1.Value of serum Endocan in the assessment of disease severity and prognosis for elderly multiple organ dysfunction syndrome patients
Feng KUAI ; Yi HAN ; Suming ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics 2023;42(11):1291-1295
Objective:To examine the significance of serum Endocan levels in evaluating the severity of disease and predicting the prognosis for elderly patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS).Methods:Seventy-five elderly patients from the Department of Geriatric ICU at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were selected and divided into two groups: the non-MODS group and the MODS group.This division was based on the levels of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)scores and MODS scores within 24 hours of admission.Additionally, 40 elderly individuals undergoing physical examination were included as a control group.Venous blood samples were collected from all participants to detect the levels of Endocan using ELISA.The patients were further categorized into the survival group and the death group based on their clinical outcome within 28 days.The Endocan levels in all groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were generated to assess the value of Endocan in determining the severity of the disease and predicting prognosis in elderly MODS patients.Results:The levels of Endocan were found to be higher in the MODS group compared to the non-MODS and control groups[(622.3±149.2)ng/L vs.(433.1±189.7)ng/L, P<0.001]. Furthermore, patients with higher APACHE Ⅱ and MODS scores exhibited higher levels of Endocan.The area under the ROC curve(AUC)for Endocan, MODS score, and Endocan+ MODS score were 0.791, 0.806, and 0.820, respectively( P>0.05). Similarly, the AUC for Endocan, APACHE Ⅱ score, and Endocan+ APACHE Ⅱ score were 0.763, 0.799, and 0.803, respectively( P>0.05). Interestingly, the survival group had lower levels of Endocan compared to the death group[(444.6±193.6)ng/L vs.(618.2±149.5)ng/L, P<0.001]. Conclusions:Endocan can be utilized as a noteworthy indicator, which is associated with the seriousness of illness and the prognosis for elderly patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS).
2. Verification of doses to PTV and OAR and 2D dose distribution in IMRT for 8 accelerators in Jiangsu province
Chunyong YANG ; Yuanyuan ZHOU ; Xingjiang CAO ; Xiang DU ; Suming LUO ; Xian XUE ; Zhijian HE ; Jin WANG
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection 2020;40(2):129-133
Objective:
To validate the method for measuring the TPV and OAR doses and 2D dose distribution in IMRT through using TLD and radiochromic film.
Methods:
Eight medical linear accelerators (Valian, Elekta, Siemens) were selected. The polystyrene phantom provided by IAEA was CT scanned and the image obtained was transferred to TPS for formulation of treatment plan, prescription of PTV and OAR doses and calculation of corresponding monitoring unit (MU), IMRT was performed on the phantom using 6 MV X-ray. Irradiated TLDs and films were measured and evaluated at the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory at the Radiation Safety Institute of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
Results:
According to IAEA requirement, the relative deviations between TLD-measured and TPS-planned doses were within ±7.0% for the prescribed PTV and OAR doses. As measured result, the PTV values for 8 accelerators were in the range of 0.6% to 5.9%, consistent with the IAEA requirements, whereas the OAT values for 8 accelerators were within -0.6% to 7.0%, consistent the requirements. As IAEA required, the 2D dose distribution passing rate of 3 mm/3% should be higher than 90%. The film-measured and TPS-planned values for 8 accelerators were within 90.2% to 100.0%, consistent with the requirements.
Conclusions
TLD and radiochromic film are feasible in validating the PTV and OAR doses and the 2D dose distribution pass rate in IMRT. This method can be widely used in quality audit and internal verification in IMRT in medical institutiions on a large scale.
3. Verification of doses to PTV and OAR and 2D dose distribution in IMRT for 7 accelerators in Hubei province
Gangtao SUN ; Wenshan ZHOU ; Song YE ; Xian XUE ; Suming LUO
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection 2020;40(2):134-139
Objective:
To study a method to measure the doses to planned target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR) and 2D dose distribution in IMRT by using TLD and radiochromic film for a verification purpose.
Methods:
Totally 7 different types of medical linear accelerators were selected from seven hospitals in Hubei province. A polystyrene phantom provided by IAEA was CT scanned and then the scanned images were returned to the Treatment Planning System (TPS) for determining the prescribed doses to PTS and OAR and the corresponding MU. After the phantom was irradiated with 6 MV X-ray, the TLDs and films were transmitted to the secondary standard dosimetry laboratory of China CDC for measurement and estimation.
Results:
The IAEA required the relative deviations between TLD-measured and TPS-planned doses to OAR and PTV be within ±7.0%. For PTV, the measured-to-planned deviation values for 7 accelerator were within -5.4% to 6.5%, all consistent with the IAEA requirements. For OAR, the values for 5 accelerators were within -2.2% to 6.7%, not consistent the requirements, whereas the values for the other 2 were -8.6% and 8.2% respectively, beyond the required values. The IAEA required that the 2D dose distribution 3 mm/3% pass rate be higher than 90%. The measured values for 7 accelerators were in the range of 90.3%-98.9%, all consistent with the requirements.
Conclusions
It is feasible scientifically and easy to operate in practice for using TLD and film to carry out dose verification in IMRT. It would be advisable to apply this method to quality verification in IMRT in medical institutions to the extent possible.
4.Surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study
Xufei ZHANG ; Jun CHEN ; Peige WANG ; Suming LUO ; Naxin LIU ; Xuemin LI ; Xianli HE ; Yi WANG ; Xiaogang BI ; Ping ZHANG ; Yong WANG ; Zhongchuan LV ; Bo ZHOU ; Wei MAI ; Hua WU ; Yang HU ; Daorong WANG ; Fuwen LUO ; Ligang XIA ; Jiajun LAI ; Dongming ZHANG ; Qian WANG ; Gang HAN ; Xiuwen WU ; Jian'an REN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2020;23(11):1036-1042
Objective:Surgical site infection (SSI) can markedly prolong postoperative hospital stay, aggravate the burden on patients and society, even endanger the life of patients. This study aims to investigate the national incidence of SSI following abdominal surgery and to analyze the related risk factors in order to provide reference for the control and prevention of SSI following abdominal surgery.Methods:A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. Clinical data of all the adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery in 68 hospitals across the country from June 1 to 30, 2020 were collected, including demographic characteristics, clinical parameters during the perioperative period, and the results of microbial culture of infected incisions. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI within postoperative 30 days, and the secondary outcomes were ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, cost of hospitalization and the mortality within postoperative 30-day. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors of SSI after abdominal surgery.Results:A total of 5560 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included, and 163 cases (2.9%) developed SSI after surgery, including 98 cases (60.1%) with organ/space infections, 19 cases (11.7%) with deep incisional infections, and 46 cases (28.2%) with superficial incisional infections. The results from microbial culture showed that Escherichia coli was the main pathogen of SSI. Multivariate analysis revealed hypertension (OR=1.792, 95% CI: 1.194-2.687, P=0.005), small intestine as surgical site (OR=6.911, 95% CI: 1.846-25.878, P=0.004), surgical duration (OR=1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.003, P<0.001), and surgical incision grade (contaminated incision: OR=3.212, 95% CI: 1.495-6.903, P=0.003; Infection incision: OR=11.562, 95%CI: 3.777-35.391, P<0.001) were risk factors for SSI, while laparoscopic or robotic surgery (OR=0.564, 95%CI: 0.376-0.846, P=0.006) and increased preoperative albumin level (OR=0.920, 95%CI: 0.888-0.952, P<0.001) were protective factors for SSI. In addition, as compared to non-SSI patients, the SSI patients had significantly higher rate of ICU stay [26.4% (43/163) vs. 9.5% (514/5397), χ 2=54.999, P<0.001] and mortality within postoperative 30-day [1.84% (3/163) vs.0.01% (5/5397), χ 2=33.642, P<0.001], longer ICU stay (median: 0 vs. 0, U=518 414, P<0.001), postoperative hospital stay (median: 17 days vs. 7 days, U=656 386, P<0.001), and total duration of hospitalization (median: 25 days vs. 12 days, U=648 129, P<0.001), and higher hospitalization costs (median: 71 000 yuan vs. 39 000 yuan, U=557 966, P<0.001). Conclusions:The incidence of SSI after abdominal surgery is 2.9%. In order to reduce the incidence of postoperative SSI, hypoproteinemia should be corrected before surgery, laparoscopic or robotic surgery should be selected when feasible, and the operating time should be minimized. More attentions should be paid and nursing should be strengthened for those patients with hypertension, small bowel surgery and seriously contaminated incision during the perioperative period.
