Efficacy and safety of bone cement augmentations for spinal pathologic fractures related to multiple myeloma, and usefulness of radionuclide studies for surgical decision were retrospectively evaluated. Forty eight vertebrae from 27 patients for bone cement augmentation procedures and 48 vertebrae from 29 patients for conservative treatment were enrolled. Clinical results using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI), and radiologic results were assessed. For clinical decisions on treatment of spinal pathologic fracture, bone scan or single photon emission computed tomography was done for 20 patients who underwent surgery. Mean follow-up was 16.8 months. In terms of clinical results, immediate pain relief was superior in the operated group to that in the conservative group. ODI, maintenance of vertebral height and local kyphotic angle at the last follow-up were superior in the operated group in comparison to the conservative group. At one year follow-up, cumulative survival rate were 77.4% and 74.7% in the operated and conservative groups, respectively (log rank test> 0.05). Leakage of bone cement was noted at 10 treated vertebrae. Bone cement augmentations presented short-term pain relief for spinal pathologic fractures by myeloma with relative safety in highly selected patients, and radionuclide imaging studies were useful for the surgical decision on these procedures.
Aged ; Bone Cements/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Myeloma/*pathology ; Pain Measurement ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spinal Fractures/*radionuclide imaging/*surgery ; Spine/radionuclide imaging/*surgery ; Treatment Outcome