Objectives: Perception about Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine provides information about awareness on identifying disabilities and managing their impact on activities of daily living; however, misconceptions about the field continue to exist among both students and physicians. This study aims to describe the perceptions of clinical clerks and interns towards the practice and role of Rehabilitation Medicine in management of patients. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Students from the Learning Unit 6 and 7 of UP College of Medicine answered adapted online survey forms from a previous study and participated in online focus group discussions. Qualitative data were used to infer the perception of medical students towards the specialty. The effect of the respondent’s profile, background and affiliation on their knowledge, attitudes and perceptions were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Learning Unit 6 and 7 students were found to have a perceived broad level of knowledge with regards the specialty. The students associated the specialty with focus on holistic care, quality of life, interdisciplinary collaboration, and diversity of cases managed. No statistically significant differences were found between the perception among: 1) Learning Unit 6 and 7, 2) those with or without a previous encounter with the specialty, 3) allied medical and non-allied medical undergraduate courses in terms of: a) confidence in the knowledge (p = 0.489), b) familiarity with conditions managed (p = 0.93) and c) interest towards the specialty (p = 0.693). The Organ System Integrated (OSI) curriculum, which promotes horizontal and vertical integration of concepts, provided a wide understanding of the basic concepts related to physiatry. The students’ responses suggest a positive attitude towards Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, as measured in their level of interest about knowing more regarding the specialty. Most common perceptions were that the specialty was multidisciplinary and holistic. However, the respondents’ perceptions regarding the roles of the Rehabilitation team were limited. Conclusion Learning unit level 6 and 7 students had a broad understanding of the practice and scope of the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine specialty. Future researches can include other medical students in all year levels, including Learning Units 3, 4 and 5 of UPCM, to observe the development of their perceptions about the specialty throughout medical school.
Perception ; Students, Medical ; Curriculum

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine offers a solution to healthcare access issues, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic when physical distancing limited in-person visits. It can also be used by the Doctors-to-the-Barrios (DTTBs), who are often newly licensed physicians who have not undergone residency training yet, to remotely consult specialists and assist them in providing better healthcare recommendations to their patients. Understanding the acceptance of telemedicine particularly among DTTBs is crucial to optimizing its implementation, as local studies on this topic are lacking.

The purpose of this study is to determine the factors affecting acceptance of telemedicine by the DTTBs.

This study employed a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional research design from 2021 to 2022. Ethical approval was obtained prior to study implementation. Informed consent form was sent to all enrolled master’s students in the DTTB program. The study adapted the questionnaire utilized by Zailani et al. using a five-point Likert scale to identify the determinants of acceptance of telemedicine based on the following constructs: government policy, external supplier’s capacity, project team’s capacity, top management support, perceived usefulness, attitude, self-efficacy, acceptance of telemedicine, and organizational culture. Linear regression was performed to identify significant constructs that determine acceptance of telemedicine. All data were reported at 95% confidence interval.

Total of 116/180 DTTBs participated in the study. Attitude (β = 0.5849, p < 0.01) and self-efficiency (β = 0.5327, p < 0.01) together with organizational culture had a significant positive impact on the acceptance of telemedicine.

This study shows the current state of acceptance of telemedicine by our DTTBs. It highlights their positive attitude and self-efficiency towards telemedicine and the lack of support they receive from the government in funding and implementing telemedicine efforts despite its potential to address healthcare access issues.

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation and quarantine measures set to control the spread of the infection paved for the increased utilization of virtual methods of consultation and follow-up. Telerehabilitation allows access to rehabilitation services despite distance and makes possible the continuation of rehabilitation services despite the lack of face-to-face interaction. This is difficult for pediatric patients who are dependent on their caregivers for understanding and making decisions regarding their health. Loss of continuity of rehabilitation services led to poorer outcomes in children with disabilities. Although advantageous for them, pediatric patients may not benefit from telerehabilitation if caregivers have negative perceptions of the process and are unwilling to utilize the service.

This study determined caregivers’ perceptions and willingness to participate in telerehabilitation as a method of outpatient follow-up for pediatric patients admitted to a COVID-referral center in a developing country.

The study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design. Respondents were adults (≥19 years old) caring for pediatric patients admitted at non-COVID wards of the Philippine General Hospital and who were referred for rehabilitation services. A survey tool adapted from a previous study on willingness to utilize telemedicine among caregivers of pediatric patients was translated into the Filipino language and used in the study. A dataset from Excel was imported in STATA 16 (StataCorp, Texas, USA) and was exhaustively checked for completeness, accuracy, and consistency before analysis. The association between patient characteristics and willingness to utilize telerehabilitation for any app was determined using Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. The latter was used when more than 20% of the cells had an expected value of less than or equal to five. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for all tests.