5.Risk factors for surgical site infection after emergency abdominal surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China
Ze LI ; Junru GAO ; Li SONG ; Peige WANG ; Jian'an REN ; Xiuwen WU ; Suming LUO ; Qingjun ZENG ; Yanhong WENG ; Xinjian XU ; Qingzhong YUAN ; Jie ZHAO ; Nansheng LIAO ; Wei MAI ; Feng WANG ; Hui CAO ; Shichen WANG ; Gang HAN ; Daorong WANG ; Hao WANG ; Jun ZHANG ; Hao ZHANG ; Dongming ZHANG ; Weishun LIAO ; Wanwen ZHAO ; Wei LI ; Peng CUI ; Xin CHEN ; Haiyang ZHANG ; Tao YANG ; Lie WANG ; Yongshun GAO ; Jiang LI ; Jianjun WU ; Wei ZHOU ; Zejian LYU ; Jian FANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2020;23(11):1043-1050
Objective:Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common infectious complication after emergency abdominal surgery (EAS). To a large extent, most SSI can be prevented, but there are few relevant studies in China. This study mainly investigated the current situation of SSI occurrence after EAS in China, and further explored risk factors for SSI occurrence.Methods:Multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted. Clinical data of patients undergoing EAS in 33 hospitals across China between May 1, 2019 and June 7, 2019 were prospectively collected, including perioperative data and microbial culture results from infected incisions. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI after EAS, while the secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, ICU occupancy rate, length of ICU stay, hospitalization cost, and mortality within postoperative 30 days. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors of SSI after EAS.Results:A total of 660 EAS patients aged (47.9±18.3) years were enrolled in this study, including 56.5% of males (373/660). Forty-nine (7.4%) patients developed postoperative SSI. The main pathogen of SSI was Escherichia coli [culture positive rate was 32.7% (16/49)]. As compared to patients without SSI, those with SSI were more likely to be older (median 56 years vs. 46 years, U=19 973.5, P<0.001), male [71.4% (35/49) vs. 56.1% (343/611), χ 2=4.334, P=0.037] and diabetes [14.3% (7/49) vs. 5.1% (31/611), χ 2=5.498, P=0.015]; with-lower preoperative hemoglobin (median: 122.0 g/L vs. 143.5 g/L, U=11 471.5, P=0.006) and albumin (median: 35.5 g/L vs. 40.8 g/L, U=9452.0, P<0.001), with higher blood glucose (median: 6.9 mmol/L vs. 6.0 mmol/L, U=17 754.5, P<0.001); with intestinal obstruction [32.7% (16/49) vs. 9.2% (56/611), χ 2=25.749, P<0.001], with ASA score 3-4 [42.9% (21/49) vs. 13.9% (85/611), χ 2=25.563, P<0.001] and with high surgical risk [49.0% (24/49) vs. 7.0% (43/611), χ 2=105.301, P<0.001]. The main operative procedure resulting in SSI was laparotomy [81.6%(40/49) vs. 35.7%(218/611), χ 2=40.232, P<0.001]. Patients with SSI experienced significantly longer operation time (median: 150 minutes vs. 75 minutes, U=25 183.5, P<0.001). In terms of clinical outcome, higher ICU occupancy rate [51.0% (25/49) vs. 19.5% (119/611), χ 2=26.461, P<0.001], more hospitalization costs (median: 44 000 yuan vs. 15 000 yuan, U=24 660.0, P<0.001), longer postoperative hospital stay (median: 10 days vs. 5 days, U=23 100.0, P<0.001) and longer ICU occupancy time (median: 0 days vs. 0 days, U=19 541.5, P<0.001) were found in the SSI group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the elderly (OR=3.253, 95% CI: 1.178-8.985, P=0.023), colorectal surgery (OR=9.156, 95% CI: 3.655-22.937, P<0.001) and longer operation time (OR=15.912, 95% CI:6.858-36.916, P<0.001) were independent risk factors of SSI, while the laparoscopic surgery (OR=0.288, 95% CI: 0.119-0.694, P=0.006) was an independent protective factor for SSI. Conclusions:For patients undergoing EAS, attention should be paid to middle-aged and elderly patients and those of colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic surgery should be adopted when feasible and the operation time should be minimized, so as to reduce the incidence of SSI and to reduce the burden on patients and medical institutions.
6.Surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study
Xufei ZHANG ; Jun CHEN ; Peige WANG ; Suming LUO ; Naxin LIU ; Xuemin LI ; Xianli HE ; Yi WANG ; Xiaogang BI ; Ping ZHANG ; Yong WANG ; Zhongchuan LV ; Bo ZHOU ; Wei MAI ; Hua WU ; Yang HU ; Daorong WANG ; Fuwen LUO ; Ligang XIA ; Jiajun LAI ; Dongming ZHANG ; Qian WANG ; Gang HAN ; Xiuwen WU ; Jian'an REN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2020;23(11):1036-1042
Objective:Surgical site infection (SSI) can markedly prolong postoperative hospital stay, aggravate the burden on patients and society, even endanger the life of patients. This study aims to investigate the national incidence of SSI following abdominal surgery and to analyze the related risk factors in order to provide reference for the control and prevention of SSI following abdominal surgery.Methods:A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. Clinical data of all the adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery in 68 hospitals across the country from June 1 to 30, 2020 were collected, including demographic characteristics, clinical parameters during the perioperative period, and the results of microbial culture of infected incisions. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI within postoperative 30 days, and the secondary outcomes were ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, cost of hospitalization and the mortality within postoperative 30-day. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors of SSI after abdominal surgery.Results:A total of 5560 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included, and 163 cases (2.9%) developed SSI after surgery, including 98 cases (60.1%) with organ/space infections, 19 cases (11.7%) with deep incisional infections, and 46 cases (28.2%) with superficial incisional infections. The results from microbial culture showed that Escherichia coli was the main pathogen of SSI. Multivariate analysis revealed hypertension (OR=1.792, 95% CI: 1.194-2.687, P=0.005), small intestine as surgical site (OR=6.911, 95% CI: 1.846-25.878, P=0.004), surgical duration (OR=1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.003, P<0.001), and surgical incision grade (contaminated incision: OR=3.212, 95% CI: 1.495-6.903, P=0.003; Infection incision: OR=11.562, 95%CI: 3.777-35.391, P<0.001) were risk factors for SSI, while laparoscopic or robotic surgery (OR=0.564, 95%CI: 0.376-0.846, P=0.006) and increased preoperative albumin level (OR=0.920, 95%CI: 0.888-0.952, P<0.001) were protective factors for SSI. In addition, as compared to non-SSI patients, the SSI patients had significantly higher rate of ICU stay [26.4% (43/163) vs. 9.5% (514/5397), χ 2=54.999, P<0.001] and mortality within postoperative 30-day [1.84% (3/163) vs.0.01% (5/5397), χ 2=33.642, P<0.001], longer ICU stay (median: 0 vs. 0, U=518 414, P<0.001), postoperative hospital stay (median: 17 days vs. 7 days, U=656 386, P<0.001), and total duration of hospitalization (median: 25 days vs. 12 days, U=648 129, P<0.001), and higher hospitalization costs (median: 71 000 yuan vs. 39 000 yuan, U=557 966, P<0.001). Conclusions:The incidence of SSI after abdominal surgery is 2.9%. In order to reduce the incidence of postoperative SSI, hypoproteinemia should be corrected before surgery, laparoscopic or robotic surgery should be selected when feasible, and the operating time should be minimized. More attentions should be paid and nursing should be strengthened for those patients with hypertension, small bowel surgery and seriously contaminated incision during the perioperative period.
