Administration, Inhalation ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Nitric Oxide ; administration & dosage ; Piperazines ; administration & dosage ; Purines ; administration & dosage ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; administration & dosage

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety between newly developed sildenafil (Please Orally Soluble Film) and sildenafil citrate (VIAGRA(R)) after single oral administration in healthy Korean male subjects. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single dose, 2-way crossover study was conducted in 50 healthy male subjects. Each sequence group consisted of 25 subjects, received a single oral 50 mg dose of Please Orally Soluble Film (test formulation) or VIAGRA(R) (reference formulation) by study period. Blood samples were obtained during a 24-hour period after dosing. Sildenafil and its metabolite concentrations were determined using validated LC-MS/MS. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events, vital sign check-up, physical examination, laboratory tests and electrocardiography. RESULTS: All enrolled participants completed the study. The point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of log transformed C(max) and AUC(last) of the test formulation in comparison to those of reference formulation were 0.9294(0.8353 - 1.0341) and 0.9415 (0.8869 - 0.9994) respectively. The analysis of variance showed no significant influences of formulation, sequence and period on the pharmacokinetic parameters. The frequencies of adverse events were not statistically different between the formulations. No serious adverse event was observed or reported. CONCLUSION: Please Orally Soluble Film could be considered bioequivalent to VIAGRA(R) and had similar safety properties in healthy Korean male subjects.
Administration, Oral ; Citric Acid ; Cross-Over Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Physical Examination ; Piperazines ; Purines ; Sulfones ; Sildenafil Citratea ; Vital Signs

OBJECTIVETo sum up the experience in administering oral tadalafil on alternate days for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) that fails to respond to on-demand medication.

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 15 cases of ED treated with oral tadalafil on alternate days from September 2010 to March 2012. All the patients had failed to respond to on-demand medication of sildenafil previously.

RESULTSAfter 4 weeks of tadalafil treatment, 11 (73.3%) of the cases were remarkably improved, with significant difference in IIEF-5 scores before and after treatment (P < 0.05). Transient adverse reactions were observed in the other 4 cases, including mild headache in 2, slight backache in 1, and facial flush in 1.

CONCLUSIONOral tadalafil on alternate days is safe and effective in the treatment of ED that fails to respond to on-demand medication of sildenafil.

Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Carbolines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Erectile Dysfunction ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; therapeutic use ; Tadalafil ; Treatment Failure ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Vardenafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, used in erectile dysfunction. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of vardenafil following a single oral administration in healthy male subjects. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single dosing, dose-escalation study was conducted in 30 healthy subjects. A single oral dose of vardenafil or placebo was given to 10 subjects (8 active + 2 placebo) in each dose group of 5, 10 and 20 mg. Serial blood and urine samples were obtained up to 48 hours for pharmacokinetic analysis. Vardenafil and its metabolite were detected by high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay. RESULTS: A total of 45 adverse events (AE) were reported in 22 subjects, including 5 AEs from placebo treatment, and all the AEs were mild, except one case of moderate nasal stuffiness. Vardenafil was absorbed after a single oral dose, with the tmax of 0.5-1.0 hours. The Cmax and AUClast were 10.21 +/- 3.68 ug/L(mean +/- SD) and 18.08 +/- 7.44 ugxh/L in 5 mg dose group, 19.79 +/- 12.13 ug/L and 38.61 +/- 21.04 ugxh/L in 10 mg dose group and 53.16 +/- 37.01 ug/L and 110.05 +/- 69.65 ugxh/L in 20 mg dose group. Dose-linearity on AUClast and Cmax of vardenafil were observed in three dose groups. In all dose groups, the fraction excreted in urine was less than 1%. CONCLUSION: The vardenafil was tolerable over a single dose range of 5 - 20 mg. The pharmacokinetics of vardenfil after a single oral dose was explored and linear pharmacokinetic characteristics were observed over the dose range of 5 - 20 mg in healthy subjects.
Administration, Oral ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Humans ; Imidazoles ; Male ; Piperazines ; Sulfones ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; Triazines

OBJECTIVETo investigate the protective effect of L-carnitine (LC) combined with sildenafil on the reproductive endocrine function of male rats with diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODSA total of 40 male SD rats were randomly divided into five groups, group A taken as normal controls, and groups B, C, D and E made into DM models by injection of streptozotocin at 65 mg/kg. Then the rats in groups A and B were treated with normal saline, C with sildenafil at 5 mg per kg per d, D with LC at 300 mg per kg per d, and E with sildenafil at 5 mg per kg per d plus LC at 300 mg per kg per d, all via gastric gavage for 6 weeks, followed by determination of the levels of testosterone (T), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) in the serum of the rats.

RESULTSAfter 6 weeks of treatment, the T, FSH and LH levels were (25.25 +/- 2.67) nmol/L, (5.78 +/- 0.61) IU/L and (625.21 +/- 43.45) ng/L in group A, (9.63 +/- 1.71) nmol/L, (1.98 +/- 0.42) IU/L and (479.89 +/- 27.62) ng/L in group B, (18.98 +/- 3.07) nmol/L, (5.08 +/- 0.33) IU/L and (586.57 +/- 31.72) ng/L in group C, (16.18 +/- 2.65) nmol/L, (4.63 +/- 0.30) IU/L and (540.78 +/- 25.52) ng/L in group D, and (23.65 +/- 2.66) nmol/L, (5.59 +/- 0.48) IU/L and (621.53 +/- 36. 40) ng/L in group E. The three parameters were significantly lower in B than in the other four groups (P < 0.01), and so were they in C and D than in A and E (P < 0.05), but showed no significant differences either between C and D (P > 0. 05) or between A and E (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSix-week medication of either sildenafil or LC alone could increase the levels of T, FSH and LH in the serum of DM rats, but the combination of the two had an even more obvious increasing effect, which indicates a still better protective effect on the reproductive endocrine function of diabetic male rats.

Animals ; Carnitine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone ; blood ; Luteinizing Hormone ; blood ; Male ; Piperazines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Testosterone ; blood

OBJECTIVETo investigate the impact of penile surgery on the erectile function of the patient and to evaluate the role of small-dose vardenafil in restoring the impaired penile erection.

METHODSSixty cases of penile cavernosum surgery were equally and randomly divided into a vardenafil and a control group, the former treated 5 - 7 days after surgery with 10 mg vardenafil every other day, while the latter given vitamin E at 100 mg once a day, both for 12 weeks. The penile erectile function of the patients was evaluated with the IIEF-5 questionnaire before surgery and at 3 and 6 months after vardenafil medication.

RESULTSThe mean IIEF-5 scores of the vardenafil group were 18.83 +/- 2.98 and 20.13 +/- 2.98 at 3 and 6 months after vardenafil medication, significantly higher than 14.21 +/- 3.62 before surgery (P > 0.05), while that of the control group was significantly decreased at 3 months as compared with the preoperative score (13.38 +/- 2.82 versus 15.80 +/- 3.02, P < 0.05). The vardenafil group showed the highest IIEF-5 score after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONLong-term administration of small-dose vardenafil after penile surgery helps to restore and maintain penile erectile function.

Adult ; Erectile Dysfunction ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Imidazoles ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Penile Erection ; Penis ; surgery ; Piperazines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Postoperative Period ; Recovery of Function ; Sulfones ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Triazines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Vardenafil Dihydrochloride ; Vasodilator Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use

Child ; Humans ; Hypertension, Pulmonary ; drug therapy ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Purines ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use

The possible characteristics of spinal interaction between sildenafil (phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor) and morphine on formalin-induced nociception in rats was examined. Then the role of the opioid receptor in the effect of sildenafil was further investigated. Catheters were inserted into the intrathecal space of male Sprague-Dawley rats. For induction of pain, 50 microliter of 5% formalin solution was applied to the hindpaw. Isobolographic analysis was used for the evaluation of drug interaction between sildenafil and morphine. Furthermore, naloxone was intrathecally given to verify the involvement of the opioid receptor in the antinociception of sildenafil. Both sildenafil and morphine produced an antinociceptive effect during phase 1 and phase 2 in the formalin test. The isobolographic analysis revealed an additive interaction after intrathecal delivery of the sildenafil-morphine mixture in both phases. Intrathecal naloxone reversed the antinociception of sildenafil in both phases. These results suggest that sildenafil, morphine, and the mixture of the two drugs are effective against acute pain and facilitated pain state at the spinal level. Thus, the spinal combination of sildenafil with morphine may be useful in the management of the same state. Furthermore, the opioid receptor is contributable to the antinocieptive mechanism of sildenafil at the spinal level.
Analgesics/*administration & dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid/*administration & dosage ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal/drug effects ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Synergism ; Formaldehyde/toxicity ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Morphine/*administration & dosage ; Naloxone/administration & dosage ; Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage ; Pain/chemically induced/therapy ; Pain Measurement/drug effects ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Piperazines/*administration & dosage ; Purines/administration & dosage ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Sulfones/*administration & dosage ; Time Factors

AIMTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of SK3530, a newly developed type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE5I), in Korean men with erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODSA total of 119 patients were randomized at 10 centers in Korea to receive either SK3530 (50, 100, or 150 mg; n = 89) or placebo (n = 30) taken l h before anticipated sexual activity for an 8-week period. The patients were evaluated at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks after beginning therapy. Efficacy was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and the Global Assessment Question (GAQ). Safety was analyzed by adverse events, laboratory values and vital signs.

RESULTSAt the end of the study, all the primary and secondary efficacy end-points were statistically significantly improved by SK3530 compared with placebo (P<0.05). Of the 89 patients in the treatment arm, 36 (42.3%) achieved normal erectile function after treatment, including six patients with severe ED. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32 patients. The most common adverse events were flushing, headache, dizziness and eye redness (10.9%, 7.6%, 2.5% and 2.5%, respectively), and most were mild. Only two patients discontinued treatment during the study period because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONThe results of our phase II study have confirmed the efficacy and safety of SK3530 in a broad population of men with ED of various etiologies and severity. The optimal doses in terms of efficacy and safety were determined to be 50 mg and 100 mg, respectively.

Double-Blind Method ; Erectile Dysfunction ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Placebos ; Pyrimidinones ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Sulfones ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury and the relationship between patient's subjective answers and the results of objective tests regarding erectile dysfunction. METHOD: Twenty-one male patients with erectile dysfunction after spinal cord injury were administered with nocturnal penile tumescense and rigidity testing (NPTR) using Rigiscan(R) over 2 consecutive nights. NPTR using Rigiscan(R) at second night was performed after oral administration of sildenafil 50 mg. Answer of the global efficacy question (GEQ) after oral administration of sildenafil 50 mg and the parameters of NPTR were compared. RESULTS: After oral administration of sildenafil 50 mg, number and duration of erectile episodes, and duration of rigidity greater than 60% on NPTR improved significantly (p< 0.05). Sixteen out of seventeen patients (94.1%) who showed improved nocturnal erection after oral administration of sildenafil 50 mg answered that they had an improved erectile function after sildenafil. All four patients (100%) who showed no improvement in nocturnal erection after sildenafil answered that their erectile function was not improved after oral administration of sildenafil 50 mg. CONCLUSION: We expect NPTR using Rigiscan(R) might be useful for the evaluation of erectile dysfunction in men with spinal cord injury.
Administration, Oral ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Humans ; Male ; Piperazines ; Purines ; Spinal Cord ; Spinal Cord Injuries ; Sulfones ; Sildenafil Citrate