Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA/M ESCC).Methods:A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted for the recent efficacy, survival, prognostic factors, post-treatment failure modes, and treatment-related adverse reactions of 57 LA/M ESCC patients eligible for enrollment.Results:The entire group of patients had 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) of 86.0%, 57.5%, and 53.9%, respectively and 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 61.4%, 31.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. The median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 15.0 (95% CI: 10.77-19.23) months. These patients had an overall response rate (ORR) of 80.7% (46/57) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 94.7% (54/57). As indicated by the result of the multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors affecting the OS of the patients included their age, clinical stage, number of immunotherapy cycles, and recent efficacy ( HR = 0.25, 2.58, 0.35, 4.05, P < 0.05), and the independent factors influencing the PFS of the patients included their clinical stage and recent efficacy ( HR = 2.27, 1.97, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the effects of irradiation ranges and the combination modes of immunologic drugs and chemoradiotherapy on both OS and PFS of the patients ( P > 0.05). A total of 32 patients suffered post-treatment failure. After the second treatment, they had 1- and 2-year OS of 55.7% and 25.3%, respectively, with median OS of 14.0 (95% CI: 5.17-22.83) months. A total of 26 cases experienced treatment-associated adverse reactions of grades 2 or higher during and after treatment. Conclusions:The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is effective and safe as the first-line treatment for LA/M ESCC patients. The post-treatment failure modes still include local recurrence and distant metastasis. Therefore, such combination merits further investigation.

Objective:To investigate the radiation dose and fractionation regimens for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) in Chinese radiation oncologists.Methods:Over 500 radiation oncologists were surveyed through questionnaire for radiation dose and fractionation regimens for LS-SCLC and 216 valid samples were collected for further analysis. All data were collected by online questionnaire designed by WJX software. Data collection and statistical analysis were performed by SPSS 25.0 statistical software. The differences in categorical variables among different groups were analyzed by Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Results:Among 216 participants, 94.9% preferred early concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 69.4% recommended conventional fractionation, 70.8% preferred a total dose of 60 Gy when delivering conventional radiotherapy and 78.7% recommended 45 Gy when administering hyperfractionated radiotherapy.Conclusions:Despite differences in LS-SCLC treatment plans, most of Chinese radiation oncologists prefer to choose 60 Gy conventional fractionated radiotherapy as the main treatment strategy for LS-SCLC patients. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Chinese Medical Association guidelines or expert consensus play a critical role in guiding treatment decision-making.

Objective:To investigate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and influencing factors of intensity-modulated radiotherapy±chemotherapy (IMRT±C) for the upper thoracic esophageal cancer.Methods:The medical records of 168 patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer who met the inclusion criteria from January 2011 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The RFS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate prognostic analysis was performed by Cox models. The recurrence factors were identified by the Logistics model. Results:The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 67.8%, 38.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, and the median RFS was 21.9 months. The locoregional recurrence rate was 47.6%(80/168). The recurrence sites were local esophagus ( n=63), regional lymph nodes ( n=7), and local esophagus+ regional lymph node recurrence ( n=10). Multivariate analysis showed that hoarseness, cTstaging, combined with chemotherapy, 95%PTV 1 exposure dose and GTV average exposure dose were the influencing factors of RFS ( P=0.029, <0.001, 0.031, 0.038, 0.020). Logistics model showed that cTstaging, cNstaging, short-term efficacy, irradiationmethod, GTV maximum transverse diameter and PTV average exposure dose were the influencing factors of recurrence ( P=0.046, 0.022, 0.001, <0.001, 0.012, 0.001). Conclusions:Patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer treated with radical IMRT combined with/without chemotherapy have a higher locoregional recurrence rate, and the recurrence rate is mainly the esophagus. The independent factors that affect RFS are different from the risk factors of recurrence.

Objective:To observe the postoperative complications and revision rates of robot arm-assisted unicompartment arthroplasty by means of a meta-analysis.Methods:Relevant databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI, and Web of Science were searched by computer for high-quality studies on complications and revision rates after robot arm-assisted unicompartment arthroplasty in both English and Chinese from the database establishment date to March 2021. The quality of the studies retrieved was evaluated. Relevant data including postoperative complications, infection, pain, prosthesis loosening, and revision were extracted for a meta-analysis using STATA 15.0 software.Results:A total of 16 studies were included, including one randomized controlled study, 6 case-control studies and 9 cohort studies. By the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), 7 studies scored 14 points, 3 studies 13 points, one study 12 points, 4 studies 11 points, and one study 10 points. Meta analysis showed that the total rate of complications was 2% (95% CI: 1%to 4%) . Three studies used NAVIO robot, 7 studies MAKO robot, one study NAVIO and MAKO robots, and one study Acrobot robot. Since just one study used Acrobot robot, only MAKO and NAVIO robots were included for the subgroup analysis which showed that the postoperative complication rates for NAVIO and MAKO robots were 4.0% (95% CI: -2% to 10%) and 3% (95% CI: 1% to 5%) , respectively. The incidence of postoperative pain was 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1% to 0.3%), the incidence of postoperative infection 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3% to 0.8%), the incidence of postoperative prosthesis loosening 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3% to 0.8%), and the revision rate 2% (95% CI: 1% to 2%). According to the subgroup analysis of NAVIO and MAKO robots, their revision rates were 4% (95% CI: 2% to 7%) and 2% (95% CI: 1% to 2%), respectively. Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of robot arm-assisted unicompartment arthroplasty is good, for the complications in the patients are limited and the long-term survival rate of the prosthesis is excellent.

Objective:To study the prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) before radiotherapy in clinical stage Ⅲ esophageal cancer patients.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 125 esophageal cancer patients with clinical stage Ⅲ undergoing definitive radiotherapy in Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2013 to 2017. The PNI and nutritional risk index (NRI) were calculated before radiotherapy. The optimal cutoff value of PNI was determined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) at 49.925.The patients were divided into low PNI group(PNI<49.925) and high PNI group (PNI≥49.925). Based on NRI, the patients were divided into normal NRI group (NRI≥100) and abnormal NRI group (NRI<100). Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and to perform univariate analysis. The mutlivariate analysis was performed by Cox regression model.Results:PNI was positively correlated with hemoglobin ( r=0.505, P<0.001) and NRI ( r=0.594, P<0.001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates in the low PNI group were significantly lower than those of the high PNI group (67.5%, 27.3%, 11.4% vs. 85.4%, 45.8%, 27.4%, respectively, χ2=8.569, P<0.05). Moreover, the 1-, 3- and 5-year PFS rates in the low PNI group were obviously higher than those in the high PNI group (59.7%, 23.2%, 4.9% vs. 79.2%, 35.4%, 24.9%, respectively, χ2=6.715, P<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that GTV, radiotherapy dose, chemotherapy, albumin, NRI and PNI were significantly correlated with OS and PFS (OS: χ2=6.822, 4.326, 4.474, 13.123, 8.846, 8.569, P<0.05: PFS: χ2=7.869, 4.636, 5.874, 10.911, 8.544, 6.715, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that GTV, radiotherapy dose and PNI were independent prognostic factors for OS ( P<0.05). And GTV, radiotherapy dose, chemotherapy and PNI were independent prognostic factors for PFS ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The PNI before radiotherapy is a significant and independent predictor for survival of clinical stage Ⅲ esophageal cancer patients. Based on simple and inexpensive standard laboratory measurements, PNI could be a promising prognostic biomarker for esophageal cancer patients.

Objective:To analyze the therapeutic effects and prognosis after radiotherapy (chemotherapy) of patients with postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer.Methods:This study analyzed 501 patients with postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer who were treated in the Radiotherapy Department of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and met enrollment conditions. Among them, 274 patients received concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The analyses in this study focused on the survival after the retreatment, postoperative recurrence patterns, prognosis of retreatment, and prognostic factors affecting the retreatment. Meanwhile, statistical analysis was conducted using the software SPSS Statistics 19.0.Results:The time of postoperative recurrence was 0.3-87.4 months, with a median number of 11.6 months. The median survival time was 12.1 months after the retreatment. Among all the patients, 344 patients suffered from only local recurrence, while the remaining 157 patients experienced distant metastasis. According to multivariate analysis result, independent prognostic factors included gender, pN stage, lymph node positive logarithmic ratio (LODDS), the number of chemotherapy cycles, time of recurrence, and distant metastasis ( P < 0.05). Meanwhile, prognostic factors affecting the 344 patients with only local recurrence included the time of recurrence, the number of chemotherapy cycles, and prescription dose ( χ2=22.605, 13.957, 10.446; P< 0.05). The remaining 157 patients suffered from distant metastasis. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of them were 43.3%, 9.1%, and 5.5%, respectively, and those of the patients with only local recurrence were 53.6%, 22.6%, and 16.4%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (χ 2=10.786, P< 0.05). Conclusions:Radiotherapy (chemotherapy) is safe and effective for the treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer. However, it features poor prognosis for male patients with a late pN stage, a high LODDS, the number of chemotherapy cycles ≤ 2, the time of recurrence≤ 24 months, and distant metastasis.

Objective:To evaluate the effects of different irradiation doses on postoperative local recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer after radio (chemo) therapy.Methods:Clinical data of 331 esophageal cancer patients presenting with postoperative local recurrence admitted to our hospital from 2009 to 2014 were collected. The recurrence site, the effects of different radiotherapy doses on the prognosis of patients and the independent prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed. The survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate prognostic analysis was performed by log-rank test. Multivariate prognostic analysis was conducted by Cox proportional hazard regression model.Results:The 1-, 3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 54.3%, 23.2% and 16.6%, respectively. The median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI: 11.7-15.0). The median survival of patients with radiotherapy doses< 60 Gy and ≥60 Gy was 10.8 and 13.9 months ( P=0.013). Stratified analysis showed that patients with age< 60 years, no smoking history, no drinking history, no family history, upper thoracic segment, left thoracotomy, N 0 staging, log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS)< 0.030, recurrence time ≥ 13.1 months and recurrence site ≥ 2 had better prognosis when receiving radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy ( P=0.038, 0.033, 0.001, 0.003, 0.018, 0.010, 0.041, 0.039, 0.043 and 0.007). Moreover, the short-term clinical efficacy of patients treated with ≥60 Gy dose was significantly better than that of those with<60 Gy dose ( P<0.001), which did not increase the incidence of ≥grade 2 radiation-induced gastritis ( P=0.977) or radiation-induced pneumonitis ( P=0.444). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the LODDS size, prescription dose and short-term efficacy were the independent factors affecting clinical prognosis of patients ( P=0.006, 0.008 and<0.001). Conclusions:The recommended dose for esophageal cancer patients with local recurrence after radiotherapy (chemotherapy) is greater than or equal to 60 Gy. The results of this study need to be confirmed by prospective studies with a large sample size.

Objective:To explore the benefit groups of patients with locoregional recurrence of esophageal thoracic squamous cell carcinoma who received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with different patterns of irradiation.Methods:Clinical data of 344 esophageal thoracic squamous cell carcinoma patients with postoperative recurrence who received intensity conformal radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2009 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The distribution of recurrence sites and prognostic factors were analyzed. A stratified analysis was carried out on the benefit groups of patients receiving the elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved field irradiation (IFI).Results:276 cases (80.2%) recurred at a single site and 68 cases (19.8%) recurred at more than two sites. The follow-up rate was 96.2%. The 1-, 3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 53.6%, 22.6% and 16.4%, respectively, with a median of 12.8 months (95% CI: 11.3-14.3 months). The 1-, 3-and 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 46.5%, 16.9% and 12.0%, respectively, with a median of 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.6-12.4 months). The 1-, 3-and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 39.8%, 11.3% and 6.7%, respectively, with a median of 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.8-10.0 months). Multivariate analysis showed that gender, the log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) and the number of chemotherapy cycles were the independent prognostic factors ( P=0.003, <0.001, <0.001). Subgroup univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with an esophageal lesion length<5.0 cm, N 0 stage, the number of surgically-dissected lymph nodes of ≤9, the number of postoperative positive lymph node metastasis site of 0, and LODDS≤0.030 obtained benefits from ENI ( P=0.032, 0.012, 0.001, 0.012 and 0.014). Patients with the number of surgically-dissected lymph nodes of ≥16 achieved benefits from IFI ( P=0.035). Conclusions:Radiotherapy is an effective treatment mode for patients with local recurrence after esophageal cancer surgery. For patients with preoperative esophagography showing shorter esophageal lesions, earlier postoperative pathological N stage, lower LODDS score, and fewer surgically-dissected lymph nodes probably obtain more benefits from ENI than IFI. However, patients with more surgically-dissected lymph nodes may obtain more benefit from IFI compared with ENI.

Objective:To analyze the survival benefits and treatment related toxic effects of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-RT) for non-operative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.Methods:The data of 2 132 ESCC patients who were not suitable for surgery or rejected operation, and underwent radical radiotherapy from 2002 to 2016 in 10 hospitals of Jing-Jin-Ji Esophageal and Esophagogastric Cancer Radiotherapy Oncology Group (3JECROG) were analyzed. Among them, 518 (24.3%) cases underwent SIB (SIB group) and 1 614 (75.7%) cases did not receive SIB (No-SIB group). The two groups were matched with 1∶2 according to propensity score matching (PSM) method (caliper value=0.02). After PSM, 515 patients in SIB group and 977 patients in No-SIB group were enrolled. Prognosis and treatment related adverse effects of these two groups were compared and the independent prognostic factor were analyzed.Results:The median follow-up time was 61.7 months. Prior to PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-years overall survival (OS) rates of SIB group were 72.2%, 42.8%, 35.5%, while of No-SIB group were 74.3%, 41.4%, 31.9%, respectively ( P=0.549). After PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-years OS rates of the two groups were 72.5%, 43.4%, 36.4% and 75.3%, 41.7%, 31.6%, respectively ( P=0.690). The univariate survival analysis of samples after PSM showed that the lesion location, length, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, simultaneous chemoradiotherapy, gross tumor volume (GTV) and underwent SIB-RT or not were significantly associated with the prognosis of advanced esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent radical radiotherapy ( P<0.05). Cox model multivariate regression analysis showed lesion location, TNM stage, GTV and simultaneous chemoradiotherapy were independent prognostic factors of advanced esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent radical radiotherapy ( P<0.05). Stratified analysis showed that, in the patients whose GTV volume≤50 cm 3, the median survival time of SIB and No-SIB group was 34.7 and 30.3 months ( P=0.155), respectively. In the patients whose GTV volume>50 cm 3, the median survival time of SIB and No-SIB group was 16.1 and 20.1 months ( P=0.218). The incidence of radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis above Grade 3 in SIB group were 4.3% and 2.5%, significantly lower than 13.1% and 11% of No-SIB group ( P<0.001). Conclusions:The survival benefit of SIB-RT in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is not inferior to non-SIB-RT, but without more adverse reactions, and shortens the treatment time. SIB-RT can be used as one option of the radical radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Objective:To analyze the survival benefits and treatment related toxic effects of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-RT) for non-operative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.Methods:The data of 2 132 ESCC patients who were not suitable for surgery or rejected operation, and underwent radical radiotherapy from 2002 to 2016 in 10 hospitals of Jing-Jin-Ji Esophageal and Esophagogastric Cancer Radiotherapy Oncology Group (3JECROG) were analyzed. Among them, 518 (24.3%) cases underwent SIB (SIB group) and 1 614 (75.7%) cases did not receive SIB (No-SIB group). The two groups were matched with 1∶2 according to propensity score matching (PSM) method (caliper value=0.02). After PSM, 515 patients in SIB group and 977 patients in No-SIB group were enrolled. Prognosis and treatment related adverse effects of these two groups were compared and the independent prognostic factor were analyzed.Results:The median follow-up time was 61.7 months. Prior to PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-years overall survival (OS) rates of SIB group were 72.2%, 42.8%, 35.5%, while of No-SIB group were 74.3%, 41.4%, 31.9%, respectively ( P=0.549). After PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-years OS rates of the two groups were 72.5%, 43.4%, 36.4% and 75.3%, 41.7%, 31.6%, respectively ( P=0.690). The univariate survival analysis of samples after PSM showed that the lesion location, length, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, simultaneous chemoradiotherapy, gross tumor volume (GTV) and underwent SIB-RT or not were significantly associated with the prognosis of advanced esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent radical radiotherapy ( P<0.05). Cox model multivariate regression analysis showed lesion location, TNM stage, GTV and simultaneous chemoradiotherapy were independent prognostic factors of advanced esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent radical radiotherapy ( P<0.05). Stratified analysis showed that, in the patients whose GTV volume≤50 cm 3, the median survival time of SIB and No-SIB group was 34.7 and 30.3 months ( P=0.155), respectively. In the patients whose GTV volume>50 cm 3, the median survival time of SIB and No-SIB group was 16.1 and 20.1 months ( P=0.218). The incidence of radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis above Grade 3 in SIB group were 4.3% and 2.5%, significantly lower than 13.1% and 11% of No-SIB group ( P<0.001). Conclusions:The survival benefit of SIB-RT in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is not inferior to non-SIB-RT, but without more adverse reactions, and shortens the treatment time. SIB-RT can be used as one option of the radical radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.