Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: The life expectancy of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) has significantly improved with advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, aging PLWH face a growing burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), polypharmacy, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which pose challenges in their management. This study investigates the prevalence of NCDs, polypharmacy, and DDIs among PLWH aged ≥50 years in Korea and their impact on quality of life (QOL). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 243 PLWH aged ≥50 years receiving ART for at least three months at three university hospitals in Korea between January and July 2022. Data were collected through electronic medical records and personal interviews, assessing demographics, comorbidities, polypharmacy, ART adherence, and QOL using the Korean version of WHOQOL-HIV BREF scale. Potential DDIs were analyzed using the University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interaction Database, and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified using the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. We classified participants into three age groups:50–<65 years, 65–<75 years, and ≥75 years. Results: The prevalence of comorbidities was 71.6%, with older participants (≥75 years) showing a significantly higher burden, including bone diseases, osteoarthritis, and dementia (P<0.001). Polypharmacy was observed in 28.4% of participants and increased with age, with 53.3% of those aged ≥75 years taking ≥10 pills daily.Polypharmacy was associated with poorer QOL (71.6 vs. 76.6, P=0.010). Amber-flag DDIs were found in 81 participants (33.3%), most commonly involving metformin and divalent cations. No red-flag DDIs were identified.PIMs were observed in 6.6% of participants aged ≥65 years. Conclusion Aging PLWH in Korea face significant challenges from comorbidities, polypharmacy, and DDIs, which negatively impact QOL. Integrated, age-specific, and multidisciplinary care strategies are urgently needed to improve outcomes and ensure the well-being of older PLWH.

Purpose: Recently, deep learning techniques have been introduced for age estimation, with automated methods based on radiographic analysis demonstrating high accuracy. In this study, we applied convolutional neural network (CNN) techniques to the lower dentition area on orthopantomograms (OPGs) of children to develop an automated age estimation model and evaluate its accuracy for use in forensic dentistry. Methods: In this study, OPGs of 2,856 subjects aged 3-14 years were analyzed. The You Only Look Once (YOLO) V8 object detection technique was applied to extract the mandibular dentition area on OPGs, designating it as the region of interest (ROI). First, 200 radiographs were randomly selected, and were used to train a model for extracting the ROI. The trained model was then applied to the entire dataset. For the CNN image classification task, 80% of OPGs were allocated to the training set, while the remaining 20% were used as the test set. A transfer learning approach was employed using the ResNet50 and VGG19 backbone models, with an ensemble technique combining these models to improve performance. The mean absolute error (MAE) on the test set was used as the validation metric, and the model with the lowest MAE was selected. Results: In this study, the age estimation model developed using mandibular dentition region from OPGs achieved MAE and root mean squared error (RMSE) values of 0.501 and 0.742, respectively, on the test set, and MAE and RMSE values of 0.273 and 0.354, respectively, on the training set. Conclusions The automated age estimation model developed in this study demonstrated accuracy comparable to that of previous research and shows potential for applications in forensic investigations. Increasing the sample size and incorporating diverse deep learning techniques are expected to further enhance the accuracy of future age estimation models.

Background: The life expectancy of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) has significantly improved with advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, aging PLWH face a growing burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), polypharmacy, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which pose challenges in their management. This study investigates the prevalence of NCDs, polypharmacy, and DDIs among PLWH aged ≥50 years in Korea and their impact on quality of life (QOL). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 243 PLWH aged ≥50 years receiving ART for at least three months at three university hospitals in Korea between January and July 2022. Data were collected through electronic medical records and personal interviews, assessing demographics, comorbidities, polypharmacy, ART adherence, and QOL using the Korean version of WHOQOL-HIV BREF scale. Potential DDIs were analyzed using the University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interaction Database, and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified using the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. We classified participants into three age groups:50–<65 years, 65–<75 years, and ≥75 years. Results: The prevalence of comorbidities was 71.6%, with older participants (≥75 years) showing a significantly higher burden, including bone diseases, osteoarthritis, and dementia (P<0.001). Polypharmacy was observed in 28.4% of participants and increased with age, with 53.3% of those aged ≥75 years taking ≥10 pills daily.Polypharmacy was associated with poorer QOL (71.6 vs. 76.6, P=0.010). Amber-flag DDIs were found in 81 participants (33.3%), most commonly involving metformin and divalent cations. No red-flag DDIs were identified.PIMs were observed in 6.6% of participants aged ≥65 years. Conclusion Aging PLWH in Korea face significant challenges from comorbidities, polypharmacy, and DDIs, which negatively impact QOL. Integrated, age-specific, and multidisciplinary care strategies are urgently needed to improve outcomes and ensure the well-being of older PLWH.

Background: The life expectancy of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) has significantly improved with advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, aging PLWH face a growing burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), polypharmacy, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which pose challenges in their management. This study investigates the prevalence of NCDs, polypharmacy, and DDIs among PLWH aged ≥50 years in Korea and their impact on quality of life (QOL). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 243 PLWH aged ≥50 years receiving ART for at least three months at three university hospitals in Korea between January and July 2022. Data were collected through electronic medical records and personal interviews, assessing demographics, comorbidities, polypharmacy, ART adherence, and QOL using the Korean version of WHOQOL-HIV BREF scale. Potential DDIs were analyzed using the University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interaction Database, and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified using the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. We classified participants into three age groups:50–<65 years, 65–<75 years, and ≥75 years. Results: The prevalence of comorbidities was 71.6%, with older participants (≥75 years) showing a significantly higher burden, including bone diseases, osteoarthritis, and dementia (P<0.001). Polypharmacy was observed in 28.4% of participants and increased with age, with 53.3% of those aged ≥75 years taking ≥10 pills daily.Polypharmacy was associated with poorer QOL (71.6 vs. 76.6, P=0.010). Amber-flag DDIs were found in 81 participants (33.3%), most commonly involving metformin and divalent cations. No red-flag DDIs were identified.PIMs were observed in 6.6% of participants aged ≥65 years. Conclusion Aging PLWH in Korea face significant challenges from comorbidities, polypharmacy, and DDIs, which negatively impact QOL. Integrated, age-specific, and multidisciplinary care strategies are urgently needed to improve outcomes and ensure the well-being of older PLWH.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.