Purpose: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has long been recognized as an effective treatment for depression and suicidality.Virtual reality (VR) technology is widely used for cognitive training for conditions such as anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, but little research has considered VR-based CBT for depressive symptoms and suicidality. We tested the effectiveness and safety of a VR-based CBT program for depressive disorders. Materials and Methods: We recruited 57 participants from May 2022 through February 2023 using online advertisements. This multi-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled exploratory trial used two groups: VR treatment group and treat as usual (TAU) group. VR treatment group received a VR mental health training/education program. TAU group received standard pharmacotherapy. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the 6-week treatment period, and 4 weeks after the end of the treatment period in each group. Results: Depression scores decreased significantly over time in both VR treatment and TAU groups, with no differences between the two groups. The suicidality score decreased significantly only in VR group. No group differences were found in the remission or response rate for depression, perceived stress, or clinical severity. No adverse events or motion sickness occurred during the VR treatment program. Conclusion VR CBT treatment for major depressive disorder has the potential to be equivalent to the gold-standard pharmacotherapy in reducing depressive symptoms, suicidality, and related clinical symptoms, with no difference in improvement found in this study. Thus, VR-based CBT might be an effective alternative to pharmacotherapy for depressive disorders.

Purpose: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has long been recognized as an effective treatment for depression and suicidality.Virtual reality (VR) technology is widely used for cognitive training for conditions such as anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, but little research has considered VR-based CBT for depressive symptoms and suicidality. We tested the effectiveness and safety of a VR-based CBT program for depressive disorders. Materials and Methods: We recruited 57 participants from May 2022 through February 2023 using online advertisements. This multi-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled exploratory trial used two groups: VR treatment group and treat as usual (TAU) group. VR treatment group received a VR mental health training/education program. TAU group received standard pharmacotherapy. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the 6-week treatment period, and 4 weeks after the end of the treatment period in each group. Results: Depression scores decreased significantly over time in both VR treatment and TAU groups, with no differences between the two groups. The suicidality score decreased significantly only in VR group. No group differences were found in the remission or response rate for depression, perceived stress, or clinical severity. No adverse events or motion sickness occurred during the VR treatment program. Conclusion VR CBT treatment for major depressive disorder has the potential to be equivalent to the gold-standard pharmacotherapy in reducing depressive symptoms, suicidality, and related clinical symptoms, with no difference in improvement found in this study. Thus, VR-based CBT might be an effective alternative to pharmacotherapy for depressive disorders.

Purpose: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has long been recognized as an effective treatment for depression and suicidality.Virtual reality (VR) technology is widely used for cognitive training for conditions such as anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, but little research has considered VR-based CBT for depressive symptoms and suicidality. We tested the effectiveness and safety of a VR-based CBT program for depressive disorders. Materials and Methods: We recruited 57 participants from May 2022 through February 2023 using online advertisements. This multi-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled exploratory trial used two groups: VR treatment group and treat as usual (TAU) group. VR treatment group received a VR mental health training/education program. TAU group received standard pharmacotherapy. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the 6-week treatment period, and 4 weeks after the end of the treatment period in each group. Results: Depression scores decreased significantly over time in both VR treatment and TAU groups, with no differences between the two groups. The suicidality score decreased significantly only in VR group. No group differences were found in the remission or response rate for depression, perceived stress, or clinical severity. No adverse events or motion sickness occurred during the VR treatment program. Conclusion VR CBT treatment for major depressive disorder has the potential to be equivalent to the gold-standard pharmacotherapy in reducing depressive symptoms, suicidality, and related clinical symptoms, with no difference in improvement found in this study. Thus, VR-based CBT might be an effective alternative to pharmacotherapy for depressive disorders.

Purpose: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has long been recognized as an effective treatment for depression and suicidality.Virtual reality (VR) technology is widely used for cognitive training for conditions such as anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, but little research has considered VR-based CBT for depressive symptoms and suicidality. We tested the effectiveness and safety of a VR-based CBT program for depressive disorders. Materials and Methods: We recruited 57 participants from May 2022 through February 2023 using online advertisements. This multi-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled exploratory trial used two groups: VR treatment group and treat as usual (TAU) group. VR treatment group received a VR mental health training/education program. TAU group received standard pharmacotherapy. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the 6-week treatment period, and 4 weeks after the end of the treatment period in each group. Results: Depression scores decreased significantly over time in both VR treatment and TAU groups, with no differences between the two groups. The suicidality score decreased significantly only in VR group. No group differences were found in the remission or response rate for depression, perceived stress, or clinical severity. No adverse events or motion sickness occurred during the VR treatment program. Conclusion VR CBT treatment for major depressive disorder has the potential to be equivalent to the gold-standard pharmacotherapy in reducing depressive symptoms, suicidality, and related clinical symptoms, with no difference in improvement found in this study. Thus, VR-based CBT might be an effective alternative to pharmacotherapy for depressive disorders.

Purpose: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has long been recognized as an effective treatment for depression and suicidality.Virtual reality (VR) technology is widely used for cognitive training for conditions such as anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, but little research has considered VR-based CBT for depressive symptoms and suicidality. We tested the effectiveness and safety of a VR-based CBT program for depressive disorders. Materials and Methods: We recruited 57 participants from May 2022 through February 2023 using online advertisements. This multi-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled exploratory trial used two groups: VR treatment group and treat as usual (TAU) group. VR treatment group received a VR mental health training/education program. TAU group received standard pharmacotherapy. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the 6-week treatment period, and 4 weeks after the end of the treatment period in each group. Results: Depression scores decreased significantly over time in both VR treatment and TAU groups, with no differences between the two groups. The suicidality score decreased significantly only in VR group. No group differences were found in the remission or response rate for depression, perceived stress, or clinical severity. No adverse events or motion sickness occurred during the VR treatment program. Conclusion VR CBT treatment for major depressive disorder has the potential to be equivalent to the gold-standard pharmacotherapy in reducing depressive symptoms, suicidality, and related clinical symptoms, with no difference in improvement found in this study. Thus, VR-based CBT might be an effective alternative to pharmacotherapy for depressive disorders.

Background and Objectives: The transformation of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment in Korea, ushered by targeted therapy’s advent, prompted our analysis of baseline attributes, treatment trends, and survival shifts within our single-center registry. Methods: We examined 230 patients (72.6% female, mean age 40.6±17.4 years) diagnosed and/or treated between 1980 and 2021 in our PAH clinic. Given targeted therapy’s introduction and active use since 2007, we compared diagnostic classification, demographics, and treatment patterns at that juncture. Survival analysis encompassed PAH types and the overall population. For historical survival comparison, 50 non-registry patients were retrospectively added, and age-sex matching enabled pooled analysis. Results: Congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CHD-PAH) constituted the largest subset (43.0%), trailed by connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH, 29.6%) and idiopathic PAH (IPAH, 19.1%). Post-2007, CTD-PAH proportions surged, notably with an elevated initiation rate of targeted therapy (95.4%). Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years stood at 91.3%, 77.4%, and 65.8%, respectively, with CHD-PAH exhibiting superior survival to idiopathic or CTD-PAH. Age-sex matching analysis indicated survival disparities between those starting immediate targeted therapy vs. conservative treatment upon diagnosis, especially driven by IPAH. Conclusions In the post-introduction of the targeted therapy era, patients with PAH promptly started treatment right away, and higher survival rates of patients who started initial PAH-targeted therapy were demonstrated. The transition towards early treatment initiation might have likely contributed to the elevated survival rates observed in Korea’s PAH patient cohort.

Background and Objectives: The transformation of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment in Korea, ushered by targeted therapy’s advent, prompted our analysis of baseline attributes, treatment trends, and survival shifts within our single-center registry. Methods: We examined 230 patients (72.6% female, mean age 40.6±17.4 years) diagnosed and/or treated between 1980 and 2021 in our PAH clinic. Given targeted therapy’s introduction and active use since 2007, we compared diagnostic classification, demographics, and treatment patterns at that juncture. Survival analysis encompassed PAH types and the overall population. For historical survival comparison, 50 non-registry patients were retrospectively added, and age-sex matching enabled pooled analysis. Results: Congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CHD-PAH) constituted the largest subset (43.0%), trailed by connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH, 29.6%) and idiopathic PAH (IPAH, 19.1%). Post-2007, CTD-PAH proportions surged, notably with an elevated initiation rate of targeted therapy (95.4%). Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years stood at 91.3%, 77.4%, and 65.8%, respectively, with CHD-PAH exhibiting superior survival to idiopathic or CTD-PAH. Age-sex matching analysis indicated survival disparities between those starting immediate targeted therapy vs. conservative treatment upon diagnosis, especially driven by IPAH. Conclusions In the post-introduction of the targeted therapy era, patients with PAH promptly started treatment right away, and higher survival rates of patients who started initial PAH-targeted therapy were demonstrated. The transition towards early treatment initiation might have likely contributed to the elevated survival rates observed in Korea’s PAH patient cohort.

Background and Objectives: The transformation of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment in Korea, ushered by targeted therapy’s advent, prompted our analysis of baseline attributes, treatment trends, and survival shifts within our single-center registry. Methods: We examined 230 patients (72.6% female, mean age 40.6±17.4 years) diagnosed and/or treated between 1980 and 2021 in our PAH clinic. Given targeted therapy’s introduction and active use since 2007, we compared diagnostic classification, demographics, and treatment patterns at that juncture. Survival analysis encompassed PAH types and the overall population. For historical survival comparison, 50 non-registry patients were retrospectively added, and age-sex matching enabled pooled analysis. Results: Congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CHD-PAH) constituted the largest subset (43.0%), trailed by connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH, 29.6%) and idiopathic PAH (IPAH, 19.1%). Post-2007, CTD-PAH proportions surged, notably with an elevated initiation rate of targeted therapy (95.4%). Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years stood at 91.3%, 77.4%, and 65.8%, respectively, with CHD-PAH exhibiting superior survival to idiopathic or CTD-PAH. Age-sex matching analysis indicated survival disparities between those starting immediate targeted therapy vs. conservative treatment upon diagnosis, especially driven by IPAH. Conclusions In the post-introduction of the targeted therapy era, patients with PAH promptly started treatment right away, and higher survival rates of patients who started initial PAH-targeted therapy were demonstrated. The transition towards early treatment initiation might have likely contributed to the elevated survival rates observed in Korea’s PAH patient cohort.

Background and Objectives: The transformation of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment in Korea, ushered by targeted therapy’s advent, prompted our analysis of baseline attributes, treatment trends, and survival shifts within our single-center registry. Methods: We examined 230 patients (72.6% female, mean age 40.6±17.4 years) diagnosed and/or treated between 1980 and 2021 in our PAH clinic. Given targeted therapy’s introduction and active use since 2007, we compared diagnostic classification, demographics, and treatment patterns at that juncture. Survival analysis encompassed PAH types and the overall population. For historical survival comparison, 50 non-registry patients were retrospectively added, and age-sex matching enabled pooled analysis. Results: Congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CHD-PAH) constituted the largest subset (43.0%), trailed by connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH, 29.6%) and idiopathic PAH (IPAH, 19.1%). Post-2007, CTD-PAH proportions surged, notably with an elevated initiation rate of targeted therapy (95.4%). Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years stood at 91.3%, 77.4%, and 65.8%, respectively, with CHD-PAH exhibiting superior survival to idiopathic or CTD-PAH. Age-sex matching analysis indicated survival disparities between those starting immediate targeted therapy vs. conservative treatment upon diagnosis, especially driven by IPAH. Conclusions In the post-introduction of the targeted therapy era, patients with PAH promptly started treatment right away, and higher survival rates of patients who started initial PAH-targeted therapy were demonstrated. The transition towards early treatment initiation might have likely contributed to the elevated survival rates observed in Korea’s PAH patient cohort.

Background: s/Aims: Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods: Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results: In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.