1.Efficiency comparison of different predictive models in the screening of anisometropia in children and adolescents
International Eye Science 2025;25(11):1859-1863
AIM: To compare the diagnostic efficiency of binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA), pre-cycloplegia refraction spherical equivalent(PR-SE), axial length(AL)difference, and their different combinations in the screening of anisometropia in children and adolescents, and to evaluate the practical value of different indicator combinations in simplifying the screening process when taking cycloplegic retinoscopy results as the gold standard for diagnosing anisometropia.METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A total of 500 consecutive cases of children and adolescents aged 6-18 years with known refractive status were included. Taking cycloplegic retinoscopy results as the gold standard for anisometropia diagnosis, the binocular UCDVA, PR-SE, and AL difference were incorporated into ROC curve analysis to assess the diagnostic efficacy of each indicator. Furthermore, predictive models were constructed and reliability analysis was performed.RESULTS: The average age of the included cases was 10.75±2.24 years, including 239 males and 261 females. The AUC of the interocular PR-SE difference(0.972, 95%CI: 0.960-0.984)was significantly higher than that of other indicators. The Youden index was the largest when the bincular UCDVA difference was 0.25, the PR-SE difference was 0.743, and the AL difference was 0.31. When the interocular PR-SE difference used 0.743 and 1.00 D as screening cutoffs, the former had a higher AUC(AUC=0.924, 95%CI: 0.895-0.953). Comparison of different constructed predictive models showed that when the binocular PR-SE difference was ≥0.743 D, the negative predictive value reached 98.89%, making it suitable for initial screening. The combination of UCDVA+PR-SE+AL had the highest specificity and positive predictive value, while the PR-SE+AL combination had the highest consistency rate.CONCLUSION: The binocular PR-SE difference is the best choice for single-indicator screening. Combining UCDVA and AL can increase the specificity to 98.00% and the positive predictive value to 88.24%. The PR-SE+AL combination can achieve the highest consistency rate.
2.Efficiency of the ratio of axial length to corneal curvature radius in the evaluation of myopia in children and adolescents
International Eye Science 2024;24(8):1314-1318
AIM: To evaluate the value of the ratio of axial length to corneal radius of curvature(AL/CR)in the diagnosis of myopia in children and adolescents.METHODS: The refraction and ocular biometric parameters of 2 182 cases of children and adolescents(4 364 eyes)who initially visited the optometry clinic of the Second People's Hospital of Beihai from January 2022 to December 2023 were collected and analyzed.RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)showed that AL/CR had a higher area under the curve(AUC=0.925, 95%CI: 0.917-0.933)in diagnosing myopia. When AL/CR was 3.053, the Youden index was the largest. As the threshold of AL/CR decreased, the sensitivity of myopia diagnosis increased, while the specificity decreased. Compared with screening myopia, the sensitivity of AL/CR=3.053 in diagnosing myopia was low, but the specificity was high, especially in the cases of hyperopia and pre-myopia.CONCLUSION: The accuracy of AL/CR in diagnosing myopia is superior to that of axial length and average corneal curvature, with higher specificity. As the threshold of AL/CR decreases, the sensitivity of diagnosing myopia increases, but the specificity decreases. In cases of hyperopia and pre-myopia, the specificity of AL/CR in diagnosing myopia is higher than that of screening myopia.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail