Objective: To evaluate the mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) colectomy using the Cai tube in the treatment of left colorectal cancer. Methods: A prospective randomized control trial (China Clinical Trials Registration Number: ChiCTR-OOR-15007060) was performed. Sixty patients with left colorectal cancer at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Zhongshan Hospital from September 2015 to August 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Case inclusion criteria: (1) left colorectal adenocarcinoma (rectal cancer with distance ≥ 8 cm from tumor low margin to anal edge, sigmoid colon cancer, descending colon cancer and left transverse colon cancer) confirmed by preoperative pathology; (2) satisfactory conditions of conventional laparoscopic surgery; (3) maximum diameter of the tumor < 4.5 cm confirmed by preoperative abdominal and pelvic CT or MRI; (4) BMI < 30 kg/m². Case exclusion criteria: (1) benign lesions, mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma and other special pathological types of tumors confirmed by preoperative pathological examination; (2) multiple or recurrent cancers; (3) with a history of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; (4) obvious regional infiltration or distant metastasis indicated by preoperative imaging examination; (5) intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, etc. Participants were randomly assigned to NOSES group (using the Cai tube) and conventional laparoscopy (CL) group by random number table method. Clinical data between two groups were compared and analyzed, including perioperative conditions, tumor exfoliation cell detection and bacterial culture results of intraperitoneal lavage fluid, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading), postoperative pain [visual simulation scoring (VAS) assessment], anal function (Kirwan anal function grading assessment), and postoperative 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), overall recurrence rate, and local recurrence rate. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled, with 30 in the NOSES group and 30 in the CL group. All the patients in the NOSES group successfully completed operation with Cai tube. Baseline data between the two groups were not significantly different (all P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in conversion rate to open surgery, number of lymph node harivested, proximal and distal resection margin of tumor, negative rate of circumferential margin, operation time, blood loss, inflammatory indexes, postoperative anal function, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost, morbidity of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade II or above) (all P>0.05). Compared to the CL group, the NOSES group had lower maximum postoperative VAS score (2.5±0.3 vs. 5.1±0.4, t=3.187, P<0.01), and fewer use of additional postoperative analgesia [6.7% (2/30) vs. 33.3% (10/30),χ²=6.670, P=0.02]. The postoperative time to gas passage was shorter in the NOSES group [(2.2±1.4) days vs. (3.1±1.2) days,P=0.026]. No tumor cells and bacterial contamination were found in abdominal lavage fluid before and after operation in either group. The anal function at postoperative 3-month of all the patients in the NOSES group was Kirwan grade I to II, while in the CL group, anal function of 2 cases (6.7%) was Kirwan grade III, and of 28 cases was also Kirwan grade I to II, whose difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the NOSES group and the CL group, 3-year DFS was 96.7% and 83.3% (P=0.090), OS was 100% and 90% (P=0.096), overall recurrence rate was 3.3% and 10.0% (P=0.166), and local recurrence rate was 3.3% and 3.3% (P=0.999), respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusions: In the treatment of left colorectal cancer, compared with conventional laparoscopic colectomy, NOSES colectomy using Cai tube exhibits less scar, less postoperative pain, shorter recovery of gastrointestinal function, and similar mid-term outcomes. Given proper surgical indications, the surgical procedure is safe and feasible.
Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Pain, Postoperative ; Postoperative Complications/surgery* ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome

Anastomosis, Surgical ; Colon, Sigmoid/surgery* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Humans ; Robotics

Tumor spreading through the lymphatic drainage is an important metastatic pathway for rectum and sigmoid colon carcinoma. Regional lymph node dissection, as an important part of radical resection of colorectal cancer, is the main way for patients with colorectal cancer to achieve radical resection and acquire tumor-free survival. The regional lymph nodes of sigmoid cancer include paracolic lymph nodes, intermediate lymph nodes, and central lymph nodes locating at the root of blood vessel, and radical surgery should include lymph node dissection at the above three stations. The lymphatic pathways of metastasis for rectal cancer include longitudinal metastasis within the mesorectum and lateral metastasis beyond the mesorectum. The standard surgical method of rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision (TME) at present, and the resection range includes the metastatic lymph nodes within the mesorectum through the longitudinal pathway. However, there are many different opinions about lateral lymph node dissection(LLND) aiming at the metastatic lymph nodes locating at the lateral space of rectum. The range of lymph node dissection for rectum and sigmoid cancer is a vital factor that determines the prognosis of patients. Insufficient range of dissection can lead to residual metastatic lymph nodes and have serious impacts on the prognosis of patients. Excessive range of dissection can result in greater surgical trauma, prolonged operation time, more blood loss, and higher rate of complication without oncological benefits. Individualizating the appropriate resection range of rectum and sigmoid colon cancer on the basis of standardization and according to the clinical stage and invasion range of tumor demonstrates great significance of ensuring the radical operation, reducing trauma, promoting rehabilitation, protecting the function and improving the prognosis.
Humans ; Lymph Node Excision/methods* ; Lymph Nodes/pathology* ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Rectum/pathology* ; Reference Standards ; Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery*

We reported a case of irreducible indirect inguinal hernia caused by sigmoid colon cancer entering the right groin.The patient complained about a right groin mass for more than 60 years with progressive enlargement for 3 years and pain for half a month.Abdominal CT examination at admission showed rectum and sigmoid colon hernia in the right inguinal area and thickening of sigmoid colon wall.Electronic colonoscopy and pathological diagnosis showed sigmoid colon cancer.Therefore,the result of preliminary diagnosis was irreducible indirect inguinal hernia caused by sigmoid colon cancer entering the right groin.We converted laparoscopic exploration to laparotomy followed by radical sigmoidectomy and employed end-to-end anastomosis of descending colon and rectum in combination with repair of right inguinal hernia.The patient recovered well after operation and was discharged.
Colon, Sigmoid/surgery* ; Groin ; Hernia, Inguinal/surgery* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery*

PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic surgery is widely accepted in the treatment of colorectal cancer, conversion to open surgery is associated with the rate of unfavorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with open conversion from laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.METHODS: A total of 3,002 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy as an initial plan for the treatment of colorectal cancer located from the sigmoid colon to the rectum were retrospectively evaluated between January 2009 and December 2018 at Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Risk factors significantly associated with open conversion were determined using univariate and multivariate regression models.RESULTS: Among the 3,002 patients, open conversion was performed in 120 patients (4%). Age >60 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.370), preoperative bowel obstruction (AOR, 2.348), clinical T4 stage (AOR, 2.201), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level >5 ng/mL (AOR, 2.289) were significantly associated with open conversion. Moreover, mucinous carcinoma was a significantly more frequent histopathologic type than adenocarcinoma (10.0% vs. 3.2%, P<0.001) in the open conversion group with an AOR of 2.549 (confidence interval, 1.259–5.159; P=0.009).CONCLUSION: The present study presented a novel finding, i.e. mucinous carcinoma as the histopathologic type could be an independent predictive factor for conversion from laparoscopic colectomy to open surgery. Identifying patients with mucinous carcinoma will help stratify the risk of open conversion preoperatively.
Adenocarcinoma ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen ; Colectomy ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Humans ; Korea ; Laparoscopy ; Mucins ; Odds Ratio ; Rectum ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for cancer is considered as a simple surgical approach, which is suitable for primary laparoscopic surgery. However, the success of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is closely related to the anatomical characteristics of the sigmoid colon. The length, adhesion and morphology of the sigmoid colon vary greatly. The differences of the length, width, adhesion and morphology of the mesentery are large. The distribution of vessels is diversified. The high ligation or the low ligation is still controversial. The location of the sigmoid colon cancer is also not constant. These problems have great influence on the operation. Before operation, the tumor must be accurately located and the anatomical characteristics of the sigmoid colon must be fully evaluated. The operation can be carried out smoothly and the complications during and after the operation can be reduced.
Colectomy ; Colon, Sigmoid ; anatomy & histology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Sigmoid Neoplasms ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate the safety, feasibility and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for the transverse colon cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer (transverse group) in our department from January 2011 to January 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, which were compared with those of 155 patients undergoing laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for ascending colon cancer (ascending group) and 230 patients undergoing laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid colon cancer (sigmoid group). Differences in operative details, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications and long-term survival among 3 groups were evaluated.

RESULTSNo significant differences in the baseline information were found among 3 groups(all P>0.05). The average operative time was significantly longer in transverse group as compared to ascending group and sigmoid group [(192.1±58.7) min vs. (172.2±54.7) min and (169.1±53.6) min]( P<0.05), while the blood loss [(89.7±63.6) ml, (86.3±66.3) ml, (82.6±61.5) ml], conversion rate [3.3%(2/61), 2.6%(4/155), 2.2%(5/230)], number of harvested lymph node (13.0±4.7, 14.4±6.5, 13.4±5.6), time to flatus [(2.7±1.1) d, (2.6±1.1) d, (2.5±1.0) d], time to liquid diet [(3.0±1.7) d, (2.8±1.5) d, (2.7±1.4) d], incidence of postoperative complication(6.6%, 9.0%, 11.7%), and hospital stay [(11.6±5.8) d, (10.7±5.8) d, (10.6±5.7) d] among 3 groups were not significantly different (all P>0.05). A total of 436 patients received postoperative follow-up of median 36 (5 to 67) months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 73.1%, 73.7% and 74.8%, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 71.5%, 71.1% and 72.7% in transverse, ascending and sigmoid colon cancer groups respectively, whose differences were not significant among 3 groups (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer is safe and feasible with slightly longer operation time, and has quite good long-term oncologic efficacy.

Colectomy ; methods ; Colon, Ascending ; surgery ; Colon, Sigmoid ; surgery ; Colon, Transverse ; surgery ; Colonic Neoplasms ; surgery ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; Mesocolon ; surgery ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.

METHODSClinical data of 133 patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014 in the General Hospital of the PLA Rocket Force were retrospectively analyzed. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter, incidence of postoperative urinary retention, and time to re-insert indwelling catheter were recorded. Risk factors of urinary retention were analyzed.

RESULTSOf 133 patients, 70 were males and 63 were females, with a median age of 62 (20-79) years old. Distance from tumor lower margin to anal verge were ≤5 cm in 58 patients, >5 cm to 10 cm in 41 patients, and >10 cm to 15 cm in 34 patients. The postoperative TNM stage was recorded in 35 patients with stage I(, 34 with stage II(, 59 with stage III( and 5 with stage IIII(. Surgical procedures included anterior resection (AR) for 92 patients, abdominoperineal resection (APR) for 25 patients and intersphincteric resection (ISR) for 16 patients. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 89 patients compared with open operation in 44 patients. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter was 2-7 days after operation (median, 5 days) and 36 (27.1%) patients developed urinary retention. All the 36 patients achieved spontaneous voiding by re-inserting urinary catheter for 2-28 days (median, 6 days). Univariate analysis showed that elderly (>65 years) and laparoscopic approach had significantly higher incidence of urinary retention [37.5%(21/56) vs. 19.5%(15/77), χ=5.333, P=0.021; 34.8%(31/89) vs. 11.4%(5/44), χ=8.214, P=0.004; respectively]. Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that old age(OR=3.949, 95%CI:1.622 to 9.612, P=0.002), laparoscopic approach (OR=5.665, 95%CI:1.908 to 16.822, P=0.002), and abdominoperineal resection (OR=3.443, 95%CI:1.199 to 9.887, P=0.022) were independent risk factors of urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.

CONCLUSIONSPatients undergoing rectal cancer surgery have a high risk of postoperative urinary retention. More attention should be paid to the old patients, especially those undergoing laparoscopic procedure or abdominoperineal resection, to prevent postoperative urinary retention and urinary dysfunction.

Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Colon, Sigmoid ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms ; classification ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Catheterization ; statistics & numerical data ; Urinary Retention ; epidemiology ; Urination ; physiology

OBJECTIVETo evaluate metastatic patterns of colorectal cancer following curative surgery based on primary tumor location in order to provide evidence for the decision of individualized adjuvant therapy and postoperative follow-up.

METHODSClinical and follow-up data of 904 patients who underwent curative colorectal cancer in The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2004 to October 2012 with complete follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. A total 274 patients belonged to right-sided colon cancer group (cecum, ascending, hepatic flexure, and transverse colon), 243 belonged to left-sided colon cancer group(splenic flexure, descending, and sigmoid colon), and 387 belonged to rectal cancer group. The overall rate of distal metastasis and site-specific metastasis rates (liver, lung, and peritoneum) were compared among these 3 groups.

RESULTSThe cohort patients had a median follow-up of 37(4-122) months, and the median follow-up duration was similar in right-sided, left-sided, and rectal cancer groups with 39(5-119), 39(6-122) and 36(5-121) months(P=0.513). During the follow-up period, 44 patients (4.9%) had local recurrence alone, 137 (15.2%) distal metastasis alone, and 30(3.3%) local recurrence combined with distal metastasis. Compared to right-sided colon cancer group, rectal and left-sided cancer groups had significantly higher overall metastasis rates [23.5% (91/387), 17.3% (42/243) vs. 12.0% (33/274), P=0.000). With respect to specific regions, lung metastasis rate in rectal cancer group was 9.3%, which was significantly higher than that in left-sided(4.5%) and right-sided colon cancer group(2.6%)(P=0.001). Other sites of metastasis did not yield significant differences, including liver(P=0.130) and peritoneum(P=0.858).

CONCLUSIONSCancer location may be used as a reference of personalized adjuvant therapy and postoperative follow-up surveillance programs. Lower threshold for adjuvant therapy in rectal and left-sided colon cancers, and more aggressive surveillance for lung metastasis by chest X-ray or CT should be considered.

Aged ; Colon, Ascending ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Colon, Transverse ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and cosmetic result of suprapubic single incision laparoscopic surgery(SSILS) in the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer.

METHODSClinicopathological data of 16 patients undergoing SSILS and 122 undergoing conventional laparoscopic surgery(CLS) for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer in the Nanfang Hospital from August 2011 to July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were analyzed with propensity score matching at a ratio of 1 to 2 by logistic regression analysis. The matching covariates included age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) score, tumor location, tumor diameter, pathologic TNM stage, previous abdominal surgery. After matching, 48 patients (16 SSILS and 32 CLS) were enrolled in the study. The SSILS group comprised of 13 (81.3%) males with mean age of (56.4±13.4) years. The CLS group comprised of 23(71.9%) males with mean age of (55.6±13.7) years. Postoperative short-term parameters, oncologic efficacy and cosmetic result were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSThe male gender ratio, age, body mass index, ASA score, tumor location, tumor diameter, tumor differentiation, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, previous abdominal surgery were comparable between the two groups. As compared to CLS group, less incision length [(4.8±1.5) cm vs. (6.8±1.2) cm, U=63.000, P=0.000], shorter time to ambulation [(2.6±1.0) days vs. (3.9±1.5) days, U=116.500, P=0.002], shorter hospital stay [(8.4±5.3) days vs.(9.2±3.1) days, U=139.000, P=0.010] and less postopertive pain(Visual Analogue Scale: 4.3±1.4 vs. 5.2±1.1 at day 3, t=2.457, P=0.018; 3.7±1.0 vs. 4.6±1.0 at day 4, t=2.700, P=0.010; 3.3±0.8 vs. 4.0±1.0 at day 5, t=2.466, P=0.017) were observed in SSILS group. The other short-term parameters(blood loss, operative time, insertion of additional port rate, time to flatus, defecation, time to liquid and soft diet, complication morbidity, number of lymph nodes harvested, proximal and distal resection margin) were not significantly different between 2 groups(all P>0.05). The median follow-up time was 41(22-49) months. There was no loco-regional recurrence in 2 groups. Distant metastasis was 18.8% (n=3, all liver metastasis) and 6.3% (n=2, one liver metastasis and one peritoneal metastasis) in SSILS and CLS groups (χ(2)=0.698, P=0.404) respectively. Three-year disease-free survival and 3-year overall survival were 81.3% vs 93.0%(χ(2)=1.355, P=0.244) and 100.0% vs 96.9%(χ(2)=0.500, P=0.480) in SSILS and CLS groups, respectively. Photograph questionnaire investigation showed that the cosmetic score was significantly higher in SSILS group than that in CLS group (8.9±1.1 vs. 7.6±1.1, U=100.500, P=0.000). Of 48 patients of 2 groups, 81.3%(39/48) case preferred SSILS.

CONCLUSIONIn experienced laparoscopic treatment centers, SSILS for rectosigmoid cancer is feasible and safe with quite good oncological efficacy and certain advantages, such as fast recovery, less pain and better cosmetic result.

Adult ; Aged ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Period ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Sigmoid Neoplasms ; surgery