 17 patients (73.9%) following the second HCT at a median of 17 days (range: 9–58 days) post-transplantation. However, secondary GF subsequently occurred in 5 patients, and successful engraftment following salvage transplantation was achieved in 12 (52.2%) patients. In the entire study population, the estimated 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) were 30.4% and 58.5%, respectively. Among patients who achieved successful engraftment following a second transplantation, the OS and TRM rates were 41.7% and 33.3%, respectively, indicating a trend toward better OS and significantly lower TRM compared to those with GF. Notably, 17 patients died, with infection being the most common cause (n = 12), irrespective of the engraftment status. Conclusion A successful engraftment following a second allo-HCT reduced the TRM; however, the OS remained suboptimal. The effective control of infectious diseases remains crucial for patients with GF, regardless of the engraftment status following salvage transplantation.

Background: Graft failure (GF) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Secondary transplantation has been recognized as a potential curative intervention. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of salvage transplantation by analyzing the patients who underwent a second HCT for GF following the initial allo-HCT between 1998 and 2020. Results: Overall, 23 recipients were identified, including 14 and 9 individuals with primary and secondary GF, respectively. Nine recipients underwent a second transplant from the same donor. Familial mismatched donors predominated in the second HCT (86.9%), with reduced-intensity conditioning as the prevailing approach (60.9%). Neutrophil engraftment occurred in 17 patients (73.9%) following the second HCT at a median of 17 days (range: 9–58 days) post-transplantation. However, secondary GF subsequently occurred in 5 patients, and successful engraftment following salvage transplantation was achieved in 12 (52.2%) patients. In the entire study population, the estimated 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) were 30.4% and 58.5%, respectively. Among patients who achieved successful engraftment following a second transplantation, the OS and TRM rates were 41.7% and 33.3%, respectively, indicating a trend toward better OS and significantly lower TRM compared to those with GF. Notably, 17 patients died, with infection being the most common cause (n = 12), irrespective of the engraftment status. Conclusion A successful engraftment following a second allo-HCT reduced the TRM; however, the OS remained suboptimal. The effective control of infectious diseases remains crucial for patients with GF, regardless of the engraftment status following salvage transplantation.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Background: Graft failure (GF) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Secondary transplantation has been recognized as a potential curative intervention. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of salvage transplantation by analyzing the patients who underwent a second HCT for GF following the initial allo-HCT between 1998 and 2020. Results: Overall, 23 recipients were identified, including 14 and 9 individuals with primary and secondary GF, respectively. Nine recipients underwent a second transplant from the same donor. Familial mismatched donors predominated in the second HCT (86.9%), with reduced-intensity conditioning as the prevailing approach (60.9%). Neutrophil engraftment occurred in 17 patients (73.9%) following the second HCT at a median of 17 days (range: 9–58 days) post-transplantation. However, secondary GF subsequently occurred in 5 patients, and successful engraftment following salvage transplantation was achieved in 12 (52.2%) patients. In the entire study population, the estimated 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) were 30.4% and 58.5%, respectively. Among patients who achieved successful engraftment following a second transplantation, the OS and TRM rates were 41.7% and 33.3%, respectively, indicating a trend toward better OS and significantly lower TRM compared to those with GF. Notably, 17 patients died, with infection being the most common cause (n = 12), irrespective of the engraftment status. Conclusion A successful engraftment following a second allo-HCT reduced the TRM; however, the OS remained suboptimal. The effective control of infectious diseases remains crucial for patients with GF, regardless of the engraftment status following salvage transplantation.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Background: Graft failure (GF) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Secondary transplantation has been recognized as a potential curative intervention. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of salvage transplantation by analyzing the patients who underwent a second HCT for GF following the initial allo-HCT between 1998 and 2020. Results: Overall, 23 recipients were identified, including 14 and 9 individuals with primary and secondary GF, respectively. Nine recipients underwent a second transplant from the same donor. Familial mismatched donors predominated in the second HCT (86.9%), with reduced-intensity conditioning as the prevailing approach (60.9%). Neutrophil engraftment occurred in 17 patients (73.9%) following the second HCT at a median of 17 days (range: 9–58 days) post-transplantation. However, secondary GF subsequently occurred in 5 patients, and successful engraftment following salvage transplantation was achieved in 12 (52.2%) patients. In the entire study population, the estimated 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) were 30.4% and 58.5%, respectively. Among patients who achieved successful engraftment following a second transplantation, the OS and TRM rates were 41.7% and 33.3%, respectively, indicating a trend toward better OS and significantly lower TRM compared to those with GF. Notably, 17 patients died, with infection being the most common cause (n = 12), irrespective of the engraftment status. Conclusion A successful engraftment following a second allo-HCT reduced the TRM; however, the OS remained suboptimal. The effective control of infectious diseases remains crucial for patients with GF, regardless of the engraftment status following salvage transplantation.