Objective To investigate the 50% effective dose(ED)and 95% effective dose(ED)of dexmedetomidine(DEX)combined with 0.032 μg/(kg·h)sufentanil as well as its analgesic effect for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS).Methods Totally 25 patients undergoing elective VATS were enrolled. DEX and 0.032 μg/(kg·h)sufentanil were used for postoperative PCIA. The loading dose of DEX was 0.048 μg/(kg·h),and the dose difference between two adjacent patients was 0.008 μg/(kg·h). The DEX dose of a current patient was determined by whether the previous patient was satisfied with postoperative analgesic effect. If the previous patient was satisfied with postoperative analgesic effect,the DEX dose of the current patient was decreased by 0.008 μg/(kg·h);and if the previous analgestic effect was not satisfactory,DEX dose of the current patient was increased by 0.008 μg/(kg·h). The study endpoint was dexmedetomidine dose was<0.008 μg/(kg· h) within 7 upper and lower cycles in 7 consecutive cases. Finally,the probability unit regression was used to estimate the ED and ED of DEX and their 95% .Results When DEX combined with 0.032 μg/(kg·h) sufentanil was used for postoperative PCIA in young patients undergoing VATS,the ED and EDof DEX were 0.0346 μg/(kg· h)[95%:0.0283-0.0408 μg/(kg·h)] and 0.0459 μg/(kg·h)[95%:0.0400-0.0880 μg/(kg·h)],respectively. No adverse reaction such as vomiting,respiratory depression,or bradycardia occurred. The average Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores at rest(=-5.128,=0.000)and cough(Z=-6.642,=0.000)and the Ramsay sedation score(Z=-2.335,=0.020)within 6 hours after surgery were higher than those after 6 hour.Conclusion DEX combined with 0.032 μg/(kg·h) sufentanil are effective for postoperative PCIA in patients undergoing VATS when the ED and ED are 0.0346 μg/(kg·h)and 0.0459 μg/(kg·h),respectively.
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Dexmedetomidine ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of a single dose of ropivacaine combined with sufentanilfor thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) on pain and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracosopic surgery.

METHODSSixty patients undergoing video-assisted thoracosopic surgery were randomly divided into three groups to receive intravenous combined general anesthesia (group C), a single dose of ropivacainefor thoracic paravertebral block before surgery combined with intravenous and general anesthesia(group T), or a single dose of ropivacaineand sufentanilfor thoracic paravertebral blockcombined with intravenous and general anesthesia (group T). None of the patients used postoperative analgesia pump, and tramadol hydrochoride injection (100 mg) was given in cases with NRS scores > 4 after the surgery. The data were recorded including analgesics used for nerve block before the operation, intravenous dosage of sufentanilduring operation, total dose of sufentanilused (intravenous+nerve block), intravenous remifentanil dose during operation, NRS scores at 4, 6, 24, 48 h after the surgery, rescue analgesia in the first postoperative 24 h after surgery, ICU stay and hospital stay after the surgery.

RESULTSCompared with those in group C, the intravenous sufentanildose, total sufentanildose, intravenous remifentanildose during operation, NRS scores at 4 and 6, 24 h, and ICU stay and hospital stay after the surgery were significantly decreased in groups Tand T(P<0.05). The total dose of opioids during the operation and NRS scores at 4 and 6 h were significantly lower in group Tthan in group T(P<0.05), but the total dose of sufentanil, ICU stay and hospital stay were simialr between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONA single dose of ropivacaine combined with sufentanilfor thoracic paravertebral blockbefore surgery can reduce the total dose opioids, produce the optimal analgesic effect, and promote postoperative recovery of the patients.

Amides ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Analgesics, Opioid ; therapeutic use ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Injections ; Nerve Block ; methods ; Pain Management ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative ; Piperidines ; therapeutic use ; Postoperative Period ; Sufentanil ; therapeutic use ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted

BACKGROUNDSpinal anesthesia was considered as a reasonable anesthetic option in severe preeclampsia when cesarean delivery is indicated, and there is no indwelling epidural catheter or contraindication to spinal anesthesia. However, the ideal dose of intrathecal bupivacaine has not been quantified for cesarean delivery for severe preeclamptic patients. This study aimed to determine the ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for severely preeclamptic patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

METHODSTwo hundred severely preeclamptic patients are undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study. Patients received 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, or 10 mg intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with 2.5 μg sufentanil. Successful spinal anesthesia was defined as a T6 sensory level achieved within 10 minutes after intrathecal drug administration and/or no epidural supplement was required during the cesarean section. The ED 50 and ED 95 were calculated with a logistic regression model.

