Objectives: Perception about Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine provides information about awareness on identifying disabilities and managing their impact on activities of daily living; however, misconceptions about the field continue to exist among both students and physicians. This study aims to describe the perceptions of clinical clerks and interns towards the practice and role of Rehabilitation Medicine in management of patients. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Students from the Learning Unit 6 and 7 of UP College of Medicine answered adapted online survey forms from a previous study and participated in online focus group discussions. Qualitative data were used to infer the perception of medical students towards the specialty. The effect of the respondent’s profile, background and affiliation on their knowledge, attitudes and perceptions were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Learning Unit 6 and 7 students were found to have a perceived broad level of knowledge with regards the specialty. The students associated the specialty with focus on holistic care, quality of life, interdisciplinary collaboration, and diversity of cases managed. No statistically significant differences were found between the perception among: 1) Learning Unit 6 and 7, 2) those with or without a previous encounter with the specialty, 3) allied medical and non-allied medical undergraduate courses in terms of: a) confidence in the knowledge (p = 0.489), b) familiarity with conditions managed (p = 0.93) and c) interest towards the specialty (p = 0.693). The Organ System Integrated (OSI) curriculum, which promotes horizontal and vertical integration of concepts, provided a wide understanding of the basic concepts related to physiatry. The students’ responses suggest a positive attitude towards Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, as measured in their level of interest about knowing more regarding the specialty. Most common perceptions were that the specialty was multidisciplinary and holistic. However, the respondents’ perceptions regarding the roles of the Rehabilitation team were limited. Conclusion Learning unit level 6 and 7 students had a broad understanding of the practice and scope of the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine specialty. Future researches can include other medical students in all year levels, including Learning Units 3, 4 and 5 of UPCM, to observe the development of their perceptions about the specialty throughout medical school.
Perception ; Students, Medical ; Curriculum

Objective: Bariatric surgery effectively treats non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The glutamate-serine-glycine (GSG) index has emerged as a non-invasive diagnostic marker for NAFLD, but its ability to monitor treatment response remains unclear. This study investigates the GSG index's ability to monitor NAFLD's response to bariatric surgery. Methodology: Ten NAFLD participants were studied at baseline and 6 months post-bariatric surgery. Blood samples were collected for serum biomarkers and metabolomic profiling. Hepatic steatosis [proton density fat fraction (PDFF)] and fibroinflammation (cT1) were quantified with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and hepatic stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Amino acids and acylcarnitines were measured with mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses included paired Student’s t-test, Wilcoxon-signed rank test, and Pearson’s correlation. Results: Eight participants provided complete data. At baseline, all had hepatic steatosis (BMI 39.3 ± 5.6 kg/m2, PDFF ≥ 5%). Post-surgery reductions in PDFF (from 12.4 ± 6.7% to 6.2 ± 2.8%, p = 0.013) and cT1 (from 823.3 ± 85.4ms to 757.5 ± 41.6ms, p = 0.039) were significant, along with the GSG index (from 0.272 ± 0.03 to 0.157 ± 0.05, p = 0.001). Conclusion The GSG index can potentially be developed as a marker for monitoring the response of patients with NAFLD to bariatric surgery.
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ; Amino Acids ; Metabolomics

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the contributors to the burden of non-communicable disease. Health education is a key component in COPD management. Effective health education interventions directed to patient, family and community are necessary to prevent exacerbations, emergency room visits, hospitalizations and improve quality of life for patients with COPD. The general objective of the study was to determine effectiveness of health education interventions directed to patient, family and community. Specifically, to determine the effect on the number of acute exacerbations, COPD related emergency room visits and hospitalizations, improvement in the quality of life and patient satisfaction. Methods: This study only included comparative clinical trials randomized or non- randomized, parallel or cross-over clinical trial design, cohort study involving humans as the participants. It also includes published studies in peer reviewed journals of PubMed, clinical trials registered Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the grey literature. There were no foreign language studies included relevant to this review. The non-comparative clinical trials, outcomes research or real-world data, animal experiments, reviews and case reports were excluded. The study population of reviewed literature has an established diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria for diagnosis of COPD. Studies involving COPD patients who have other co morbidities were also included. The patients with COPD in the study were similar to patients consulting in family and community medicine practice clinics in the Philippines. Data synthesis was done separately for each type of intervention, i.e., patient directed, family directed, community directed health education intervention on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Quantitative analysis was only possible for studies reporting similar outcomes and units of measures such as number of COPD-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits for health education intervention directed to patient and improvement in the quality-of-life scores for health education intervention directed to family and community. Narrative synthesis was done when it was not feasible to include studies to do pooled analysis due to any of the following reasons such as different outcomes and when outcomes not reported as means with standard deviation. The Review Manager 5 software was used in the analysis of the data. Sensitivity analysis was done by restricting the analysis to published studies and with low risk of bias. Results: A total of ten studies were included. Health education interventions directed to patient has no benefit in decreasing the number of COPD related emergency room visits (1.84, 95% CI 0.94,2.74) and insufficient evidence to decrease the number of COPD related hospitalizations (4.33,95%CI-4.69,13.34). Health education intervention directed to family have insufficient evidence to improve the quality of life among patients with COPD (0.35,95% CI -0.49,1.19). Community directed health education intervention have significantly improved the quality of life among patients with COPD (-1.95,95% CI -3.37, -0.53).The studies had low risk for bias in terms of random sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessment except for one study that was a non-randomized trial (Tabari et al, 2018). The highest risk for bias across the studies was the non-blinding of the participants. The withdrawals or dropouts in one study exceeded 20%. Three studies reported non possibility of blinding the assessor (Marques et al 2015, Nguyen et al 2019, Tabari et al 2018). Furthermore, five studies (Gallefos, 2004, Hernandez et al 2015, Tabari et al 2018, Van Wetering et al 2010, Marques et al, 2015) did not report the use of intention to treat analysis Discussion Effective health education interventions directed to patient, family and community in conjunction with standard of care may decrease exacerbations, hospitalizations, emergency visits, better quality of life and patient satisfaction. The studies included for this review were heath education interventions solely directed to patient, to family and to community and not a combination of the interventions directed to patient and family, or patient and community, or patient and family and community. Overall, health education interventions are integrated in a patient centered family focused community-oriented care for COPD. Health education is just one of the components of the integrated care on COPD. Better control of COPD is likely due to the combined effects of the different care components. Hence, there is a need for more randomized controlled trials on health education interventions directed to patient and family. Inclusion of COPD related hospitalizations, emergency room visits, acute exacerbations as outcome measures in health education interventions directed to patient, family and community is useful to provide evidence in effectiveness of the intervention. The authors declare no financial or funding involvement in the development and implementation of this study. This protocol was registered with Research Grants Administration Office (RGAO) with Registration No. RGAO-2020-1276, Research Implementation Development Office (RIDO) and to the Research Committee of the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians. The study was given Certification of Exemption from Ethical Review by the University of the Philippines Research Ethics Board (UPMREB CODE: UPMREB 2020-783-EX
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in several stressors and difficulties among Filipinos, forcing everyone to cope with the limited resources. There are limited local studies on measuring how well Filipinos are coping in the pandemic. Knowledge on the predominant coping strategy during this crisis and which resources are lacking may guide physicians in tailoring appropriate interventions. Objective: The study aimed to determine the Family Resources and coping strategies of Filipino patients seen in a private, primary clinic in Bucandala (Imus, Cavite) during the COVID-19 pandemic, using the SCREEM Res and Filipino Coping Strategies (FCS) Scale, respectively. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out among adult patients who consulted at a private primary clinic in Imus from November to December 2020. Respondents answered a self-administered survey on sociodemographic profile, family resources (SCREEM Res) and coping strategies (FCS Scale). Results: A total of 140 respondents were included in the study. They almost equally belonged to the average (49.29%) or low income group (47.14%) with a median household size of 4.9. Many (44.29%) were unemployed. The median Total SCREEMRes score of the respondents was 25 (adequate). However, 42% of the respondents had moderately inadequate resources. The SCREEM Res domains of social, cultural and religious resources were adequate (median, 5) while the educational, economic and medical resources were moderately inadequate (median, 4). FCS scores were highest for the domains religiosity, problem solving and cognitive reappraisal and lowest for substance use. Conclusion Respondents had adequate social, cultural and religious family resources but moderately inadequate economic, educational and medical resources. Their predominant coping strategies include religiosity, problem solving and cognitive reappraisal. Family physicians may partner with families in augmenting their inadequate resources by maximizing the use of the dominant coping strategies.
COVID-19 ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Pandemics

Background: The literature on complementary and alternative (CAM) therapies in South East Asia is limited. The objective of the study was to evaluate the frequencies of CAM therapies in the Malaysian patients with migraine and tension-type headache (TTH). We also assessed the reasons for CAM use. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Consecutive patients presenting with migraine and TTH to the neurology clinic were recruited. Demographic characteristics were documented. Data on CAM use, including frequency and the reasons was collected. Results: Six hundred and eighty five patients (365 TTH and 320 migraine) were recruited. They consisted of 305 (44.5%) Malay, 174 (25.4%) Chinese, 169 (24.7%) Indian and 37 (5.4%) patients from other ethnic groups. A total of 478 (69.8%) patients, comprising 266 (55.6%) patients with TTH and 212 (44.4%) patients with migraine used CAM therapies. The most commonly used CAM therapies were medicated oil (355 patients, 51.8%) and massage (246 patients, 35.9%). The most common reasons for CAM use were reduction of pain (47.7 %), stress reduction (34.9%), and “cooling” effect (27.4%). Thirteen (4.1%) patients with migraine practiced reflexology, whereas 5 (1.4%) patients with TTH practiced reflexology (p=0.032). Twenty three (7.2%) patients with migraine took vitamin supplements compared to 13 (3.6%) patients with TTH (p=0.039). On univariate analysis, CAM use was significantly associated with ethnic groups (p=0.014), gender (p<0.0001), age (p=0.004), salary (p=0.014), educational level (p=0.003), and headache subtypes (p= 0.067). On logistic regression, married women were more likely to use CAM (OR=1.864, 95% CI 1.216-2.858, p=0.004). Conclusion: A large number of Malaysian headache patients used CAM. The most common reasons were reduction of pain, stress and “heatiness”. Medicated oil was most commonly used, followed by massage. Married women were more likely to use CAM, and this was the only determinant in this study.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged health systems globally and prompted the publication of several guidelines. The experiences of our international colleagues should be utilized to protect patients and healthcare workers. The primary aim of this article is to appraise national guidelines for the perioperative anesthetic management of patients with COVID-19 so that they can be enhanced for the management of any resurgence of the epidemic. PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for guidelines related to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the World Federation Society of Anesthesiologists COVID-19 resource webpage was searched for national guidelines; the search was expanded to include countries with a high incidence of SARS-CoV. The guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Guidelines from Australia, Canada, China, India, Italy, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America were evaluated. All the guidelines focused predominantly on intubation and infection control. The scope and purpose of guidelines from China were the most comprehensive. The UK and South Africa provided the best clarity. Editorial independence, the rigor of development, and applicability scored poorly. Heterogeneity and gaps pertaining to preoperative screening, anesthesia technique, subspecialty anesthesia, and the lack of auditing of guidelines were identified. Evidence supporting the recommendations was weak. Early guidelines for the anesthetic management of COVID-19 patients lacked quality and a robust reporting framework. As new evidence emerges, national guidelines should be updated to enhance rigor, clarity, and applicability.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged health systems globally and prompted the publication of several guidelines. The experiences of our international colleagues should be utilized to protect patients and healthcare workers. The primary aim of this article is to appraise national guidelines for the perioperative anesthetic management of patients with COVID-19 so that they can be enhanced for the management of any resurgence of the epidemic. PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for guidelines related to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the World Federation Society of Anesthesiologists COVID-19 resource webpage was searched for national guidelines; the search was expanded to include countries with a high incidence of SARS-CoV. The guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Guidelines from Australia, Canada, China, India, Italy, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America were evaluated. All the guidelines focused predominantly on intubation and infection control. The scope and purpose of guidelines from China were the most comprehensive. The UK and South Africa provided the best clarity. Editorial independence, the rigor of development, and applicability scored poorly. Heterogeneity and gaps pertaining to preoperative screening, anesthesia technique, subspecialty anesthesia, and the lack of auditing of guidelines were identified. Evidence supporting the recommendations was weak. Early guidelines for the anesthetic management of COVID-19 patients lacked quality and a robust reporting framework. As new evidence emerges, national guidelines should be updated to enhance rigor, clarity, and applicability.

Objectives: Perception about Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine provides information about awareness on identifying disabilities and managing their impact on activities of daily living; however, misconceptions about the field continue to exist among both students and physicians. This study aims to describe the perceptions of clinical clerks and interns towards the practice and role of Rehabilitation Medicine in management of patients. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Students from the Learning Unit 6 and 7 of UP College of Medicine answered adapted online survey forms from a previous study and participated in online focus group discussions. Qualitative data were used to infer the perception of medical students towards the specialty. The effect of the respondent’s profile, background and affiliation on their knowledge, attitudes and perceptions were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Learning Unit 6 and 7 students were found to have a perceived broad level of knowledge with regards the specialty. The students associated the specialty with focus on holistic care, quality of life, interdisciplinary collaboration, and diversity of cases managed. No statistically significant differences were found between the perception among: 1) Learning Unit 6 and 7, 2) those with or without a previous encounter with the specialty, 3) allied medical and non-allied medical undergraduate courses in terms of: a) confidence in the knowledge (p = 0.489), b) familiarity with conditions managed (p = 0.93) and c) interest towards the specialty (p = 0.693). The Organ System Integrated (OSI) curriculum, which promotes horizontal and vertical integration of concepts, provided a wide understanding of the basic concepts related to physiatry. The students’ responses suggest a positive attitude towards Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, as measured in their level of interest about knowing more regarding the specialty. Most common perceptions were that the specialty was multidisciplinary and holistic. However, the respondents’ perceptions regarding the roles of the Rehabilitation team were limited. Conclusion Learning unit level 6 and 7 students had a broad understanding of the practice and scope of the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine specialty. Future researches can include other medical students in all year levels, including Learning Units 3, 4 and 5 of UPCM, to observe the development of their perceptions about the specialty throughout medical school.
Perception ; Students, Medical ; Curriculum

Takayasu arteritis is a rare granulomatous vasculitis that is commonly classified as a large vessel disease. Small and medium vessel involvement are extremely rare, with only a few case reports describing neurovascular, ocular and cutaneous involvement. We describe a 21 year old Malaysian woman with pre-existing Takayasu arteritis confined to the large vessels, presenting one year later to our centre with status epilepticus. Extensive radiologic studies revealed diffuse encephalopathic changes and multifocal neurovascular involvement, with the vasculitis progressing to encompass the large, medium and small vessels. The patient was treated with high dose steroid therapy and discharged well with long term steroid and immunosuppressive therapy. Follow up MRI with vessel wall imaging sequence (VW-MR) and arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion imaging demonstrated intra and extracranial vessel wall inflammation, with generalized reduction in left sided cerebral blood flow. This case demonstrates that Takayasu arteritis is not exclusively a large vessel vasculitis, and that small and medium vessel involvement does not preclude its diagnosis.