PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (ALCSs) for the treatment of diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis as a salvage procedure and to analyze the risk factors of treatment failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reviewed retrospectively 39 cases of diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis who underwent surgical treatment from 2009 to 2017. The mean age and follow-up period were 62±13 years and 19.2±23.3 months, respectively. Wounds were graded using the Wagner and Strauss classification. X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (or bone scan) and deep tissue cultures were taken preoperatively to diagnose osteomyelitis. The ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index (TBI), and current perception threshold were checked. Lower extremity angiography was performed and if necessary, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was conducted preoperatively. As a surgical treatment, meticulous debridement, bone curettage, and ALCS placement were employed in all cases. Between six and eight weeks after surgery, ALCS removal and autogenous iliac bone graft were performed. The treatment was considered successful if the wounds had healed completely within three months without signs of infection and no additional amputation within six months. RESULTS: The treatment success rate was 82.1% (n=32); 12.8% (n=5) required additional amputation and 5.1% (n=2) showed delayed wound healing. Bacterial growth was confirmed in 82.1% (n=32) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus being the most commonly identified strain (23.1%, n=9). The lesions were divided anatomically into four groups; the largest number was the toes: (1) toes (41.0%, n=16), (2) metatarsals (35.9%, n=14), (3) midfoot (5.1%, n=2), and (4) hindfoot (17.9%, n=7). A significant difference in the Strauss wound score and TBI was observed between the treatment success group and failure group. CONCLUSION: The insertion of ALCSs can be a useful treatment option in diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis. Low scores in the Strauss classification and low TBI are risk factors of treatment failure.
Amputation ; Angiography ; Angioplasty ; Ankle Brachial Index ; Classification ; Curettage ; Debridement ; Diabetic Foot ; Follow-Up Studies ; Lower Extremity ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Metatarsal Bones ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Osteomyelitis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Toes ; Transplants ; Treatment Failure ; Wound Healing ; Wounds and Injuries

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe a surgical technique of axillary approach of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation and its preliminary results. METHODS: From July 2002 to September 2003, 101 patients with lumbar radiculopathy due to L5-S1 disc herniation, who were treated by percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic discectomy, were retrospectively reviewed. There were 57 males and 44 females with a mean age of 44.8 years (range, 18 to 62 years). The surgery consisted of needle insertion into the epidural space via the interlaminar space, sequential dilatation, and endoscopic discectomy through the axillary area of the S1 root. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 14.5 months and the average surgical time was 41 min. According to the modified Macnab criteria, 44 patients (43.6%) had excellent outcomes, 49 (48.5%) had good results and only 8 (7.8%) had fair or poor outcomes. Four patients had a revision microdiscectomy due to incomplete removal of disc fragment. There were no major complications related to this surgical approach. CONCLUSION: Axillary approach of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy is safe and effective procedure for the treatment of L5-S1 disc herniation. It combines the advantages of MED and conventional percutaneous endoscopic discectomy.
Dilatation ; Diskectomy* ; Epidural Space ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Needles ; Operative Time ; Radiculopathy ; Retrospective Studies