7.Risk factors for surgical site infection after emergency abdominal surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China
Ze LI ; Junru GAO ; Li SONG ; Peige WANG ; Jian'an REN ; Xiuwen WU ; Suming LUO ; Qingjun ZENG ; Yanhong WENG ; Xinjian XU ; Qingzhong YUAN ; Jie ZHAO ; Nansheng LIAO ; Wei MAI ; Feng WANG ; Hui CAO ; Shichen WANG ; Gang HAN ; Daorong WANG ; Hao WANG ; Jun ZHANG ; Hao ZHANG ; Dongming ZHANG ; Weishun LIAO ; Wanwen ZHAO ; Wei LI ; Peng CUI ; Xin CHEN ; Haiyang ZHANG ; Tao YANG ; Lie WANG ; Yongshun GAO ; Jiang LI ; Jianjun WU ; Wei ZHOU ; Zejian LYU ; Jian FANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2020;23(11):1043-1050
Objective:Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common infectious complication after emergency abdominal surgery (EAS). To a large extent, most SSI can be prevented, but there are few relevant studies in China. This study mainly investigated the current situation of SSI occurrence after EAS in China, and further explored risk factors for SSI occurrence.Methods:Multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted. Clinical data of patients undergoing EAS in 33 hospitals across China between May 1, 2019 and June 7, 2019 were prospectively collected, including perioperative data and microbial culture results from infected incisions. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI after EAS, while the secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay, ICU occupancy rate, length of ICU stay, hospitalization cost, and mortality within postoperative 30 days. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors of SSI after EAS.Results:A total of 660 EAS patients aged (47.9±18.3) years were enrolled in this study, including 56.5% of males (373/660). Forty-nine (7.4%) patients developed postoperative SSI. The main pathogen of SSI was Escherichia coli [culture positive rate was 32.7% (16/49)]. As compared to patients without SSI, those with SSI were more likely to be older (median 56 years vs. 46 years, U=19 973.5, P<0.001), male [71.4% (35/49) vs. 56.1% (343/611), χ 2=4.334, P=0.037] and diabetes [14.3% (7/49) vs. 5.1% (31/611), χ 2=5.498, P=0.015]; with-lower preoperative hemoglobin (median: 122.0 g/L vs. 143.5 g/L, U=11 471.5, P=0.006) and albumin (median: 35.5 g/L vs. 40.8 g/L, U=9452.0, P<0.001), with higher blood glucose (median: 6.9 mmol/L vs. 6.0 mmol/L, U=17 754.5, P<0.001); with intestinal obstruction [32.7% (16/49) vs. 9.2% (56/611), χ 2=25.749, P<0.001], with ASA score 3-4 [42.9% (21/49) vs. 13.9% (85/611), χ 2=25.563, P<0.001] and with high surgical risk [49.0% (24/49) vs. 7.0% (43/611), χ 2=105.301, P<0.001]. The main operative procedure resulting in SSI was laparotomy [81.6%(40/49) vs. 35.7%(218/611), χ 2=40.232, P<0.001]. Patients with SSI experienced significantly longer operation time (median: 150 minutes vs. 75 minutes, U=25 183.5, P<0.001). In terms of clinical outcome, higher ICU occupancy rate [51.0% (25/49) vs. 19.5% (119/611), χ 2=26.461, P<0.001], more hospitalization costs (median: 44 000 yuan vs. 15 000 yuan, U=24 660.0, P<0.001), longer postoperative hospital stay (median: 10 days vs. 5 days, U=23 100.0, P<0.001) and longer ICU occupancy time (median: 0 days vs. 0 days, U=19 541.5, P<0.001) were found in the SSI group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the elderly (OR=3.253, 95% CI: 1.178-8.985, P=0.023), colorectal surgery (OR=9.156, 95% CI: 3.655-22.937, P<0.001) and longer operation time (OR=15.912, 95% CI:6.858-36.916, P<0.001) were independent risk factors of SSI, while the laparoscopic surgery (OR=0.288, 95% CI: 0.119-0.694, P=0.006) was an independent protective factor for SSI. Conclusions:For patients undergoing EAS, attention should be paid to middle-aged and elderly patients and those of colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic surgery should be adopted when feasible and the operation time should be minimized, so as to reduce the incidence of SSI and to reduce the burden on patients and medical institutions.
