Western medicine was first introduced to Korea by Christian missionaries and then by the Japanese in the late 19th century without its historical, philosophical, cultural, social, political, and economic values being communicated. Specifically, during the Japanese colonial era, only ideologically ‘degenerated’ medicine was taught to Koreans and the main orthodox stream of medicine was inaccessible. Hence, Korean medical education not only focuses on basic and clinical medicine, but also inherited hierarchical discrimination and structural violence. After Korea's liberation from Japan and the Korean war, the Korean medical education system was predominantly influenced by Americans and the Western medical education system was adopted by Korea beginning in the 1980s. During this time, ethical problems arose in Korean medical society and highlighted a need for medical humanities education to address them. For Korean medical students who are notably lacking humanistic and social culture, medical humanities education should be emphasized in the curriculum. In the Fourth Industrial Revolution, human physicians may only be distinguishable from robot physicians by ethical consciousness; consequentially, the Korean government should invest more of its public funds to develop and establish a medical humanities program in medical colleges. Such an improved medical education system in Korea is expected to foster talented physicians who are also respectable people.
Aptitude ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Clinical Medicine ; Consciousness ; Curriculum ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Education ; Education, Medical ; Ethics, Medical ; Financial Management ; Humanities ; Humans ; Japan ; Korea ; Korean War ; Missionaries ; Rivers ; Societies, Medical ; Students, Medical ; Violence

This article provides an overview of the developmental history and rationale of medical ethics to establish the code of ethics and professional conduct of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (KACAP). Most medical professional organizations have their own codes of ethics and conduct because they have continuous responsibility to regulate professional activities and conducts for their members. The Ethics and Award Committee of the KACAP appointed a Task-Force to establish the code of ethics and conduct in 2012. Because bioethics has become global, the Ethics Task Force examined global standards. Global standards in medical ethics and professional conduct adopted by the World Medical Association and the World Psychiatric Association have provided the basic framework for our KACAP's code of ethics and professional conduct. The Code of Ethics of the Americal Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry has provided us additional specific clarifications required for child and adolescent patients. The code of ethics and professional conduct of the KACAP will be helpful to us in ethical clinical practice and will ensure our competence in recognizing ethical violations.
Adolescent ; Adolescent Psychiatry* ; Adolescent* ; Advisory Committees ; Awards and Prizes ; Bioethics ; Child* ; Codes of Ethics ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical* ; Humans ; Mental Competency ; Societies

No abstract available.
Ethics, Medical ; Health Communication/ethics ; Humans ; Mass Media/*ethics ; Physicians/*ethics ; Republic of Korea ; Social Support ; Societies, Medical/ethics

Peer review is the pillar of the integrity of science communication. It is often beset with flaws as well as accusations of unreliability and lack of predictive validity. 'Rational cheating' by reviewers is a threat to the validity of peer review. It may diminish the value of good papers by unfavourable appraisals of the reviewers whose own works have lower scientific merits. This article analyzes the mechanics and defects of peer review and focuses on rational cheating in peer review, its implications, and options to restrain it.
Peer Review, Research/*ethics ; Societies, Medical/ethics

Consumption of medical services has been expanding since the health insurance system was established in the Republic of Korea. However, physicians do not seem to be satisfied with the current state of medical practice. One of the main reasons for this dissatisfaction seems to be related to underpayment of costs. The monopolistic insurance agency has kept reimbursements for appropriate medical services below cost. The public also seems to have less trust in doctors than in the past because of repeated scandales in the news media such as doctors' accepting inappropriate rebates from the pharmaceutical industry. Patients are vulnerable to illness and depend on their doctors' decision making and advising. Plus family members and taxpayers must share in caring and the financial burden that patients face. Therefore, society has high ethical standards for physicians. The medical society also has been responding to these practices. To meet society's expectations, doctors should not abandon self-regulation through the medical society. Furthermore, because the identity of a professional healthcare provider is based on the trust and endorsement of society, physicians should attempt to maintain appropriate care for patients' best interests. The public should support physicians' appropriate medical practice via reasonable reimbursement of medical costs. Through self-support and self-regulation to maintain appropriate medical practice for patients, physicians can enhance public trust. In turn, public trust in doctors will address this country's distorted medical services and restore the eroded reputation of physicians as healthcare professionals.
Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1 ; Decision Making ; Delivery of Health Care ; Drug Industry ; Ethics, Medical ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Insurance ; Insurance, Health ; Republic of Korea ; Societies, Medical

The development of life sustaining treatment technology including artificial ventilation has given us the moral problem, considering the human dignity and futility of medical treatment, until when these treatments could be given to terminally ill patients. In Korea, there were two supreme court decisions a significant impacts on the withdrawal of life sustaining treatment. After these decisions, Korean medical society has developed a guideline for advance directives and has also established a voluntary hospital ethics committee. The patient's right of self- determination right and the paternalistic approach of medicine should be balanced at an optimal level, because benefits of medical advances should be adjusted to take into account the burden of life prolongations. Decision making always has been difficult because related to ethical values, and there a broad spectrum of value-laden attitudes within Korean society. The legalization of end-of-life care should be from the respect of the professional autonomy of medical society. Under these considerations, we should supply alternative methods like hospice care, which can help to manage the withdrawal of life support appropriately, and also make an effort to relieve the economical burden of patients.
Advance Directives ; Decision Making ; Ethics Committees ; Ethics Committees, Clinical ; Hospice Care ; Hospices ; Hospitals, Voluntary ; Humans ; Jurisprudence ; Korea ; Medical Futility ; Patient Rights ; Personal Autonomy ; Personhood ; Professional Autonomy ; Societies, Medical ; Supreme Court Decisions ; Terminally Ill ; Ventilation ; Withholding Treatment

On April 28, the National Assembly passed 3 bills revising the Medical Act, Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, and Medical Instruments Act which are related to the so-called 'dual punishment system' at its 9th plenary session of the 289th provisional meeting. According to the government timetable, beginning November of this year (2010), doctors will be subject to imprisonment for up to two years or face fines of up to 30 million won when found to have taken financial or non-financial benefits from drug companies. Their license could also be suspended for one year. Interactions between industry and physicians are vital to public health. However, they must be principled partnerships effectively managed to sustain public trust in both partners' commitment to patient welfare and the improvement of health care. Mounting scientific evidence indicates that gifts, favors, and other marketing activities, both explicit and implicit, prejudice independent judgment in unconscious ways. Physicians who receive free gifts from the pharmaceutical industry must consider the ethical dilemmas posed by this practice. These dilemmas are conflict of interest, impairment of objectivity, and the impact of these free gifts on the cost of health care. In order to minimize the likelihood of biased decisions by physicians, pharmaceutical companies should comply with their code of ethics for fair competition, while medical societies should establish an influence-free culture for physicians and optimize the benefits inherent in the principled relationships between medical society and industry.
Bias (Epidemiology) ; Codes of Ethics ; Conflict of Interest ; Delivery of Health Care ; Drug Industry ; Gift Giving ; Humans ; Judgment ; Licensure ; Marketing ; Prejudice ; Public Health ; Punishment ; Societies, Medical ; Unconscious (Psychology)