Purpose: This study systematically reviewed and analyzed the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Intervention Research Systematic Review Manual and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. This study targeted people with severe mental illness as the population, interventions aimed at reducing internalized stigma, comparisons with control groups, and internalized stigma as the outcome. A literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycArticles, RISS, KMbase, and KoreaMed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Effect sizes were computed using Hedges’s g, and subgroup analyses were conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 4.0. Results: Of 2,388 papers, 15 were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size (Hedges’s g) of the intervention was –0.60 (95% confidence interval, –1.01 to –0.19), indicating a statistically significant reduction in internalized stigma (Z=–2.88, p=.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that the intervention type (p=.008) and session length (p=.011) were significant moderators influencing the effectiveness of the interventions. Conclusion Tailoring interventions by considering variables such as the intervention type and session length could enhance the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for reducing internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness (PROSPERO: CRD42023418561).

Purpose: This study systematically reviewed and analyzed the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Intervention Research Systematic Review Manual and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. This study targeted people with severe mental illness as the population, interventions aimed at reducing internalized stigma, comparisons with control groups, and internalized stigma as the outcome. A literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycArticles, RISS, KMbase, and KoreaMed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Effect sizes were computed using Hedges’s g, and subgroup analyses were conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 4.0. Results: Of 2,388 papers, 15 were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size (Hedges’s g) of the intervention was –0.60 (95% confidence interval, –1.01 to –0.19), indicating a statistically significant reduction in internalized stigma (Z=–2.88, p=.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that the intervention type (p=.008) and session length (p=.011) were significant moderators influencing the effectiveness of the interventions. Conclusion Tailoring interventions by considering variables such as the intervention type and session length could enhance the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for reducing internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness (PROSPERO: CRD42023418561).

Purpose: This study systematically reviewed and analyzed the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Intervention Research Systematic Review Manual and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. This study targeted people with severe mental illness as the population, interventions aimed at reducing internalized stigma, comparisons with control groups, and internalized stigma as the outcome. A literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycArticles, RISS, KMbase, and KoreaMed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Effect sizes were computed using Hedges’s g, and subgroup analyses were conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 4.0. Results: Of 2,388 papers, 15 were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size (Hedges’s g) of the intervention was –0.60 (95% confidence interval, –1.01 to –0.19), indicating a statistically significant reduction in internalized stigma (Z=–2.88, p=.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that the intervention type (p=.008) and session length (p=.011) were significant moderators influencing the effectiveness of the interventions. Conclusion Tailoring interventions by considering variables such as the intervention type and session length could enhance the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for reducing internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness (PROSPERO: CRD42023418561).

Purpose: This study systematically reviewed and analyzed the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Cochrane Intervention Research Systematic Review Manual and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. This study targeted people with severe mental illness as the population, interventions aimed at reducing internalized stigma, comparisons with control groups, and internalized stigma as the outcome. A literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycArticles, RISS, KMbase, and KoreaMed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Effect sizes were computed using Hedges’s g, and subgroup analyses were conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 4.0. Results: Of 2,388 papers, 15 were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size (Hedges’s g) of the intervention was –0.60 (95% confidence interval, –1.01 to –0.19), indicating a statistically significant reduction in internalized stigma (Z=–2.88, p=.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that the intervention type (p=.008) and session length (p=.011) were significant moderators influencing the effectiveness of the interventions. Conclusion Tailoring interventions by considering variables such as the intervention type and session length could enhance the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for reducing internalized stigma among people with severe mental illness (PROSPERO: CRD42023418561).

This case report aimed to describe successful pain management and maintenance of pregnancy in a woman with a herniated intervertebral disc using ultrasound-guided epidural steroid injections (US ESI). A 43-year-old pregnant woman at 23 weeks’ gestation presented with severe radiating pain extending from the hip to the thigh and calf. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a herniated disc at the L5–S1 level with severe compromise of the thecal sac. Multiple rounds of US ESI were performed that reduced her pain from a numerical rating scale score of 9–10 to approximately 6.The patient underwent a cesarean section at 36 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Following delivery, the patient underwent a discectomy and has since experienced no recurrence of pain or complications.Pregnant women with herniated intervertebral discs may experience severe radicular pain but have limited treatment options. This case demonstrates that US ESI can be beneficial when appropriate.

This case report aimed to describe successful pain management and maintenance of pregnancy in a woman with a herniated intervertebral disc using ultrasound-guided epidural steroid injections (US ESI). A 43-year-old pregnant woman at 23 weeks’ gestation presented with severe radiating pain extending from the hip to the thigh and calf. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a herniated disc at the L5–S1 level with severe compromise of the thecal sac. Multiple rounds of US ESI were performed that reduced her pain from a numerical rating scale score of 9–10 to approximately 6.The patient underwent a cesarean section at 36 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Following delivery, the patient underwent a discectomy and has since experienced no recurrence of pain or complications.Pregnant women with herniated intervertebral discs may experience severe radicular pain but have limited treatment options. This case demonstrates that US ESI can be beneficial when appropriate.

This case report aimed to describe successful pain management and maintenance of pregnancy in a woman with a herniated intervertebral disc using ultrasound-guided epidural steroid injections (US ESI). A 43-year-old pregnant woman at 23 weeks’ gestation presented with severe radiating pain extending from the hip to the thigh and calf. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a herniated disc at the L5–S1 level with severe compromise of the thecal sac. Multiple rounds of US ESI were performed that reduced her pain from a numerical rating scale score of 9–10 to approximately 6.The patient underwent a cesarean section at 36 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Following delivery, the patient underwent a discectomy and has since experienced no recurrence of pain or complications.Pregnant women with herniated intervertebral discs may experience severe radicular pain but have limited treatment options. This case demonstrates that US ESI can be beneficial when appropriate.

This case report aimed to describe successful pain management and maintenance of pregnancy in a woman with a herniated intervertebral disc using ultrasound-guided epidural steroid injections (US ESI). A 43-year-old pregnant woman at 23 weeks’ gestation presented with severe radiating pain extending from the hip to the thigh and calf. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a herniated disc at the L5–S1 level with severe compromise of the thecal sac. Multiple rounds of US ESI were performed that reduced her pain from a numerical rating scale score of 9–10 to approximately 6.The patient underwent a cesarean section at 36 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Following delivery, the patient underwent a discectomy and has since experienced no recurrence of pain or complications.Pregnant women with herniated intervertebral discs may experience severe radicular pain but have limited treatment options. This case demonstrates that US ESI can be beneficial when appropriate.

This case report aimed to describe successful pain management and maintenance of pregnancy in a woman with a herniated intervertebral disc using ultrasound-guided epidural steroid injections (US ESI). A 43-year-old pregnant woman at 23 weeks’ gestation presented with severe radiating pain extending from the hip to the thigh and calf. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a herniated disc at the L5–S1 level with severe compromise of the thecal sac. Multiple rounds of US ESI were performed that reduced her pain from a numerical rating scale score of 9–10 to approximately 6.The patient underwent a cesarean section at 36 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Following delivery, the patient underwent a discectomy and has since experienced no recurrence of pain or complications.Pregnant women with herniated intervertebral discs may experience severe radicular pain but have limited treatment options. This case demonstrates that US ESI can be beneficial when appropriate.

Gabriel–de Vries syndrome, caused by the mutation of YY1, is a newly defined genetic syndrome characterized by developmental delay, facial dysmorphism, and intrauterine growth retardation. A 7-month-old girl presented developmental delay and subtle facial dysmorphism including facial asymmetry, micrognathia, and low-set ears. Whole exome sequencing identified a de novo heterozygous missense variant in the YY1 (c.1220A>G; p.His407Arg) gene. Here, we examined the clinical and genetic characteristics of an infant with a novel likely pathogenic variant of YY1. This case expands the phenotypic spectrum of Gabriel–de Vries syndrome.