Of 123 respondents, 92 (75%) reported willingness to utilize telerehabilitation for outpatient consultation and therapy using video calls or a customized telerehabilitation app when available. Among 31 (25%) respondents who were not willing or unsure of participation, the main reasons identified were preference for face-to-face, lack of financial resources/load, poor connectivity, and doubt about the effectiveness of telerehabilitation.Patients with younger age (Fisher’s exact test, P=0.023), low usage of video call service (Fisher’s exact test, P=0.020), and lack of available devices (Fisher’s exact test, P=0.015) significantly reduced willingness to utilize telerehabilitation. Caregiver age, sex, educational attainment, estimated monthly income, number of devices used, speed of internet connectivity, and technological behaviors did not show statistical significance in association with willingness to participate in telerehabilitation.Most caregivers recognized the usefulness of a service allowing transmission of health data to and from the hospital, consultation with a doctor in case of an emergency, sending of reminders for medical visits and therapy, and provision of a list of home exercises and nutritional recommendations. Telerehabilitation was perceived advantageous, but concerns regarding privacy, trust, lack of human contact, and technological difficulty were also present.

With high levels of willingness among caregivers, telerehabilitation is a viable method of providing rehabilitation services for the continuation of management after inpatient admission among pediatric patients. Limitations in its utilization include technological issues including the lack of devices, low level of service use, and slow internet connectivity. Although well perceived as advantageous, there are concerns regarding loss of human contact, difficulty in using technological devices, and trust and privacy issues that may affect utilization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 is a novel disease primarily affecting the respiratory system. Of those infected, approximately 20% require management in a hospital-setting which may lead to deconditioning. Measures implemented to control spread of the virus also restricted mobility both in the hospital and community setting. The goal of this study was to describe the patient characteristics (age, sex, comorbidities), hospitalization (length of hospital stay, ICU stay, referral to Rehabilitation Medicine), and long-term functional outcome of patients who have clinically recovered from moderate to critical COVID-19 in terms of participation in activities of daily living.

This was a descriptive prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary government hospital with participant recruitment from September 2020 to February 2021 consisting of clinically recovered adult patients managed as COVID-19 Confirmed via rRT-PCR with moderate, severe, or critical risk status. Descriptive statistics were obtained and multiple regression analysis was done to determine associations between patient demographics and their Barthel Index Scores on follow-up at discharge, one month post-discharge, and six months post-discharge.

A total of 63 patients were recruited to our study with an average age of 52.4 years. More recovered patients had fulfilled the criteria of moderate illness (46%), with the most common comorbidity being chronic lung disease (42.1%) and diabetes (42.1%). Almost all had total independence pre-morbidly with better baseline functional scores for the COVID-19 severe population. Majority of the patients (63.5%) were not referred for Rehabilitation services. Across all patients, Barthel Index Score at discharge indicated a significant decline from slight dependence to moderate dependence in performing activities of daily living with the pre-morbid status significantly predicting scores at discharge (β = 0.621, p = 0.001) on multiple regression analysis. Patient demographics, hospitalization and ICU stay and outcome, and referral to Rehabilitation Medicine were not found to be significant factors. In the course of follow up, a high dropout rate was observed across the population and by the end of the study, 57.1% of the participants were alive while among those lost to follow up, 20.6% had expired and the remaining 22.2% had an unknown status.

COVID-19 significantly affects the functional outcome of patients in terms of activities of daily living as measured by the Barthel Index. Preliminary data gathered from our study and the high dropout rate supports the need for better follow-up and selecting a tool that is better able to describe the non-demographic factors affecting functionality and participation in activities of daily living.

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 is a pandemic that shut down businesses and industries worldwide. The spread of the disease changed social behavior as residents around the world were obliged to endure lockdown and quarantine measures, reducing their physical activity.

To determine the level of physical activity before and during the pandemic among physicians.

A cross-sectional study was carried out on 422 qualified physicians of the Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila. The data was obtained from a self-administered questionnaire.

Results of the study revealed a shift of lifestyle from physically active to sedentary in 42.4-57.11% of the respondents during the pandemic. There was no change between the activity levels at work before and during COVID while there was a change in the travel and recreational activities. The results also showed that significant factors including lack of energy, fear of injury, lack of skill, resources, social influences, support seeking activities, and positive alternatives affected their activity levels.

During the pandemic, overall physical activity level decreased. Similarly, factors that motivate health workers to be physically active or sedentary during the COVID-19 pandemic can affect their physical activity levels. Based on this study, the hospital can create guidelines to ensure physical activity among its doctors, especially during a pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Physical activity (PA) and fitness level are considered key factors in public health promotion, and as such, healthcare workers (HCW) need to be physically well because they are not only responsible for themselves, but of their clients as well. Therefore, we aim to determine the PA and health-related fitness (HRF) level of HCW in a tertiary hospital, disaggregated to age, sex, work assignments, and job tenure.

A cross-sectional research design was utilized to assess HCW from the administrative, medical, nursing, and paramedical cohorts. ALPHA-FIT Test Battery was used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, lower extremity power and strength, upper body muscle endurance, balance, and body composition.

Our study concurred with the results of previous studies on HCW yielding lower PA levels compared with the general population. We tested 282 participants (administrative: 97; medical: 36; nursing: 55; paramedical: 94), mean age 37.4 years, 64.54% females, 52.13% perceived average health status. Ninety percent of the HCW had PA levels below the World Health Organization’s recommended levels. The ALPHA-FIT mean score per category revealed: one-legged stance, 2.67/3; figure-of-8 run, 2.45/3; shoulder-neck mobility, 4.58/5; modified push-up, 2.05/4; hand-grip strength, 2.5/5; jump and reach, 4/4; dynamic sit-up, 2.62/3; six-minute walk test, 475.38 meters covered. There were no significant differences in PA and HRF levels across cohorts except for modified sit-ups (p < 0.001) and figure-of-8 run (p = 0.012). The results showed significant inverse correlation between balance and shoulder-neck mobility and age (p < 0.001), and modified push ups (p = 0.004). Males had significantly higher sit-up scores (p < 0.001), one-legged stance scores (p = 0.001), and faster figure-of-8 run (p = 0.011), while females had better jump and reach scores (p < 0.001).

Physical activity levels of HCW did not meet the World Health Organization’s recommended PA levels. Healthcare professionals who are expected to be aware of the benefits of PA and HRF have shown low to midfit levels of grip strength, upper extremity endurance, core strength, and cardiorespiratory endurance. Information on PA and HRF may aid in policy making on employee wellness that could highly impact health service delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of guitar lessons (intervention group) in comparison to conventional occupational therapy (OT) sessions (control group) on hand function of chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 34 chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment. Participants were grouped randomly into intervention (guitar lessons) and control (conventional occupational therapy) groups. Each group participant underwent a total of eight consecutive therapy sessions, twice weekly for an hour each session, at the designated treatment rooms in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Philippine General Hospital. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations were done to assess range of motion, grip and pinch strength, and hand functions. Satisfaction surveys were answered at the end of the 8-therapy session.

Improvements in hand function were assessed through measurement of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength, and with the use of Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test, and Purdue Pegboard Test of Manual Dexterity. In this study, the comparison of actual change of passive range of motion (ROM) of the impaired hand from pre- to post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference. No statistically significant difference between groups were also observed for the active ROM of the impaired hand. Comparison of function of the impaired hand pre- and posttreatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference except for an observed greater improvement with the control group in motor coordination (median [IQR] 0 [-1 to 0] vs 1 [1 to 5], p = 0.004), tip (median [IQR] 0.33 [0 to 0.75] vs 1 [0.58 to 1.5], p = 0.006), and 3-jaw (median [IQR] 0.5 [0 to 0.92] vs 1.08 [0.41 to 2], p = 0.043) pinch strength.

Results. Improvements in hand function were assessed through measurement of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength, and with the use of Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test, and Purdue Pegboard Test of Manual Dexterity. In this study, the comparison of actual change of passive range of motion (ROM) of the impaired hand from pre- to post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference. No statistically significant difference between groups were also observed for the active ROM of the impaired hand. Comparison of function of the impaired hand pre- and posttreatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference except for an observed greater improvement with the control group in motor coordination (median [IQR] 0 [-1 to 0] vs 1 [1 to 5], p = 0.004), tip (median [IQR] 0.33 [0 to 0.75] vs 1 [0.58 to 1.5], p = 0.006), and 3-jaw (median [IQR] 0.5 [0 to 0.92] vs 1.08 [0.41 to 2], p = 0.043) pinch strength.

All participants in both groups displayed 100% compliance in attending onsite treatments. Despite not showing statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.721), an 11.8% tendency for better compliance is found in the intervention group.

The specific guitar lesson created and performed in this study as used by 17 participants of the intervention group have brought about improvement in hand function that is comparable with those who underwent traditional occupational therapy. This may be most helpful in areas with limited access to rehabilitation facilities and occupational therapy services. This may also be used as a continuing activity of chronic stroke patients at home to help improve hand function.