8. Investigation of treatment and analysis of prognostic risk on enterocutaneous fistula in China: a multicenter prospective study
Tao ZHENG ; Haohao XIE ; Xiuwen WU ; Qiang CHI ; Feng WANG ; Zhenhua YANG ; Chaowu CHEN ; Wei MAI ; Suming LUO ; Xiaofei SONG ; Shimin YANG ; Wei ZHOU ; Haiyan LIU ; Xinjian XU ; Zheng ZHOU ; Chuanyuan LIU ; Lian′an DING ; Kai XIE ; Gang HAN ; Hongbin LIU ; Jianzhong WANG ; Shichen WANG ; Peige WANG ; Gefei WANG ; Guosheng GU ; Jian′an REN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2019;22(11):1041-1050
Objective:
To investigate the diagnosis and treatment for enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) in China, and to explore the prognostic factors of ECF.
Methods:
A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted based on the Registration System of Chinese Gastrointestinal Fistula and Intra-Abdominal Infections to collect the clinical data of ECF patients from 54 medical centers in 22 provinces/municipalities from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. The clinical data included patient gender, age, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, underlying diseases, primary diseases, direct causes of ECF, location and type of ECF, complications, treatment and outcomes. All medical records were carefully filled in by the attending physicians, and then re-examined by more than two specialists. The diagnosis of ECF was based on the clinical manifestations, laboratory/imaging findings and intraoperative exploration.
Results:
A total of 1521 patients with ECF were enrolled, including 1099 males and 422 females, with a median age of 55 years. The top three primary diseases of ECF were malignant tumors in 626 cases (41.2%, including 540 gastrointestinal tumors, accounting for 86.3% of malignant tumors), gastrointestinal ulcers and perforations in 202 cases (13.3%), and trauma in 157 cases (10.3%). The direct causes of ECF were mainly surgical operation in 1194 cases (78.5%), followed by trauma in 156 (10.3%), spontaneous fistula due to Crohn
10. Effects of milrinone on levels of inflammatory factors and liver and renal function after CPB in rheumatic heart disease patients for valve replacement
Yunfei QU ; Ning ZHANG ; Dengxiang LAI ; Suming ZHOU ; Ying TANG ; Yunming YU ; Qiang WU ; Yanlin TANG ; Dan MAO ; Xiaochang NIU ; Jianrong ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2019;26(9):1074-1079
Objective:
To investigate the effects of milrinone on levels of inflammatory factors and liver and renal function after CPB in rheumatic heart disease patients for valve replacement.
Methods:
From January 2014 to January 2016, 80 patients received valve replacement in the Central Hospital of Chongqing Three Gorges were randomly divided into observation group and control group by block randomization grouping method, with 40 patients in each group.The patients in the observation group were pumped intravenously with milrinone 0.5μg·kg-1·min-1 for 72h after surgery, while the patients in the control group were not pumped.The serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α were detected by ELISA before operation and on 0d, 1d, 3d, 5d after operation, respectively.The levels of ALT, AST, Scr were also detected at the same time.Moreover, the time for operation, extracorporeal circulation, interruption, mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital were also compared between the two groups.
Results:
The levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 increased immediately after operation in both groups[control group: (14.97±5.14)pg/mL, (52.45±10.37)pg/mL, (34.10±8.38)pg/mL, (32.27±8.45)pg/mL; observation group: (16.05±5.71)pg/mL, (54.39±8.56)pg/mL, (33.80±7.69)pg/mL, (31.48±5.94)pg/mL,

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail