The leading causes of refractory peptic ulcers are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Additionally, insufficient treatment for the suppression of gastric acid, smoking, alcohol consumption, and concomitant diseases can hinder recovery. Treatment includes the eradication of H. pylori, discontinuation of the causative agent, and appropriate suppression of gastric acid. Even after improvement of symptoms, sufficient proton pump inhibitor maintenance is necessary for 8 to 12 weeks. To increase the success rate of H. pylori eradication, it is essential to accurately determine the initial infection and for patients where treatment has failed due to antibiotic resistance, the success rate of treatment can be increased through sensitivity testing. Sometimes, evaluation for rare causes, such as Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, may be necessary, and follow-up gastroscopy must be performed to exclude the possibility of malignancy.

The leading causes of refractory peptic ulcers are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Additionally, insufficient treatment for the suppression of gastric acid, smoking, alcohol consumption, and concomitant diseases can hinder recovery. Treatment includes the eradication of H. pylori, discontinuation of the causative agent, and appropriate suppression of gastric acid. Even after improvement of symptoms, sufficient proton pump inhibitor maintenance is necessary for 8 to 12 weeks. To increase the success rate of H. pylori eradication, it is essential to accurately determine the initial infection and for patients where treatment has failed due to antibiotic resistance, the success rate of treatment can be increased through sensitivity testing. Sometimes, evaluation for rare causes, such as Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, may be necessary, and follow-up gastroscopy must be performed to exclude the possibility of malignancy.

The leading causes of refractory peptic ulcers are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Additionally, insufficient treatment for the suppression of gastric acid, smoking, alcohol consumption, and concomitant diseases can hinder recovery. Treatment includes the eradication of H. pylori, discontinuation of the causative agent, and appropriate suppression of gastric acid. Even after improvement of symptoms, sufficient proton pump inhibitor maintenance is necessary for 8 to 12 weeks. To increase the success rate of H. pylori eradication, it is essential to accurately determine the initial infection and for patients where treatment has failed due to antibiotic resistance, the success rate of treatment can be increased through sensitivity testing. Sometimes, evaluation for rare causes, such as Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, may be necessary, and follow-up gastroscopy must be performed to exclude the possibility of malignancy.

The leading causes of refractory peptic ulcers are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Additionally, insufficient treatment for the suppression of gastric acid, smoking, alcohol consumption, and concomitant diseases can hinder recovery. Treatment includes the eradication of H. pylori, discontinuation of the causative agent, and appropriate suppression of gastric acid. Even after improvement of symptoms, sufficient proton pump inhibitor maintenance is necessary for 8 to 12 weeks. To increase the success rate of H. pylori eradication, it is essential to accurately determine the initial infection and for patients where treatment has failed due to antibiotic resistance, the success rate of treatment can be increased through sensitivity testing. Sometimes, evaluation for rare causes, such as Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, may be necessary, and follow-up gastroscopy must be performed to exclude the possibility of malignancy.

The leading causes of refractory peptic ulcers are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Additionally, insufficient treatment for the suppression of gastric acid, smoking, alcohol consumption, and concomitant diseases can hinder recovery. Treatment includes the eradication of H. pylori, discontinuation of the causative agent, and appropriate suppression of gastric acid. Even after improvement of symptoms, sufficient proton pump inhibitor maintenance is necessary for 8 to 12 weeks. To increase the success rate of H. pylori eradication, it is essential to accurately determine the initial infection and for patients where treatment has failed due to antibiotic resistance, the success rate of treatment can be increased through sensitivity testing. Sometimes, evaluation for rare causes, such as Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, may be necessary, and follow-up gastroscopy must be performed to exclude the possibility of malignancy.

Background/Aims: The use of 1-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbate (PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablets (OST) as low-volume bowel preparation agents has gradually increased. However, these agents may induce acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, particularly in elderly populations. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute gastropathy of 1-L PEG/Asc and OST according to age, as well as efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy for screening on the same day and underwent bowel preparation using OST or 1-L PEG/Asc. We collected EGD findings related to acute gastropathy, bowel-cleansing score using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), polyp or adenoma detection rate (ADR), and laboratory parameters. Results: Of 4,711 patients, 1,758, 2,241, and 712 were in the younger (18–49 years), middle-aged (50–64 years), and older (≥65 years) groups, respectively. In all age groups, the OST group had higher rates of acute gastropathy than the 1-L PEG/Asc group. The younger-, middle-, and older-aged groups had OST and 1-L PEG/Asc usage rates of 42.9% and 11.6%, 41.2% and 16.0%, and 41.5% and 16.4%, respectively. Notably, in the younger group, the total BBPS and ADR scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1-L PEG/Asc group; however, these did not differ in the other age groups. Conclusions Acute gastropathy was more strongly associated with OST than with 1-L PEG/Asc in all age groups. Therefore, physicians should consider acute gastropathy associated with low-volume agents in all age groups when performing bowel preparation.

Background/Aims: The use of 1-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbate (PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablets (OST) as low-volume bowel preparation agents has gradually increased. However, these agents may induce acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, particularly in elderly populations. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute gastropathy of 1-L PEG/Asc and OST according to age, as well as efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy for screening on the same day and underwent bowel preparation using OST or 1-L PEG/Asc. We collected EGD findings related to acute gastropathy, bowel-cleansing score using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), polyp or adenoma detection rate (ADR), and laboratory parameters. Results: Of 4,711 patients, 1,758, 2,241, and 712 were in the younger (18–49 years), middle-aged (50–64 years), and older (≥65 years) groups, respectively. In all age groups, the OST group had higher rates of acute gastropathy than the 1-L PEG/Asc group. The younger-, middle-, and older-aged groups had OST and 1-L PEG/Asc usage rates of 42.9% and 11.6%, 41.2% and 16.0%, and 41.5% and 16.4%, respectively. Notably, in the younger group, the total BBPS and ADR scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1-L PEG/Asc group; however, these did not differ in the other age groups. Conclusions Acute gastropathy was more strongly associated with OST than with 1-L PEG/Asc in all age groups. Therefore, physicians should consider acute gastropathy associated with low-volume agents in all age groups when performing bowel preparation.

Background/Aims: The use of 1-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbate (PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablets (OST) as low-volume bowel preparation agents has gradually increased. However, these agents may induce acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, particularly in elderly populations. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute gastropathy of 1-L PEG/Asc and OST according to age, as well as efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy for screening on the same day and underwent bowel preparation using OST or 1-L PEG/Asc. We collected EGD findings related to acute gastropathy, bowel-cleansing score using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), polyp or adenoma detection rate (ADR), and laboratory parameters. Results: Of 4,711 patients, 1,758, 2,241, and 712 were in the younger (18–49 years), middle-aged (50–64 years), and older (≥65 years) groups, respectively. In all age groups, the OST group had higher rates of acute gastropathy than the 1-L PEG/Asc group. The younger-, middle-, and older-aged groups had OST and 1-L PEG/Asc usage rates of 42.9% and 11.6%, 41.2% and 16.0%, and 41.5% and 16.4%, respectively. Notably, in the younger group, the total BBPS and ADR scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1-L PEG/Asc group; however, these did not differ in the other age groups. Conclusions Acute gastropathy was more strongly associated with OST than with 1-L PEG/Asc in all age groups. Therefore, physicians should consider acute gastropathy associated with low-volume agents in all age groups when performing bowel preparation.

Background/Aims: The use of 1-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbate (PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablets (OST) as low-volume bowel preparation agents has gradually increased. However, these agents may induce acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, particularly in elderly populations. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute gastropathy of 1-L PEG/Asc and OST according to age, as well as efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy for screening on the same day and underwent bowel preparation using OST or 1-L PEG/Asc. We collected EGD findings related to acute gastropathy, bowel-cleansing score using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), polyp or adenoma detection rate (ADR), and laboratory parameters. Results: Of 4,711 patients, 1,758, 2,241, and 712 were in the younger (18–49 years), middle-aged (50–64 years), and older (≥65 years) groups, respectively. In all age groups, the OST group had higher rates of acute gastropathy than the 1-L PEG/Asc group. The younger-, middle-, and older-aged groups had OST and 1-L PEG/Asc usage rates of 42.9% and 11.6%, 41.2% and 16.0%, and 41.5% and 16.4%, respectively. Notably, in the younger group, the total BBPS and ADR scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1-L PEG/Asc group; however, these did not differ in the other age groups. Conclusions Acute gastropathy was more strongly associated with OST than with 1-L PEG/Asc in all age groups. Therefore, physicians should consider acute gastropathy associated with low-volume agents in all age groups when performing bowel preparation.

Background/Aims: The use of 1-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbate (PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablets (OST) as low-volume bowel preparation agents has gradually increased. However, these agents may induce acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, particularly in elderly populations. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute gastropathy of 1-L PEG/Asc and OST according to age, as well as efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy for screening on the same day and underwent bowel preparation using OST or 1-L PEG/Asc. We collected EGD findings related to acute gastropathy, bowel-cleansing score using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), polyp or adenoma detection rate (ADR), and laboratory parameters. Results: Of 4,711 patients, 1,758, 2,241, and 712 were in the younger (18–49 years), middle-aged (50–64 years), and older (≥65 years) groups, respectively. In all age groups, the OST group had higher rates of acute gastropathy than the 1-L PEG/Asc group. The younger-, middle-, and older-aged groups had OST and 1-L PEG/Asc usage rates of 42.9% and 11.6%, 41.2% and 16.0%, and 41.5% and 16.4%, respectively. Notably, in the younger group, the total BBPS and ADR scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1-L PEG/Asc group; however, these did not differ in the other age groups. Conclusions Acute gastropathy was more strongly associated with OST than with 1-L PEG/Asc in all age groups. Therefore, physicians should consider acute gastropathy associated with low-volume agents in all age groups when performing bowel preparation.