Early into the pandemic, medical attention centered on the immediate need for intensive medical care of patients diagnosed to have coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). As more data emerged on the best medical care possible, attention was also given to the complications and long-term sequelae of COVID-19.
COVID-19

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic prompted a shift from standard in-person consultation to non-patient contact methods such as telemedicine. To our knowledge, there was no published a priori evaluation of the telemedicine readiness and acceptance among the medical staff of the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) before implementing the institution’s telemedicine program. The lack of this vital pre-implementation step is understandable given the unprecedented crisis. However, if telemedicine programs will continue in the post-quarantine period, it is crucial to determine the facilitators and barriers to the use of telemedicine. Objective: This study determined the level of readiness and acceptance for telemedicine as an alternative method for patient consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-enhanced community quarantine period among PGH medical staff (consultants, residents, fellows). Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2020 to July 2021. Medical staff from the 16 clinical departments of the PGH were selected by systematic random sampling. Inclusion criteria included appointment as medical staff in PGH or University of the Philippines College of Medicine (UPCM), voluntary informed consent, internet access, and technical capacity to access e-mail and SurveyMonkey™. The online survey consisted of two questionnaires. It collected data on the demographic profile and outcomes of interest (e.g., telemedicine readiness and acceptance). Technological readiness was determined through the 16-item modified version of Technological Readiness Index (TRI) version 2.0, while telemedicine acceptance was determined through the modified version of the 19-item Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) questionnaire. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed at a 95% confidence interval. Results: The study had an 87% response rate with 205 respondents, 62% of whom were physicians in training (resident physicians and fellows). The respondents had a median age of 33 years and were mostly males. Only 19% had telemedicine experience before the pandemic. The majority (51%) learned telemedicine on their own. The most common devices used for telemedicine were mobile or smartphones (53%) and laptops (38%). The primary source of internet for telemedicine was mobile broadband (e.g., cellular data) (40%). The majority practiced telemedicine at their home or residence (51%), followed closely by the hospital or clinic (47%). The mean score of the respondents on TRI was 3.56 (very good technological readiness), and 4.00 (very good telemedicine acceptance) on UTAUT (behavioral intention to use the system). Performance expectancy (p = 0.02), effort expectancy (p = 0.03), and self-efficacy (p = 0.02) were significantly directly related to telemedicine adoption, while anxiety (p = 0.03) was significantly inversely related. Conclusion The PGH medical staff were found to have very good telemedicine readiness and acceptance. This suggests a willingness to use telemedicine during the pandemic. Further studies on the organization and technical support system of the telemedicine program in the PGH are strongly recommended. The quality and efficiency of the program will strongly influence the continued use of telemedicine by the medical staff even after the pandemic.
Health Services Administration ; Telemedicine ; Telecommunications ; Remote Consultation ; COVID-19

Background: The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) established its telerehabilitation service program in 2017. The program previously catered to patients in a partner rural community by providing teleconsultation and teletherapy over a distance. With the unprecedented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the program has expanded its service to outpatients previously managed face-to-face by the department, regardless of location. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the telerehabilitation service program at UP-PGH when it was expanded during the pandemic and to associate telerehabilitation usability ratings with the participant groups, demographic characteristics, and prior telemedicine knowledge and experience. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved the doctors, physical therapists, occupational therapists, psychologists, patients, and patients’ carers, who participated in at least one telerehabilitation session and consented to respond to a digital survey thereafter. Total enumeration sampling of all telerehabilitation participants was employed. The study outcome was the usability of the expanded telerehabilitation program based on the System Usability Scale (SUS) benchmarked at 68. Descriptive and inferential statistics were done at a 95% confidence interval. The participants’ responses to open-ended questions regarding telerehabilitation experience and recommendations were also presented. Results: The participants consisted of 19 doctors, 11 therapists, 37 patients, and 74 caregivers. The majority of the participants were female and lived in urban areas. The primary online telerehabilitation platforms used were Viber™ and Zoom™. The mean of overall SUS scores was below average for health providers [doctors (mean = 61.71), therapists (mean = 67.73)]; and above average for end-users [patients (mean 74.56), and carers (mean = 71.89)]. There was a significant difference in the overall SUS scores between doctors (mean: 61.7) and patients (mean: 74.6), p<0.05. In terms of videoconferencing platform, participants reported significantly higher system usability for those who used either Zoom™ (mean: 75.0) or Viber™ (mean: 69.3), as compared to Google Meet™ (mean: 53.1), p<0.05. There was no significant difference in the overall SUS scores across sexes, places of residence, primary telerehabilitation techniques used, prior telemedicine knowledge, and experience. The majority viewed telerehabilitation as a valuable method to provide service during the pandemic, but they were mostly concerned with technical problems, particularly an unstable Internet connection. Conclusion The expanded telerehabilitation service program of the PGH was perceived as useful by patients and caregivers but not by the health providers. While the program succeeded in providing continued outpatient rehabilitation services during the pandemic, the challenges experienced by its telehealth providers must be investigated and addressed.
Telemedicine ; Telerehabilitation ; Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical ; Delivery of Health Care