Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Purpose: Romosozumab reportedly increases bone density in patients with severe osteoporosis; however, data on its clinical effects are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective survey to study the bone density-increasing effects of romosozumab and blood test-based predictive factors in patients with severe osteoporosis, examining its effects in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The subjects were patients with severe osteoporosis who were treated with romosozumab at the participating facilities. The increase in bone density was assessed by comparing bone density changes (as a percentage) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur before and 12 months after administration using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The association between changes in bone density at each site and pre-treatment bone metabolism markers (Tracp 5b, P1NP), serum calcium levels, nutritional status [Conut score: albumin, total cholesterol (TCho), and total lymphocyte count], and kidney function (eGFR) was assessed. Results: In both naïve patients and those switching from bone resorption inhibitors, the bone density increased significantly. In naïve patients, eGFR were positively associated with bone density in the total femur. In cases of switching from bone resorption inhibitors, correlations were found between Tracp 5b and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as well as between Tracp 5b, Alb, T-Cho, and eGFR in the total femur BMD. Conclusion Romosozumab administration significantly increases bone density in osteoporosis, and assessing key predictive factors is necessary to ensure clinical effectiveness.

Methods: This study included 99 men (mean age, 74.9 years; range, 28–93 years) who visited Qiball Clinic for BMD and body composition examinations. The osteoporosis group consisted of 24 patients (mean age, 72.5 years; range, 44–92 years), and the control group consisted of 75 individuals (mean age, 74.9 years; range, 28–93 years). Whole-body skeletal muscle mass was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer. BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Skin autofluorescence (SAF), a marker of dermal AGE accumulation, was measured using a spectroscope. Osteoporosis was defined as a bone density T score of –2.5 or less. Physical findings, skeletal muscle mass, BMD, grip strength, and SAF were compared between the osteoporosis and control groups. Results: The osteoporosis group had significantly lower trunk muscle mass (23.1 kg vs. 24.9 kg), lower leg muscle mass (14.4 kg vs. 13.0 kg), and skeletal mass index (7.1 kg/m2 vs. 6.7 kg/m2) than the control group (all p<0.05). Lower limb muscle mass was identified as a risk factor for osteoporosis in men (odds ratio, 0.64; p=0.03). Conclusions Conservative treatment of osteoporosis in men will require an effective approach that facilitates the maintenance or strengthening of skeletal muscle mass, including exercise therapy with a focus on lower extremities and nutritional supplementation.

Methods: This study included 50 patients with CSM and 39 with C-OPLL who underwent multi-segment laminoplasty. Decreased CL was defined as the difference between preoperative and 2-year postoperative neutral C2–7 Cobb angles. Radiographic parameters included preoperative neutral C2–7 Cobb angles, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1S), dynamic extension reserve (DER), and range of motion. The radiographic risk factors were investigated for decreased CL in CSM and C-OPLL. Additionally, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Results: C2–7 SVA (p =0.018) and DER (p =0.002) were significantly correlated with decreased CL in CSM, while C2–7 Cobb angle (p =0.012) and C2–7 SVA (p =0.028) were correlated with decreased CL in C-OPLL. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that greater C2–7 SVA (B =0.22, p =0.026) and small DER (B =−0.53, p =0.002) were significantly associated with decreased CL in CSM. By contrast, greater C2–7 SVA (B =0.36, p =0.031) was significantly associated with decreased CL in C-OPLL. The JOA score significantly improved in both CSM and C-OPLL (p <0.001). Conclusions C2–7 SVA was associated with a postoperative decreased CL in both CSM and C-OPLL, but DER was only associated with decreased CL in CSM. Risk factors for decreased CL slightly differed depending on the etiology of the condition.

Methods: This prospective, single-arm study included 11 patients (eight men; mean age, 62.7 years) with ≥3-months’ chronic pain history due to lumbar disease. Subcutaneous TCZ injections were administered twice, at a 2-week interval. We evaluated low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness using numeric rating scales and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; baseline and 6 months postinjection); serum IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α levels (baseline and 1 month postinjection); and clinical adverse events. Results: Intractable symptoms reduced after TCZ administration. Low back pain improved for 6 months. Improvements in leg pain and numbness peaked at 4 and 1 month, respectively. Improvements in ODI were significant at 1 month and peaked at 4 months. Serum IL-6 was increased at 1 month. IL-6 responders (i.e., patients with IL-6 increases >10 pg/mL) showed particularly significant improvements in leg pain at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months compared with nonresponders. We observed no apparent adverse events. Conclusions Systemic TCZ administration improved symptoms effectively for 6 months, with peak improvements at 1–4 months and no adverse events. Changing serum IL-6 levels correlated with leg pain improvements; further studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanistic connections between lumbar disorders and inflammatory cytokines.

Methods: A total of 14 patients with unilateral radicular symptoms and five healthy subjects were subjected to simultaneous apparent T2 mapping and neurography with nerve-sheath signal increased with inked rest-tissue rapid acquisition of relaxation enhancement signaling (SHINKEI-Quant) using a 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for neck pain and upper arm pain was used to evaluate clinical symptoms. T2 relaxation times of the cervical dorsal root ganglia of the brachial plexus were measured bilaterally from C4 to C8 in patients with radicular symptoms and from C5 to C8 in healthy controls. The T2 ratio was calculated as the affected side to unaffected side. Results: When comparing nerve roots bilaterally at each spinal level, no significant differences in T2 relaxation times were found between patients and healthy subjects. However, T2 relaxation times of nerve roots in the patients with unilateral radicular symptoms were significantly prolonged on the involved side compared with the uninvolved side (p<0.05). The VAS score for upper arm pain was not significantly correlated with the T2 relaxation times, but was positively correlated with the T2 ratio. Conclusions In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the SHINKEI-Quant technique can be used to quantitatively evaluate the compressed cervical nerve roots. The VAS score for upper arm pain was positively correlated with the T2 ratio. This suggests that the SHINKEI-Quant is a potential tool for the diagnosis of cervical nerve entrapment.

Methods: Study participants comprised five healthy volunteers (mean age, 27.2 years) and 27 patients with LSS (mean age, 58.4 years) who were individually assessed using 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Intraspinal ADC and FA values of 10 intervertebral discs from healthy volunteers and 52 intervertebral discs from LSS patients were measured. Also, intraspinal canal area, Schizas classification (A: normal, B: mild stenosis, C: severe stenosis) and correlations with symptoms were investigated. Clinical symptoms were checked for the presence of low back pain (LBP), intermittent claudication (IMC), and bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD). Results: Compared to healthy individuals, LSS patients had significantly lower ADC (p<0.05) and significantly higher FA values (p<0.01). In Schizas classification, stenosis worsened from A to C. ADC values decreased significantly while FA values increased significantly in that order (p<0.05). A positive correlation was found between intraspinal canal area and ADC values (r=0.63, p<0.01) and a negative correlation between intraspinal canal area and FA values (p=−0.61, p<0.01). No correlations were noted between LBP and ADC or FA values. On the other hand, ADC values were significantly lower (p<0.05) and FA values were significantly higher (p<0.05) in patients with IMC or BBD. Conclusions Intraspinal DTI parameters such as ADC and FA values were associated with the Schizas classification, intraspinal canal area, and clinical symptoms, suggesting that ADC and FA may be useful for quantitative assessment of LSS.