Background: Management of COVID--19 patients during surges have been a challenge as hospitals have to deal with staff, room, and medication shortages. Among these medications is tocilizumab which is given to patients with severe/critical conditions. In Ospital ng Makati, patients are given baricitinib as alternative immunomodulator to prevent possible cytokine storm during tocilizumab shortages. The current recommendation for baricitinib is to give it in addition to dexamethasone and remdesivir for hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring low to high-flow oxygen, and non-invasive ventilation. However, there is not enough evidence to recommend it as an alternative to tocilizumab in COVID--19 patients. This study aims to find out the real-world efficacy of baricitinib in addition to standard of care among admitted patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia admitted in Ospital ng Makati. Methods: This is a retrospective, case control study that reviewed records of adult patients admitted at Ospital ng Makati from December 2020 to May 2021 due to severe COVID-19. Patients who were given standard of care was compared to those who were given baricitinib by measuring the duration of clinical improvement, in-hospital all-cause mortality, number of hospital stay, and progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and need for mechanical ventilator. Results: The use of baricitinib led to a faster improvement time (10 vs 12 days) however did not reach level of significance (p=0.069). There was also no significant difference in the mortality, number of hospital days, and progression to ARDS between the two groups. Conclusion There is not enough evidence to recommend baricitinib as an alternative to tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID--19 infection.
COVID-19 ; Standard of Care

Humans ; Aminoquinolines/therapeutic use* ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics* ; Lung Neoplasms/genetics* ; Mutation/genetics* ; Standard of Care

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient survival outcomes between completion hysterectomy and conventional surveillance in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the cervix after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).METHODS: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the cervix after CCRT were identified in a tertiary academic center database from 2004 to 2018. Patients received completion hysterectomy or surveillance after CCRT. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the patients with or without adjuvant hysterectomy. Surgery features, operative complications, and pathologic characteristics were documented. Patient outcomes were also analyzed according to clinicopathologic factors.RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were assigned to completion surgery and 97 to surveillance after CCRT. The PFS was better in the surgery group compared to the CCRT only group, at 3 years the PFS rates were 68.1% and 45.2%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]=0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.282–0.749; p=0.002). Adjuvant surgery was also associated with a higher rate of OS (HR=0.361; 95% CI=0.189–0.689; p=0.002), at 3 years, 87.9% and 67%, respectively. Tumor stage, size, lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), lymphadenopathy were associated with PFS but not with OS. Hysterectomy specimens revealed 64.1% (50/78) of the patients had pathologic residual tumor. Patients age less than 60, tumor size over 4 cm, stage IIB and persistent residual disease after CCRT were most likely to benefit from hysterectomy. Hysterectomy was associated with a lower rate of locoregional recurrence but did not reach statistical significance (5.13% vs. 13.5%, p=0.067).CONCLUSION: Completion hysterectomy after CCRT was associated with better survival outcome compared with the current standard of care.
Adenocarcinoma ; Cervix Uteri ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Lymphatic Diseases ; Neoplasm, Residual ; Recurrence ; Standard of Care ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

standard of care, they pose considerable risks and require prolonged postoperative rehabilitation. Obtaining proper informed consent and establishing realistic outcome expectations are imperative for successful postoperative outcomes.]]>
Congenital Abnormalities ; Contracture ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Male ; Penile Induration ; Penile Prosthesis ; Penis ; Rehabilitation ; Sensation ; Standard of Care ; Surgeons ; Transplants

Although recent advances in molecular targeted therapy and immuno-oncology have revolutionized the landscape of lung cancer therapeutics, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains an essential component of lung cancer treatment. Extensive evidence has demonstrated the clinical benefit of chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with other treatment modalities, on survival and quality of life of patients with early and advanced lung cancer. Combinational approaches with other classes of anti-neoplastic agents and new drug-delivery systems have revealed promising data and are areas of active investigation. Chemotherapy is recommended as a standard of care in patients that have progressed after tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Chemotherapy remains the fundamental means of lung cancer management and keeps expanding its clinical implication. This review will discuss the current position and future role of chemotherapy, and specific consideration for its clinical application in the era of precision medicine.
Drug Therapy ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Lung Neoplasms ; Lung ; Molecular Targeted Therapy ; Precision Medicine ; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases ; Quality of Life ; Standard of Care

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) represents one of the most common emergent scenarios encountered by a vascular specialist. Despite expedient revascularization, high rates of limb loss are reported along with high mortality rates which are second only to ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgical revascularization is standard of care. Endovascular techniques as an alternative have emerged to be appropriate first line therapy when addressing the threatened limb. We review the etiology and classification of ALI and current endovascular techniques and evidence to date in the management of patients acutely presenting with extremity ischemia.
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Classification ; Embolism and Thrombosis ; Endovascular Procedures ; Extremities ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Mortality ; Peripheral Arterial Disease ; Specialization ; Standard of Care

The current standard of care for treating patients with locally advanced rectal cancer includes preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT) followed by a total mesorectal excision and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. A subset of these patients has achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) and they have shown improved disease-free and overall survival compared to non-pCR patients. Thus, many efforts have been made to achieve a higher pCR through PCRT. In this review, results from various ongoing and recently completed clinical trials that are being or have been conducted with an aim to improve tumor response by modifying therapy will be discussed.
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Standard of Care

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a relatively rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy. It is characterized by high rates of recurrence and metastasis, both to regional lymph nodes and to distant locations. Its characteristic clinical manifestation is a single, painless, hard, erythematous nodule on a sun-exposed area, particularly in older men. Surgical management of both the primary site and the sentinel lymph node is the standard of care. In this article, we describe the diagnosis and treatment of a case of MCC in the left cheek.
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell ; Cheek ; Diagnosis ; Head ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Male ; Merkel Cells ; Neck ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Recurrence ; Skin Neoplasms ; Standard of Care

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study involved the analysis of computed tomography (CT) scan data from 125 Indian subjects of 18 years or older with normal imaging findings. Scans were obtained from patients with head injuries as a part of the screening process along with brain CT scans.PURPOSE: To establish the dimensions of lateral masses of the atlas vertebrae in normal disease-free Indian individuals.OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Lateral mass fixation has become the standard of care in fixation of the supra-axial cervical spine. Many studies have investigated the dimensions of lateral masses in cadaveric specimens; however, studies involving the radiological morphometric analysis of the lateral masses of the atlas vertebra in living patients are lacking.METHODS: Subjects underwent craniovertebral junction CT scans during evaluations of head injury. All had normal radiology reports. The CT scans were obtained using a CT Philips Brilliance 64 machine (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) with a slice thickness of 1 mm and then analyzed using Horos software ver. 2.0.2 (Horos Project, Annapolis, MD, USA) on a MacBook.RESULTS: Lateral masses of the atlas vertebrae were found to be larger in males than females and larger on the right than the left side. The angle of permissible medialization was found to be larger on the right side. The analysis of the average dimensions indicated the conventionally described screw positions to be safe.CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides information that may help to establish standard dimensions of lateral masses of the atlas vertebrae among the normal Indian population. We demonstrate that there is no significant difference when compared with the Western population. The results presented here will be of use to clinicians as they may inform preoperative planning for lateral mass fixation surgeries.
Brain ; Cadaver ; Cervical Atlas ; Craniocerebral Trauma ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Observational Study ; Spine ; Standard of Care ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) has been a standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LAO) within 6 hours after onset, since five landmark ERT trials conducted by 2015 demonstrated its clinical benefit. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that ERT, even in the late time window of up to 16 hours or 24 hours after last known normal time, improved the outcome of patients who had a target mismatch, defined as either clinical-core mismatch or perfusion-core mismatch, which prompted the update of national guidelines in several countries. Accordingly, to provide evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for ERT in patients with acute LAO in Korea, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Stroke Society decided to revise the previous Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for ERT. For this update, the members of the writing group were appointed by the Korean Stroke Society and the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology. After thoroughly reviewing the updated evidence from two recent trials and relevant literature, the writing members revised recommendations, for which formal consensus was achieved by convening an expert panel composed of 45 experts from the participating academic societies. The current guidelines are intended to help healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers make well-informed decisions and to improve the quality of care regarding ERT. The ultimate decision for ERT in a particular patient must be made in light of circumstances specific to that patient.
Arteries ; Caregivers ; Cerebral Infarction ; Consensus ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Korea ; Mechanical Thrombolysis ; Reperfusion ; Standard of Care ; Stroke ; Writing