Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Background/Aims: The genetic expression in the active inflammatory regions is increased in ulcerative colitis (UC) with endoscopic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular activity of inflammation and tissue remodeling markers in endoscopically inflamed and uninflamed regions of UC. Methods: Patients with UC (n=47) and controls (n=20) were prospectively enrolled at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Inflamed tissue was obtained at the most active lesion, and uninflamed tissue was collected from approximately 15 cm above the upper end of the active lesion via colonoscopic biopsies. The messenger RNA expression levels of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, E-cadherin, olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4), leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), vimentin, fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP1), and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) were evaluated. Mucosal healing (MH) was defined according to a Mayo endoscopic score of 0, 1 or non-MH (Mayo endoscopic score of 2 or 3). Results: The messenger RNA expressions of TGF-β, IL-1β, OLFM4, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA were significantly higher, and that of E-cadherin was significantly lower in inflamed and uninflamed regions of patients with UC than those in controls. In the inflamed regions, patients in the non-MH group had significantly increased genetic expression of TGF-β, FSP1, vimentin, and α-SMA compared to patients in the MH group. Similarly, the non-MH group had significantly higher genetic expression of TGF-β, IL-1β, IL-6, vimentin, and α-SMA than the MH group in the uninflamed regions. Conclusions Endoscopic activity in UC suggests inflammation and tissue remodeling of uninflamed regions similar to inflamed regions.

Purpose: Patients experience severe physical trauma every year. However, studies on survivors’ experiences after severe injury are limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on time spans of trauma treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore survivors’ experiences to improve the current quality of trauma treatment and highlight the importance of patient-centered care. Materials and Methods: Structured, face-to-face interviews with six domains were conducted on survivors aged ≥18 years who were previously hospitalized in an intensive care unit due to traumatic injuries. Self-reported questionnaires were administered for a multidimensional assessment of participants’ conditions. Transcripts of each narrative were analyzed per grounded theory. Results: Fourteen participants were assessed. The median injury severity score was 25.5. The median elapsed time from injury to interview was 17.3 months. The physical and psychiatric difficulties of the participants remained unresolved even after completing rehabilitation. The main theme derived from the narratives were struggle with injury, consequences, and contributing factors, with the following subthemes: 1) suffering from injury and treatment, 2) psychological adaptation to the changed self and life after the accident, 3) significant family support, 4) gratitude to medical staff despite inadequacies in the healthcare system, and 5) legal and economic issues that impede recovery. Conclusion Increased efforts focusing on enabling survivors of severe injury to return to society and improve their quality of life are needed, including the establishment of patient-centered care in the trauma field, extended care for the survivors’ families, multidisciplinary treatment, and the collection of quantitative post-discharge data.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has been used for over a century and has been demonstrated to be effective in treating patients with various allergic diseases. AIT allergens can be administered through various routes, including subcutaneous, sublingual, intralymphatic, oral, or epicutaneous routes. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has recently gained clinical interest, and it is considered an alternative treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. This review provides an overview of the current evidence-based studies that address the use of SLIT for treating AR, including (1) mechanisms of action, (2) appropriate patient selection for SLIT, (3) the current available SLIT products in Korea, and (4) updated information on its efficacy and safety. Finally, this guideline aims to provide the clinician with practical considerations for SLIT.