Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation testing is crucial for the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat non–small cell lung cancer. In addition to traditional tissue-based tests, liquid biopsies using plasma are increasingly utilized, particularly for detecting T790M mutations. This study compared tissue- and plasma-based EGFR testing methods. Methods: A total of 248 patients were tested for EGFR mutations using tissue and plasma samples from 2018 to 2023 at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Tissue tests were performed using PANAmutyper, and plasma tests were performed using the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. Results: All 248 patients underwent tissue-based EGFR testing, and 245 (98.8%) showed positive results. Of the 408 plasma tests, 237 (58.1%) were positive. For the T790M mutation, tissue biopsies were performed 87 times in 69 patients, and 30 positive cases (38.6%) were detected. Plasma testing for the T790M mutation was conducted 333 times in 207 patients, yielding 62 positive results (18.6%). Of these, 57 (27.5%) were confirmed to have the mutation via plasma testing. Combined tissue and plasma tests for the T790M mutation were positive in nine patients (13.4%), while 17 (25.4%) were positive in tissue only and 12 (17.9%) in plasma only. This mutation was not detected in 28 patients (43.3%). Conclusions Although the tissue- and plasma-based tests showed a sensitivity of 37.3% and 32.8%, respectively, combined testing increased the detection rate to 56.7%. Thus, neither test demonstrated superiority, rather, they were complementary.

Background: Dental caries is a prevalent public health problem among adolescents that significantly affects their quality of life. The Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) model provides a structured, risk-based approach for caries prevention and management. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the CAMBRA-students mobile application, integrated with an information and communication technology (ICT) based intervention, in modifying caries risk factors in middle school students. Methods: A non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used. A total of 131 middle school students aged 13∼14 years participated. The experimental group (n=68) received a risk-based intervention using the CAMBRA-student mobile application for 1 year, while the control group (n=63) received only standard oral health education and underwent pre- and post-tests. Data on caries risk factors; protective factors; disease indicators; and decayed, missing, and filled teeth rates were collected. Paired and independent t-tests were conducted to analyze changes within and between groups. Results: The rate of change in the caries risk classification before and after the intervention differed between the groups. In the control group, 50% of the low-risk participants were at a high-risk after 12 months. In the intervention group, 90% of the low-risk participants shifted to the high-risk category, and those classified as extremely high-risk moved to the high-risk category. When comparing changes in the caries risk assessment before and after the intervention, both groups demonstrated a significant increase in protective factors (p＜0.001). However, disease indicators increased significantly in the control, whereas no significant change was noted in the intervention group. Conclusion This study evaluated the effectiveness of an ICT-based caries management program for middle school students and confirmed changes in protective factors and specific oral health behaviors through personalized interventions. Future studies should investigate the long-term sustainability of such interventions across diverse populations to further establish their effectiveness.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Background: Dental caries is a prevalent public health problem among adolescents that significantly affects their quality of life. The Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) model provides a structured, risk-based approach for caries prevention and management. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the CAMBRA-students mobile application, integrated with an information and communication technology (ICT) based intervention, in modifying caries risk factors in middle school students. Methods: A non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used. A total of 131 middle school students aged 13∼14 years participated. The experimental group (n=68) received a risk-based intervention using the CAMBRA-student mobile application for 1 year, while the control group (n=63) received only standard oral health education and underwent pre- and post-tests. Data on caries risk factors; protective factors; disease indicators; and decayed, missing, and filled teeth rates were collected. Paired and independent t-tests were conducted to analyze changes within and between groups. Results: The rate of change in the caries risk classification before and after the intervention differed between the groups. In the control group, 50% of the low-risk participants were at a high-risk after 12 months. In the intervention group, 90% of the low-risk participants shifted to the high-risk category, and those classified as extremely high-risk moved to the high-risk category. When comparing changes in the caries risk assessment before and after the intervention, both groups demonstrated a significant increase in protective factors (p＜0.001). However, disease indicators increased significantly in the control, whereas no significant change was noted in the intervention group. Conclusion This study evaluated the effectiveness of an ICT-based caries management program for middle school students and confirmed changes in protective factors and specific oral health behaviors through personalized interventions. Future studies should investigate the long-term sustainability of such interventions across diverse populations to further establish their effectiveness.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation testing is crucial for the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat non–small cell lung cancer. In addition to traditional tissue-based tests, liquid biopsies using plasma are increasingly utilized, particularly for detecting T790M mutations. This study compared tissue- and plasma-based EGFR testing methods. Methods: A total of 248 patients were tested for EGFR mutations using tissue and plasma samples from 2018 to 2023 at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Tissue tests were performed using PANAmutyper, and plasma tests were performed using the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. Results: All 248 patients underwent tissue-based EGFR testing, and 245 (98.8%) showed positive results. Of the 408 plasma tests, 237 (58.1%) were positive. For the T790M mutation, tissue biopsies were performed 87 times in 69 patients, and 30 positive cases (38.6%) were detected. Plasma testing for the T790M mutation was conducted 333 times in 207 patients, yielding 62 positive results (18.6%). Of these, 57 (27.5%) were confirmed to have the mutation via plasma testing. Combined tissue and plasma tests for the T790M mutation were positive in nine patients (13.4%), while 17 (25.4%) were positive in tissue only and 12 (17.9%) in plasma only. This mutation was not detected in 28 patients (43.3%). Conclusions Although the tissue- and plasma-based tests showed a sensitivity of 37.3% and 32.8%, respectively, combined testing increased the detection rate to 56.7%. Thus, neither test demonstrated superiority, rather, they were complementary.

Background: Dental caries is a prevalent public health problem among adolescents that significantly affects their quality of life. The Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) model provides a structured, risk-based approach for caries prevention and management. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the CAMBRA-students mobile application, integrated with an information and communication technology (ICT) based intervention, in modifying caries risk factors in middle school students. Methods: A non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used. A total of 131 middle school students aged 13∼14 years participated. The experimental group (n=68) received a risk-based intervention using the CAMBRA-student mobile application for 1 year, while the control group (n=63) received only standard oral health education and underwent pre- and post-tests. Data on caries risk factors; protective factors; disease indicators; and decayed, missing, and filled teeth rates were collected. Paired and independent t-tests were conducted to analyze changes within and between groups. Results: The rate of change in the caries risk classification before and after the intervention differed between the groups. In the control group, 50% of the low-risk participants were at a high-risk after 12 months. In the intervention group, 90% of the low-risk participants shifted to the high-risk category, and those classified as extremely high-risk moved to the high-risk category. When comparing changes in the caries risk assessment before and after the intervention, both groups demonstrated a significant increase in protective factors (p＜0.001). However, disease indicators increased significantly in the control, whereas no significant change was noted in the intervention group. Conclusion This study evaluated the effectiveness of an ICT-based caries management program for middle school students and confirmed changes in protective factors and specific oral health behaviors through personalized interventions. Future studies should investigate the long-term sustainability of such interventions across diverse populations to further establish their effectiveness.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.