RESULTSED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for successful spinal anesthesia were 5.67 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.20-6.10 mg) and 8.82 mg (95% CI: 8.14-9.87 mg) respectively. The incidence of hypotension in Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was higher than that in Group 4 mg and Group 6 mg (P < 0.05). The sensory block was significantly different among groups 10 minutes after intrathecal injection (P < 0.05). The use of lidocaine in Group 4 mg was higher than that in other groups (P < 0.05). The use of phenylephrine in Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was higher than that in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The lowest systolic blood pressure before the infant delivery of Group 8 mg and Group 10 mg was lower than the other two groups (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of muscle relaxation in Group 4 mg was lower than other groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in patients' satisfaction and the newborns' Apgar score and the blood gas analysis of umbilical artery serum (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONOur study showed that the ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine for severely preeclamptic patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery were 5.67 mg and 8.82 mg, respectively. In addition, decreasing the dose of intrathecal bupivacaine could reduce the incidence of maternal hypotension.

Adult ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Blood Pressure ; physiology ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cesarean Section ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDSpinal anesthesia is considered as a reasonable anesthetic option in lower abdominal and lower limb surgery. This study was to determine the dose-response of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with scarred uterus undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

METHODSSeventy-five patients with scarred uterus undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study. Patients received 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14 mg intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine with 5 μg sufentanil. Successful spinal anesthesia was defined as a T4sensory level achieved with no need for epidural supplementation. The 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) were calculated with a logistic regression model.

RESULTSED50and ED95of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for patients with scarred uterus undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were 8.28 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28-9.83 mg) and 12.24 mg (95% CI: 10.53-21.88 mg), respectively.

CONCLUSIONWhen a CSEA technique is to use in patients with scarred uterus for an elective cesarean delivery, the ED50and ED95of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine along with 5 μg sufentanil were 8.28 mg and 12.24 mg, respectively. In addition, this local anesthetic is unsuitable for emergent cesarean delivery, but it has advantages for ambulatory patients.

Adult ; Amides ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; methods ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; methods ; Cesarean Section ; methods ; Cicatrix ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Uterus ; pathology

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dezocine combined with sufentanil in burn patients after escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting.

METHODSSixty burn patients hospitalized in Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of our hospital from February 2011 to December 2013, conforming to the study criteria and going to have escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting, were divided into sufentanil group (S, n = 30) and dezocine+sufentanil group (DS, n = 30) according to the random number table. Patients in group S were given 150 mL normal saline containing 2.5 µg/kg sufentanil citrate and 6 mg tropisetron after skin grafting for 48 hours. Patients in group DS were given 150 mL normal saline containing 0.25 mg/kg dezocine, 1.5 µg/kg sufentanil citrate, and 6 mg tropisetron for 48 hours. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Bruggrmann Comfort Scale (BCS), and Ramsay Sedation Scale were used to evaluate the sedative effect or analgesic effect, and their scores were recorded at administration hour (AH) 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48. The times of efficient injection and incidence of adverse effect within the 48 AH were recorded. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, t test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTSThere were no obvious differences in the scores of VAS and BCS between two groups at each time point (with t values from -0.426 to 0.864, P values above 0.05). The scores of Ramsay Sedation Scale in group S at AH 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 were respectively (3.2 ± 0.6), (3.2 ± 0.5), (3.3 ± 0.7), (3.2 ± 0.4), and (3.3 ± 0.4) points, which were higher than those in group DS [(2.4 ± 0.6), (2.5 ± 0.5), (2.4 ± 0.6), (2.4 ± 0.4), and (2.4 ± 0.5) points, with t values from 5.302 to 8.391, P values below 0.001]. The times of efficient injection within the 48 AH was 6.8 ± 0.7 in group S and 6.5 ± 0.9 in group DS, showing no significantly statistical difference (t = 1.260, P > 0.05). Respiratory depression was not observed in both groups; the incidence of pruritus was the same, and that of urine retention was similar between the 2 groups within the 48 AH (with P values above 0.05). Within the 48 AH, the incidence of nausea and vomiting in group S was 26.7% (8/30), which was obviously higher than that in group DS (6.7%, 2/30, P < 0.05); the incidence of drowsiness in group S was 20.0% (6/30), which was significantly higher than that in group DS (no patient, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSDezocine combined with sufentanil can provide effective postoperative analgesia with little adverse effect for PCIA in burn patients after escharectomy or tangential excision followed by autologous skin grafting, therefore it can be widely used.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; adverse effects ; Analgesics, Opioid ; administration & dosage ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Burns ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Skin Transplantation ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Tetrahydronaphthalenes ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the characteristics of selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were randomized into two groups. The Fentanyl group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+fentanyl 20 microg+5% dextrose 1.4 mL, and the Sufentanil group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+sufentanil 5 microg+5% dextrose 1.7 mL intrathecally. Intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients in each group completed the study. The median peak sensory block level was similar between two groups, but sensory regression time was longer in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group (p=0.017). All patients were able to move themselves to the bed without any aid when they arrived at the admission room. Pain scores were lower in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group at postoperative 6, 12, and 18 hours (p=0.001). Compared to the Fentanyl group, the Sufentanil group required less postoperative analgesia (p=0.023) and the time to the first analgesic request was longer (p=0.025). Twenty-four of 26 patients (92.3%) in each group showed "good" satisfaction level. CONCLUSION: Selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine with fentanyl or sufentanil provided appropriate sensory block level with spared motor function for transurethral resection of the prostate in elderly patients. Intrathecal sufentanil was superior to fentanyl in postoperative analgesic quality.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesics, Opioid/*administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Spinal/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine/*administration & dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Fentanyl/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate/*surgery ; Sufentanil/*administration & dosage ; Time Factors ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the characteristics of selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were randomized into two groups. The Fentanyl group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+fentanyl 20 microg+5% dextrose 1.4 mL, and the Sufentanil group received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.2 mL+sufentanil 5 microg+5% dextrose 1.7 mL intrathecally. Intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients in each group completed the study. The median peak sensory block level was similar between two groups, but sensory regression time was longer in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group (p=0.017). All patients were able to move themselves to the bed without any aid when they arrived at the admission room. Pain scores were lower in the Sufentanil group than the Fentanyl group at postoperative 6, 12, and 18 hours (p=0.001). Compared to the Fentanyl group, the Sufentanil group required less postoperative analgesia (p=0.023) and the time to the first analgesic request was longer (p=0.025). Twenty-four of 26 patients (92.3%) in each group showed "good" satisfaction level. CONCLUSION: Selective spinal anesthesia using 1 mg of bupivacaine with fentanyl or sufentanil provided appropriate sensory block level with spared motor function for transurethral resection of the prostate in elderly patients. Intrathecal sufentanil was superior to fentanyl in postoperative analgesic quality.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesics, Opioid/*administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Spinal/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine/*administration & dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Fentanyl/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate/*surgery ; Sufentanil/*administration & dosage ; Time Factors ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: This study examined the sparing effect of sufentanil on the median effective concentration (EC50) of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing elective transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized double-blind dose-response study. Fifty eight elderly patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for TURP surgery under epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated to a group receiving 15 mL of ropivacaine (group R) or a group receiving ropivacaine plus 5 microg of sufentanil (group RS). The concentration of ropivacaine was determined by a Dixon's up-and-down sequential allocation. The first participant received 0.3% of ropivacaine in both groups and subsequent concentrations were determined by the response of the previous patient in the same group. The EC50 of epidural ropivacaine was analyzed using the Dixon and Massey method. RESULTS: The EC50 of ropivacaine during TURP surgery was 0.186% (95% confidence interval, 0.173-0.200%) in group R, and 0.136% (95% confidence interval, 0.127-0.144%) in group RS (p<0.01). No differences in Bromage scale of motor block examination and the onset time of sensory block were observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of 5 microg of epidural sufentanil caused a 37% reduction in the EC50 of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients who underwent TURP surgery. Thus, sufentanil addition during surgery of TURP can decrease the dose of ropivacaine anesthesia required.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amides/*administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Epidural/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Prospective Studies ; Sufentanil/*administration & dosage ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo observe the effectiveness of conscious sedation with midazolam, propofol and sufentanil for patients in plastic surgery.

METHODS81 patients, scheduled for plastic surgery, were randomly selected to receive conscious sedation with midazolam 0.05 mg x kg(-1) and sufentanil 0.1 microg x kg(-1) intravenously, following by a continuous infusion of midazolam-propofol-sufentanil combination (midazolam 5 mg + propofol 200 mg + sufentanil 10 microg, a total of 23 ml). The initial infusion rate was 0.2 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1), and was adjusted (in 20% of initial infusion rate increment) to maintain OAA/S score as 11 during the operation. The patients' vital signs, discomfort and level of sedation were evaluated at 5 to 10 min intervals until the end of the surgery. The complications (i. e. anoxemia, apnea, restlessness, nausea and vomiting), anesthesia duration and drug consumption were recorded. The drug infusion was discontinued at 5 - 10 min before the end of the surgical procedure. On the first postoperative day, patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with the anesthetic management and whether they would choose to receive the same anesthetic technique if necessary in the future.

RESULTSThe OAA/S score decreased from 20.0 +/- 0 to 11.9 +/- 2.6 after midazolam and sufentanil IV (P < 0.05), and was maintained as 10.5-11.1 during the procedure. At the end of the procedure, the OAA/S score returned to 16.0 +/- 2.2, which was also lower significantly compared with baseline value (P < 0.05). The induction of sedation produced a significant decrease in SBP and DBP (P < 0.05) and no significant changes in heart rate (P > 0.05). At the end of the procedure, SBP, DBP and HR returned to the baseline value. The anoxemia happened in 11 cases, apnea in 5 cases and restlessness in 2. No nausea and vomiting occurred. The anesthesia duration and consumption of midazolam, propofol and sufentanil were (101.1 +/- 42.5) min, (8.4 +/- 3.7) mg, (189.1 +/- 88.7) mg and (18.2 +/- 5.6) microg respectively. In an interview on the first postoperative day, 96% (78/ 81) of the patients were satisfied with their anesthesia and were willing to receive the same anesthetic technique if necessary in the future.

CONCLUSIONConscious sedation with midazolam, propofol and sufentanil is an effective anesthetic technique for patients in plastic surgery.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Conscious Sedation ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Midazolam ; administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; Surgery, Plastic ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intrathecal sufentanil and protein kinase C inhibitor on pain threshold and the expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receaptors (NMDAR)/calcitonin generelated peptide (CGRP) in spinal dorsal horn in rats with neuropathic pain. METHODS: Fifty-four healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 6 groups (9 in each group). The rats in the sham group(Group S) + spared nerve injury (SNI), SP+SNI, and P+SNI were intrathecally injected sufentanil (1 μg), sufentanil (1 μg) and chelerythrine chloride (11 μg), chelerythrine chloride (11 μg) followed by 10 μL normal saline once every day for 14 days postoperatively, respectively. Similarly, rats in the control group (Group C), the sham group (Group S), and SNI model group (Group SNI) were intrathecally injected 20 μL normal saline in the uniform interval. Pain behaviours were measured on Day 1 pre-surgery and on Day 1, 2, 7, and 14 after the intrathecal injection. The expressions of NMDAR and CGRP in the spinal dorsal horn of L5 segment were determined by immunohistochemistry on Day 2, 7, and 14 after the intrathecal injection. RESULTS: Compared with Group C and Group S, mechanical allodynia threshold in group SNI was decreased after the surgery (P<0.01), and expressions of NMDAR and CGRP immunoreactive soma in the spinal dorsal horn was significantly increased (P<0.01). Mechanical stimulation pain threshold was elevated in Group S+SNI, Group P+SNI, and Group SP+SNI compared with Group SNI (P<0.01), while expressions of NMDAR and CGRP immunoreactive soma in Group S+SNI, Group P +SNI, and Group SP+SNI were significantly decreased (P<0.05 or 0.01). CONCLUSION Intrathecal administration of sulfentanil and protein kinase C inhibitor can provide significant antinociception in rats with neuropathic pain and obviously inhibit the upregulation of NMDAR and CGRP expressions in the spinal dorsal horn of SNI rat models.
Animals ; Benzophenanthridines ; administration & dosage ; Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide ; metabolism ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Neuralgia ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; physiopathology ; Pain Measurement ; Posterior Horn Cells ; metabolism ; Protein Kinase C ; antagonists & inhibitors ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate ; metabolism ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage