Tumor deposit (TD) is a common histopathological finding in gastric cancer. With the improved ability of lymphadenectomy and pathological examination, the positive rate and harvested number of TD are also increasing. The role of TD in staging and prognosis prediction for gastric cancer patients is getting more attention. However, due to the lack of standardization and unification, the denomination, definition and diagnostic criteria are still controversial. The previous studies on the definition and diagnostic criteria of TD were reviewed to standardize the items and improve the awareness. TD is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Each TD should be counted separately as a lymph node in the final pN determination according to TNM staging system of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) or American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) or Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. But this rule is just an experience-based practice, without support from high-level evidence. Several studies have tried to incorporate TD into TNM staging system to improve the accuracy and discriminative ability. With the wide use of the 8th TNM staging system, how to incorporate TD into the new staging system in an easy and reasonable way still needs more investigations.
Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; surgery ; Neoplasm Staging ; methods ; Prognosis ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; therapy

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical significance of No.12 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy.

METHODSClinicopathologic data and No.12 lymph node dissection of 256 advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing radical operation in our department between January 2005 and December 2010 were retrospectively summarized and the influence factors of metastasis in No.12 lymph nodes were analyzed.

RESULTSOf 256 patients, 179 were male and 77 were female with the average age of 59.2 years. Tumor located in the upper of stomach in 24 cases, middle of stomach in 41 cases, lower of stomach in 174 cases, multi-focus or diffuse distribution of stomach in 17 cases. Tumor diameter was <3 cm in 39 cases, 3 to 5 cm in 100 cases, >5 cm in 117 cases. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level increased in 61 cases, serum carbohydrate antigens (CA)72-4 increased in 56 cases and CA19-9 increased in 61 cases. The number of No.12 lymph nodes resected from all the patients was 1 152, and the average number was 4.5±1.9. The metastasis rate of No.12 lymph nodes was 9.4%(24/256) after hematoxylin eosin staining (positive group). All the patients received effective follow-up to December 2015, and the average follow-up time was 101.2 months. The median survival time of positive No.12 group (24 cases) was 29.8 months and of negative No.12 group (232 cases) was 78.2 months, whose difference was statistically significant (χ=21.715, P=0.000). Univariate analysis found that No.12 lymph node metastasis was not associated with age, gender, tumor differentiation (all P>0.05), but was associated with tumor location, tumor diameter, invasive depth (all P<0.05), and was closely associated with Borrmann type, outside metastatic lymph nodes of No.12 and high levels of serum CEA, CA72-4 and CA19-9 (all P=0.000). Multivariate regression analysis found that tumor location (RR=2.452, 95%CI:1.537 to 3.267, P=0.000), Borrmann type (RR=1.864, 95%CI:1.121 to 3.099, P=0.016) and number of outside metastatic lymph nodes of No.12 (RR=2.979, 95%CI: 2.463 to 3.603, P=0.000) were the independent risk factors of the No.12 metastasis (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMetastasis in No.12 lymph nodes indicates poorer prognosis. The No.12 lymph nodes of advanced gastric cancer patients with curative resection, especially those with the tumor located in the lower part, Borrmann type IIII(, outside metastatic lymph nodes of No.12, should be regularly cleaned.

Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate ; blood ; CA-19-9 Antigen ; blood ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen ; blood ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; methods ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; diagnosis ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Grading ; statistics & numerical data ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Staging ; statistics & numerical data ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; blood ; mortality ; pathology ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo explore the risk factors and prognosis of No.8p lymph node metastasis in cases with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODSClinicopathological and follow-up data of 790 cases with advanced gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy (including No.8p lymphadenectomy) from October 2003 to October 2013 in Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Associations of No.8p lymph node metastasis with clinicopathological characteristics and metastasis in other regional lymph node were analyzed. Prognostic difference between positive No.8p group and negative No.8p group was examined.

RESULTSPositive No.8p lymph node was found in 93 cases (11.8%) among 790 cases with advanced gastric cancer. Univariate analysis showed that gender [male 9.8%(56/572) vs. female 17.0%(37/218), P=0.005], preoperative CEA level [<5 μg/L 28.0%(61/218) vs. ≥5 μg/L 5.6%(32/572), P=0.005], tumor size[diameter <5 cm 3.8%(13/346) vs. ≥5 cm 18.0%(80/445), P=0.000], tumor location [gastric fundus and cardiac 10.7% (26/244) vs. gastric body 13.5% (30/222) vs. gastric antrum 10.1% (31/308) vs. total gastric 37.5%(6/16), P=0.007], Borrmann staging [type II( 1.9%(4/211) vs. type III( 11.6% (54/464) vs. type IIII( 30.4%(35/115), P=0.000], tumor differentiation [high 0/8 vs. moderate 6.7%(25/372) vs. low 16.6%(68/410), P=0.000], T staging [T2 2.4%(4/170) vs. T3 13.1%(35/267) vs. T4 15.3%(54/353), P=0.000], N staging [N0 0 (0/227) vs. N1 2.2%(5/223) vs. N2 15.2%(26/171) vs. N3 36.7%(62/169), P=0.000] were closely associated with the No.8p lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis that revealed gender (OR=1.762, 95%CI: 1.020-3.043), tumor size (OR=1.107, 95%CI: 1.020-1.203), N staging (OR=4.093, 95%CI: 2.929-5.718), tumor differentiation (OR=1.782, 95%CI:1.042-3.049), and metastasis in No.8a(OR=5.370, 95%CI: 3.425-8.419), No.3(OR=1.127, 95%CI:1.053-1.206), No.6(OR=1.221,95%CI: 1.028-1.450), No.7(OR=2.149, 95%CI: 1.711-2.699), No,11p(OR=2.085, 95%CI: 1.453-2.994), No.14v(OR=2.604, 95%CI: 1.038-6.532) group lymph nodes were the independent risk factors of No.8p lymph node metastasis. One-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates in positive No.8p group were 85.7%, 47.5% and 22.6%, and those in negative No.8p group were 96.2%, 82.5% and 70.3% respectively, whose differences were significant (χ=109.767, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMetastasis in Np.8p lymph nodes is an important factor affecting the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. In patients with female gender, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, preoperative late N staging, low tumor differentiation or metastasis in No.8a, No.3, No.6, No.7, No.11p, No.14v group lymph nodes, thorough clean rance of No.8p group lymph node should be considered.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen ; blood ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; methods ; Lymph Nodes ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; diagnosis ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Grading ; statistics & numerical data ; Neoplasm Staging ; statistics & numerical data ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; mortality ; surgery ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo investigate the prognostic factors of patients with lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer (pN0).

METHODSClinicopathological data of patients with pN0 gastric cancer who underwent radical operation at the Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University from May 1980 to August 2012 were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

INCLUSION CRITERIA(1) Patients were diagnosed as gastric adenocarcinoma; (2) Postoperative pathology confirmed T1a to 4bN0M0 gastric cancer; (3) Total number of harvested lymph node was more than 15. The patients, who died within 1 month after the operation, died of other diseases, had remnant gastric cancer, or had incomplete follow-up data, were excluded. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the clinical factors that may influence the prognosis of patients with stage pN0 gastric cancer, then, those significant variables were entered into the Cox's proportional hazards regression model for multivariate analysis to obtain the independent prognostic factors for patients with pN0 gastric cancer finally. Furthermore, the prognosis of patients with pN0 advanced gastric cancer (invasive depth ≥ T2) were analyzed using the same method.

RESULTSA total of 610 patients with pN0 gastric cancer were enrolled in the study, including 441 males and 169 females with age ranging from 19 to 83 (mean 56.4±11.0) years, D1 lymph node dissection in 45 cases, D2 lymph node dissection in 543 cases, D3 lymph node dissection in 22 cases, and 384 cases of advanced gastric cancer. The overall followed-up was 1 to 372 (median 32) months. Ninety cases (14.8%) were dead during the follow-up. The median survival was 277.7(95%CI: 257.6 to 297.8) months, and the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 96.5%, 87%, 83.2%. Univariate analysis showed that tumor diameter, depth of invasion, gross type, lymph node dissection and lymph vessel cancer embolus were related to the prognosis (all P<0.05). The 5-year survival rate of patients with tumor diameter >4 cm was significantly lower than those with tumor diameter ≤4 cm (75.6% vs. 87.8%, P=0.000). The 5-year survival rates of T1a, T1b, T2, T3 and T4 were 98.4%, 92.8%, 84.2%, 61.0% and 31.4% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.000). In gross type, 5-year survival rate of early gastric cancer was 96.0%, and of Borrmann I( to IIII( type gastric cancer was 100%, 83.4%, 73.7% and 68.9% respectively, whose difference was statistically significant(P=0.000). The 5-year survival rates in patients undergoing lymph node dissection D1, D2 and D3 were 100%, 83.3% and 58.7%, and the difference was significant (P=0.005). The 5-year survival rate of patients with positive lymphatic cancer embolus was lower than those with negative ones (69.4% vs. 86.9%, P=0.000). Multivariate analysis showed that the gross type [Borrmann II(/early gastric cancer: HR(95% CI)=15.129(3.284 to 69.699), Borrmann III(/early gastric cancer: HR(95% CI)=14.613 (3.292 to 64.875), Borrmann IIII(/early gastric cancer: HR (95% CI)=15.430 (2.778 to 85.718),Borrmann IIIII(/early gastric cancer: HR(95%CI)=12.604 (1.055 to 150.642), P=0.025] and the positive lymphatic cancer embolus [HR(95% CI)=3.241 (2.056 to 5.108), P=0.000] were the independent prognostic factors of patients with pN0 gastric cancer. For pN0 patients with advanced gastric cancer, multivariate analysis showed that the depth of invasion [stage T3/stage T2: HR(95%CI)=1.520 (0.888 to 2.601), stage T4/stage T2: HR(95%CI)=2.235(1.227 to 4.070); P=0.031] and the positive lymphatic cancer embolus [HR(95%CI)=3.065 (1.930 to 4.868); P=0.000] were the independent risk factors influencing the prognosis.

CONCLUSIONSPositive lymphatic cancer embolus and worse gross pattern indicate poorer prognosis of patients with pN0 gastric cancer, which may be used as effective markers in evaluating the prognosis. As for pN0 advanced gastric cancer, invasion depth and positive lymphatic cancer embolus can play a more important role in the prediction.

Adenocarcinoma ; classification ; diagnosis ; mortality ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; China ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; statistics & numerical data ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; physiopathology ; Lymphatic Vessels ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; statistics & numerical data ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; classification ; diagnosis ; mortality ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo compare the survival rate of proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in the treatment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma (Siewert II( types), and to provide reference for clinical choice.

METHODSA total of 533 patients with Siewet II( type EGJ adenocarcinoma were screened. All the patients underwent radical operations and were pathologically diagnosed as Siewet II( type EGJ adenocarcinoma in Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases from May 2008 to March 2014. These patients all had complete followed-up data. Finally, 234 patients were enrolled into the retrospective study, and divided into proximal gastrectomy group(117 patients) and total gastrectomy group (117 patients) based on the matching of age, sex, tumor size, TNM staging, and differentiation. The survival rate was compared between the two groups.

RESULTSIn proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy group, the overall 3-year survival rate was 65.6% and 62.6% respectively, and the overall 5-year survival rate was 53.8% and 44.5% respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups (P=0.768). In subgroup analyses of 3-year survival rate between proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group, the results were as follows: 72.8% and 80.4% respectively (P=0.423) for tumor diameter ≤4 cm, 57.9% and 46.5% (P=0.239) for tumor diameter >4 cm, 83.3% and 83.3% (P=0.998) for high differentiated EGJ adenocarcinoma, 68.2% and 53.3% (P=0.270) for moderate differentiated EGJ adenocarcinoma, 56.1% and 69.6% (P=0.280) for poorly differentiated EGJ adenocarcinoma, 64.8% and 56.0% (P=0.451) for mucinous EGJ adenocarcinoma, 80.0% and 76.9% (P=0.912) for T1-2 stage EGJ adenocarcinoma, 64.3% and 60.4% (P=0.610) for T3 stage, 50.0% and 62.5% (P=0.953) for T4a stage, 92.3% and 100% (P=0.380) for stage I( EGJ adenocarcinoma, 79.6% and 66.3%(P=0.172) for stage II(, 42.6% and 49.5% (P=0.626) for stage I I(. All above differences between the two groups were not significant(all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONProximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy are comparable in terms of 3-year and 5-year survival rates.

Adenocarcinoma ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Esophagogastric Junction ; pathology ; surgery ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Neoplasm Staging ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Survival Rate

The Standard for Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer published by China Ministry of Health in 2011 clearly advocates that individualized treatment strategy based on D2 standard radical surgery should be recommended, which is according to staging and biologic typing. The present review will comment on the strategy from the following aspects: clinical TNM staging, pathological TNM staging, biologic typing, occult lymph node metastasis and molecular typing.
China ; Dissection ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Precision Medicine ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery

Based upon studies from randomized clinical trials, the extended (D2) lymph node dissection is now recommended as a standard procedure for local advanced gastric cancer worldwide. However, the rational extent lymphadenectomy for local advanced gastric cancer has remained a topic of debate in the past decades. Patients with more lymph nodes harvested may have better survival. Negative node count may provide prognostic information for gastric cancer patients. The extranodal metastasis is significantly associated with the survival of gastric cancer patients and should be incorporated into N stage. In total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer without great curvature invasion, prophylactic splenectomy should be avoided not only for operative safety but also for survival benefit. The metastatic rate of No14v nodes for patients with distal stage III( disease is about 20%, so D2+ No.14v lymphadenectomy may be an option in a potentially curative gastrectomy for tumors with metastasis to the No.6 nodes. According to JCOG9501, extend D2+PAND should not be used to treat curable stage T2b, T3, N1-2 (II(B-III(A) gastric cancer. But the clinical benefit of D2+PAND for patients with stage T4 and/or stage N3 (III(B, III(C) disease could not be determined. The quality control of D2 procedure is very important for the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Base on the experience from Europe, Unite States and China, centralization of gastric cancer treatment will improve the outcome of gastric cancer operation effectively.
China ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; methods ; Prognosis ; Splenectomy ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; surgery

An inverted hyperplastic polyp (IHP) found in stomach is rare and characterized by downward growth of hyperplastic mucosal component into the submucosa. Because of such characteristic, IHP can be misdiagnosed as subepithelial tumor or malignant tumor. In fact, adenocarcinoma was reported to have coexisted with gastric IHP in several previous reports. Because only 18 cases on gastric IHP have been reported in English and Korean literature until now, pathogenesis and clinical features of gastric IHP and correlation with adenocarcinoma have not been clearly established. Herein, we report a case of gastric IHP which was initially misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor and resected using endoscopic submucosal dissection. Literature review of previously published case reports on gastric IHP is also presented.
Adult ; Gastric Mucosa/pathology/surgery ; Humans ; Hyperplasia/*diagnosis/diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Polyps/pathology/surgery ; Stomach/diagnostic imaging ; Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/diagnostic imaging/pathology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE: To explore the prognosis and surgical method for diffuse-type advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
 METHODS: The clinicopathological data of patient, who underwent curative gastrectomy in the Second Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University from 2005 to 2010, were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic factors of diffuse-type AGC were analyzed by Cox regression models. The patients were divided into a total gastrectomy group (n=120) and a subtotal gastrectomy group (n=167) according to the surgical approach. Survival rates were established by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log-rank test between the total gastrectomy group and the subtotal gastrectomy group.
 RESULTS: A total of 287 patients with diffuse-type AGC were enrolled in this study, including 120 patients in the total gastrectomy group and 167 patients in the subtotal gastrectomy group. Univariate analysis showed that the prognosis of diffuse-type AGC was associated with body mass index, number of retrieved lymph nodes, Borrmann type, tumor size, T stage, N stage, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, extent of resection, surgical margin, postoperative complication, perineural and vascular invasion (all P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that normal body mass index, tumor size, T stage, N stage, total gastrectomy, surgical margin, postoperative complication were the independent predictors for diffuse-type AGC (all P<0.05). The 5-year overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate for diffuse-type AGC after curative gastrectomy were 17.8% and 13.6%, respectively. The median survival time and progression-free survival of them were 22 and 18 months, respectively. The overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate in the total gastrectomy group was significantly higher than that in the subtotal gastrectomy (P<0.01); the extended extent of lymph node dissection, the lower rate of positive surgical margin and postoperative complications were present in the total gastrectomy group (all P<0.05 or P<0.01).
 CONCLUSION The patients with diffuse-type AGC have a poor prognosis. The great tumor diameter, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, subtotal gastrectomy, high rate of positive surgical margin and postoperative complication are independent risky factors for the diffuse-type AGC. However, the total gastrectomy may be beneficial to patients.
Disease-Free Survival ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Survival Rate

While endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used to treat gastrointestinal tumors, it is rarely used for subepithelial tumors (SETs) originating from the muscularis propria of the esophagus and gastric cardia because of the risk of perforation and problems with inadequate space and field of view during procedures. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is a new therapeutic method for treating SETs in specific locations in the esophagus and stomach. This technique is highly skill-dependent, using a mucosal flap that covers a deeper part of the gut wall, but is safe and minimally invasive compared with conventional endoscopic approaches such as ESD in SETs originating from the muscularis propria.We report a patient who underwent STER to remove a SET located at the gastric cardia. The patient recovered without any complications. We believe that our case shows the efficacy and safety of the STER technique for patients with a SET originating from the muscularis propria.
Cardia/pathology/surgery ; Endosonography ; Gastric Mucosa/pathology/surgery ; Gastroscopy ; Humans ; Leiomyoma/*diagnosis/surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Stomach Neoplasms/*diagnosis/surgery