Peritoneal metastasis is one of the most frequent patterns of metastasis in gastric cancer, and remains a major unmet clinical problem. Thus, systemic chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. In well-selected patients, the reasonable combination of cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy will bring significant survival benefits to patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. In patients with high-risk factors, prophylactic therapy may reduce the risk of peritoneal recurrence, and improves survival after radical gastrectomy. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials will be needed to determine which modality is better. The safety and efficacy of intraoperative extensive intraperitoneal lavage as a preventive measure has not been proven. The safety of HIPEC also requires further evaluation. HIPEC and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy have achieved good results in conversion therapy, and it is necessary to find more efficient and low-toxicity therapeutic modalities and screen out the potential benefit population. The efficacy of CRS combined with HIPEC on peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer has been preliminarily validated, and with the completion of clinical studies such as PERISCOPE II, more evidence will be available.
Humans ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology* ; Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Hyperthermia, Induced/methods* ; Peritoneum/pathology* ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Survival Rate

Peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer serving as the most frequent form of metastasis, is one of the leading causes of death. A portion of surgically treated patients often suffer from small peritoneal residual metastasis, which will lead to recurrence and metastasis of gastric cancer patients after surgery. Given these, the prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer deserves more attention. Molecular residual disease (MRD) refers to the molecular abnormalities of tumor origin that cannot be found by traditional imaging or other laboratory methods after treatment, but can be found by liquid biopsy, representing the possibility of tumor persistence or clinical progress. In recent years, the detection of MRD based on ctDNA has gradually become a research hotspot in the prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastasis. Our team established a new method for MRD molecular diagnosis of gastric cancer, and reviewed the research achievements in this field.
Humans ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology* ; Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary* ; Liquid Biopsy ; Neoplasm, Residual/genetics*

Brain Diseases ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ; Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary* ; Peritoneum/pathology* ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*

INTRODUCTIONSporadic colorectal cancers with BRAF mutations constitute two distinct subgroups of colorectal cancers. Recent studies have linked the presence of the BRAF mutation to a familial inheritance pattern. This was a proof-of-concept study that aimed to examine: (a) the extent of field change in sporadic colorectal cancers with BRAF mutation; and (b) the extent of resection margins required and the pattern of DNA mismatch repair protein loss in these tumours.

METHODSEight microsatellite instability-high tumours with positive BRAF mutation from an existing histopathological database were selected for BRAF mutation and mismatch repair protein analysis.

RESULTSAll the resection margins were negative for BRAF mutation. Three tumours had loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expressions, and five tumours had no protein loss. Six peritumoral tissues were negative and one was positive for BRAF mutation.

CONCLUSIONThe results suggest that any early field change effect is restricted to the immediate vicinity of the tumour and is not a pan-colonic phenomenon. Current guidelines on resection margins are adequate for BRAF mutation-positive colorectal cancers. Any suggestion of a hereditary link to these tumours is likely not related to germline BRAF gene mutations. The pattern of protein loss reinforces previous findings for the two subgroups of BRAF mutation-positive colorectal cancers.

Colorectal Neoplasms ; genetics ; pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microsatellite Instability ; Mutation ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Peritoneal Neoplasms ; pathology ; secondary ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf ; genetics ; Stomach Neoplasms ; pathology ; secondary

OBJECTIVETo assess the clinical value of the diagnostic laparoscopy in choosing treatment strategies for patients with gastric cancer.

METHODSRetrospective analysis was performed on clinical and pathological data collected from 2 023 patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery in the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from 2009 to 2014. All the patients were diagnosed as gastric cancer by endoscopic biopsy and staged by imaging examination before surgery. During the diagnostic laparoscopy procedure, a small periumbilical incision was made and a pneumoperitoneum with COunder 10-15 mmHg was established through a port. A 10 mm trocar was put in, and the camera was inserted. Two 5 mm trocars were put in two ports which located in midclavicular line two fingers under the left and right costal margin and then the instruments were inserted. A thorough inspection included ascites, the abdominal cavity, liver, diaphragm, spleen, greater omentum, colon, small intestine, mesentery, adnexa (female) and pelvic floor. If the tumor located at the posterior part of the stomach, the gastrocolic ligament was opened in order to look for carcinomatosis in the omental bursa. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in diagnosing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis was calculated, and the rate of adjusting treatment plans after diagnostic laparoscopy was also calculated.

RESULTSThere were 52.7%(1 067/2 023) of patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in evaluating adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis were 98.3%(1 049/1 067) and 98.1%(1 047/1 067) respectively. Besides, 14 patients with stage T4b and 32 with intra-abdominal metastasis, which were missed by imaging examination, were diagnosed by diagnostic laparoscopy. The treatment plans of 9.3% (99/1 067) of patients were changed after diagnostic laparoscopy, and 65 (6.1%) cases of non-therapeutic laparotomy were avoided. However, 18 cases of adjacent organ invasion and 20 cases of intra-abdominal metastasis were still missed by diagnostic laparoscopy, and 12 cases received non-therapeutic laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONDiagnostic laparoscopy has considerable value in assessing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis and has great clinical significance in making precise treatment plans.

Abdominal Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; secondary ; Digestive System ; pathology ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy ; instrumentation ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Laparotomy ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; diagnostic imaging ; Patient Care Planning ; statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Surgical Instruments ; Unnecessary Procedures ; statistics & numerical data

OBJECTIVETo establish an evaluation model of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer, and to assess its clinical significance.

METHODSClinical and pathologic data of the consecutive cases of gastric cancer admitted between April 2015 and December 2015 in Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 710 patients were enrolled in the study after 18 patients with other distant metastasis were excluded. The correlations between peritoneal metastasis and different factors were studied through univariate (Pearson's test or Fisher's exact test) and multivariate analyses (Binary Logistic regression). Independent predictable factors for peritoneal metastasis were combined to establish a risk evaluation model (nomogram). The nomogram was created with R software using the 'rms' package. In the nomogram, each factor had different scores, and every patient could have a total score by adding all the scores of each factor. A higher total score represented higher risk of peritoneal metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the established nomogram. Delong. Delong. Clarke-Pearson test was used to compare the difference of the area under the curve (AUC). The cut-off value was determined by the AUC, when the ROC curve had the biggest AUC, the model had the best sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTSAmong 710 patients, 47 patients had peritoneal metastasis (6.6%), including 30 male (30/506, 5.9%) and 17 female (17/204, 8.3%); 31 were ≥ 60 years old (31/429, 7.2%); 38 had tumor ≥ 3 cm(38/461, 8.2%). Lauren classification indicated that 2 patients were intestinal type(2/245, 0.8%), 8 patients were mixed type(8/208, 3.8%), 11 patients were diffuse type(11/142, 7.7%), and others had no associated data. CA19-9 of 13 patients was ≥ 37 kU/L(13/61, 21.3%); CA125 of 11 patients was ≥ 35 kU/L(11/36, 30.6%); CA72-4 of 11 patients was ≥ 10 kU/L(11/39, 28.2%). Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of 26 patients was ≥ 2.37(26/231, 11.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that Lauren classification (HR=8.95, 95%CI:1.32-60.59, P=0.025), CA125(HR=17.45, 95%CI:5.54-54.89, P=0.001), CA72-4(HR=20.06, 95%CI:5.05-79.68, P=0.001), and NLR (HR=4.16, 95%CI:1.17-14.75, P=0.032) were independent risk factors of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. In the nomogram, the highest score was 241, including diffuse or mixed Lauren classification (54 score), CA125 ≥ 35 kU/L (66 score), CA72-4 ≥ 10 kU/L (100 score), and NLR ≥ 2.37 (21 score), which represented a highest risk of peritoneal metastasis (more than 90%). The AUC of nomogram was 0.912, which was superior than any single variable (AUC of Lauren classification: 0.678; AUC of CA125: 0.720; AUC of CA72-4: 0.792; AUC of NLR: 0.613, all P=0.000). The total score of nomogram increased according to the TNM stage, and was highest in the peritoneal metastasis group (F=49.1, P=0.000). When the cut-off value calculated by ROC analysis was set at 140, the model could best balanced the sensitivity (0.79) and the specificity (0.87). Only 5% of patients had peritoneal metastasis when their nomogram scores were lower than 140, while 58% of patients had peritoneal metastasis when their scores were ≥ 140(χ=69.1, P=0.000).

CONCLUSIONThe risk evaluation model established with Lauren classification, CA125, CA72-4 and NLR can effectively predict the risk of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer, and provide the reference to preoperative staging and choice of therapeutic strategy.

Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate ; blood ; Area Under Curve ; CA-125 Antigen ; blood ; CA-19-9 Antigen ; blood ; Female ; Humans ; Leukocyte Count ; statistics & numerical data ; Logistic Models ; Lymphocytes ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; diagnosis ; Neutrophils ; pathology ; Nomograms ; Peritoneal Neoplasms ; secondary ; Prognosis ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; methods ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stomach Neoplasms ; blood ; classification ; diagnosis ; pathology

Peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer is the main cause of death in gastric cancer patients. Peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer is difficult to diagnose in its early stage due to lack of obvious clinical signs and symptoms, and poor treatment outcomes and prognosis are often associated with late stage peritoneal metastasis. Therefore, it is crucial to utilize effective early diagnostic tools and to improve the long-term outcomes and the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Recently, systemic chemotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy are the first line therapy, and cytoreductive operation plus abdominal cavity thermochemotherapy may be the best method in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis. However, conversion therapy has been gradually incorporated into the treatment of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer because of the better efficacy and the higher survival.
Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Protocols ; Combined Modality Therapy ; methods ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures ; Early Detection of Cancer ; methods ; Humans ; Hyperthermia, Induced ; Peritoneal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; secondary ; Prognosis ; Stomach Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo explore the clinicopathalogical features, treatment methods and prognostic factors of metastatic ovarian tumors from gastric cancer.

METHODClinical data of 110 gastric cancer patients with metastatic ovarian tumor between January 2001 and August 2015 of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and Cox regression model multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of metastatic ovarian tumor from gastric cancer.

RESULTThe follow-up duration ranged from 3 to 60 months (mean 12 months). The follow-up rate was 94.5%(104/110). 104 cases underwent surgical treatment, including satisfactory cytoreductive surgery (57 cases) and unsatisfactory cytoreductive surgery (47 cases). The median overall survival was 12 months and median progression-free survival was 8 months. The survival rates of 1-, 3- and 5-year were 48.1%, 7.7% and 0, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that pattern of metastasectomy, number of metastatic lymph node, cytoreductive surgery level, presence of peritoneal metastasis or not when ovarian metastasis was diagnosed, ovariectomy prior to primary gastric cancer and extent of ovarian metastatic lesion were associated with prognosis(P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that extent of ovarian metastatic lesion(RR=2.76, 95% CI: 1.68 to 4.54, P=0.005), presence of peritoneal metastasis when ovarian metastasis was diagnosed (RR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.41, P=0.003) and cytoreductive surgery level(RR=3.67, 95% CI: 2.13 to 6.33, P=0.011) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONSPrognosis of patients with metastatic ovarian carcinoma from gastric cancer is quite poor. Extent of ovarian metastatic lesion and peritoneal metastasis were independent prognostic factors. Optimal cytoreduction is associated with better survival.

Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial ; diagnosis ; secondary ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; secondary ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; pathology ; Survival Rate

The aim of the present study was to accurately evaluate the association of Sox2 expression with the survival of patients with digestive tract cancers. Relevant literatures were identified by comprehensively searching databases including the Pubmed, Embase, CBMdisc, and Wanfang (up to October 2014). A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the association between Sox2 expression and overall survival or clinicopathological parameters of patients with digestive tract cancers (esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers). The results showed a significant association between high Sox2 expression and poor overall survival in patients with digestive tract carcinomas (HR=1.55, 95% CI=1.04-2.31), especially for patients with esophageal cancer (HR=2.04, 95%CI=1.30-3.22), colorectal cancer (HR=1.40, 95% CI=1.04-1.89), and digestive tract adenocarcinoma (HR=1.80, 95% CI=1.12-2.89), for Europeans (HR=1.98, 95% CI=1.44-2.71) or patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment (HR=1.73, 95% CI=1.10-2.72). Furthermore, Sox2 over-expression was highly correlated with vascular invasion (OR=1.86, 95% CI=1.25-2.77) and poor differentiation (OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.14-3.08), especially in esophageal and colorectal cancers. In conclusion, Sox2 expression may serve as a novel prognostic factor for patients with digestive tract cancers. Over-expression of Sox2 that is correlated with vascular invasion and poor differentiation suggests poor outcomes of patients with digestive tract cancers.
Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; genetics ; metabolism ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; metabolism ; pathology ; Gene Expression ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; methods ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasms, Vascular Tissue ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; mortality ; secondary ; Prognosis ; SOXB1 Transcription Factors ; genetics ; metabolism ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; Survival Analysis

The death of patients with gastric cancer is mainly due to its recurrence and metastasis, and circulating tumor cell (CTC) is the necessary condition of metastasis. As liquid biopsy, CTC detection has its certain clinical significance. The detection is required after enrichment because circulating tumor cells are rare. Many enrichment methods have been developed: methods based on physical characteristics of TCT, like density, size and dielectric properties and so on; immunogenicity, like Cell Search System; and microfluidic chip technology. The immunofluorescence is commonly used to identify CTC in gastric cancer and the isolated CTC can also be used for the following analysis on the level of nucleic acid, protein and gene regulation. Detection of CTC in gastric cancer is helpful to judge the prognosis, assess staging, monitor the curative effect and guide the development of drug. There are many challenges for clinical transformation of CTC: the lower enrichment efficiency, the less specific surface markers, the uncertain diagnostic efficiency and so on, but it also has the good research prospect because it is non-invasive, repeatable and can real-time monitor the condition and guide the clinical treatment compared with pathological biopsy. In this paper, the detection and identification methods, and clinical value of CTC in gastric cancer patients are reviewed.
Biomarkers, Tumor ; Biopsy ; Cell Separation ; methods ; Cytodiagnosis ; methods ; Flow Cytometry ; methods ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; methods ; Humans ; Microchip Analytical Procedures ; methods ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; prevention & control ; Neoplasm Staging ; methods ; Neoplastic Cells, Circulating ; metabolism ; pathology ; Prognosis ; Secondary Prevention ; Stomach Neoplasms ; blood ; diagnosis ; genetics ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome